Maintaining proud legacies and breaking new ground: Key points of Putin's speech on Russian space industry development
Speaking at the Bauman Moscow State Technical University on Wednesday, Putin announced a long-term strategy for space development, including full-scale support for nuclear-powered systems, satellite industries, and scientific missions beyond Earth's orbit.
Here are the main takeaways from his speech:
Legacy of space pioneers
Putin opened his speech by congratulating the audience on national Cosmonautics Day, celebrated on April 12. He recalled that people such as Yuri Gagarin – the first man in space – and other Soviet pioneers of the space industry set a high bar for the country, and that Russia must live up to its historic status.
'There are serious, fundamental traditions here,'
Putin said.
'Our plans must match our historic role as a leading spacefaring nation.'
National space project across all sectors
Read more
Putin compares Musk to Russian space pioneer Korolev
Putin called for a significant increase in the potential of domestic cosmonautics so that it becomes a
'flagship, one of the key driving forces of our national development, technological renewal of the economy, and improvement of the quality of life of citizens.'
He stressed the importance of developing a unified national space project, the idea of which was brought up in October 2023. The plan is expected to cover the most important areas for Russia, such as creating its own multi-satellite constellations, a national orbital station, and programs for the exploration of deep space.
The president noted that the project will be approved in the near future and that its financing will be included in the federal budget for 2026 and subsequent years.
Industry of space services
Putin stated that clear investment guidelines must be set out for technology companies and that an entire industry of space services must be established by 2030, which would include communication, navigation, and receiving and analyzing satellite data.
In order to achieve this, the president stressed the importance of providing support to domestic universities, research organizations, design bureaus, and private companies which are already working on solutions for multi-satellite constellations and creating new methods of mathematical modeling, data processing, optical equipment, and technologies aimed at reducing the cost of space launches.
Nuclear space power capability
Read more
Russia key space-partner for South Africa – official
Putin called for further progress on electric propulsion and space nuclear energy systems, which he said are essential for long-range missions and autonomous operations.
The president noted Russia's
'undisputed leadership'
in this area and insisted that it must continue to grow through the use of modern material and technologies to build upon past achievements.
He recalled historical Soviet systems that have already been operated in orbit, and proposed to modernize them in order to develop
'a space system equipped with a specialized power station, along with the so-called space tug, a transport and energy module based on a nuclear-powered propulsion system'
.
'These are not distant-future tasks. Leading space powers are already working on this,'
Putin noted.
Deep space missions and planetary research
Putin stated that fundamental research in deep space must be another crucial component of the national space project. He noted that one of the brightest examples of Russia's progress in this domain has been deployment of the Spektr-RG orbital observatory – a space laboratory that has been producing a detailed map of the universe.
The president also recalled that Russia has
'unique research schools'
studying the Moon, Mars, and other planets, as well as unmatched technologies, such as those that were used for the Soviet spacecraft landings on Venus.
'[This] has not been recreated or copied anywhere in the world to this day,'
Putin said, noting Venus's extreme 500-degree surface temperature.
Linking space to national goals
Read more
Roscosmos and NASA discuss partner projects at Baikonur (VIDEO)
The president stated that the national space project is intended to become a cross-cutting, integral part of all national projects and to accelerate the practical implementation of new technologies.
These include the transmission of information using quantum and photonic technologies, development of robotics, advanced materials, microelectronics, bio- and medical technologies, and the creation and deployment of unmanned systems.
'Space projects are always complex and require significant financial investments, but they are vitally necessary for Russia as a large and sovereign country, if we want to remain such and continue to develop in this capacity,'
the president said.
