Property owners challenge City's new proposed fixed charges in court
Image: City of Cape Town/Supplied
THE constitutionality of the City's decision to link certain fixed charges to property values in its amended Budget for 2025/26 will come under the spotlight when the South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA) hauls the DA-led administration to court.
The organisation has taken issue with the City's cleaning tariff, the fixed water charge, and the fixed sanitation charge, saying these three items of the budget were in fact property rates imposed outside of the legislation which governs the imposition of such rates.
However, Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis believes that the court application is an attempt to go back to a system of regressive taxation which hits ordinary families, and the poor, the hardest.
SAPOA's membership currently comprises more than 90% of the country's commercial and retail property industry, including some of the largest property-owning companies in South Africa.
The properties owned by their membership include the V&A Waterfront (co-owned by Growthpoint), Canal Walk Shopping Centre (owned by Hyprop), Cape Gate Shopping Centre (owned by Hyprop), Table Bay Mall (owned by Hyprop), Tyger Valley Shopping Centre (co-owned by Pareto), Blue Route Mall (owned by Redefine), Gugulethu Square (owned by Vukile), Atlantis City Shopping Centre (owned by Vukile), Sable Square Shopping Centre (owned by Spear), and Cavendish Square (owned by Old Mutual).
In his founding affidavit, SAPOA chief executive Nilesh 'Neil' Gopal said that the board resolved to take legal action to have the budget declared unconstitutional and invalid.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'They contravene the applicable constitutional and national legislative framework applicable to the imposition of rates and the levying of tariffs for municipal services,' he said in papers.
Gopal added that while they acknowledge the city's rebates that they offer, it mostly is to aid pensioners and isn't sufficient to offset the impact the tariffs will have on them.
'These reductions and rebates do not detract from the fact that the three items are unlawful and should not have been introduced in the first place: A reduction or a rebate cannot save a charge which was unlawfully imposed,' he said.
Gopal maintained that the continued rise in municipal costs had a significant detrimental effect on the costs of occupancy faced by tenants in commercial/retail properties.
'My point is that the systems of exemptions, reductions, and rebates established by the City under the Cleaning Tariff (as well as the Fixed Water Charge and the Fixed Sanitation Charge) are different from the Rates Act. It relies, however, on the General Valuation Roll ("GV Roll') established under the Rates Act. It is an impermissible parallel system of rates.
'For all these reasons, the Cleaning Tariff, while purporting to be a service, is a rate, but an unlawful one, because it does not comply, or even follow the scheme let alone the letter of the Rates Act,' he added.
The relief SAPOA is seeking is to have the budget declared invalid.
However, the order of invalidity should be suspended for two months to allow the city to deal with the revenue shortfall that will result from the invalidity of the three items.
Hill-Lewis said the city cannot agree that wealthy property owners should be charged the same as lower-income or middle-class households.
'This would be regressive, would place a disproportionate burden on ordinary families, and would be patently unfair.
'The city's budget protects homes under R2,5m and extends rates relief to many more middle-class homes, all while preserving the city's critical infrastructure and service investments,' said Hill-Lewis.
If SAPOA were to succeed in their argument, the effect would be 'to have ordinary families effectively subsidising the wealthiest property owners', said Hill-Lewis.
'Fixed charges linked to property value are a lawful, fairer, and equitable way for Capetonians to contribute within their means to our city's infrastructure programme and fixed service costs. Cross-subsidising – where the better off among us help to fund services for the less fortunate – is the only sustainable way to ensure a working city of hope for all,' said Hill-Lewis.
The Cape Town Collective Ratepayers' Association (CTCRA), an association with 56 ratepayer associations and civic organisations from across Cape Town, has thrown its weight behind SAPOA's decision, saying: 'This case is not just of importance to the ratepayers of Cape Town. If left unchallenged, there is a realistic possibility that other municipalities in South Africa will adopt CoCT's methods. It is critical that the rule of law, fairness in service delivery, and constitutional accountability are upheld – not just for our city, but for the nation.'
