logo
Can Australia's youth social media ban work? – DW – 07/31/2025

Can Australia's youth social media ban work? – DW – 07/31/2025

DW6 days ago
Australia is implementing a social media blackout for children under 16 to arrest a growing mental health crisis. But is a ban the best way to help young digital natives?
When Australia's government decided to implement a world-first national youth social media ban, it was pitched as an antidote to a growing mental health crisis.
It followed intense debate about the dangers of social media, much articulated in the book, "The Anxious Generation," by Jonathan Haidt. The American social psychologist argues that smartphone-based childhoods and social media is helping to fuel an epidemic of mental illness among teenagers.
As the ban was passed in the Australian Parliament in November 2024, one poll revealed overwhelming support among 77% of Australians. The plan to fine TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit, X, Instagram, and now YouTube, 49.5 million Australian dollars (€27.7 million, $32.3 million) for failing to block young people was supported by 87% of those surveyed. Underage social media users and their parents will not be punished for any violations under the law.
Social media companies, including Elon Musk's X, were predictably unimpressed with a ban that many concede will also be difficult to police. "It's entirely likely the ban could see young people pushed to darker corners of the internet where no community guidelines, safety tools, or protections exist," said a TikTok spokesperson when the bill was passed.
The Australian social media ban partly seeks to protect young people from the cyberbullying, disinformation and illegal content that has riddled social media platforms. But some experts doubt whether prohibition is an antidote to deteriorating youth mental health.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Marilyn Campbell, a professor in the school of Early Childhood and Inclusive Education at the Queensland University of Technology who writes on cyberbullying, warns that there is little research that actually establishes a "causal" connection between social media and psychological health.
"We know that there's a high correlation between the rise of new technologies and the increase in young people's poorer mental health," she said. "But we don't even know why yet."
One 2023 study sampling social media use in 72 countries found "no evidence suggesting that the global penetration of social media is associated with widespread psychological harm."
Even though populist psychology works like "The Anxious Generation" merely draw a correlation between rising youth anxiety and depression and social media use, they have been heavily hyped in the media, Campbell noted. Building on the popularity of these ideas, the government is now pursuing a "nice, simple solution," she told DW.
"You don't have to spend any money on it," she said of the ban. "It's not complicated."
Researchers at the University of Queensland note that the limited understanding of social media impacts on young people's mental health means that other influences need to be considered such as rising "social inequity," "climate anxiety" and "gendered violence."
Instead of focusing on social media, governments need to "reform the mental health system," Campbell suggested, adding that "many more school counselors and school psychologists" would help.
"There's lots of things that they could do but that costs money," she added.
"We know that social media is doing social harm, and my Government and this Parliament is prepared to take action to protect young Australians," said Australian Prime Minsiter on Wednesday when announcing that YouTube would be added to the list of banned platforms after initially being left out.
But social media can also be positive for young people, said Campbell.
Writing for magazine in January, she noted that young people with autism or who are "exploring their sexual and gender identity" can sometimes more easily identify with peers online than in their physical locality.
She added that like the prohibition of alcohol in the US, a ban just forces the problem underground.
Youth also need to be prepared to live in a "technologically-saturated world," the professor told DW. "We are not doing them any favors by saying, well, you can't be in this world until you're 16."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The Australian ban will not come into effect until this December, however trials are underway to address the complex task of enforcing the social media blackout.
Platforms won't be allowed to compel users to provide government-issued ID or digital identification, but need to provide "alternative age assurance methods" to confirm the age of social media account holders.
One recent study showed that some 80% of people surveyed are concerned about the accuracy of age assurance technologies, and potential data privacy breaches.
Some 77% of German respondents to a 2024 poll also said they would either "fully" or "somewhat" support an Australia-like social media ban.
An even higher percentage — 82% — were "absolutely certain" or "somewhat certain" that social media use is in some way bad for children and teenagers.
Several US states are also limiting access to social media, including ensuring greater parental guidance over social media usage. For decades now, the US has required tech companies to seek parental consent to access the data of users under 13.
Sweden too is looking to ban access to smartphones in schools due to worries about a decline in both mental and physical health.
In 2024, US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy suggested that warning labels be added to social media platforms akin to warnings on cigarettes and alcohol.
This came after a Surgeon General report found some positives with social media use such as "community and connection with others who share identities, abilities and interests," but also "symptoms of depression and anxiety" among adolescents spending 3-plus hours a day on social platforms.
Marilyn Campbell reiterated that social media apps should not be banned, but designed to encourage safer interaction with young people.
"I think that children need to be educated to live in the digital world," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Envoy Witkoff To Visit Moscow On Wednesday
US Envoy Witkoff To Visit Moscow On Wednesday

