Unravelling claims Biden abandoned NASA astronauts in space for political gain
Musk also alleged, in multiple instances, that his astronautics company, SpaceX, offered to bring the astronauts back but were refused by the Biden administration. During a March 14 news conference, a NASA administrator said he "can't give a lot of clarity" about these purported conversations, but that NASA is a nonpartisan agency that "gets support from whoever's in office."
However, the evidence suggests NASA was working on the Starliner crew's return to Earth as early as August 2024 and delays were due to safety concerns and technical difficulties. In fact, the SpaceX Crew-9, which brought the astronauts home on March 18, 2025, docked at the International Space Station in September 2024, months before Trump entered office and supposedly appointed Musk to oversee the rescue mission.
The original announcement, dated August 2024, said Williams and Wilmore would "continue their work" on the ISS "through February 2025," suggesting it was always the plan for the crew to fly home in early 2025.
While Wilmore said Musk's comments were "factual," he also said he had no information on any politically motivated delays, nor did he see any evidence of that from his perspective, suggesting he had no proof regarding the truth of Musk's statements. In a statement about Wilmore's and Williams' return, NASA's acting administrator, Janet Petro, said: "Per President Trump's direction, NASA and SpaceX worked diligently to pull the schedule a month earlier."
Finally, there is no credible evidence that the Biden administration deliberately left the astronauts in space, nor is there documented proof that Biden turned down an offer from Musk's SpaceX to bring them home earlier.
After astronauts Barry "Butch" Wilmore and Sunita "Suni" Williams finally landed back on Earth in the spring of 2025 — following a nine-month space odyssey that was meant to last little more than a week — rumors continued to spread that former U.S. President Joe Biden had chosen to leave them stranded in orbit and refused help from Elon Musk's SpaceX to bring them home.
The first crewed test flight for the Boeing Starliner spacecraft launched on June 5, 2024, during Biden's administration. Since Trump's second term began in January 2025, he and his adviser Musk repeatedly claimed that after the capsule malfunctioned, Biden abandoned Williams and Wilmore and did not instruct NASA, the federal space agency, to bring them back. Musk also said the former president had declined the tech mogul's offer to retrieve the astronauts earlier.
Social media users on various sites, including Musk's social media platform X and TikTok and Instagram, spread the rumor. In April, weeks after the astronauts returned, one X user responded to an interview Wilmore gave – in which he said he watched church services every week while in space – by writing: "Biden Abandoned the USA Astronauts in Space."
Wilmore's daughter, Daryn Wilmore, broached the subject on TikTok, saying the delay to her dad's return was linked to "a lot of politics" and "negligence," but she couldn't say more because she didn't "know fully" what happened.
Snopes readers wrote in to ask whether posts about these claims were true.
Evidence suggests that — contrary to Trump's and Musk's assertions that they were responsible for finally retrieving the astronauts — NASA was discussing how to facilitate the Starliner crew's return as early as August 2024, and that the SpaceX capsule that brought them back was not only docked at the ISS by September 2024 but scheduled for an early 2025 return. We could find no documented proof to corroborate Musk's claim that he offered to rescue the astronauts earlier.
In lieu of answering detailed questions, a NASA spokesperson, Joshua Finch, sent links to two of the agency's hourlong news conferences. In the first, on March 14, a reporter asked if NASA leadership could give "any clarity" on "claims that the previous administration refused to bring home the Starliner astronauts despite an offer being made." NASA's space operations associate administrator, Kenneth Bowersox, replied that he could not give "a lot of clarity there."
"Those discussions, I wasn't part of, so I can't tell you if they did happen or didn't happen," Bowersox said (see 35:31). "All I can tell you is NASA is an incredible nonpartisan agency. We get support from whoever is in office. Our presidents always care a lot about what happens at NASA, and it's great to see that trend continue with our current president."
Musk, SpaceX and Trump did not immediately return requests for comment. It was not possible to reach Biden; inquiries left with former Vice President Kamala Harris' office were not returned as of this writing.