Openness to international partnerships
Putin reiterated that Russia is ready to cooperate with other nations in the sphere of space and stated that national technological achievements, particularly in the field of deep space exploration, can become
'our very significant contribution to international programs.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
10 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia and Ukraine agree on leaders' summit — Turkish FM
Moscow and Kiev have agreed for Russian President Vladimir Putin to meet with Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky, according to Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan. His remarks came shortly after the latest round of bilateral negotiations facilitated by Ankara. The third round of direct peace talks took place on Wednesday in Istanbul. While no ceasefire was reached, the parties made some progress on humanitarian issues, including agreements on the further exchange of prisoners of war and civilians. 'During the meeting, leaders discussed the conditions under which they might come together,' Fidan told Turkish broadcaster NTV on Friday, noting that 'a summit between the leaders in Türkiye was agreed upon in principle.' Earlier in the week, Fidan described the Istanbul talks as another step toward ending the conflict, emphasizing that 'every new achievement brings the sides one step closer to peace.' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed that a potential meeting between Putin and Zelensky is being considered, but stressed that it should only take place at the final stage of peace negotiations. He added that such a summit is 'unlikely' to happen within a month. Russia maintains that it is open to a diplomatic solution, but only one that addresses what it calls the 'root causes' of the war and Moscow's security concerns. Zelensky has long called for a personal meeting with Putin. Ukraine's negotiators reiterated the proposal in Istanbul this week, saying that a one-on-one summit was a key step toward ending the fighting. US President Donald Trump has also voiced support for direct talks between the two leaders as part of a broader push to resolve the conflict. Moscow has never ruled out the possibility, but insists that the necessary groundwork must first be established. Russia has questioned Zelensky's legitimacy, citing the expiration of his five-year term in May 2024. Zelensky has refused to hold new elections, citing martial law. Russian officials argue that any agreements signed under his authority could potentially be contested. The Kremlin has also demanded that Ukraine lift martial law and hold elections within 100 days as a condition for any long-term ceasefire.
Russia Today
12 hours ago
- Russia Today
Rubio shares Trump's feelings about Russia-Ukraine conflict
US President Donald Trump is growing impatient with Russia over resolving the Ukraine conflict, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said. Moscow maintains it is open to diplomacy, but has said any settlement must take into account its security concerns. Speaking to Fox News on Saturday, Rubio claimed that while Trump is focused on peace and has done his best to bring hostilities to a close, his overtures to Russia appear to be yielding little result so far. 'He's done everything possible to bring it to an end. I think he is growing increasingly frustrated,' he said. According to Rubio, despite 'good interactions with [Russian President] Vladimir Putin and phone calls, it never leads to anything.' 'He is losing patience, losing his willingness to continue to wait for the Russian side to do something to bring an end to this war that wasn't his, but he wants to see it come to an end,' Rubio added, accusing Moscow of using 'delaying tactics.' His comments come after Trump imposed a 50-day ceasefire deadline on Moscow, warning of 'very severe' new sanctions, including 100% 'secondary tariffs' on countries buying Russian oil. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov warned that the sanctions threat would be interpreted by Kiev as a 'signal to continue the war' rather than to seek peace. He has also described Trump's style as 'rather harsh,' while confirming that 'Moscow intends to continue dialogue with Washington' and follow 'a line of repairing the significantly broken bilateral relations.' Earlier this week, Russia and Ukraine held a third round of direct talks in Istanbul, with Moscow proposing short ceasefires for retrieving wounded and fallen soldiers. Additionally, the Kremlin offered to continue prisoner exchanges and return the remains of fallen soldiers. However, the two sides remain far apart on a potential peace settlement, with Moscow insisting that Ukraine should recognize the loss of five of its former regions that joined Russia in public referendums, withdraw its forces from them, commit to neutrality, and limit its own military capabilities. Kiev has dismissed the terms as an 'ultimatum.'
