US-based I Squared Capital dumps plans to make separate offer for Hong Kong's HKBN
U.S.-based infrastructure investment firm
I Squared Capital
has withdrawn plans to make a
takeover offer
for Hong Kong's
HKBN
, the
broadband operator
said on Monday, as a competing bid backed by a state-owned entity takes center stage.
The announcement comes over a month after Reuters reported that
China Mobile
was nearing a deal to take over HKBN with I Squared having dropped out.
I Squared already owns Hong Kong-based broadband provider
HGC Global Communications
, in which China Investment Corp. holds a minority stake.
However, the Miami-based firm has so far been unable to secure approval from the Chinese sovereign wealth fund to proceed with a formal bid for HKBN, according to the Reuters report.
Rival suitor China Mobile built a 15.5% stake in HKBN from buyout company TPG and has offered HK$7.8 billion ($993.64 million) for the broadband firm.
I Squared was preparing to trump China Mobile's offer of HK$5.23 per HKBN share, which was made in December, but was not keen to pay more than HK$6 apiece, Reuters reported in January.
HKBN CEO William Yeung said in May it was a "rumour" that China Investment Corp had vetoed I Squared's plan to present a formal offer for HKBN.
The takeover offer from China Mobile was not good enough and HKBN was open to engage with more bidders to get the best value for its shareholders, Yeung had said.
"Despite the HKBN CEO's comments that the China Mobile offer is not good enough, China Mobile has no pressing need to bump if a competing offer fails to materialise," Smartkarma's Arun George said in a note before HKBN's announcement on Monday.
I Squared Capital did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment over why it decided to walk away from making an offer.
China Mobile also did not respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
EU opens new probe into TikTok data transfer to China
An Irish regulator has initiated an investigation into TikTok regarding the transfer of European users' personal data to servers located in China. This action follows a previous fine of 530 million euros imposed on TikTok for similar data transfer issues. The regulator expressed deep concern over TikTok's submission of inaccurate information during the initial investigation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads An Irish regulator helping police European Union data privacy said Thursday it had launched an investigation into TikTok over the transfer of European users' personal data to servers in was fined 530 million euros ($620 million) in May by the Data Protection Commission over European data transfers to China, though the Chinese social media giant had insisted this data was only accessed DPC on Thursday said it had been informed by TikTok in April that "limited EEA user data had in fact been stored on servers in China," contrary to evidence presented by the regulator said it had expressed "deep concern" in its previous investigation that "TikTok had submitted inaccurate information".TikTok is a division of Chinese tech giant since it has its European headquarters in Ireland, the Irish authority is the lead regulator in Europe for the social platform — as well as others such as Google, Meta and DPC is tasked with ensuring companies comply with the EU's strict General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), launched in 2018 to protect European consumers from personal data has imposed a number of big fines against tech companies as the EU seeks to rein in big tech firms over privacy, competition, disinformation and taxation.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
Falling producer prices in China, and slowing inflation in SE Asia has a story to tell: Trump is transnational
Trade war between US and China is far from over. AP The latest data from China and Southeast Asia show that prices are rising more slowly, a trend that is growing and going beyond just local economic conditions. Behind the falling prices from producers and weaker consumer inflation, there is a bigger story—one that is increasingly shaped by US President Donald Trump's trade policies. Usually, inflation is driven by local issues and of course, guided by regional supply factors, but what's happening in Asia now seems to be caused by global forces, especially political ones. Trump's protectionist economic policies, like new tariffs, are having an effect far beyond the United States. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD China's factory gate prices plunge China's producer price index (PPI) dropped a startling 3.6 per cent year-on-year in June, marking the sharpest contraction in nearly two years. This surpassed economists' expectations and extended a streak of factory-gate deflation to 33 consecutive months. While weak consumer demand and oversupply have played a role, there is a growing recognition that this is not merely a domestic issue. Consumer prices in China (measured by the Consumer Price Index, or CPI) went up slightly by 0.1 per cent in June compared to the same time last year. This small rise marks a technical end to deflation. However, core inflation, which leaves out food and energy prices, is still low at 0.7 per cent. Experts have warned that deflation may not yet be over. The slow recovery in China's property market and the early stages of an 'anti-involution' campaign, which is meant to stop harmful price-cutting between companies, point to this analysis. These price wars, especially in sectors like autos, batteries and solar panels, reflect manufacturers' attempts to offload excess capacity in the face of weakening domestic and foreign demand. With US tariffs squeezing access to North American markets, Chinese firms have increasingly turned to Southeast Asia as an outlet, flooding regional markets with cheap goods. This shift reflects the transnational dimension of the price collapse. Southeast Asia: Collateral damage in the US-China trade crossfire Thailand, often seen as an inflation bellwether in Asean, saw its CPI drop 0.25 per cent in June, its third consecutive month of decline, a report in Nikkei Asia said. Thai officials attribute this to a bountiful agricultural harvest and lower food and energy costs. However, economists warn that Thailand is particularly vulnerable to deflation, given its political uncertainty and stalled tourism recovery, both of which drag on consumer demand. The region's fragility is being compounded by surging imports of cheap Chinese goods. In her view, Thailand, with its heavy reliance on Chinese tourism and weak domestic spending, is highly exposed to imported deflation. This vulnerability is mirrored across the region. Singapore's headline inflation dropped to 0.8 per cent in June, the lowest since the pandemic, while Malaysia's eased to a four-year low of 1.2 per