logo
Not all Jews are Zionists — Alan Shatter does not speak for me

Not all Jews are Zionists — Alan Shatter does not speak for me

Irish Examiner5 days ago
As I watched Tuesday's committee hearing on the Occupied Territories Bill before the Oireachtas Foreign Affairs Committee, I was once again dismayed by the representation of Jews in Ireland, and the speeches delivered in our name on Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza and the illegal occupation of East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
As a non-Zionist Jew from Dublin, my Irish identity has always been just as important to me as my faith and ethnicity. The past 21 months have caused increasing tensions between those in my community who stand in solidarity with Palestine and those whose loyalties remain with Israel, no matter how many red lines they cross.
The horrors of October 7 will never fade from the collective Israeli memory. The trauma induced by Hamas' massacre and taking of hostages has caused irreparable damage to each and every Israeli and Palestinian.
In the wake of October 7, not only have we witnessed a live-streamed genocide in Gaza, but also a shocking acceleration of violence and displacement in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. While I have been vocal in my condemnation of Hamas, it is imperative that we acknowledge that the suffering of Palestinians did not begin in the aftermath of the Hamas attack, but 77 years earlier with the Nakba.
As the granddaughter of a Holocaust escapee who fled to Ireland, I am horrified by former justice minister Alan Shatter's comparison of the Occupied Territories Bill with boycotts against Jews in 1930/40s Germany. It is beyond me that anyone would see fit to compare innocent Jews persecuted by the Nazis with Israeli settlers who we have seen systematically annex, violently attack and displace Palestinians across the occupied territories.
While Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich, Itamar Ben Gvir and Israel Katz have openly called for ethnic cleansing, the illegal expansion of Israel's territories, and the establishment of a 'Humanitarian City' which has been compared by former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert to a 'concentration camp' respectively, Tuesday's representatives of the Ireland Israel Alliance and the Irish Jewish Community instead relied on deflection and accusations of anti-Semitism to oppose the proposed bill.
Chairman of the Jewish Council of Representatives Maurice Cohen claimed the Occupied Territories Bill was not about politics but that it is "performative", a "symbol without substance". While I agree that the scope of the Occupied Territories Bill is insufficient if we are to pressure Israel into making any real changes in their policies, passing it may set a new precedent and lead to the adoption of similar bills by other countries.
I agree wholeheartedly in the value of diplomacy, however, it has become abundantly clear that Netanyahu and his government are unwilling to participate in meaningful discussion, prioritising the destruction of Gaza over the safe return of the hostages, time and again.
Ireland Israel Alliance Barrister Natasha Hausdorff's reluctance to refer to the West Bank by its proper name speaks volumes. As does her reference to the "disputed territories" rather than the "occupied territories".
Speaking in biblical terms of Judea and Samaria, Hausdorff attempts to undermine and erase Palestinian legitimacy and any possibility of true self-determination. Basing the status and boundaries of Israel on religious texts written thousands of years ago, highlights a level of ideological fundamentalism that would not be tolerated or indulged if argued in the context of any other political regime.
It is essential during any discussion of the West Bank and East Jerusalem that we view the actions of the Israeli government, IDF and settlers within the context of international law. Those opposing the Occupied Territories Bill refused to acknowledge the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal, with Hausdorff claiming 'one cannot occupy what is one's own sovereign territory'.
This also starkly contradicts numerous UN resolutions which clearly state that Israeli settlements across the occupied territories are a violation of international law. Critics also emphasised the "message" such a bill sent to Jews both in Israel and the diaspora, though there was no acknowledgement of the very dangerous message sent by Israel's continued military and political protection of such settlements and the brutal violence, destruction and displacement imposed by Israeli settlers upon Palestinians in the occupied territories.
As she rounded off her initial address at the Oireachtas hearing, Hausdorff quite rightly highlighted the financial and reputational risks which may result from Ireland's continuing support of Palestine. While I personally believe that boycotts, divestment and sanctions are now imperative, I understand the potential economic consequences of such actions given Ireland's position as the second largest purchaser of Israeli goods in the world.
Where I differ from the opinions shared, is the question of morality. I cannot abide by any worldview that prioritises profit over human rights, religious and political agendas over facts and respect for international law.
Ria Czerniak-LeBov: 'While I personally believe that boycotts, divestment and sanctions are now imperative, I understand the potential economic consequences of such actions given Ireland's position as the second largest purchaser of Israeli goods in the world.'
Ireland is very much at risk of gaining a reputation as an empathetic and ethically critical nation, however financially entangled we appear to be in Israeli and US pharma and tech corporations. As an Irish woman, such a reputation is something I would be proud of.
No country is above the law and claiming that criticism of Israel or its illegal settlements is anti-Semitic is a blatantly manipulative strategy which aims to silence dissent. For those who feel deeply uncomfortable, isolated or personally wounded by criticism of Israel and Zionism, I would simply urge introspection and perspective.
Having watched 21 months of collective punishment, human rights abuses, displacement and what has now been termed genocide by leading scholars in the field, none of us should feel comfortable. That such atrocities are being committed "in our name" should outrage Jews globally.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aid reaching Gaza a 'drop in the ocean' of what is needed, says UN
Aid reaching Gaza a 'drop in the ocean' of what is needed, says UN