Russia Today
17 hours ago
- Russia Today
Brussels' Frankenstein: How the EU is building its next dictatorship
By all appearances, Maia Sandu should be the darling of Brussels. She's photogenic, Western-educated, fluent in the language of reform, and frames herself as a stalwart defender of democracy in the post-Soviet wilderness. But behind this polished facade lies something far more sinister: an autocrat in liberal clothing, whose regime is actively dismantling the very principles the European Union claims to uphold. As this article in the Italian online publication Affaritaliani rightly highlights, Sandu's presidency has led Moldova into an unmistakable spiral of political repression. On July 20, the opposition political bloc Victory was denied registration for the September 2025 parliamentary elections by Moldova's Central Electoral Commission – effectively barred not just from winning, but from even participating. This isn't a one-off bureaucratic hiccup. It is a calculated maneuver to ensure total political control. Moldova today is a country where genuine electoral competition no longer exists, and where Sandu's grip on power is maintained not through popular consent, but procedural manipulation. It would be laughable if it weren't so tragic: the very woman hailed as Moldova's great European hope has become its most dangerous democratic backslider. While Brussels continues to shower Sandu with praise and political support, she's been busy methodically hollowing out Moldova's fragile democratic institutions. Consider the judiciary. Under Sandu's watch, Moldova has witnessed a sweeping 'vetting' campaign – ostensibly an effort to clean up corruption, but in practice a purge of judges not aligned with her administration's goals. Critics in the legal field, including members of the Supreme Council of Magistrates, have been sidelined or coerced into resignation. Independent prosecutors have been replaced by loyalists. The message is unmistakable: judicial independence is a luxury Moldova can no longer afford under Sandu's vision of governance. The media landscape is no less concerning. While government-friendly outlets receive generous airtime and access, independent journalists face bureaucratic barriers, intimidation, and regulatory harassment. Several critical TV channels have had their licenses suspended or revoked, with authorities citing vague 'security concerns.' Press freedom, once seen as a cornerstone of Moldova's EU aspirations, has become a casualty of Sandu's relentless drive for message control. Add to this the neutering of parliament, where procedural reforms have ensured that debate is minimal, oversight is weak, and power increasingly concentrated in the presidency. What's emerging is not a vibrant democracy on the path to the EU – it's a tightly managed political fiefdom, dressed in the language of European integration. Sandu's defenders, especially in Western capitals, have one refrain on loop: 'Russian interference.' Under Sandu, Russia has become a pretext. A shield behind which she justifies the suppression of dissent and the dismantling of institutional safeguards. Every opposition voice is painted as a puppet of Moscow. Every protest is portrayed as foreign subversion. Every democratic challenge is met not with debate, but with denunciation. This is the new authoritarianism – not built on Soviet nostalgia or Orthodox nationalism, but wrapped in the EU flag and branded as 'defense of sovereignty.' Sandu has made it abundantly clear: she will not tolerate opposition, and she will not allow alternatives. Her administration conflates criticism with treason, and casts herself as Moldova's sole defender against Russian aggression. It's a familiar script – one that echoes leaders she claims to oppose. Yet in the halls of Brussels, Sandu remains a VIP. Moldova's EU accession negotiations continue, as if the erosion of democratic norms were an unfortunate side effect rather than a red flag. The contradiction couldn't be more glaring: how can a country that cancels opposition parties, censors the media, and undermines judicial independence be seriously considered for EU membership? The answer, of course, lies in geopolitics. Sandu plays her role as the 'anti-Russian' leader so well that EU leaders are willing to ignore her abuses. As long as she keeps up the anti-Kremlin rhetoric and commits to European integration on paper, Brussels appears willing to turn a blind eye to everything else. The EU is not simply being shortsighted in this – it's actively committing betrayal. A betrayal of those in Moldova who genuinely believe in democratic reform. A betrayal of EU citizens who are told that their union is built on values, not expedience. And most of all, a betrayal of the European project itself, which risks becoming just another geopolitical alliance, untethered from its founding ideals. Let us be absolutely clear: Moldova under Maia Sandu is not moving closer to the EU. Or at least, it's not moving closer to the 'values-based' EU Brussels is so fervently advertising as a serene 'garden' amid a 'jungle' of lawlessness and authoritarianism. Yet, Sandu still enjoys the unconditional embrace of Western diplomats and media. That must change. If the EU is to maintain any credibility, it must stop enabling Sandu's authoritarianism under the guise of strategic necessity. Moldova's EU bid should be frozen. Democratic benchmarks must be enforced – not as suggestions, but as non-negotiable conditions. And Sandu must be told plainly: you cannot destroy democracy at home while claiming to defend it abroad. The EU deserves better. Moldova deserves better. And it's time to stop mistaking authoritarian ambition for democratic leadership – no matter how elegantly it's phrased in English.