Int'l Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

US Envoy Witkoff To Visit Moscow On Wednesday

US envoy Steve Witkoff will meet on Wednesday with Russian leadership in Moscow, an American source confirmed, as President Donald Trump's deadline to impose fresh sanctions over Russia's war in Ukraine looms. The source did not specify if the meetings will include Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom Witkoff has met with several times previously. Trump has given Russia until Friday to halt its offensive in Ukraine or face new penalties. The White House has not outlined specific actions it plans to take on Friday, but Trump has previously threatened to impose "secondary tariffs" targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, such as China and India. The move would aim to stifle Russian exports, but would risk significant international disruption. Despite pressure from Washington, Russia has continued its onslaught against its pro-Western neighbor. Three rounds of peace talks in Istanbul have failed to make headway on a possible ceasefire, with the two sides appearing as far apart as ever. Moscow has demanded that Ukraine cede more territory and renounce Western support. Kyiv is calling for an immediate ceasefire, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky last week urged his allies to push for "regime change" in Moscow. In recent weeks, Trump has increasingly voiced frustration with Putin over Moscow's unrelenting offensive. When reporters asked Trump on Monday what Witkoff's message would be to Moscow, and if there was anything Russia could do to avoid the sanctions, Trump replied: "Yeah, get a deal where people stop getting killed." Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Monday it considered the talks with Witkoff to be "important, substantial and helpful" and valued US efforts to end the conflict. Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said Friday that he wants peace but that his demands for ending his nearly three-and-a-half-year offensive were unchanged. Russia has frequently called on Ukraine to effectively cede control of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, a demand Kyiv has called unacceptable. Putin also wants Ukraine to drop its ambitions to join NATO. The visit comes after Trump said that two nuclear submarines he deployed following an online row with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev were now "in the region." Trump has not said whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the exact deployment locations, which are kept secret by the US military. Russia, in its first comments on the deployment, urged "caution" Monday. "Russia is very attentive to the topic of nuclear non-proliferation. And we believe that everyone should be very, very cautious with nuclear rhetoric," the Kremlin's Peskov said.

Pakistan: Hundreds of Imran Khan supporters arrested – DW – 08/05/2025
Pakistan: Hundreds of Imran Khan supporters arrested – DW – 08/05/2025

DW

time3 hours ago

  • DW

Pakistan: Hundreds of Imran Khan supporters arrested – DW – 08/05/2025

Thousands defied a protest ban in several Pakistani cities and clashed with police, as they called for the release of jailed former Prime Minister Imran Khan. More than 240 supporters of former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan were arrested on Tuesday, as they rallied on the second anniversary of his detention. Security officials and police said at east 122 were detained trying to block roads and threatening law and order in the eastern city of Lahore, capital of Punjab province Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party (PTI) had sought to stage nationwide protests, calling for his release. Police fired tear gas to quell the crowds in the cities of Karachi and Muzaffarabad. "The party decided to hold peaceful protests across the country, to which the government responded by imposing a ban on gatherings, (and) blocking main highways," said Zulfikar Bukhari, PTI party spokesperson, who is based in London. Supporters outside a Lahore courthouse shouted "Free Imran Khan!" while smaller groups gathered protests across the city. Bukhari said over 200 activists were detained in Lahore alone. Khan urged supporters to "come out and hold peaceful protests until a true democracy is restored," according to a message attributed to Khan on his party's X account on Monday. The former cricket star turned prime minister of Pakistan was ousted in 2022 by a no-confidence vote. He has been detained since August 2023 and been charged in dozens of cases, ranging from corruption, terrorism and disclosure of official secrets. Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, were both convicted of graft and were sentenced to 14 years and seven years in prison, respectively. An anti-terrorism court also convicted dozens of PTI party members, including MPs and the National Assembly's opposition leader, over nationwide protests in 2023. Khan has denied any wrongdoing, saying the charges against him are politically motivated. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Ukrainian refugee aid across Europe compared – DW – 08/05/2025
Ukrainian refugee aid across Europe compared – DW – 08/05/2025