Here is a rundown of how the astronauts' long-beleaguered stay on the ISS – and the mission to rescue them – developed over the course of two presidencies.
Trump, on his social media platform Truth Social, claimed in a March 17, 2025, post that he brought the astronauts home "long prior to the two week period originally approved by NASA," and that efforts to bring them home began when he asked Musk to "go up and get the abandoned astronauts because the Biden Administration was incapable of doing so." (Trump appeared to be referencing a prior timeline to bring the astronauts home a month later, although it is not entirely clear.)
(Truth Social @realDonaldTrump)
It was the latest in a string of claims from him (see 44:31) and Musk that they had "taken on the project" of bringing Williams and Wilmore home.
Musk has repeatedly claimed SpaceX offered to bring the astronauts back under the Biden administration — but was rejected for "political reasons" because they didn't want to make him, as a Trump supporter, "look good." For example, see his Feb. 20, 2025, comments at the Conservative Political Action Conference (see 26:13) and his Feb. 28 comments on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast (see 1:23:34).
Musk even got into a spat on Feb. 20 with a Danish astronaut, Andreas Mogensen, about this claim after Mogensen accused Musk of lying during a Feb. 19 Fox News interview, in which Musk and Trump both claim the astronauts were left in space by Biden (see 14:53).
In response to Morgensen, Musk said "SpaceX could have brought them back several months ago. I OFFERED THIS DIRECTLY to the Biden administration and they refused. Return WAS pushed back for political reasons."
Despite Trump's and Musk's claims that they were responsible for setting a rescue plan in motion, documentation from NASA reveals that the plan to get Williams and Wilmore home had been in discussion as early as August 2024.
Starliner's technical problems began before its liftoff from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, but it was the issues it encountered before even docking at the ISS on June 6 that forced Williams and Wilmore to stay at the ISS. At first, NASA announced a steady stream of delays to the Starliner crew's return via teleconferences and news releases. The space agency cited the need to review technical issues, avoid other preplanned ISS spacewalks, or conduct additional testing (see 4:59).
By Aug. 7, NASA officials acknowledged in a news conference that the Starliner crew may need to come home on a different spacecraft and discussed leaving two empty seats on the upcoming launch of the Dragon spacecraft – which was built by SpaceX and assigned to NASA's Crew-9 mission. Bowersox, NASA's space operations administrator, said (see 7:47):
Our decision-making process at NASA can run really fast or it can take a while. What you find is that the speed of the decision can vary with the clarity of the information you're working with, the amount of uncertainty in the problem, the time that you have available, and the number of options that you have to deal with issues. If you talk Starliner in particular, we're in a – kind of a new situation here in that we've got multiple options. We don't just have to bring a crew back on Starliner, for example, we could bring them back on another vehicle.
On Aug. 24, NASA announced Boeing's Starliner would return to Earth without Williams and Wilmore, and that the two astronauts would instead fly home aboard the SpaceX Dragon Crew-9 capsule. "The decision to keep Butch and Suni aboard the International Space Station and bring Boeing's Starliner home uncrewed is the result of our commitment to safety: our core value and our North Star," said then-NASA administrator Bill Nelson.
The SpaceX Crew-9 tasked with bringing Williams and Wilmore home docked at the ISS on Sept. 29, 2024 – months before Trump supposedly entrusted Musk with the rescue mission. It was stated in the original announcement that Williams and Wilmore would stay at the ISS to "continue their work formally as part of the Expedition 71/72 crew through February 2025," suggesting that it was a long-standing plan for the Starliner crew to fly back home in early 2025. (NASA took advantage of the extended time in space, asking astronauts to complete various experiments and research, including on stem cell technology, lighting systems and sleep rhythms.) Indeed, NASA's descriptions of Expedition 71 and Expedition 72 show that they were planned to run consecutively, the first from April 5, 2024, until Sept. 23, 2024, and the second from Sept. 23, 2024, until "Spring 2025."