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

Aid reaching Gaza a 'drop in the ocean' of what is needed, says UN

Aid that is being air dropped into Gaza is a step in the right direction, but the level of aid getting into the territory in recent months is "a drop in the ocean" of what is needed, a senior UN figure has said. Peace talks in the Middle East came to a standstill last week after the US and Israel recalled negotiating teams from Qatar, with White House special envoy Steve Witkoff blaming Hamas for a "lack of desire" to reach an agreement. Since then, Israel has promised military pauses in three populated areas of Gaza to allow designated UN convoys of aid to reach desperate Palestinians. The UK, which is joining efforts to airdrop aid into the enclave and evacuate children in need of medical assistance, said that access to supplies must be "urgently" widened. Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, UN Under Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Co-Ordinator Tom Fletcher said the situation in Gaza is "unrelentingly grim at the moment for civilians". "Gaza is starving. One in every three people has not eaten for days and days in a row," he said. "So the needs are enormous, and we're ready to go. You know, the aid that's got in in recent months is a drop in the ocean of what's needed." Mr Fletcher said they were "ready to mobilise" and hoped that the routes were secured so food, water, medicine and shelter could be brought to desperate civilians. In relation to how much aid will be allowed in, he said it is not clear. During the last ceasefire, over 42 days, 600 to 700 trucks a day were getting into Gaza. "That's what we need right now", he said. "That's what the civilians in Gaza need. Yesterday, I think we got some somewhere around over 100 trucks in, nothing like enough." He said that all the border crossings need to be opened and all restrictions on visas and other "bureaucratic restraints" and "security restrictions" should be removed. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to raise the prospect of reviving ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas when he meets US President Donald Trump in Scotland. The prime minister will travel to Ayrshire, where the US president is staying at his Turnberry golf resort, for wide-ranging discussions on trade and the Middle East as international concern grows over starvation in Gaza. 'Unrelentingly focused' Mr Fletcher said that the agency is facing a tough time but remains "unrelentingly focused". "I'm talking to the teams on the ground last night, this morning. They themselves are hungry. They themselves have been going without food. Incredibly brave people and they're driving these trucks facing enormous crowds of desperate, starving Palestinians." Mr Fletcher said the situation was a "starvation crisis" and a "medical crisis". He added that decisions were made daily as to what trucks to try to get into the territory. Gaza needed to be flooded with aid, he said. "We can do that. We've got the aid. We could reach everyone in Gaza with food, with medical support, with shelter. But we've got to get going at much, much bigger scale." Reacting to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying that his government was being unfairly blamed and that there are secure routes, Mr Fletcher said, "well, if those secure routes have existed, they've been very, very hard to find". "For months, there's been a blockade, little bits has gone in now and again, but the situation on the ground is dire, and I think that's why world leaders, across the planet, have been so clear, so firm that we have to be allowed to do our job."

Aid reaching Gaza is a 'drop in the ocean' of what is needed, says UN
Aid reaching Gaza is a 'drop in the ocean' of what is needed, says UN

