logo
The real cost of driving foreign students away

The real cost of driving foreign students away

Yahoo28-05-2025
In 1965, then-French finance minister Valéry Giscard d'Estaing came up with the 'mot juste' for describing the way that the supremacy of the dollar provided the foundation for the financial supremacy of the US. The fact the dollar was so dominant in international transactions gave the US, d'Estaing said, an 'exorbitant privilege.' Because every country needed dollars to settle trade and backstop their own currencies, foreign countries had to buy up US debt, which in turn meant that the US paid less to borrow money and was able to run up trade and budget deficits without suffering the usual pain. The exorbitant privilege of the dollar was that the US would be able to live beyond its means.
It's always been an open question as to how long that privilege would last, but President Donald Trump's harsh tariff policies, paired with a budget bill that right now would add trillions to the budget deficit, might just be enough to finally dislodge the dollar. Annual federal deficits are already running at 6 percent of GDP, while interest rates on 10-year US Treasuries have more than doubled to around 4.5 percent over the past few years, increasing the cost of interest payments on the debt. As of the last quarter of 2024, 58 percent of global reserves were in dollars, down from 71 percent in the first quarter of 1999. The dollar may remain king, if only because there seems to be no real alternative, but thanks to the US' own actions, the exorbitance of its privilege is already eroding — and with it, America's ability to compensate for its fiscal fecklessness.
But the dollar isn't the only privilege the US enjoys. Since the postwar era, America's best universities have led the world. Harvard, Princeton, MIT, CalTech — these elite universities are the foundation of the American scientific supremacy that has in turn fueled decades of economic growth. But also, by virtue of their unparalleled ability to attract the best minds from around the world, these schools have given the US the educational privilege of being the magnet of global academic excellence. In the same way that the dollar's dominance has allowed the US to live beyond its means, the dominance of elite universities has compensated for the fact that the US has, at best, a mediocre K-12 educational system.
And now that privilege is under attack by the Trump administration. Cutting off federal funding for universities like Columbia and Princeton and eviscerating agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation were bad enough — but the administration's recent move to bar international students from Harvard would be a death blow, especially if it spread to other top schools.
The ability to attract the best of the best, especially in the sciences, is what makes Harvard Harvard, which in turn has helped make the United States the United States. Just as losing the privilege of the dollar would force the US to finally pay for years of fiscal mismanagement, losing the privilege of these top universities would force the country to pay for decades of educational failure.
As Vox contributor Kevin Carey wrote this week, foreign students are a major source of financial support for US colleges and universities, many of which would struggle to survive should those students disappear. But the financial picture actually understates just how much US science depends on foreign talent and, in turn, depends on top universities like Harvard to bring in top students and professors.
An astounding 70 percent of grad students in the US in electrical engineering and 63 percent in computer science — probably the two disciplines most important to winning the future — are foreign-born. Nineteen percent of the overall STEM workforce in the US is foreign-born; focus just on the PhD-level workforce, and that number rises to 43 percent. Since 1901, just about half of all physics, chemistry, and medicine Nobel Prizes have gone to Americans, and about a third of those winners were foreign-born, a figure that has risen in recent decades. It's really not too much to suggest that if all foreign scientists and science students were deported tomorrow, US science would grind to a halt.
Could American-born students step into that gap? Absolutely not. That's because as elite as America's top universities are, the country's K-12 education system has been anything but.
Every three years, the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is given to a representative sample of 15-year-old students in over 80 countries. It's the best existing test for determining how a country's students compare in mathematics, reading, and science to their international peers.
In the most recent PISA tests, taken in 2022, US students scored below the average for OECD or developed countries in math; on reading and science, they were just slightly above average. And while a lot of attention has been rightly paid to learning loss since the pandemic — one report from fall 2024 estimated that the average US student is less than halfway to a full academic recovery — American students have lagged behind their international peers since long before then. Other wealthy nations, from East Asian countries to some small European ones, regularly outpace American peers in math by the equivalent of one full academic year.
To be clear, this picture isn't totally catastrophic. It's fine — American students perform around the middle compared to their international peers. But just fine won't make you the world's undisputed scientific leader. And fine is a long way from what the US once was.
America was a pioneer in universal education, and it did the same in college education through the postwar GI Bill, which opened up college education to the masses. By 1950, 34 percent of US adults aged 25 or older had completed high school or more, compared to 14 percent in the UK and 11 percent in France. When NASA engineers were putting people on the moon in the 1960s, the US had perhaps the world's most educated workforce to draw from.
Since then, much of the rest of the world has long since caught up with the US on educational attainment, and a number of countries have surpassed it. But thanks in large part to the privilege that is elite universities like Harvard or the University of California, and their ability to recruit the best, no country has caught up to the US in sheer scientific brainpower. Take away our foreign talent, however, and US science would look more like its K-12 performance — merely fine.
It seems increasingly apparent that the Trump administration wants to make an example of Harvard, proving its own dominance by breaking a 388-year-old institution with strong ties to American power and influence. On Tuesday, the New York Times reported that the administration planned to cancel all remaining federal contracts with Harvard, while Trump himself mused on redirecting Harvard's $3 billion in grants to trade schools.
Grants and contracts are vital, but they can be restored, just as faith in the US dollar might be restored by a saner trade policy and a tighter budget. But if the Trump administration chooses to make the US fundamentally hostile to foreign students and scientific talent, there may be no coming back. Politico reported this week that the administration is weighing requiring all foreign students applying to study in the US to undergo social media vetting. With universities around the world now competing to make themselves alternatives to the US, what star student from Japan or South Korea or Finland would choose to put their future in the hands of the Trump administration, when they could go anywhere else they wanted?
The US once achieved scientific leadership because it educated its own citizens better and longer than any other country. Those days are long past, but the US managed to keep its pole position, and all that came with it, because it supported and funded what were far and away the best universities in the world. That was our privilege, as much as the dollar was. And now we seem prepared to destroy both.
Should that come to pass, we'll see just how little is left.
A version of this story originally appeared in the Future Perfect newsletter. Sign up here!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pelosi hammers Johnson for blocking summer votes on Epstein files
Pelosi hammers Johnson for blocking summer votes on Epstein files