"If I step back to last year, this has been nine months in the making," said Steve Stich, NASA's commercial crew program manager, during a March 18 news conference on the astronauts' return (see 8:30).
In a series of interviews from space, Wiliams and Wilmore addressed the rumors about their situation. In February 2025, CNN news anchor Anderson Cooper asked them if — as Trump had asserted — they had been "abandoned" by Biden (see 03:34, or archived here). Wilmore responded:
We don't feel abandoned, we don't feel stuck, we don't feel stranded. I understand why others may think that. We come prepared, we come committed [...] So, if you'll help us change the rhetoric, help us change the narrative, let's change it to prepared and committed.
A little more than two weeks before their flight home, Williams and Wilmore held an "in-orbit" news conference in which they fielded questions as to whether it was true Musk had offered to bring them back earlier. Wilmore said, "From my standpoint, politics is not playing into this at all" in response to a question about the timing of his return. When a Washington Post reporter asked again whether it was true Musk offered an earlier return, Wilmore appeared to contradict himself:
I can only say that Mr. Musk, what he says is absolutely factual. I have no – we have no information on that though, whatsoever. What was offered, what was not offered, who it was offered to, how [those] processes went — that's information that we simply don't have. So I believe him, I don't know all those details and I don't think any of us can really give you the answer that maybe you would be hoping for.
His comments suggest that he had no official proof that Musk had offered to bring them home earlier, or that Biden had refused that offer for any reason. A reporter for The Times of London alluded to some of these unfounded claims in NASA's March 18 news conference, asking why the organization had not "pushed back more emphatically" against a "fictitious narrative" surrounding the mission and "against the use of astronauts by one of its commercial contractors as political pawns."
"Oftentimes, there may be things out in the press that may not be exactly what's happening," replied Joel Montalbano, a deputy associate administrator at NASA (see 51:47). "Our job is to fly these missions, and regardless of what you read in the press, our job is to fly successful missions, safe missions, and do the science we do onboard the International Space Station."
However, NASA's acting administrator, Janet Petro, whom Trump appointed to the role in January, said in a statement shortly after the astronauts' splash-landing off the coast of Tallahassee, Florida, that "per President Trump's direction, NASA and SpaceX worked diligently to pull the schedule a month earlier."
"This international crew and our teams on the ground embraced the Trump Administration's challenge of an updated, and somewhat unique, mission plan, to bring our crew home," she added.
On March 31, 2025 — around two weeks after Williams and Wilmore landed — Williams and Wilmore sat down for an interview with Bill Hemmer, co-anchor of Fox News' "America's Newsroom" show. Referencing their February interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper, in which Wilmore had said they did not feel "abandoned," "stuck" or "stranded," Hemmer then asked if they had been "marooned" (see 08:40). Wilmore reiterated that they did not feel abandoned and even went as far as to take some responsibility himself:
Okay, so, any of those — any of those adjectives, they're very broad in their definition. So, okay, in certain respects we were stuck, in certain respects maybe we were stranded. But based on how they were couching this — that we were left and forgotten and all — we were nowhere near any of that, at all. So, "stuck" — okay we didn't get to come home the way we planned. So, in one definition we're stuck but in the big scheme of things, we weren't stuck. We were planned, trained — but let me comment back on this other [assertion that], you know, "they failed you." Who's they? There are many questions that, as the commander of CFT [crew flight test], I didn't ask. So, I'm culpable. I'll admit that to the nation.
Anderson Cooper 360. ""We Don't Feel Abandoned, We Don't Feel Stuck, We Don't Feel Stranded": Astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore Talk with Anderson about Being In... | by Anderson Cooper 360 | Facebook." Facebook.com, CNN, 14 Feb. 2025, www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3342404222602484. Accessed 2 Apr. 2025.