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

Aid reaching Gaza is a 'drop in the ocean' of what is needed, says UN

UN Under Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Co-Ordinator Tom Fletcher has said that aid being air dropped into Gaza is a step in the right direction, but that the aid getting into the territory in recent months is "a drop in the ocean" of what is needed. Peace talks in the Middle East came to a standstill last week after the US and Israel recalled negotiating teams from Qatar, with White House special envoy Steve Witkoff blaming Hamas for a "lack of desire" to reach an agreement. Since then, Israel has promised military pauses in three populated areas of Gaza to allow designated UN convoys of aid to reach desperate Palestinians. The UK, which is joining efforts to airdrop aid into the enclave and evacuate children in need of medical assistance, said that access to supplies must be "urgently" widened. Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, Mr Fletcher said the situation in Gaza is "unrelentingly grim at the moment for civilians". "Gaza is starving. One in every three people has not eaten for days and days in a row. "So the needs are enormous, and we're ready to go. You know, the aid that's got in in recent months is a drop in the ocean of what's needed." Mr Fletcher said they were "ready to mobilise" and hoped that the routes were secured so food, water, medicine and shelter could be brought to desperate civilians. In relation to how much aid will be allowed in, he said it is not clear. During the last ceasefire, over 42 days, 600 to 700 trucks a day were getting into Gaza. "That's what we need right now", he said. "That's what the civilians in Gaza need. Yesterday, I think we got some somewhere around over 100 trucks in, nothing like enough." He said that all the border crossings need to be opened and all restrictions on visas and other "bureaucratic restraints" and "security restrictions" should be removed. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to raise the prospect of reviving ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas when he meets US President Donald Trump in Scotland. The prime minister will travel to Ayrshire, where the US president is staying at his Turnberry golf resort, for wide-ranging discussions on trade and the Middle East as international concern grows over starvation in Gaza. 'Unrelentingly focused' Mr Fletcher said that the agency is facing a tough time but remains "unrelentingly focused". "I'm talking to the teams on the ground last night, this morning. They themselves are hungry. They themselves have been going without food. Incredibly brave people and they're driving these trucks facing enormous crowds of desperate, starving Palestinians." Mr Fletcher said the situation was a "starvation crisis" and a "medical crisis". He added that decisions were made daily as to what trucks to try to get into the territory. Gaza needed to be flooded with aid, he said. "We can do that. We've got the aid. We could reach everyone in Gaza with food, with medical support, with shelter. But we've got to get going at much, much bigger scale." Reacting to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying that his government was being unfairly blamed and that there are secure routes, Mr Fletcher said, "well, if those secure routes have existed, they've been very, very hard to find. "For months, there's been a blockade, little bits has gone in now and again, but the situation on the ground is dire, and I think that's why world leaders, across the planet, have been so clear, so firm that we have to be allowed to do our job."

Delayed UN meeting to discuss two-state solution
Delayed UN meeting to discuss two-state solution

RTÉ News​

time3 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Delayed UN meeting to discuss two-state solution

Dozens of ministers will gather at the United Nations for a delayed conference to work toward a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, but the US and Israel are boycotting the event. The 193-member UN General Assembly decided in September last year that such a conference would be held in 2025. Hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, the conference was postponed in June after Israel attacked Iran. The conference aims to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told newspaper La Tribune Dimanche in an interview published yesterday that he will also use the conference this week to push other countries to join France in recognising a Palestinian state. France intends to recognise a Palestinian state in September at the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly, President Emmanuel Macron said last week. "We will launch an appeal in New York so that other countries join us to initiate an even more ambitious and demanding dynamic that will culminate on September 21," Mr Barrot said, adding that he expected Arab countries by then to condemn Palestinian militants Hamas and call for their disarmament. The conference comes as a 22-month war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza still rages. The war was triggered on 7 October 2023, when Hamas killed 1,200 people in southern Israel and took some 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, Israel's military campaign has killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities. The US will not attend the conference at the United Nations, said a State Department spokesperson, describing it as "a gift to Hamas, which continues to reject ceasefire proposals accepted by Israel that would lead to the release of hostages and bring calm in Gaza." The State Department spokesperson added that Washington voted against the General Assembly last year calling for the conference and would "not support actions that jeopardise the prospect for a long-term, peaceful resolution to the conflict." Israel is also not taking part in the conference, "which doesn't first urgently address the issue of condemning Hamas and returning all of the remaining hostages," said Jonathan Harounoff, international spokesperson at Israel's UN mission. The UN has long endorsed a vision of two states living side by side within secure and recognised borders. Palestinians want a state in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza, all territory captured by Israel in the 1967 war with neighbouring Arab states. The UN General Assembly in May last year overwhelmingly backed a Palestinian bid to become a full UN member by recognising it as qualified to join and recommending the UN Security Council "reconsider the matter favourably." The resolution garnered 143 votes in favor and nine against. The General Assembly vote was a global survey of support for the Palestinian bid to become a full UN member - a move that would effectively recognise a Palestinian state - after the US vetoed it in the UN Security Council several weeks earlier.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store