Cape Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 minutes ago
- IOL News
New 'fixed' utility fees here to stay, says City
Some residents have reported deductions of up to R60 on electricity purchases of just R100. Image: File Picture: Danie van der Lith/African News Agency THE City has doubled down on its defence of the controversial fixed utility fees that residents say put further strain on already stretched budgets, with some reporting deductions of up to R60 on electricity purchases of just R100. City customers now pay a fixed monthly charge of R59.90 (excluding VAT), known as the "Services and Wires Charge." This amount, since July 1, is applied as a daily rate of R1.97. '(For domestic tariff customers) With each electricity purchase, customers pay for the number of days since the last purchase. Example: a customer buying electricity every 15 days will pay 15 x R1,97 = R29,55 in fixed charges (R59,90 for 30 days). Depending on the vendor, the fixed charge could be displayed as 'utility charge' or 'Service and wires charge' or fixed charge,' said City spokesperson, Luthando Tyhalibongo. Home use tariff customers are being billed a monthly fixed charge of R339,89 (VAT excl.). Public frustration over fixed utility fees began long before they took effect. During the 2025/26 Budget process, the public raised widespread objections warning that the charges would place an added burden on already struggling households. The South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA) has also taken the DA-led City to court, challenging the lawfulness of the fixed charges and the City's decision to link certain fixed utility charges to property values. The Cape Town Collective Ratepayers' Association (CTCRA) representing 56 ratepayer associations and civic organisations from across Cape Town is also supporting the application as Amicus Curiae. CTCRA interim chair, Bas Zuidberg said: 'Home owners, especially the Home user category, have seen quite a steep increase from R245 to R340 per month for this fixed charge. 'The CTCRA has received more complaints about the fixed water charge, which is no longer connected to the size of the CoCT connection but is now linked to property values. We have also received many complaints about the new sewage fixed charge and the city-wide cleaning charge, which are also linked to property values.' He said it was clear from the start that these charges were 'highly contentious'. 'More than 10 000 people signed a petition that CTCRA sent out to voice their objections. While CoCT did make a few changes these were not nearly enough to address the concerns. CTCRA is not against the imposition of fixed charges, but we believe linking them to property values is unlawful. Secondly we disagree with the city-wide cleaning charge, which we believe should be funded from the property rates. Thirdly the fixed charges should not be used as an additional revenue stream by CoCT, but they should (in conjunction with the variable charges) cover the actual maintenance cost for the infrastructure. CoCT has proven in the past (through the 'unregulated' portion of electricity consumption charges) not to adhere to this basic principle.' Civic organisation STOP COCT has also received complaints from residents after noticing the added fixed charges on their municipal bills from July 1, most being outraged and saying that they simply could not afford them. 'The impact on households of the two new fixed charges (sanitation and cleaning) and the increase of 38% in the electricity fixed charge is very negative. In most households these fixed charges now total from around R500 upwards. 'According to the arguments in the Sapoa court case against the City of Cape Town, some of these fixed charges are outside the framework of the law. I fully agree with this argument and believe that the way the City implemented these fixed charges as new revenue streams only benefits the City. Many people are currently joining STOP COCT giving the reason that they have had enough of the tariff increases and the fixed charges,' STOP COCT founder, Sandra Dickson said. However, the City maintained that the charges were a necessity. 'Tariffs include both a fixed charge and consumption charges. This means residents can save by consuming less, while still ensuring that all ratepayers contribute to Cape Town's infrastructure and fixed service costs. Fixed charges are common throughout South African municipalities and the world, and are a lawful means of ensuring sustainable infrastructure and service delivery. Following two rounds of meaningful public participation, the final revised budget not only protects households under R2,5 million as it was designed to do, but also expands relief to more homes including above this threshold as well,' Tyhalibongo said. 'Previously, all City-supplied customers made a contribution to city-wide cleaning services via the cost of electricity. Cleaning has now been removed from the electricity price. Customers therefore now pay less for electricity, and City-Wide Cleaning is now shown separately on the monthly bill under 'sundries'. It is not new City income but to cover existing costs beyond the refuse collection (under the refuse tariff for wheelie bins and dry recycling)." Cape Times
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Outa urges probe into R56 million Polokwane tender scandal
Polokwane municipality has rejected corruption allegations as politically motivated, claiming the tender processes were lawful. The non-profit civil rights group, Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa), has called on relevant authorities to investigate allegations of more than R50 million worth of corruption involving the Polokwane mayor and municipal manager. Outa CEO Wayne Duvenage was reacting to allegations that mayor John Mpe and municipal manager Thuso Nemugumoni awarded a R56.3 million tender to a company linked to a Zimbabwean national believed to be close to them. Whistle-blower report prompts Outa's call for action The allegation surfaced recently after the matter was reported by local media and shared on social media. 'These allegations should be investigated, more so if the anonymous whistle-blower provides sufficient evidence/facts about the allegations,' Duvenage said. 'The extent of corruption and patronage in municipalities is outrageous. All oversight entities and the criminal justice system must act with urgency to assess the facts, suspend the individuals concerned and ensure accountability and if necessary, criminal charges are applied soonest.' Opposition reveals scale of irregular contracts DA councillor Jacques Joubert said the allegations contained in the documents 'show that there were irregularities with about 28 foreign-owned companies awarded tenders amounting to more than R740 million. 'The spreadsheets outline bid numbers and contract values mostly awarded between 2022 and 2023,' said Joubert. ALSO READ: DA wants Joburg tenders linked to Kenny Kunene investigated 'According to the documents, the tenders were given to people with proximity to the high-level officials. Where there is smoke, there is often fire. Mayor urged to support independent investigation 'The outcome of the investigations that we want on the matter should be made public to ensure full transparency and accountability. If the mayor and city manager indeed feel they have nothing to hide, they should welcome any independent investigation into the matter. 