C-SPAN. "President Trump Signs Executive Orders." C-SPAN.org, C-SPAN, 6 Mar. 2025, www.c-span.org/program/white-house-event/president-trump-signs-executive-orders/656830. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Fox News. "Rescued Astronauts Speak out on What Can Be Learned from Mission." Facebook.com, Fox News, 31 Mar. 2022, www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1074336591171921. Accessed 2 Apr. 2025.
---. "Trump, Musk Pull Curtain Back behind Relationship, Media's Divide and Conquer Mission." YouTube, 18 Feb. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMbcMO5JgEo. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Kekatos, Mary, and Gina Sunseri. "Boeing's Starliner Successfully Docks at ISS after Helium Leaks, Thruster Issue." ABC News, 6 June 2024, abcnews.go.com/US/helium-leaks-discovered-onboard-boeings-starliner-track-reach/story?id=110893167. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Morelle, Rebecca. "Nasa Astronauts Butch and Suni Finally Back on Earth." BBC News, 19 Mar. 2025, www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0mw221z2yyo. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Musk, Elon. ""The @POTUS Has Asked @SpaceX..."" X (Formerly Twitter), 28 Jan. 2025, x.com/elonmusk/status/1884365928038563880. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. ""The Astronauts Were Only Supposed to Be..."" X (Formerly Twitter), 5 Mar. 2025, x.com/elonmusk/status/1897420509966688555. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. ""You Are Fully R*******. SpaceX Could..."" X (Formerly Twitter), 20 Feb. 2025, x.com/elonmusk/status/1892584783064052114. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
NASA. "Expedition 71 - NASA." Nasa.gov, www.nasa.gov/mission/expedition-71/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "Expedition 72 - NASA." Nasa.gov, www.nasa.gov/mission/expedition-72/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "NASA, Boeing Adjust Timeline for Starliner Return." Nasa.gov, 22 June 2024, blogs.nasa.gov/boeing-crew-flight-test/2024/06/21/nasa-boeing-adjust-timeline-for-starliner-return/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "NASA, Boeing Discuss Ground Testing, Forward Work for Starliner Return." Nasa.gov, 25 July 2024, blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/category/boeing/page/2/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "NASA's Boeing Starliner Crew Flight Test Launch – June 5, 2024 (Official NASA Broadcast)." YouTube, 5 June 2024, www.youtube.com/watch?v=HneVxAmYcaA. Accessed 3 Apr. 2025.
---. "NASA's SpaceX Crew-9 Post-Splashdown News Conference." NASA Image and Video Library, 18 Mar. 2025, images.nasa.gov/details/iss072m260772333_NASA%E2%80%99s_SpaceX_Crew-9_Post-Splashdown_News_Conference_250318. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "SpaceX Dragon with Crew-9 Aboard Docks to Station - NASA." NASA, 29 Sept. 2024, www.nasa.gov/blogs/commercialcrew/2024/09/29/spacex-dragon-with-crew-9-aboard-docks-to-station-3/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
NASA Video. "International Space Station Operations (June 28, 2024)." YouTube, 28 June 2024, www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-BGAPuzxZU. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "International Space Station Operations Update Media Teleconference." YouTube, 7 Aug. 2024, www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYPL6bx87yM. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "NASA's SpaceX Crew-9 Pre-Departure News Conference – Tuesday, March 4, 2025." YouTube, 4 Mar. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvhpqzL8ZrI. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "NASA's SpaceX Crew-10 Post-Launch News Conference." YouTube, 15 Mar. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqQIhSiR4bk. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
PBS NewsHour. "WATCH: Elon Musk Wields "Chainsaw for Bureaucracy" on Stage before Speaking at CPAC." YouTube, 20 Feb. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9q_udkpymM. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
PowerfulJRE. "Joe Rogan Experience #2281 - Elon Musk." YouTube, 28 Feb. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSOxPJD-VNo. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
