logo
'Send them home': To promote tougher policies, report claims Spokane's homeless aren't from here

'Send them home': To promote tougher policies, report claims Spokane's homeless aren't from here

Yahoo8 hours ago
Jul. 5—Half of the homeless people in Spokane aren't from here and should be given bus tickets home, more strictly enforced by police and cut off from long-term services, according to a recent report released by the Spokane Business Association, a prominent political advocacy group funded by businessman Larry Stone.
A week after the report's release, the association proposed an amendment to the city's charter, which if approved by voters would reshape the city's homelessness laws and force Spokane to shift funding away from affordable housing, firefighting equipment and other priorities to fund emergency shelters, more visible police patrols and other policies recommended in the report.
Critics in City Hall have dismissed the report as unscientific, unhelpful and politically motivated ahead of the November elections, when several seats currently or recently occupied by progressives are being challenged by candidates more in line with the Spokane Business Association's policy goals.
But the report's author and the organization sponsoring the survey argue the data is concrete proof that Spokane's homelessness policies aren't only not helping people get off the streets, they're attracting people from elsewhere who are drawn to the city by lax law enforcement.
Just over 50% of the roughly 230 homeless people surveyed for the association said they moved to the city after becoming homeless.
This contradicts the federally mandated "point-in-time" counts, annual standardized surveys that try to reach every homeless person living on the streets or in a shelter. The point-in-time counts have their own flaws, as the authors of Spokane County's 2024 report readily acknowledged. But of the 2,021 people surveyed in last year's point-in-time count, roughly 80% said they lived in Spokane County before becoming homeless.
Robert Marbut, President Donald Trump's "homeless czar" from 2019 to 2021 and the consultant contracted to conduct the survey, argues his data is more accurate because he also asked where people were born, went to high school and whether they have family in Spokane.
It is not clear why these additional questions would sway the data by 30 points, but Marbut's recommendations for dealing with this influx are clearer, and consistent with the "Velvet Hammer" approach he has pitched cities across the country for at least a decade: Spokane has to get tougher with the homeless, pressuring them into treatment or departure.
Gavin Cooley, an executive of the Spokane Business Association, argued Marbut's expertise lent the report more authority than it lost from a lack of cited sources, and dismissed as "deeply political" a recent article from Range Media that turned to an expert in homeless research to pick apart the report's methodology and conclusions.
Cooley believes the media and politicians are overly focused on attacking the data and not paying enough attention to the conclusions Marbut reaches with that data.
"You can certainly note the deficiencies as you see them ... but I think it'd be a pity to miss the higher level order of what's being recommended," Cooley said.
Every effort should be made to send people back where they came from, particularly if they've been in Spokane for less than 90 days, according to the report. Those who stay should be cut off from long-term services, which should be reserved only for those with longstanding ties to Spokane. For those who are from Spokane, the report recommends mandatory treatment services in order to receive housing, which city officials claim would violate state and federal law.
Marbut has spoken out for at least a decade against policies he believes are "enabling" the homeless with "goodies," including Housing First policies that have been the national standard since 2013, in which homeless people are given stable housing upfront to enable them to then address addiction, mental health and social reintegration.
Attempts to relocate the homeless en masse are even older. The phrase "Greyhound therapy" has been used to describe the practice since the 1970s and has been criticized by researchers for just as long for redistributing the social costs of homelessness rather than improving them. Many of America's largest cities have, at one point or another, attempted similar policies; between 2011 and 2017, the Guardian tracked over 20,000 homeless people given bus tickets out of and sometimes between 16 U.S. cities.
Proponents, including the Spokane Business Association, argue that such programs reconnect people to families and friends and can lead to a long-term improvement in their situation.