'I understand the mayor has ambitions to become premier, so he would need to tackle this cloud over his name.' Polokwane municipality dismisses allegations Municipal spokesperson Thipa Selala denied the allegations and said it was a smear campaign aimed at discrediting the two officials. Selala defended the mayor and municipal manager. 'We would like to address the recent defamatory claims circulating on digital platforms. It is both necessary and urgent to clarify the facts and expose the political motives behind a series of orchestrated attacks aimed at undermining the integrity of the municipality and its leadership. Officials blame political motives and selective outrage 'The people of Polokwane deserve the truth, not sensationalised fiction designed to destabilise the municipality that is focused on service delivery, clean governance and inclusive development,' Selala said. 'We have noted with concern, contempt and disappointment the continued circulation of unfounded, malicious and misleading allegations on anonymous online platforms. ALSO READ: Man sentenced for defrauding Amtola Water Board in tender scam 'These claims attempt to falsely implicate the mayor and manager and we reject these allegations as baseless, defamatory and politically motivated.' Selala said the matter was an orchestrated smear campaign and politically motivated. 'These attacks often resurface around politically significant periods and are part of a broader agenda by individuals and factions that have lost democratic influence.' He added that the municipality did business with more than 100 companies and service providers across diverse categories of work. It was concerning and suspicious that only a select few were being singled out. 'Why is Polokwane municipality being singled out?' 'It is also important to note that many of the companies listed in recent allegations have been awarded contracts through lawful, competitive bidding processes, before the appointments of both the mayor and municipal manager.' He said that some of the accused companies and others had ongoing relationships with the municipality as far back as 2017, 2018 and 2020 – well before the current leadership team. 'Why is Polokwane municipality being singled out? The answer lies not in procurement irregularities – of which there are none – but in an intensifying campaign of targeted misinformation.' NOW READ: Gauteng health maintains court 'misinterpreted law in waste tender matter
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
History will not tolerate Israel regime's deception
Iran rejects Israeli claims and denounces the regime's ongoing assault on Gaza as genocide backed by Western complicity. In response to the remarks made by one of the representatives of the Zionist regime in The Citizen newspaper dated 14 July, 2025, the embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Pretoria deems it necessary to share the following points with the vigilant people of South Africa and public opinion. First and foremost, this statement is a response to the comments made by a representative of a terrorist and child-killing regime; a regime that, in just the past 20 months, has systematically massacred innocent people, including thousands of Palestinian women and children. The ongoing daily genocide in the Gaza Strip committed by this regime is a stain on humanity and a clear sign of state fascism in the modern era. The use of starvation as a weapon against the people of Gaza is another inhumane tactic employed by this apartheid entity, clearly in violation of international humanitarian law. A regime that itself admits to possessing illegal nuclear arsenals, is not a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty and escapes international oversight with the backing of certain Western powers, has not the slightest legitimacy to comment on other countries. ALSO READ: Is GNU to blame for Powell's resignation as DA's international relations spokesperson? The remarks of this Zionist official are a desperate attempt to divert public attention from the widespread crimes and ongoing genocide against the people of Palestine. This effort is not only baseless but also morally bankrupt and unacceptable. In this context, it is worth recalling that the direct aggression by the Zionist terrorist regime against the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran on 13 June, 2025 – carried out with the support and coordination of the US – led to the martyrdom of more than 1 100 Iranian civilians, including women, children, university professors, doctors and members of the media and emergency services. Over 6 000 others were injured, many of whom were women and children. These illegal strikes also targeted Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities, which are fully under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency and have always remained transparent and compliant with international obligations. Iran has never sought nuclear weapons and continues to cooperate with global mechanisms. ALSO READ: Hamas delegation travels to Turkey as Gaza ceasefire talks falter What has been done by the Zionist regime and the US against Iran constitutes a blatant act of aggression. In accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter, Iran exercised its legitimate right to self-defence and responded to the aggression with calculated precision. Iran's determined response not only disrupted the Israel's military calculus but reaffirmed its strategic resilience and commitment to international law. The record of the Zionist regime speaks for itself. Over the past eight decades, Israel has carried out more than 3 000 terrorist operations inside and outside of the occupied territories. ALSO READ: Trump contradicts Netanyahu, Palestinians in Gaza facing 'real starvation' [VIDEO] As a result of its crimes, more than seven million Palestinians have been displaced and made refugees, hundreds of thousands have been killed and over one million Palestinians have been imprisoned. In just the past 21 months, nearly 200 000 individuals – mostly women and children – have been killed or wounded in Gaza. Moreover, over 40 000 residential areas and infrastructure sites have been destroyed or severely damaged. Iran has always defended the rights of all nations to self-determination and has called for a fair and democratic resolution to the Palestinian crisis through a referendum involving all original inhabitants of the land, regardless of religion or ethnicity. In this regard, Iran is the voice of the oppressed – not seeking imposition, but justice. ALSO READ: Food arrives in Gaza after Israel pauses some fighting Not seeking domination, but equity. The Israel regime attempts to reverse the roles of oppressor and oppressed through false victimhood, but its hideous face is already known to the world and history will not tolerate such deception.
