Two winners share R78. 9 million Lotto jackpot
Two people have bagged the R78,977,677.80 Lotto jackpot from the June 18, 2025, draw.
According to the National Lottery, each person will walk away with R39,488,838.90.
The first winning ticket was purchased through a banking app with a R200 wager using the quick pick selection method.
The second winning ticket was purchased at a Day and Night Superstore in Johannesburg, with a R30 wager using the quick pick selection method.
Ithuba said the the winner who played via a banking platform has been notified of their winnings by their bank and the operator urges in-store participants to check their tickets.
Ithba CEO Charmaine Mabuza said:"This draw not only produced one multi-millionaire, but two.
"Both winners will walk away with significant amounts of money that will undoubtedly change their lives."
She said the winner service team is eagerly awaiting the arrival of these winners and is ready to help and support them every step of the way.
Ithuba said to help winners enjoy lasting benefits from their winnings, Ithuba offers access to certified financial experts who provide valuable financial insights for winners of R50,000 and above.
"Our objective is to empower winners tomake informed decisions and secure their financial future, ultimately changing their lives forever through their winnings."
All winners have 365 days from the draw date to claim their winnings.
IOL News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
VW lowers earnings forecast as US vehicle tariffs hit Q2 margins
Volkswagen on Friday gave its first assessment of how US President Donald Trump's trade war with Europe is expected to impact its 2025 earnings after tariffs dealt a blow to the German auto giant's operating profit in the second quarter. Europe's biggest carmaker expects an operating return on sales in the range of 4% to 5%, compared with a previously forecast 5.5-6.5% range, the company said, giving its long awaited assessment of the impact of tariffs on its business. Full-year sales are expected to be level with the year before, versus a previously forecast rise of up to 5%. Volkswagen and its peers are pressing European trade negotiators to strike a deal to replace a 25% tariff on their cars in place since April. Volkswagen reported an operating profit of €3.8bn (R78,677,067,972) in the quarter ended June 30, down 29% on the year before, citing tariffs, restructuring costs and higher sales of lower margin all-electric models. Car sales data for June underpinned a broader slowdown in Europe's struggling auto sector, and showed Volkswagen among the laggards as the company undergoes a major overhaul to cut more than 35,000 jobs by the end of the decade.
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
How new regulations will reshape what you watch and listen to
South Africa's media landscape is is expected to changed due to new regulations. Image: IOL South Africans can expect a change in their media consumption habits, as the Department of Communications and Digital Technologies (DCDT) proposes to overhaul the nation's outdated media regulatory framework. The newly published Draft White Paper on Audio and Audiovisual Media Services and Online Safety signals a shift from regulations designed for the "analogue broadcasting era" to one that looks at global streaming platforms, user-generated content, and "non-linear media consumption". According to the department, this update is important as the existing Electronic Communications Act (ECA) is "no longer fit for purpose" in the digital age. Why the old rules don't work anymore For decades, South Africa's media landscape was all about the principle of "scarcity rationale". Simply put, radio frequency spectrum was a limited resource, so this meant strict regulation of broadcasters. This framework, established by legislation like the Independent Broadcasting Authority Act (IBA Act) and continued in the Electronic Communications Act (ECA), focused on "broadcasting" as a unidirectional, one-to-many service delivered over traditional networks. Under the old rules, services like Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) offered on managed networks were considered broadcasting services requiring a licence. What complicated matters was that the TV programming and Video-on-Demand (VOD) services offered over the public internet fell outside the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa's (ICASA) jurisdiction and did not require a licence. Authorities noticed this created a regulatory imbalance, as traditional broadcasters faced "considerable obligations" for local content and stringent advertising rules, while new online players such as Netflix largely operated without these requirements. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ What changes will affect South Africans? The proposed White Paper introduces what it calls a "forward-looking approach". It seeks to "balance media freedom with public interest" and ensure regulatory fairness across all platforms. So how will this directly impact what you watch and listen to? The new framework will abandon the narrow, outdated definitions and will make up of three broad categories: traditional broadcasting services, on-demand content services (OCS) (think Netflix and BritBox), and video-sharing platform services (VSPs) (like YouTube and TikTok). What this means for South Africans is that for the first time, global streaming platforms and social media video platforms will be formally acknowledged and potentially regulated in South Africa. The policy aims for a "technology-neutral approach," meaning similar services will be regulated similarly, regardless of how they are delivered. A core focus is enhanced online safety and protection, especially for children. The White Paper aims to "strengthen protection against digital harms". For services like YouTube and TikTok and Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs), you can expect: Mechanisms to report harmful content (e.g., incitement to violence or hatred, terrorist content). Age verification systems for content that "may impair the physical, mental, or moral development of minors". Parental control systems to help adults manage what children see. A prohibition on advertising in content specifically provided for children. Measures to combat "mis- or disinformation". This means a safer online environment, particularly for younger viewers, and a clearer route to flag inappropriate content. There will most likely be more South African content on streaming platforms . Currently, traditional broadcasters have "considerable obligations" for local content, while OTTs (Over-The-Top services) have none. The policy indicates that "South African content obligations may also apply to On-demand Content Services (OCS)" in the future. What this suggests is that it could lead to a significant