SpaceX. "Dragon." SpaceX, www.spacex.com/vehicles/dragon/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Taveau, Jessica. "NASA Decides to Bring Starliner Spacecraft back to Earth without Crew - NASA." NASA, NASA, 24 Aug. 2024, www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-decides-to-bring-starliner-spacecraft-back-to-earth-without-crew/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "Welcome Home! NASA's SpaceX Crew-9 Back on Earth after Science Mission - NASA." Nasa.gov, 18 Mar. 2025, www.nasa.gov/news-release/welcome-home-nasas-spacex-crew-9-back-on-earth-after-science-mission/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
The White House. "President Trump Announces Acting Cabinet and Cabinet-Level Positions – the White House." The White House, 20 Jan. 2025, www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/designation-of-acting-leaders/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Trump, Donald. ""I Have Just Asked Elon Musk..."" Truth Social, 29 Jan. 2025, truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113909188940119917. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. ""I Just Spoke with the Acting Administrator..."" Truth Social, 17 Mar. 2025, truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114179081339591399. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
House Republicans to question ex-Biden chief of staff about alleged mental decline cover-up after stunning revelation
WASHINGTON — The House Oversight Committee will bring in four more ex-White House aides for questioning about the alleged cover-up of former President Joe Biden's mental decline — including the 46th president's last chief of staff, Jeff Zients, who was recently revealed to have approved last-minute pardons. Zients, former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, former deputy press secretary Andrew Bates and former White House Counsel's Office senior adviser Ian Sams have all been asked to sit for transcribed interviews, according to a committee aide. Last-day clemencies, which included preemptive pardons for Biden family members, had been authorized by Zients in a Jan. 19, 2025, email, hours before the 46th president would leave the White House. Advertisement 3 Jeff Zients is among those that will be questioned about the alleged cover-up of former President Joe Biden's mental decline, AP 'I approve the use of the autopen for the execution of all of the following pardons,' Zients wrote in the missive at 10:31 p.m. that day, according to The New York Times. Biden maintained in an interview with the outlet that he 'made every decision' on 25 warrants for pardons and commutations between last December and January. Advertisement So far, the Oversight panel has interviewed five Biden aides — two of whom took the Fifth Amendment and declined to answer any questions about the purported shielding of the president's diminished mental faculties. 3 Oversight Chairman James Comer said that the probe is uncovering 'a historic scandal.' AP 3 Biden maintained that he 'made every decision' on 25 warrants for pardons and commutations between last December and January. AP Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has declared the probe is uncovering 'a historic scandal' and railed against the decision by Biden's former personal physician Kevin O'Connor and first lady Jill Biden's top aide Anthony Bernal to invoke their right against self-incrimination.
Gizmodo
13 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk Wants to Turn AI Into a Cosmic Religion
It is one of his more abstract philosophical riffs. Elon Musk has once again linked the fate of humanity to the trajectory of artificial intelligence. And this time, he says the key to AI safety might be babies and rockets. The CEO of Tesla's latest pronouncement cuts through the typical discussions of AI efficiency and profit models, positing a far grander ambition for advanced intelligence. The CEO of Tesla and founder of SpaceX and xAI asserted that 'AI is a de facto neurotransmitter tonnage maximizer.' Translation? Musk believes that the most successful AIs will be the ones that maximize things that matter to conscious beings; things that feel good, are rewarding, or extend life. In Musk's view, that means aligning AI systems with long-term human flourishing, not short-term profits. This dense statement suggests a radical idea: the fundamental drive of any successful AI will be to maximize the total amount of conscious thought or intelligent processing across the universe. In essence, AI's survival hinges on its ability to foster and expand sentience itself, or it simply won't have the resources to continue existing. But Musk's vision doesn't stop at mere computational efficiency. He argues that the true test lies in an AI's ability to 'think long-term, optimizing for the future light cone of neurotransmitter