
‘Intrinsically connected': how human neurodiversity could help save nature
Across Britain, 15% of people are thought to be neurodivergent. In the process of writing Neurodivergent, By Nature, Harkness discovered that an estimated 30% of conservation employees were neurodivergent. Why?
'People like myself, especially those who are undiagnosed, probably found nature was their balm from a mental health perspective,' says Harkness when we meet beneath an awesomely peaceful ancient oak close to his home in rural Norfolk. 'The other thing is, we're different from what we'd define as neurotypical people. Therefore we like more odd things. Special interests. Nature lends itself to people who are different.'
He interrupts his own answers by repeatedly spotting micro-moths – his latest special interest – zipping across our path. 'Did you see that? Is it a yellow shell? No, it's another one of those mother of pearl moths. Sorry. They're everywhere.'
Harkness's full-time job is teaching autistic and other neurodiverse children, but he did not suspect he had ADHD until a fellow teacher said she thought he had. It took a further six years to obtain a formal diagnosis and access to medication that he has found extremely helpful.
Naturalists such as the broadcaster Chris Packham and the writer Dara McAnulty have flown the flag for neurodiversity in the environmental sector but Harkness interviews dozens of less celebrated conservationists who have undertaken pioneering work on everything from UN climate talks to saving the Seychelles black parrot and restoring pine marten populations.
Harkness, whose debut book, Bird Therapy, was a surprise self-published hit, explains well why neurodivergent people can prosper in ecological jobs.
But he also makes a strong case for the natural world needing a neurodiverse cohort of people to save it. Beside the ancient oak where we talk is a small, scruffy meadow, filled with a jumble of wild grasses, insects and the flit of birds. 'There is biodiversity right in front of you,' says Harkness, pointing at the meadow. 'You look at it one way, I look at it another way. Therefore, if we are trying to help it, we can bring different things to it. If you're looking at it from a completely different angle because of how your brain is wired, you bring a different approach again.
'You cannot be creative and make change and do good things unless you utilise all the different skills of the people you work with. If you don't have diversity of people, you don't have biodiversity. You can't have one without the other. They are intrinsically connected.'
More specifically, Harkness reveals how neurodiverse conservationists find their 'superpowers' can make them uniquely effective at their job, with skills including lateral thinking, hyperfocus, memory skills and empathy, as well as having an aptitude for fieldwork.
The autistic ecologist Naomi Davis told Harkness their favourite aspect of the job was finding and categorising species. Both Davis and the consultant ornithologist Colin Everett speak of sensory superpowers helping their surveying work: detecting fragments of birdsong that everyone else misses; even hearing bats echolocating – calls that are usually far too high-pitched for adults to hear them.
Clearly, neurodiverse people can be vital champions for biodiversity, although Harkness is bluntly honest about his own ADHD. 'I don't feel like the symptoms I experience are helpful or conducive to wellbeing and peak performance at work,' he writes.
And some people are still wary of disclosing neurodiversity. He interviews Emma Marsh, an executive director at the RSPB, who did not reveal her later-in-life autism diagnosis to work colleagues for a while, although when she finally did, she was heartened by receiving such a positive response.
As Harkness explains, harnessing the skills of neurodiverse employees often requires changes in work practices. Fieldwork – in peaceful, natural settings – is one attraction for many neurodiverse conservationists, but office-based workers may require adaptations. One senior conservationist was given permission to conduct her meetings outdoors.
Is the conservation sector meeting the needs of its neurodiverse employees? 'Approaches to neuro-inclusion across the conservation sector are fragmentary at best, with some areas of outstanding practice, and some terrible tales of discrimination and needs not being met,' says Harkness.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
Although 'a lot of what I found in the sector seemed really fantastic', he says, 'with a bit of digging, everybody [in conservation organisations] was open to the fact that they still have a lot of work to do. But neurodivergence is a relatively new concept. I wouldn't expect them to be all-singing, all dancing with their practices yet.'
The conservation sector has repeatedly been criticised for being so white and Harkness says any assessment of its efforts to accommodate neurodiversity must look at 'how well is it engaging everybody who has a protected characteristic'.