cent in May. Importantly, these developments are not simply cyclical. China, once a net importer from Asean, has become a major net exporter to the Asean-5, especially in consumer electronics and manufactured goods. This shift is largely a byproduct of US-China trade frictions. Trump's tariffs: Economic contagion in policy form The root of these distortions, increasingly, can be traced back to Washington. Trump's return to aggressive tariff measures, particularly on Chinese and Japanese goods, has upended trade flows. In an effort to bypass US tariffs, Chinese producers have rerouted goods to friendlier Southeast Asian markets, effectively exporting deflation. In this way, Trump's economic interventions, though framed as domestic protectionism, have created ripple effects that stretch across Asia. This isn't the usual effect of US Federal Reserve policies or changes in capital flows. Instead, it's a price disruption caused by government policies in the US spreading through trade to affect both industrial and consumer sectors in Asia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Japan: A mirror and a warning Even Japan, which has stronger institutions and is trying to move away from more than ten years of very loose monetary policy, is also being affected. Core consumer inflation in Japan is still high at 3.7per cent, but wholesale inflation has dropped for the third month in a row in June, which could mean prices may start falling soon. The Bank of Japan has already raised interest rates earlier this year, but now it faces a tough choice whether to raise rates again, even as trade weakens or change course to support falling demand from other countries. Beyond trade: A struggle for market share Underlying this entire narrative is a transnational price war, one in which China and Southeast Asian nations are locked in a contest for consumer markets that are shrinking due to political walls. Chinese firms, pressured by overcapacity and dulled by domestic demand fatigue, are selling into Southeast Asia at cut-rate prices, pushing regional producers to either lower their prices or surrender market share. Beijing, recognising the damage, has pledged to regulate excessive price-cutting. Yet, without strong stimulus, China may remain trapped in a deflationary spiral and exports, particularly to Asean will remain Beijing's best short-term outlet. Inflation no longer stays local Traditionally, inflation and deflation were seen as primarily domestic phenomena, shaped by local monetary policy, supply constraints or fiscal measures. But what Asia is experiencing now is different. The Trump administration's trade war has turned inflation into a transnational variable, transmitted through trade flows, consumer expectations and price competition. In this situation, policy decisions in Washington, once considered remote, have direct effects on food prices in Thailand, electronics prices in Malaysia and export strategy in Guangdong. Trump, in his bid to revive US industry, has inadvertently reshaped the inflation dynamics of half the globe. Inflation has gone global in a new way. It is no longer driven purely by monetary forces, but by political choices, chief among them the Trump administration's protectionist agenda. The rise of a transnational Trump effect is not just visible in trade data or diplomatic tension, it is embedded in the price tags of goods across Asia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
China automakers' price war, overcapacity hurt finances
China's auto sector is reeling from overcapacity and an extended price war, raising alarm among regulators and industry executives who warn the turmoil is undermining the sector's long-term viability. China's top leaders have pledged to step up regulation of aggressive price-cutting and support the orderly phasing out of outdated production capacity, state media reported earlier this month. LSEG data for 33 listed automakers headquartered in China show a broad deterioration in key financial metrics over the past six years, highlighting the impact of a brutal price war that began in 2023. Data showed that the average time carmakers took to pay their suppliers and other short-term creditors widened to 108 days in 2024 from 99 days in 2019. On June 1, new regulation kicked in, requiring large companies to settle payments within 60 days of receiving goods, engineering services or materials. Joerg Wuttke, Washington-based partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, said that European and German suppliers generally paid suppliers within 40 to 50 days. "That (new regulation) is going to enforce a more level playing field and basically stop these automakers from turning their suppliers into bankers," he said. Among major brands, top electric vehicle seller BYD took an average of 127 days to pay suppliers and other short-term creditors in 2024, up from 81 days in 2019, the LSEG data showed. When asked about the data, BYD said its average payment period to suppliers that covered both accounts payable and notes payable dropped to 127 days by 2024 from 139 days in 2019. Geely Automobile's payment period also rose to 193 days in 2024 from 139 days in 2019, according to LSEG data. Geely declined to comment. Bucking the trend, Great Wall Motor Co shortened its payment cycle to 94 days in 2024 from 115 days in 2019. The company did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. The sector's combined inventory levels more than doubled to 370 billion yuan ($51.55 billion) in 2024 from 2019, even as dealers complained of many firms dumping cars on them to meet high sales targets. Total debt among carmakers surged 56% to 959 billion yuan last year from 2019's level. The median debt-to-equity ratio climbed by 21 percentage points to 51.3%. The sector's median net profit margin fell to just 0.83% in 2024 from 2.7% in 2019. BYD, however, boosted its profit margin to 5.4% from 1.7% in 2019. The company, which makes cars and mobile phone components, attributed the improvement to a change in its business mix as the contribution of automotive-related revenue as a share of total revenue grew from 49.5% to 79.4% over the period. Nio Inc and Xpeng Inc, two of China's best-known EV brands, had among the longest payment periods among the 33 firms. The two companies stretched their payment periods to suppliers and other short-term creditors to 223 days and 237 days, respectively. Both companies continued to remain in the red, although both improved their negative margins sharply over the period. Nio said it would commit to paying suppliers within 60 days. Xpeng said its cash liquidity continued to improve and referred to comments its CEO He Xiaopeng made last Thursday at a media event that the company would also, like other firms, endeavour to meet a commitment to pay suppliers within 60 days as soon as possible.>
