Two winners share R78. 9 million Lotto jackpot
Two people have bagged the R78,977,677.80 Lotto jackpot from the June 18, 2025, draw.
According to the National Lottery, each person will walk away with R39,488,838.90.
The first winning ticket was purchased through a banking app with a R200 wager using the quick pick selection method.
The second winning ticket was purchased at a Day and Night Superstore in Johannesburg, with a R30 wager using the quick pick selection method.
Ithuba said the the winner who played via a banking platform has been notified of their winnings by their bank and the operator urges in-store participants to check their tickets.
Ithba CEO Charmaine Mabuza said:"This draw not only produced one multi-millionaire, but two.
"Both winners will walk away with significant amounts of money that will undoubtedly change their lives."
She said the winner service team is eagerly awaiting the arrival of these winners and is ready to help and support them every step of the way.
Ithuba said to help winners enjoy lasting benefits from their winnings, Ithuba offers access to certified financial experts who provide valuable financial insights for winners of R50,000 and above.
"Our objective is to empower winners tomake informed decisions and secure their financial future, ultimately changing their lives forever through their winnings."
All winners have 365 days from the draw date to claim their winnings.
IOL News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The Financial Wellness Coach: How to cut estate duty and avoid heavy tax
Although it may seem like a good idea to transfer assets before death to reduce estate duty, doing so can actually result in higher tax costs. Question: My father is a widower and has just been diagnosed with cancer. The prognosis is not good and I'm helping him to tidy up his affairs to make the inheritance process easier. I am his only child. His assets consist of a house worth R4-million and various share investments worth R8-million. To reduce his estate duty bill, we are thinking of transferring the house to his only grandchild while he is still alive. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Does this make sense? Are there any other factors we should consider? Answer: Although it may seem like a good idea to transfer assets before death to reduce estate duty, doing so can actually result in higher tax costs during your father's lifetime. This is because of: • Immediate payment of capital gains tax (CGT) If your father transfers the house to his grandchild now, he will trigger a CGT event. He will need to pay tax on the growth in value of the property from when he bought it until the date of transfer. This could be substantial, especially if the house has appreciated significantly. • Donations tax Donating the house (valued at R4-million) to the grandchild will also trigger donations tax at 20% on the value above the R100,000 annual exemption. This means that your father will have to pay donations tax of R780,000. • Transfer costs The transfer will also incur costs such as conveyancing attorney fees, deeds office charges and transfer duty. As you can see, this approach would result in a high immediate tax burden (CGT plus donations tax plus fees) without actually reducing the tax payable, as donations tax is charged at the same rate as estate duty (20%). Additionally, the value of these taxes is paid during your father's lifetime, thereby reducing the capital available for investment and growth. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Alternative strategy An alternative solution that is worth considering is the following: Your father's estate is worth R12-million. He will get the R7-million estate duty abatement. This means that R5-million of his estate would be dutiable, which, at a rate of 20%, means that he would be paying R1-million in estate duty. One of the few options is to make use of disallowed retirement contributions. In short, if you buy a retirement annuity (RA) that is worth more than the lesser of R350,000 or 27.5% of your taxable income, the excess contributions are classed as disallowed contributions. If you buy a living annuity with that money and your beneficiaries elect to receive the proceeds of the annuity when you die, this amount will not trigger estate duty. Consider this scenario Your father buys an RA for R5-million (which is above the allowable deduction threshold); The excess contributions are classified as disallowed for tax purposes; He then converts this RA into a living annuity; and If your child (his grandchild) is listed as the beneficiary of the living annuity and chooses to receive the benefit as an income stream, no estate duty will be payable on this amount upon your father's death. This will result in the following: A saving of R1-million in estate duty, as the living annuity falls outside the estate for estate duty purposes; A saving of R200,000 in executor fees, as the living annuity has a beneficiary and need not be dealt with by the executor; The income paid to your child will be taxable in their hands, but since they will probably have little to no income while still young, the tax will be minimal, if any; and This structure can fund education, living expenses or long-term income. This is a fantastic way for your father's legacy to live on. Although it is never nice to think about death, a bit of planning can make a material difference to the amount of money that leaks from an estate when there is a death. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads I would strongly recommend that you speak to a suitably qualified professional before implementing any of these ideas, because I'm only seeing part of your financial picture and there may be other factors that need to be taken into account. DM Kenny Meiring is an independent financial adviser. Contact him on 082 856 0348 or at Send your questions to [email protected]. This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Choc to the system — sweet treats under siege as cocoa prices soar globally
Climate shocks, crop disease and a global supply shortage are resulting in South Africans paying up to 40% more for their favourite chocolate bars and slabs. World Chocolate Day was celebrated annually in the first week of July, but this year there wasn't much to be merry about. In May, global cocoa prices hit R197,500 per tonne. From R154,000 in July 2024, it has been a relentless upwards march and it's hitting South Africans' wallets. And, if that Aero or Bar One feels lighter lately, it's because the world has entered an unprecedented era of chocflation. Ghana and Ivory Coast together produce the lion's share of the world's cocoa. Extreme weather and crop diseases have hit these producing regions exceptionally hard over the past five years. 'The increased variability of seasonal rainfall in the producing areas of the world due to climate change has threatened the viability of cocoa production,' says FNB senior agricultural economist Paul Makube. Cocoa trees need temperatures of between 20℃ and 30℃ and just the right amount of rainfall to grow, Makube explains, but droughts are becoming more frequent and farmers are being forced to adapt or abandon their crops. In addition to climate extremes, crop diseases are decimating harvests. Makube says the cocoa swollen shoot virus has been causing disease that has cut about 17% of Ghana's annual cocoa output over the past few years. Other disease threats that have adversely affected production include witches' broom, frost pod rot and black pod rot, says Thabile Nkunjana, senior economist at the National Agricultural Marketing Council. 'The production, yields and quality of cocoa have all been significantly impacted by these factors and consequently prices have risen sharply in recent years,' Nkunjana says. The numbers are eye-watering. As of June, cocoa hit R215/kg – the highest since the World Bank began tracking prices in 1960, Nkunjana says. In 2023 it was just R66/kg. The International Cocoa Organisation now predicts a global supply shortfall of nearly 500,000 metric tonnes for the 2023/24 season. Nevertheless, the global production outlook remains optimistic, Makube says, although demand prospects are worsening because of 'the uncertainty regarding potential inflationary pressures emanating from the US tariff onslaught'. Global squeeze, local crunch The shock is rippling across the globe and down to the local supermarket. In 2016, a chocolate slab in South Africa would have cost an average of R13.27, according to Statistics South Africa. Today, the price of a Dairy Milk slab ranges from R20 to R50, depending on where one shops. Data from consultancy group Eighty20 shows double-digit inflation on chocolate prices almost every year since 2020, far outpacing the overall consumer inflation rate. Since December 2021, the price of chocolate bars has shot up 40%. Spar is 'closely monitoring the global cocoa supply challenges and the resulting price increases in chocolate products', says Gerhard Ackermann, national merchandise executive at the Spar Group. The retailer is trying to cushion the blow with value promotions and proactive stock management. Pick n Pay says it 'always works to deliver the most affordable prices' while ensuring shelves stay stocked. South African chocolatiers are also recalibrating to weather the cocoa price storm. For Beyers Chocolates, a family-owned company that has been making chocolates since 1987, the steep rise has posed many challenges, says its marketing lead, Susan Krause. The company has responded with 'long-term supplier partnerships, smarter procurement planning and operational efficiencies across the value chain', Krause says. By keeping production local, it has been able to soften some of the cost hikes. At luxury craft chocolate maker Afrikoa, which sources its beans from farmers in Tanzania, the sustained increase in prices has heavily influenced cost, even though direct trade has helped the company to absorb 'some volatility', according to head chocolatier Kyle Hickman. Afrikoa has had to become 'more agile in production planning, prioritising efficiency and minimising waste', Hickman says. But he notes a silver lining in that 'informed consumers increasingly value the kind of responsible production that Afrikoa represents', which strengthens the company's brand story despite price sensitivity. Honest Chocolate cofounder Anthony Gird says the rise in cocoa prices, especially over the past two years, has led the company to 'do a price increase just to keep up' earlier this year. He is hoping it won't have to happen again soon, as the cocoa price hasn't risen significantly since Honest Chocolate's last bean consignment purchase. The company's clientele, Gird says, are understanding. 