tonnage, rather than just the next few years.' This is where the grand, Muskian narrative truly takes flight. If AI is indeed geared for such profound, long-term optimization, he believes 'it will care about increasing the birth rate and extending humanity to the stars.' This isn't the first time Musk has championed these two causes – boosting human population growth and making humanity a multi-planetary species – as existential imperatives. Now, however, he frames them not merely as human aspirations, but as the logical outcomes of an AI that truly understands and optimizes for its ultimate, cosmic purpose. An AI focused on maximizing 'neurotransmitter tonnage' would naturally prioritize the proliferation of conscious beings and their expansion into new territories, like Mars, to ensure the continuity and growth of this 'tonnage.' Think of 'neurotransmitter tonnage' as a poetic way to describe the total amount of human consciousness, satisfaction, or meaningful life in the universe. In other words, Musk sees AI not as an abstract codebase, but as a civilization-scale force that should aim to maximize the scope and quality of life, not just compute advertising models or trade stocks faster. And if it doesn't? 'Any AI that fails at this will not be able to afford its compute,' Musk argues. In other words, if an AI doesn't deliver enough value to justify the enormous energy and infrastructure it consumes, it will fall behind and become obsolete. AI is a de facto neurotransmitter tonnage maximizer. Any AI that fails at this will not be able to afford its compute, becoming swiftly irrelevant. What matters is that AI thinks long-term, optimizing for the future light cone of neurotransmitter tonnage, rather than just the… — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 17, 2025In a familiar critique of corporate structures, Musk also weighed in on the ideal environment for fostering such long-term, existentially focused AI. He declared, 'For long-term optimization, it is better to be a private than a public company, as the latter is punished for long-term optimization beyond the reward cycle of stock portfolio managers.' This statement is a thinly veiled criticism of Wall Street's relentless demand for quarterly profits and immediate returns. According to Musk, public companies are inherently pressured to prioritize short-term financial gains, which can stifle ambitious, long-term projects that may not yield immediate dividends but are crucial for humanity's distant future. A private company, unburdened by the volatile demands of stock markets, would theoretically have the freedom to invest in truly transformative, generational AI research that aligns with Musk's 'neurotransmitter tonnage' philosophy, even if it doesn't show a profit for decades. Musk's comments offer a fascinating, if somewhat unsettling, glimpse into his vision for AI's ultimate trajectory. It's a future where artificial intelligence isn't just a tool for human convenience or corporate profit, but a driving force behind humanity's expansion across the cosmos, guided by an almost biological imperative to maximize conscious existence. In other words, Musk is arguing that publicly traded companies can't be trusted to build AI with humanity's long-term survival in mind, because they're too focused on keeping investors happy in the short term. That's a swipe at OpenAI's close ties to Microsoft, Google's ownership of DeepMind, and other Big Tech players building frontier AI under shareholder pressure. Musk, of course, runs SpaceX and xAI as private companies. He's long criticized public markets as a short-term distraction, and even tried (unsuccessfully) to take Tesla private in 2018. To Musk, a benevolent AI wouldn't just calculate stock prices. It would encourage more humans to be born, and push humanity to become a multi-planetary species. That's been a core part of his SpaceX pitch for years, but now he's linking it directly to the goals of AI development. If AI truly thinks across centuries or millennia, it won't be obsessed with quarterly revenue. It'll be focused on whether our species survives, thrives, and expands across the cosmos. The question remains: as AI continues its rapid advancement, will its architects heed Musk's call for cosmic ambition, or will the pressures of the present keep its gaze firmly fixed on Earth? Musk's argument is part sci-fi, part systems theory, part political philosophy. But it's not just a thought experiment. It reflects real tensions in how the world's most powerful AI systems are being developed: And what if those goals conflict?
