X, India spar over lawyer's 'Tom, Dick, and Harry' remark for government officials
X has long been at loggerheads with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government over content removal requests.
The remarks were made during a hearing on the U.S. firm's challenge to a government-run website it says is a "censorship portal" that allows officials to issue content removal orders. New Delhi says the website is only to swiftly notify companies of their due diligence obligations.
India is a critical growth market for X owner Musk, who is getting closer to launching his other key ventures Starlink and Tesla in the country.
During the court hearing, X's lawyer, K. G. Raghavan, said it recently received a notice from the railways department to remove a video in which a car was being driven on a railway track. That was news, but the government found it unlawful, he told the court.
"This is the danger, My Lord, that is done now, if every Tom, Dick, and Harry officer is authorised," Raghavan told the high court in the southern state of Karnataka.
The phrase drew immediate condemnation from India's Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who said "officers are not Tom, Dick, or Harry ... they are statutory functionaries".
"No social media intermediary can expect completely unregulated functioning," Mehta said.
India's IT ministry and X did not respond to Reuters queries.
In 2021, X, formerly called Twitter, was locked in a stand-off with the Indian government over non-compliance with legal orders to block certain tweets. It later complied, but is still locked in a court fight related to the move.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
29 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
India and Bangladesh postpone cricket tour to 2026
India's six‑match white‑ball cricket tour of Bangladesh next month has been postponed to 2026, both cricket boards said Saturday. The series, including three one-day and three T20 matches, had been due to start on August 17 in Dhaka. Political relations between India and Bangladesh have turned frosty since a mass uprising last year in Dhaka toppled then prime minister Sheikh Hasina. The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) have "mutually agreed to defer" the series, the statement read. It said the decision was made "taking into account the international cricketing commitments and scheduling convenience of both teams", without giving further details. It added that Bangladesh's BCB "looks forward to welcoming India in September 2026", with exact fixtures to be released later. There is deep anger in Dhaka at the fate of Hasina, who escaped a student-led uprising by helicopter in August 2024 and flew to New Delhi. Up to 1,400 people were killed between July and August last year, according to the United Nations, when Hasina's government ordered a crackdown on protesters in a failed bid to cling to power. Elections are expected in early 2026.
%3Amax_bytes(150000)%3Astrip_icc()%2Fdogecoin-02b89237819544f19a7440c5405e12f7.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Arabian Post
3 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Stock market information for Dogecoin
Dogecoin is a crypto in the CRYPTO market. The price is 0.164341 USD currently with a change of -0.00 USD from the previous close. The intraday high is 0.167214 USD and the intraday low is 0.161817 USD. Memecoin Resilience: Dogecoin Holds Firm at $0.16 Level Dogecoin bounced off the $0.16 mark after a sharp intraday decline, signalling that bulls are defending this multi‑week floor. Trading volume surged near these levels, indicating accumulation and potential consolidation ahead. ADVERTISEMENT The memecoin dropped around 5 per cent intraday, bottoming at approximately $0.161 before recovering to about $0.163, according to CoinDesk's data. Volume during the bounce doubled the daily average, underscoring robust buyer interest around this critical price band. Market observers note that holding above $0.160 could pave the way for a sustained recovery. Technical analysts suggest Dogecoin may be forming a base around this level. CoinDesk's Shaurya Malwa points out that the token remained in a narrow range between $0.162 and $0.164 after the bounce—a pattern often associated with consolidation and trend reversals. The broader cryptocurrency landscape remains volatile. Macroeconomic pressures—particularly global trade tensions and central bank policy uncertainty—have triggered risk‑off sentiment. That volatility tends to amplify swings in meme‑style tokens like Dogecoin, yet it also creates value opportunities for strategic buyers. On‑chain interest appears healthy. Cryptocurrency analytics platform CoinGecko reports substantial trading activity across centralised exchanges, with 24‑hour turnover exceeding $900 million, although this reflects a slight dip from the previous week's average. Coinbase indicates Dogecoin remains the top memecoin by trading volume, commanding approximately 1 per cent of the total crypto market cap. In European trading on 3 July, Dogecoin climbed close to $0.174 following a defence of the $0.16 region. Analysts caution that this rebound, representing an 11 per cent gain from the low, may end up corrective rather than reflecting a confirmed trend shift. More Crypto Online, a technical analyst, contends the price movement fits an ABC diagonal wave pattern, warning that failure to hold $0.16 could invalidate bullish outlooks. Should the token maintain support, targets around $0.196 appear plausible; yet a break below $0.151 may trigger renewed weakness. Amid this backdrop, speculation builds around a possible Dogecoin‑based ETF. Amendments filed by Bitwise for a spot‑DOGE ETF have increased optimism, with analysts estimating a high probability of SEC approval by the year‑end. A green light could invite fresh institutional capital and broader market legitimacy, although timing expectations remain uncertain. Social media and celebrity influence continue to play a strong role. Elon Musk's intermittent endorsements and jovial online commentary have historically driven surges in trading volume and public interest. At present, Dogecoin remains range‑bound, with the $0.16 level acting as both a psychological and technical barrier. A sustained break above $0.164—coupled with upticks in volume—could signal a reversal toward mid‑$0.18 or even $0.20. Conversely, capitulation below the $0.16 threshold may re‑test June lows and weaken broader memecoin sentiment. Traders await forthcoming macroeconomic signals—US inflation data, central bank communications—and updates on ETF applications, all of which could determine whether Dogecoin's floor holds or fractures.