Spokane's homeless service providers have engaged in the practice for years, however.
If a homeless person requests a bus ticket, and a friend or family member declares they can take them in, they will be provided a ticket. Julie Garcia, who runs the homeless services organization Jewels Helping Hands, which manages several of the city's homeless shelters, estimated her organization hands out around 250 tickets a year.
There appears to be little academic research into whether these programs lead to long-term reductions of homelessness or just move it elsewhere. The Guardian reported that, of the thousands being bused from San Francisco through the Homeward Bound program between 2010 and 2015, the city had records of following up with only three people after they reached their destinations.
But the Spokane Business Association report goes further to suggest that the city should cut off people who decline these tickets from long-term homeless services and even emergency shelters after 21 days.
While much of the study copies nearly verbatim a similar report on King County that Marbut was commissioned to write for the Discovery Institute, Marbut claims that Spokane is unusual in one regard: Homeless people aren't coming to Spokane for its quality services, but for its lax enforcement.
"What we got on the street was generally, they treat me nice here, they don't hassle me," Marbut said.
"It wasn't that they came here because of the services — many communities I go to, it's, 'Oh, they have great services' — but here it was, 'They sort of let me be.' "
This picture notably doesn't match what many homeless people on Spokane's streets have told The Spokesman-Review in recent years, who described being pushed from place to place throughout the day by law enforcement, security guards and business owners.
"We literally don't get to sit down like this," said Amber, a 32-year-old homeless woman interviewed under an overpass in August. "We are moving constantly. ... So many people have cracked feet and heels."
Cooley dismissed this type of enforcement as an "occasional blow of the horn," and wants to see tougher laws and stricter enforcement — not because he wants them to go to jail, which he says would be ineffective and expensive — but to force people to change their lives.
Cooley acknowledged that Washington's involuntary treatment laws are not extensive enough to force a homeless person into drug or mental health treatment.
Instead, he argued, the city should use its tougher homelessness laws to offer them a choice: either go to jail, or enter "voluntary" treatment.
Or they could leave, Cooley noted.
"If you find that a great number of people have no connection to Spokane at all, and you suddenly begin to say you cannot use fentanyl in this community unfettered ... how many of those folks will stick around?" Cooley asked.
In an interview, Mayor Lisa Brown dismissed the report as misinformed, arguing many of the report's claims about the city's policies were untrue and some of its recommendations were already standard practice.
"I believe this is really about the political campaigns in November," Brown said, noting Stone's longstanding funding of candidates opposing progressive policies and production of high-dollar videos to encourage tougher homelessness policies.
"I also believe that, with the resources they are apparently able to mobilize, it would be great if, as a show of good faith, they put them into an actual solution, rather than a propaganda campaign against the city and the majority on the city council," Brown added.
But Cooley believes the evidence was clear, regardless of the survey's findings, that what the city is doing is failing to have a significant impact on the city's visible homeless population or its soaring overdose deaths.
"I know Seattle really damn well, and I can't believe the rapid turnaround as it relates to enforcement," Cooley said. "And what I don't know is where those people are ... but I know they've made a visible turn in on-street homelessness."
The report has started to leak into the broader public conversation on Spokane's homelessness policies. Wendy Fishburne, vice president of the East Spokane Business Association, appeared to quote parts of it verbatim Monday before the Spokane City Council voted to reform its homelessness laws.
"Research shows that people do better recovering from addiction when they're surrounded by their families of origin," Fishburne said. "Find out where people actually come from and compassionately send them home ... so that our resources could be used for our folks."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How the Sean Combs Verdict May Have ‘Chilling Effect' on Cases for Abuse Victims
How the Sean Combs Verdict May Have ‘Chilling Effect' on Cases for Abuse Victims