increase in local films, series, and music available on streaming services. Another key change is the implementation of a new online ombudsman for complaints. The White Paper proposes to "establish an ombudsman for online safety and media regulation". This will aim to provide an "easily identifiable and accessible route to resolution" for complaints that don't have a clear 'complaint box', so to speak, so there will be a dedicated avenue for dispute resolution, instead of just contacting a general helpline. The listing of "national sporting events which are in the public interest" will be "extended to include the broadcasting of these in the broader AAVMS market". Significant national events, like presidential inaugurations or state funerals, and potentially major sporting events, could become more widely accessible across various platforms, rather than being confined to traditional broadcasters who hold exclusive retransmission rights. Advertising rules would also see change. Currently, there's a "regulatory imbalance" where online advertisers have more leeway than those on traditional radio or television. The policy seeks to harmonise rules for misleading and comparative advertising, and address political advertising and disinformation across all platforms. This could lead to more consistent and transparent advertising practices across all media you consume. What is next? The department has outlined a three-stage implementation plan, spanning up to 24 months, to allow for careful consideration, research, and consultation. This phased approach aims to build consensus and ensure that the new framework effectively benefits South African citizens, businesses, and the creative industries. This overhaul will take time. Compare the process to upgrading a city's entire water supply system. While the old pipes (in this case, analogue broadcasting) served their purpose, they can't handle the demands of modern consumption (the streaming and user-generated content needs). The new plan involves not only laying new, larger pipes (technology-neutral regulation) but also installing new filtration systems (the proposed online safety and ombudsman), ensuring local water sources are prioritised (local content), and connecting every home, regardless of location, to clean, accessible water (universal access). IOL
Daily Maverick
18 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The Financial Wellness Coach: How to cut estate duty and avoid heavy tax
Although it may seem like a good idea to transfer assets before death to reduce estate duty, doing so can actually result in higher tax costs. Question: My father is a widower and has just been diagnosed with cancer. The prognosis is not good and I'm helping him to tidy up his affairs to make the inheritance process easier. I am his only child. His assets consist of a house worth R4-million and various share investments worth R8-million. To reduce his estate duty bill, we are thinking of transferring the house to his only grandchild while he is still alive. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Does this make sense? Are there any other factors we should consider? Answer: Although it may seem like a good idea to transfer assets before death to reduce estate duty, doing so can actually result in higher tax costs during your father's lifetime. This is because of: • Immediate payment of capital gains tax (CGT) If your father transfers the house to his grandchild now, he will trigger a CGT event. He will need to pay tax on the growth in value of the property from when he bought it until the date of transfer. This could be substantial, especially if the house has appreciated significantly. • Donations tax Donating the house (valued at R4-million) to the grandchild will also trigger donations tax at 20% on the value above the R100,000 annual exemption. This means that your father will have to pay donations tax of R780,000. • Transfer costs The transfer will also incur costs such as conveyancing attorney fees, deeds office charges and transfer duty. As you can see, this approach would result in a high immediate tax burden (CGT plus donations tax plus fees) without actually reducing the tax payable, as donations tax is charged at the same rate as estate duty (20%). Additionally, the value of these taxes is paid during your father's lifetime, thereby reducing the capital available for investment and growth. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Alternative strategy An alternative solution that is worth considering is the following: Your father's estate is worth R12-million. He will get the R7-million estate duty abatement. This means that R5-million of his estate would be dutiable, which, at a rate of 20%, means that he would be paying R1-million in estate duty. One of the few options is to make use of disallowed retirement contributions. In short, if you buy a retirement annuity (RA) that is worth more than the lesser of R350,000 or 27.5% of your taxable income, the excess contributions are classed as disallowed contributions. If you buy a living annuity with that money and your beneficiaries elect to receive the proceeds of the annuity when you die, this amount will not trigger estate duty. Consider this scenario Your father buys an RA for R5-million (which is above the allowable deduction threshold); The excess contributions are classified as disallowed for tax purposes; He then converts this RA into a living annuity; and If your child (his grandchild) is listed as the beneficiary of the living annuity and chooses to receive the benefit as an income stream, no estate duty will be payable on this amount upon your father's death. This will result in the following: A saving of R1-million in estate duty, as the living annuity falls outside the estate for estate duty purposes; A saving of R200,000 in executor fees, as the living annuity has a beneficiary and need not be dealt with by the executor; The income paid to your child will be taxable in their hands, but since they will probably have little to no income while still young, the tax will be minimal, if any; and This structure can fund education, living expenses or long-term income. This is a fantastic way for your father's legacy to live on. Although it is never nice to think about death, a bit of planning can make a material difference to the amount of money that leaks from an estate when there is a death. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads I would strongly recommend that you speak to a suitably qualified professional before implementing any of these ideas, because I'm only seeing part of your financial picture and there may be other factors that need to be taken into account. DM Kenny Meiring is an independent financial adviser. Contact him on 082 856 0348 or at Send your questions to [email protected]. This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