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Pelosi hammers Johnson for blocking summer votes on Epstein files

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the Speaker Emerita, castigated Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Tuesday for adjourning the House early to avoid holding a vote calling for the release of files on the disgraced financier and sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. 'For years, Epstein's victims — many of them just children when they were abused — have waited for justice, often in silence and in pain. They deserve answers. They deserve dignity. And they deserve action from their government,' Pelosi said in a statement on the social platform X. 'That is why it is especially shameful that Speaker Johnson has shut down the House of Representatives for the summer to avoid a vote on this resolution,' she continued. 'To block transparency in this manner is not only an abdication of duty — it is a profound insult to the victims who have carried the burden of this trauma for decades,' Pelosi added. 'The American people deserve to know the full extent of who was involved with Epstein and all of them must be held accountable — no matter how powerful.' The House GOP Whip's office issued a notice Tuesday morning that the House would leave for August recess a day earlier than originally scheduled. The last votes of the week are now expected on Wednesday at 3:30 p.m. local time, canceling planned votes for Thursday. The shift comes as leadership's plans for votes this week were upended by infighting on the House Rules Committee after Democrats tried force votes on releasing more information on Epstein. Johnson addressed the controversy at a press conference Tuesday, saying, 'What we refuse to do is participate in another one of the Democrats' political games. This is a serious matter. We are not going to let them use this as a political battering ram. The Rules Committee became the ground for them to do that.' 'But we're done being lectured on transparency by the same party that orchestrated one of the most shameless, dangerous political coverups in the history of this country or any government on the face of Planet Earth,' he added, referring to reporting about efforts to conceal from the public signs of former President Biden's aging.