The National
10 hours ago
- The National
Brics leaders meet under pressure from tariffs, oil shocks and climate rifts
When the leaders of the Brics group of developing countries gather on Sunday for their 17th annual summit, the backdrop is one of the most geopolitically volatile the bloc has faced in years, with trade tension, regional conflicts and energy instability all converging at once. Three forces will shape the mood in the room at the two day summit. First, US President Donald Trump's 'liberation day' tariff blitz, which has landed across the Brics. China struck a trade truce with the US recently, reducing steep levies. But India still faces duties of up to 27 per cent on exports bound for the US, while South Africa is grappling with a 31 per cent levy. Brazil has been hit with a 10 per cent baseline tariff. While these measures were paused for 90-days, that window closes on July 9, so the threat of fresh trade disruption looms large. Wars and oil Second, there's the instability in the Middle East, following a 12-day war between Israel and Iran. Oil markets have already felt the impact: Brent, the benchmark for two thirds of the world's oil, surged nearly 12 per cent after Israel's mid-June strike, driven by fears that further escalation could disrupt ships carrying oil through the Strait of Hormuz. Prices have since cooled, but the stakes remain high. Any new conflict would hit oil importers, such as China and India, while a plunge would hit revenue for major Brics producers such as Russia and Brazil. That brings us to the third pressure point: the upcoming Opec+ meeting in Vienna on July 10. Russia remains a key player in the oil cartel, shaping production policy in tandem with Saudi Arabia, which is not a Brics member. Brazil joined Opec+ last year, although without binding production targets, while India and China (as major importers) closely watch the cartel's quota decisions, which influence global prices. Yet in practice, most Brics members are still price-takers rather than setters, highlighting the bloc's internal imbalance and its limited influence over global energy governance. Climate policy adds another layer of friction. While the EU continues to press for faster emissions cuts, the US has retreated from climate leadership under Mr Trump. Within Brics, positions vary: Russia is intent on protecting its fossil fuel revenue, while Brazil, India and China favour a more gradual transition that aligns with their development needs. Diverging views on climate policy point to a broader issue facing Brics: as the bloc positions itself as a champion of a more 'balanced' or 'multipolar' global order, how much actual influence does it have? Global impact Comparisons with the G7 — the bloc of industrialised nations that continues to shape global policy — are hard to avoid, given Brics' efforts to position itself as a voice for emerging economies. Yet, the group has struggled to match the G7's coherence or influence on the global stage. For example: China generates about 70 per cent of the original bloc's economic output, meaning the now expanded group (which includes Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the UAE) lacks the scale and co-ordination needed to match the G7 in any meaningful way. Divisions within the bloc are not confined to economics either; they extend into diplomacy and security as well. The Middle East remains a key source of tension. Russia has taken a more assertive diplomatic line in support of Iran, particularly during its recent standoff with Israel. But other Brics members, especially India and Brazil, are likely to proceed with caution, unwilling to risk damaging relationships with the US and other western partners that are vital to their economic interests. With such differing interests, a unified stance on geopolitical crises, economic coordination, or energy policy remains unlikely. The summit is likely to deliver broad, cautious statements rather than any meaningful joint strategy. De-dollarisation? That same fragmentation is reflected in Brics' push to move away from dollar dependence — not by replacing the US currency altogether, but by reducing exposure to western-controlled financial systems. The broader aim of so-called de-dollarisation is to create alternative frameworks for trade and reserves that are less vulnerable to sanctions and less reliant on payment networks like SWIFT. However, de-dollarisation remains a distant goal. China 's renminbi is still closely managed against the greenback, the Russian rouble lacks stability, and currencies such as the Brazilian real and South African rand have little international traction. The idea of a shared BRICS currency has been raised by some leaders, but it remains more symbolic than substantive. With no common fiscal framework or monetary co-ordination among members, even developing a unified trading platform would face big obstacles. One area where Brics countries can make meaningful progress is at home. As global co-operation weakens, the way countries compete is changing. Strength now comes not only from what they sell abroad, but from the institutions they build and the connections they maintain with nearby markets. In a fragmented world, countries that combine domestic strength with access to nearby markets are holding up best. Switzerland tops the IMD World Competitiveness Ranking not only for its internal stability, but because it trades freely with the EU next door. Singapore, too, thrives not in isolation but by anchoring itself in South-East Asia's regional economy. For Brics, the deeper challenge is coherence. In a world drifting towards bilateralism, the group's ability to act with one voice remains in doubt. These tensions are not theoretical. The Iran crisis will test its diplomatic unity. Trump's tariffs will test its economic resolve. Opec+ will test its energy coordination. The Brics summit arrives, then, with limited expectations. The real test is not the declarations made this weekend, but the degree to which these countries can shape — rather than simply react to — the emerging world order.