DW

time4 hours ago

  • DW

Ukrainian refugee aid across Europe compared – DW – 08/05/2025

German politicians are debating whether to slash financial assistance for Ukrainian refugees. How does the country stack up against its EU neighbors when it comes to generosity in helping those fleeing war? Markus Söder, premier of Bavaria, Germany's largest state, wants to do away with current rules governing access to aid money for Ukrainian refugees living in Germany. The head of the Christian Social Union (CSU), part of Germany's conservative CDU/CSU union, is of the opinion that Ukrainian refugees should get less money in general — no matter if they are new arrivals or have been living in Germany for years. Söder's proposal far exceeds the changes promised in the CDU/CSU's coalition agreement, which it signed with the Social Democrats (SPD) in May to form the current government. In the contract — which forms the basis for the coalition's existence — signatory parties agreed to cut financial assistance to new Ukrainian refugees applying for asylum in the country. The coalition agreement, however, explicitly exempted cuts for Ukrainian refugees already living in Germany. To date, Ukrainian refugees fleeing to Germany have all been afforded so-called citizens' money [Bürgergeld] payments, meaning they receive the same amount of welfare assistance that an unemployed German would. For single adults, that means a sum of €563 ($650) each month. Further, German taxpayers cover the cost of rent and health insurance for their guests. In all, that means Germany is among the most financially generous countries when it comes to assistance for Ukrainians forced to flee their homes because of war. Unlike others, Ukrainian refugees are also given permission to immediately enter the German labor market upon arrival. Bavaria's Söder now wants to slash that assistance to people applying for asylum. That would mean a monthly stipend between €353 and €441 for single adults, depending on their living situation. Families would also receive between €299 and €391 monthly for each child they have, with payments varying according to age. The European Union (EU) classifies Ukrainian refugees as individuals "deserving of temporary protection" under a mechanism established in 2001. These guidelines were activated for the first time in 2022, shortly after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The guidelines stipulate that EU host countries must provide refugees, in this case Ukrainians, with access to housing, employment and health care. The guidelines do not, however, define the value of those payments and/or services, leading to great disparities across the 27-member bloc. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Poland does not hand out monthly payments and Warsaw has even gone so far as to do away with its previous one-time payment of roughly €70 for each adult refugee arriving from Ukraine. Ukrainian refugees in Poland are instead given a personal identification number, giving them access to jobs, education and free health care. Ukrainian parents are given a monthly €190 payment for their first child, with smaller payments for each child after that. Parents caring for children with a disability or those with chronic illnesses may also apply for welfare assistance. In Hungary, the government of Prime Minister Viktor Orban — known for his anti-immigrant sentiments — tightened rules defining which Ukrainian refugees it feels are "deserving of temporary protection." Western Ukraine, for instance, is now viewed as a safe place of origin in the eyes of Hungary's lawmakers, meaning refugees hailing from those parts have no right to free housing at state-run refugee facilities. The international NGO Human Rights Watch (HRW) decried the move, saying it put thousands of Ukrainians on the streets. Adult refugees considered worthy of protection are afforded a €55 monthly payment as well as about €34 a month for each child in their family. In Belgium, single adult refugees from Ukraine receive approximately €1,100 per month in assistance, the highest rate in the EU. Moreover, they receive publicly funded health insurance and have the right to publicly funded housing. Furthermore, refugees can apply for financial assistance for the acquisition of furniture, clothing, medical necessities (including glasses) and food. Ukrainian refugees in Sweden do not receive monthly stipends but daily cash allotments. Adults can receive up to about €180-€190 by month's end but only if they have no other income. Payment for children adds up to roughly €140 per month. Additional funds are available for items such as winter clothing or baby carriages. Ukrainian refugees theoretically have access to funds for things like glasses, yet they generally only have the right to medical assistance in emergency situations or in the case of care that cannot be delayed. The United Kingdom (UK) must no longer adhere to EU rules since it famously left the bloc during the so-called Brexit. There, the government allots Ukrainian refugee families about €30 each week for their eldest child, with another €20 a week for all others. Additional payments are provided to assist in covering childcare costs for those children too young to attend school. Retirees (from age 66 for females, 67 for males) are eligible for payments of up to €230 a week. Rules governing adult refugees who have yet to reach retirement age are more complicated and must often be calculated on an individual basis. One assistance program, Homes for Ukraine, is designed to help Ukrainians find living accommodation with UK citizens, for example. The program pays out a roughly €230 one-time payment to refugees, while at the same time it sets up a €400 monthly payment for individuals hosting them — these hosts must also vouch for the refugees they house. Lastly, the UK's "Universal Credit" program provides further financial support to refugees only if their savings fall below a certain threshold. The amount of money they can receive and what it can be used for depends on the refugee in question and their current financial situation. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store