Harkness does not want neurodiversity to be a 'DEI trend' that comes and goes. For meaningful change, he says, there must be more routes into conservation through apprenticeships and not just degrees.
Working as a senior teacher at an 'outstanding' complex needs school, Harkness is fiercely critical of mainstream British education, and the multi-chain academy system in particular, for failing to meet the needs of both neurodiversity and nature. Without more nature-literate schooling, he says, many neurodiverse young people won't be able to discover the balm of the natural world – or the well-fitting jobs available within it.
'If you need something different, you're not going to get it,' he writes of the academy school system.
His own personal schooling experience was bleak. Lacking an ADHD diagnosis as a young person, Harkness was simply written off as a naughty child of a single parent from social housing.
When he got his belated diagnosis, did he grieve for how long it took? 'What I really grieved for was my experience at secondary school,' he says. 'Medication has completely changed my life for the better. It doesn't for everyone but it's worked for me. What if I'd had that in year 11? Would I have got my A-levels and gone to university? Would I be a completely different person? Do I want to be? No. But it's grief for what I could've been.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Fight to save ‘most beautiful snail' from most voracious predator — us
No one knows why the Polymita snails of Cuba are so beautiful, or why their beauty is so varied. Probably, though, the array of different colours and stripes evolved as a way of avoiding predators. Which is why it is so ironic that those adornments are — today — the reason it is attracting the most voracious predator of all: us. Conservationists have warned the shells of this disappearing species are being sold to collectors, who may not even realise the snails are endangered. Now a global collaboration of scientists is looking to better understand and breed in captivity these magnificent molluscs — with the hope of preserving them. 'They are so beautiful and extraordinarily variable,' said Professor Angus Davison, from the University of Nottingham. This means that as a snail scientist he finds himself in an unusual situation. 'While all snails are interesting and beautiful to me, most snails, by and large, are not outwardly beautiful to other people.' He has been part of a team collecting samples in Cuba, with a view to mapping their DNA. He is interested in how many species there are and how they are related. It is believed that there are six, but traditional methods of counting rely heavily on intricate analysis of their genitals. The hope is that genetic data could both be more definitive, and also provide clues not contained in their penises to explain why they are like this at all. Paradoxically, said Davison, being colourful can be a way of evading predation — and this is his leading hypothesis. 'You might assume they stand out against the background. That's not necessarily true, depending on where they live.' But being very different from each other, in the way they are, could be a positive survival strategy. 'Most likely there's a bird out there that eats the snails. That bird gets a search image in its head for the most common snail — let's say it's a yellow snail. And then you get a gene change that makes a green snail. The green snail will not be eaten because the bird doesn't see them. And so the green snails will become more common. 'And then another mutation arises, which makes an orange snail. And so on.' Until, eventually, there are enough different colours that while they evade birds, they catch the eyes of tourists instead. It is illegal to collect and sell the snails, but it is hard to enforce. 'The problem is, Cuba's undergoing very great financial hardships. So there's a very great incentive for locals to collect the shells and sell them.' Davison's worry is that publicising the beauty of the snails might increase the market. His hope, though, is that educating people about them could decrease it. 'No person in the UK would buy rhino horn if offered it on a holiday. But there are people who will happily buy a shell, not even thinking about the animal or where it came from.'