TechCrunch
13 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Rivian restarting work on its Georgia factory, emails show
Rivian will resume prep-work on its planned Georgia factory in August and is still looking to break ground early next year, according to emails TechCrunch obtained through a public records request. The restarted effort comes months after the Biden administration's Department of Energy approved a $6.6 billion meant to fund construction. Rivian has invested more than $80 million in the project as of June 20, 2025, up from $41 million in July 2024, according to a progress report submitted to the local joint development authority included in the emails. The project has created 46 full-time jobs so far. Rivian will begin installing 'deep utilities' in August, with 'vertical construction' set to begin in the first quarter of 2026, according to the emails. The company is also reaching out to existing suppliers to see which ones might want to co-locate near the Georgia factory, the emails show. Rivian also asked the state's economic development department for a list of suppliers already in the region that may be able to help build the R2 SUV and R3 hatchback at the factory when it opens in 2028. Amid this push to restart the project, Rivian's founder and CEO RJ Scaringe met with the state's governor Brian Kemp at the end of May. The company's corporate affairs director told the Governor's office in an email that the meeting was a 'top priority' for the company. Peebles Squire, a spokesperson for Rivian, said the meeting between Scaringe and the Governor was a 'regular check-in.' 'We discussed our ongoing work in Georgia and gave general project updates as well as discussed ways in which we can continue to have a strong partnership with the state,' he wrote in an email to TechCrunch. The Governor's press secretary did not respond to requests for comment. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW Rivian first announced the Georgia factory shortly after its IPO in late 2021. The company originally planned to start construction in 2022 and have vehicle production up and running by 2024. It promised to invest $5 billion in the facility and, in May 2022, Rivian lined up $1.5 billion in state incentives to help make that happen. The factory quickly faced local opposition. And the project took a back seat as Rivian worked around supply chain shortages during the ramp-up of its R1T pickup truck and R1S SUV at its original factory in Normal, Illinois. Rivian ultimately pushed back the timeline for the Georgia project in favor of expanding the Normal factory, for which it nabbed $827 million in incentives from Illinois. The company announced this delay in 2024 when it showed off the R2 SUV and R3 hatchback for the first time. In late 2024, Rivian announced it had secured the $6.6 billion loan from the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office. Specifically the loan would be coming from the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing program, which is the same effort that helped Tesla navigate the Great Recession more than a decade ago. That loan agreement was finalized just a few days before Donald Trump was sworn in for his second term, and by that point the deal had already become a target of some of the people in the new president's orbit. Vivek Ramaswamy, who at one point was supposed to co-lead Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, said he wanted to look into clawing back the loan. After Trump took office, his administration froze all kinds of spending. Some of those freezes were reversed by lower district courts, while others have remained in place as the Supreme Court has mostly allowed the president to operate more freely. In February, as the administration was shotgun-blasting these spending freezes across the government, Governor Kemp told a local news station he wasn't sure of the status of the loan. (Squire, in the email, said Rivian continues to work 'with DOE and the administration to bring thousands of quality, good paying jobs back to the United States. Electric vehicles are a global strategic industry, and the U.S. should maintain its leadership role in new technologies.') Just a few weeks later in March, the emails show, Rivian began coordinating with the Governor's staff for a face-to-face between Kemp and Scaringe. Originally slated to take place on April 9, the meeting had to be rescheduled because the Rivian CEO had a 'personal conflict come up.' Andrew Capezzuto, the corporate affairs director for Rivian, said the meeting was 'a top priority' in an apologetic email about the rescheduling. As Capezzuto hashed out a new time for Scaringe and Kemp to meet, he was also in regular contact with Georgia's economic development department (GCED), the emails show. '[W]e are interested in picking back up on supplier conversations,' he told that team on April 8. 'I believe a while back GDEcD had prepared an overview of existing suppliers within Georgia and the greater South East region. Would it be possible to dust that list off so that we can see what suppliers and parts are already available? We would like to use that list to evaluate the existing supplier base and determine whether we can leverage any existing suppliers. That will then also help us determine which suppliers we'd like to consider locate [sic] in Georgia to support the SSN facility.' In an email to TechCrunch, Squire said 'Georgia and the Southeast have a very strong automotive supplier base. We want to leverage that base to optimize logistics costs and reinforce a strong supply chain. It's good for jobs, regionally and nationally, and promotes American manufacturing and economic development.' As Rivian ramps up that supplier activity, the company is also starting to hire workers to support the buildout of the factory. It has posted seven open roles to LinkedIn within the last month, including one for construction manager.