Trump says media ‘on notice' after Paramount, ABC settlements
Trump says media ‘on notice' after Paramount, ABC settlements

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump says media ‘on notice' after Paramount, ABC settlements

President Trump on Tuesday boasted that he had put mainstream media outlets 'on notice' following a pair of high-profile settlements paid to his foundation by major news networks in recent months to settle lawsuits he has brought against them. 'Just like ABC and George Slopadopoulos, CBS and its Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and were desperate to settle,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'This is another in a long line of VICTORIES over the Fake News Media, who we are holding to account for their widespread fraud and deceit.' Trump claimed he would also receive '$20 Million Dollars more from the new Owners,' in regard to Paramount's pending merger with Skydance, value he said would be paid 'in Advertising, PSAs, or similar Programming, for a total of over $36 Million Dollars.' Paramount has previously denied agreeing to pay anything more than the $16 million it announced publicly earlier this month, and a representative for the company did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Trump's Truth Social post. In December, ABC agreed to pay Trump's presidential foundation more than $15 million to settle a lawsuit he brought against the network over a segment that aired on ABC 'This Week.' Paramount's settlement came just days before CBS announced it would cancel 'The Late Show' and fire comedian Stephen Colbert, a decision the company called financial last week and a move that is being widely viewed by critics as a capitulation to Trump. Colbert, days before his cancellation, accused Paramount of paying Trump 'a big fat bribe' while fellow comedian Jon Stewart, who hosts 'The Daily Show' on Paramount property Comedy Central, cast doubt on his future with the network. Trump sought on Tuesday to paint mainstream media outlets as fearful of him, calling out 'The Wall Street Journal, The Failing New York Times, The Washington Post, MSDNC, CNN, and all other Mainstream Media Liars' who he said are now 'ON NOTICE that the days of them being allowed to deceive the American People are OVER.'

Trump details trade agreement with Indonesia
Trump details trade agreement with Indonesia

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump details trade agreement with Indonesia

President Trump on Tuesday offered more specifics surrounding a trade agreement the United States struck with Indonesia, which White House officials said would lower tariffs on American goods to practically zero even as tariffs remain on Indonesian products. Trump posted on Truth Social that Indonesia would provide critical minerals to the U.S. as part of the agreement and would purchase Boeing aircraft and American farm products. 'This Deal is a HUGE WIN for our Automakers, Tech Companies, Workers, Farmers, Ranchers, and Manufacturers,' Trump posted on Truth Social. Indonesia will eliminate all tariffs on 'over 99 percent' of its trade with the United States, a senior administration official told reporters. Indonesia will also drop a number of non-tariff barriers, the official said, including exempting U.S. companies from requirements that products be made with a certain percentage of local content. In response, the U.S. will set a tariff rate of 19 percent on goods from Indonesia. Trump had previously announced that tariff rate, which is the same as the one applied in a trade deal announced Tuesday with the Philippines. The U.S. exported roughly $10 billion worth of goods to Indonesia in 2024 and imported roughly $28 billion from Indonesia, according to government data. Goods that are trans-shipped, meaning they pass through an intermediary location on the way to their final destination, will face a 40 percent tariff, the senior administration official said. The Trump administration has zeroed in on trans-shipped goods, arguing it is a way of evading tariffs by passing products through another country that faces a lower tariff rate. The senior administration official argued the deal is ultimately a positive for both sides. Indonesia will face a higher tariff rate than it faced when Trump took office, but a lower tariff rate than the 32 percent Trump threatened in a letter earlier this month. 'But overall, this is a great deal, because it's a balanced deal that will lead to more fair and reciprocal trade between the United States and Indonesia,' the official said. 'Indonesia has been a great partner in all of this, and it's a testament to their negotiators that they were able to get to a deal quickly and take bold action.' The president in April announced a 10 percent tariff on all imports, as well as sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of other nations. He lowered those reciprocal rates after backlash from financial markets, but has now said higher tariffs will go into place for some countries beginning Aug. 1. While Trump administration officials have repeatedly teased a slew of deals ahead of that deadline, the U.S. has so far only struck agreements with the United Kingdom, Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines, as well as a framework with China.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store