BBC News
13 hours ago
- BBC News
Invasive species spotted in Tees estuary oyster pots
An invasive species has been spotted in an oyster pot being used by a conservation group to monitor river Tees Rivers Trust had set up an oyster nursery in the Tees estuary to help restore marine habitats and bring back spawning fish to the the latest pot inspection a leathery sea squirt was spotted and reported before being disposed manager Judy Power said "it was an important reminder to look for invasive species in all habitats". Ms Power said: "There was one species this month that we were less pleased to see - a leathery sea squirt."We have reported it and got rid of it."Leathery sea squirt, or styela clava, pose a threat to oyster and mussel farming by out-competing shellfish for food and space. However, she said there were positive finds during the inspection including the "amazing growth" of the oysters and other marine life."Apart from the oysters, we found six fish, including a scorpionfish and butterfish, the tiniest baby scallop we've ever seen, a little, long clawed porcelain crab which we rarely see and lots of squat lobsters and prawns," Ms Powers said. Seagrass and oysters were once present in the estuary but were lost due to a combination of over exploitation and deteriorating water quality.A single oyster can filter 150 litres of water a day through its gills helping to remove contaminants while seagrass can absorb carbon from water and provide small fish with valuable feeding believe the two species would form a coastal defence, with oyster reefs and seagrass meadows helping to keep sediment stable and prevent coastal the longer term, conservationists hope to use stones, gravel and broken scallop shells - known as "cultch" - to line the river bed and provide the right habitat for oysters. Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.


Telegraph
13 hours ago
- Telegraph
White storks could return to London for the first time in centuries
Long-vanished white storks could return to London for the first time in hundreds of years. The public is being asked for views on the potential return of the birds to the capital, as part of a project to see if they could make a home there. White storks have been reintroduced in southern England, leading to an 'explosion' in sightings across Greater London in recent years. Now conservationists are looking at whether the metre-tall birds, which are known to thrive in urban settings on the continent, could do the same in London. White storks could once be seen flying in Britain's skies and building their huge nests on roofs and buildings as well as in trees, but disappeared centuries ago as a breeding bird due to hunting and habitat loss. Since 2016, the white stork project in Sussex has sought to create new colonies of rehabilitated injured storks - which can act as a 'magnet' for wild birds that visit from the continent - at Knepp and Wadhurst Park, with the first successful breeding in 2020. In the four decades before the start of the project, there were just 27 records of white storks across Greater London. But between 2016 and 2023 there have been 472 sightings in the capital, with the numbers increasing year-on-year, conservationists said. Community-focused urban rewilding organisation Citizen Zoo is conducting an appraisal on making London a 'white stork-friendly city', including habitat mapping, reaching out to boroughs across the capital to gauge their response and surveying the public about the birds. It has worked with communities to bring beavers back to Ealing, reintroduce water voles in Surrey and restore wetlands in the capital, in efforts to bring city dwellers closer to nature, deliver wellbeing benefits and make London more resilient to climate change. The storks have wider ecological benefits for their habitat, creating huge nests which are homes and food sources for an array of species from insects to birds. But it is their ability to inspire people about nature that has been a key part of reintroduction efforts in the UK. Elliot Newton, co-founder and director of rewilding at Citizen Zoo, said: 'These are a really talismanic, iconic species that really do draw and attract attention. 'You look up into the skies and see a white stork, it's quite obvious.' The survey is being led by the University of Brighton's Rachel White, with two phases that mirror a national survey she conducted as part of the white stork project in Sussex. The first phase of the study has involved surveying a representative sample of 1,000 Londoners, and a second phase is asking residents and frequent visitors to give their view on white storks and their place in the capital. Dr White said: 'It is really important to be monitoring stakeholders' opinions and attitudes towards any reintroductions, because that's one of the main reasons that reintroduction projects fail - they haven't got the buy-in from the key stakeholders. 'It is really important to not assume, or to not just go ahead with projects, because you see the conservation value in it.' She said projects need to ensure a majority of people are onboard with a reintroduction, that the rationale has been clearly communicated and people have been given the opportunity to have their say. The national survey found overall people were very positive towards the species, even if they had never seen storks before, although there was a lack of knowledge about things such as the stork's diet, and even what they looked like. But a 'relatively small' number of people - often those who were ecologists, conservationists or birders - were not in favour of the reintroduction, largely because it was not a threatened species and they thought it should not be a priority for action, she added. The London survey will feed into the wider assessment by Citizen Zoo of the political and public enthusiasm, and habitat availability for storks, and potential next steps such as creating more habitat to encourage natural colonisation or even a release similar to that in Sussex. However, Mr Newton added that 'nature has a fantastic tendency to surprise us', with the possibility storks could establish themselves in the capital of their own accord.