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How the Sean Combs Verdict May Have ‘Chilling Effect' on Cases for Abuse Victims

Follow all of our Sean Combs trial coverage When a jury of eight men and four women cleared Sean Combs of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges on Wednesday – the most severe charges leveled against him by federal prosecutors – reaction was decidedly mixed. More from Rolling Stone Sean Combs Alternate Juror Speaks Out Beating RICO Charges Doesn't Make Diddy a Hero Charlize Theron on Why She Won't Reveal Name of Director She Alleges Sexually Harassed Her Combs' supporters cheered the news as a total vindication. While he was convicted of two lesser counts of transportation to engage in prostitution and conceded during the trial that was physically violent in his personal relationships, he was acquitted on the top counts and avoided the worst-case scenario of a possible life sentence. The national women's advocacy group UltraViolet called the verdict a 'stain on the criminal justice system,' and 'an indictment of a culture in which not believing women and victims of sexual assault remains endemic.' Legal experts say the verdict was also a big loss for the team of prosecutors who tried the case for the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York. Yes, the prosecutors managed to convict Combs of two counts under the Mann Act – securing some sort of prison sentence for the rich and powerful defendant. But that was the 'low-hanging fruit' in the government's sprawling case, Alyse Adamson, a former assistant U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, tells Rolling Stone. 'This is a huge, huge blow,' Adamson says, referring to prosecutors and the complicated case they put on with 34 witnesses over nearly two months of trial. 'This is a huge win for Combs.' For other prosecutors, this could make them think twice about using RICO in a 'novel' way, she says. 'Obviously, they were using the RICO to try to bring charges against Combs that they otherwise couldn't bring because the statute of limitations had already run,' she explains. 'The problem,' according to Adamson, is that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act enacted in 1970 is understood as something used to go after mob bosses, and 'this Combs 'enterprise' wasn't really a clearly defined and structured organization' that you see in a typical RICO case. 'I think they had evidence that somebody had been doing bad things for a long time, and the prosecutors wanted to bring a righteous prosecution to try to catch him, and I think they just were a little over their skis,' Adamson says. Brad Bailey, another former federal prosecutor who now works as a defense attorney in Boston, says the verdict 'certainly suggests an overreach on the part of the Southern District.' 'They've expended a great deal of resources. Six prosecutors on the case is an inordinately high number to commit to any one case. They also have committed a great deal of law enforcement resources in terms of the investigating agents. There was a big splash with the high-profile searches with guns drawn at his residences … so this is an embarrassment in terms of what could have been an overreach,' Bailey says. 'On the other hand, you never know what type of factor notoriety and fame place on these cases, and that's always the wild card – the unknown X factor.' Bailey noted that the jury signaled more than once to the judge that they were having trouble reaching consensus with the clock ticking. When they were selected, the judge told them he expected they would be finished with the trial by the Fourth of July holiday this week. 'My guess is that this is a jury that was tired and wanted to go home and there was contentiousness in there,' Bailey says, 'and they just decided that this was the proper reflection of the evidence as presented.' 'I'm as pro-prosecution as they come. But you have to respect the jury verdict. The jurors rejected these allegations. This was a failed prosecution,' Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor now working as a victims' rights attorney in Los Angeles, tells Rolling Stone. Rahmani says the outcome of Combs' very high-profile trial will likely have a chilling effect on the willingness of other victims and prosecutors to move forward with other cases. 'There's no question,' he says. 'Imagine going and testifying before 12 strangers and telling them that you were urinated on in your mouth … that you were forced to have sex on your period or while you had UTIs, and the jurors don't believe you? You're talking about the most graphic, explicit, personal details of your sex life, and they think you're a liar. 'I've had maybe over 100 conversations in my office when I'm talking to a victim, and I explained what a civil or criminal trial entails and that you're going to have to testify publicly and you're going to be cross-examined and you have to tell your story and relive your trauma in a very public way,' he adds. 'Eight out of 10 say they can't do it. After this, it's probably going to be nine out of 10.' Adamson agrees. 'It is already extremely difficult to have victims testify. That is a traumatizing experience, no matter the outcome,' she says. 'So this is definitely not going to make it any easier to convince witnesses and victims to come forward, for sure.' Jay Clayton, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, released a statement after the Combs verdict was delivered, saying he wanted to 'recognize the important work' of the SDNY's work seeking to combat human trafficking. He did not mention Combs by name. 'Sex crimes deeply scar victims, and the disturbing reality is that sex crimes are all too present in many aspects of our society. Victims endure gut-wrenching physical and mental abuse, leading to lasting trauma. New Yorkers and all Americans want this scourge stopped and perpetrators brought to justice,' Clayton said. 'Prosecuting sex crimes requires brave victims to come forward and tell their harrowing stories. We and our law enforcement partners recognize the hardships victims endure and have prioritized a victim-centered approach to investigating and prosecuting these cases.' Best of Rolling Stone Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked

7 Kid Items To Stock Up on Before Tariff-Induced Shortages
7 Kid Items To Stock Up on Before Tariff-Induced Shortages

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

7 Kid Items To Stock Up on Before Tariff-Induced Shortages

If you've been following the news in recent months, you've probably heard a lot about higher tariffs being imposed on imported goods — especially those from Mexico, China and Canada. As a parent, you may also be wondering which kids items to stock up on before the stores run out. We're a Family of 5 Living on One Salary: Check Out: While you should only ever buy what you need, some experts believe it might be wise to make some purchases now — just in case those items disappear or skyrocket in price. Many kids toys (approximately 85% of those sold in the U.S., according to the Toy Association) are manufactured in China — one of the countries that'd be hit hardest by rising tariffs. Aaron Razon, personal finance expert at Couponsnake, said toys made in China are most likely to be in short supply due to proposed tariffs. This includes things like action figures, LEGO sets and Barbie dolls. These toys could also become more expensive — if you're even likely to find them on the shelves. Explore More: There could be a scarcity in kids' clothes, too, especially with back-to-school shopping. Razon said that coats, boots and other seasonal accessories could be harder to find. The same could be said for accessories like socks and underwear. But don't stock up out of fear. Only buy the things you already need for your kids. If consumers start to panic buy, retailers could potentially increase their prices accordingly. Some, especially online retailers, might also place limits on how much shoppers can purchase. Along those same lines, consider buying footwear — like athletic shoes or sandals — for your kids. Just don't go overboard with it. 'I think stocking up on these items could backfire on parents if everyone starts buying in bulk in anticipation of a shortage,' said Razon. 'I mean, apart from the fact that this could lead to a surge in demand, and potentially exacerbate the very shortage they are trying to prepare for, there is also the fact that it could lead to wasted resources.' Are you in the market for a new gaming console for your kids? You might only need the one console, but now could be a good time to buy. 'Tariffs affect kids and youth particularly hard since most toys, electronics and clothing are manufactured overseas, including gaming consoles,' said Liam Hunt, Director of Research at That's because many of these items are made in China and Southeast Asia. Gaming consoles aren't the only thing to consider buying. A lot of tech and accessories imported from abroad could become more expensive or see limited stock. Hunt suggested shopping early if you're looking for holiday gifts since prices will likely increase. Supply also tends to drop around these busier times. Tariffs have a trickle-down effect on both prices and availability. Things like bikes, scooters and backyard playground equipment could be in short supply due to tariffs. So, if you're in the market for any of these things, now might be the time to buy. 'It would be wise for parents to stock up on big-ticket items,' said Hunt. 'But avoid hoarding everyday items.' Do you have a little one on the way? Or are you already a proud parent (or grandparent, or aunt or uncle)? If so, you might want to grab essential baby gear like strollers or high chairs now. Razon said the availability of these items could also be impacted by tariffs. More From GOBankingRates These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs This article originally appeared on 7 Kid Items To Stock Up on Before Tariff-Induced Shortages

Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground Wisconsin
Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground Wisconsin

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground Wisconsin

In one of the nation's most closely divided battleground states, there's one big question on both parties' minds: Is Gov. Tony Evers going to run for a third term next year? The answer will have reverberating consequences in Wisconsin, where one of five Democratic-controlled governorships is up for grabs in 2026 in states President Donald Trump won last year. Evers, 73, has said he would announce whether he'd run again after he reached a budget deal with Republicans, who control both chambers of the Legislature. But with an agreement rapidly signed, sealed and delivered last week, some Wisconsin Democrats are growing impatient for his decision. 'I'd like to see him make a decision, hopefully sooner rather than later, because I do think we've got a lot of elections that we need to be winning and focusing on,' Democratic state Sen. Kelda Roys, who ran against Evers in the 2018 Democratic gubernatorial primary, said last month. 'If the governor makes a decision, I hope that's going to be soon.' One dynamic hanging over Evers' decision is the possibility he wouldn't have to deal with a combative Legislature fully controlled by Republicans, as he has throughout his tenure. A landmark 2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court decision from a newly installed liberal majority prompted the state's gerrymandered maps to be redrawn, giving Democratic a much more realistic path to taking control of either the state Assembly or Senate in 2026. 'One question he's weighing is, 'Do I try to stay around for one more term and possibly have one, if not both, lower chambers to work with, versus just trying to haggle with Republicans and push the veto pen every single f-----g time,' said one Democratic operative in the state who requested anonymity to speak candidly about the race. Some Democrats also feel that Evers, with the benefit of incumbency, still represents the party's best shot at winning next year's gubernatorial election. 'There's no question that Evers is the most equipped to win next year,' said Joe Zepecki, a Milwaukee-based Democratic strategist who finished second in last month's race to be the chair of the Wisconsin Democratic Party. 'Why would we not want to have an incumbent Democratic governor who is the most popular politician in the state, beloved by the Democratic base. That makes all the sense in the world in what will be a good political environment for Democrats.' But others have warned that Democrats should not continue to rely on septuagenarian candidates and should clear the way for new voices, particularly following their experience with then-President Joe Biden in 2024. Evers' allies have hit back at that narrative, pointing to recent polling. One Wisconsin Democratic operative familiar with Evers' thinking, who requested anonymity to speak candidly while Evers' decision-making process is ongoing, added, 'That just doesn't match with what we're hearing from Democrats and from the Marquette Poll.' That refers to a Marquette University Law School poll of registered Wisconsin voters released last month showing that Democrats remain widely supportive of Evers running again — even as the general electorate in the purple state remains more split. The survey found that 83% of Democrats said they supported Evers seeking a third term. That poll also found that 42% of all registered voters said they wanted Evers to run again, compared to 55% who said they did not. That support level, the pollsters noted, is still strong by historical standards. Back in 2016, ahead of Republican Gov. Scott Walker's decision to run for a third term, the same poll found that just 36% of registered voters wanted him to run a third time, compared to 61% who did not. Walker ran again in 2018 and lost to Evers. Evers' approval ratings in the poll — 48% of voters said they approved of his job performance, compared to 46% who said they didn't — is in line with the levels he's seen in that survey throughout his two terms in office in the swing state. If Evers ultimately declines to run, there are several Democrats who could seek to replace him, including state Attorney General Josh Kaul, Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez, Secretary of State Sarah Godlewski, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley and Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson. But some Wisconsin Democrats expressed concern that an Evers exit could lead to an expensive and divisive primary. 'It would be a big field if he doesn't run. That could get messy,' said the Democratic operative familiar with Evers' thinking. Representatives for the political operations of Kaul, Rodriguez and Crowley didn't respond to questions. Johnson spokesperson Thad Nation said in an email that 'the Mayor has deep respect for that leadership and certainly hopes the Governor will choose to run again,' but that 'if Governor Evers decides not to seek re-election, Mayor Johnson would be in a strong position to enter the race.' Evers' decision isn't likely to have much bearing on who decides to run for the Republican nomination. Currently, the only declared candidate in the race is Josh Schoemann, the county executive of Washington County, an exurban area northwest of Milwaukee. Also weighing bids are businessman Eric Hovde, who narrowly lost a 2024 U.S. Senate race to Democrat Tammy Baldwin, and Tim Michels, who lost to Evers in 2022. U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany also hasn't ruled out a campaign. Strategists in both parties said that Evers' decision to wait until after a budget deal was reached with state lawmakers could present the governor with an opportunity to leave on a high note, or help build his case for a third term. 'Evers got most of what he wanted. He is now in a position to say, 'I've done what I needed to do. I got funding back to UW [the University of Wisconsin system], I got funding for child care, we've saved the kids in Wisconsin.' We've got a kids budget — I think that gives him an out,' said Brandon Scholz, a Wisconsin Republican strategist. 'He can go out on top.' Evers' allies said delaying his announcement provided him with maximum leverage during budget discussions with Republicans. 'I think it probably did make better his ability to work with Republicans in the Legislature to get to what appears to now be a reasonable budget,' Zepecki said. Responding to questions about whether the governor would be announcing his decision imminently now that the state budget process has wrapped, Evers senior adviser Sam Roecker said only that 'the governor has been clear he won't make a decision on 2026 until the budget process concludes.' But some Democrats said the prospects of a friendlier Legislature, Evers' poll numbers and the ability to avoid a fractured primary all pointed in one direction. 'I think he has decided, and I think he will run,' Zepecki said. 'If I had to bet money today, that's where we are.' This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store