'People who buy our chocolate understand the value in the quality and ethics of the product.' Even global brands like Nestlé are trying to manage the chocflation. The company's 'Africa for Africa' model is focused on local sourcing and production and is tightening operations to manage costs, says Conny Sethaelo, communications director at Nestlé's east and southern Africa region (ESAR). 'This helps us maintain relevance and trust, even in challenging economic conditions,' she says. Laboratory-crafted luxury While traditional cocoa producers and users fight high prices, some scientists are bypassing the pod entirely. Using plant cell cultures in vats of sugary water, researchers are growing cocoa in labs. But not everyone is excited by the science. 'We respect the innovation behind lab-grown alternatives, but our brand is firmly rooted in celebrating the authenticity of African-grown cocoa,' Hickman says. Gird echoes this sentiment and says Honest Chocolate won't be considering lab-grown cocoa in the near future. 'If cocoa supplies dry up to the extent that it becomes needed, then we would be open to giving it a try.' Krause says Beyers Chocolates is 'keeping an eye on global innovations in the category' and is open to sustainable practices that fit its values. Nestlé, on the other hand, is more focused on soil. 'Nestlé ESAR is investing in regenerative agriculture, traceable technologies and community-based farming models,' Sethaelo says. Climate change is hitting cocoa farming hard and Nkunjana notes that Africa is especially vulnerable. 'Policies that lower the danger of climate change and protect farmers from losses should be given regional priority,' he says. These policies will encourage farmers to grow their cocoa production and improve production as a result. Makube sees a way through: a mix of infrastructure upgrades, financial access for farmers, sustainable agroforestry and public-private partnerships. 'The world needs to think about close substitutes for food or food commodities in general in light of the difficulties cocoa is facing,' Nkunjana warns. 'This will ensure that there is a steady supply of food and protect consumers from price shocks.' Despite the crunch, the nation's sweet tooth is undeterred. More than half of adult South Africans have eaten some form of chocolate in the past month, Eighty20's data shows. Bar One, Lunch Bar, Aero, Black Cat and KitKat remain at the top of the sugar-fuelled food chain. Even the viral Dubai chocolate phenomenon, which debuted at an astronomical price point of R1,000 last year, has found a niche, with R400 versions now for sale at Dis-Chem.
TimesLIVE
9 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Just one Gupta property finds a buyer at Saxonwold auction
Furniture from two of the houses was sold as a separate lot per property. The loose assets of house No 5 were sold to an in-person bidder for R100,000, while the furniture of house No 7 went for R60,000. The furniture for house No 3 was not sold. Park Village Auctions disposal manager Graham van Niekerk described the outcome as 'exactly what we expected'. He said despite house No 3's rundown condition, it had more redevelopment potential. 'You can see for yourself the scope to upgrade it or start from scratch. The other two are very unique and difficult properties,' said Van Niekerk. He attributed the lack of interest in houses No 5 and No 7 to several factors: high municipal valuations, poor structural condition, restrictive zoning (residential 1) and the stigma associated with the Gupta name. Outside the compound, a small group of people protested, demanding justice and accountability for the family's alleged role in state capture. 'This is not the first time we have protested,' said Li Gula, from the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) 'We want the Guptas to come back and account. The NPA is moving far too slowly. The Zondo commission cost taxpayers millions and yet justice still drags on.' Lazarus said the auction was part of an effort by business rescue practitioners to open the process to public scrutiny. 'There is a stigma around these properties, but the most important thing is transparency. Everyone had the same opportunity to bid,' he said. Lazarus acknowledged that properties No 5 and 7 were always going to be tough sells. 'They are in serious disrepair and need major investment to restore. The business rescue team will now explore alternative methods to dispose of them, including closed tenders.' The auction may not have cleared all assets but it opened a rare public window into what remains of the once-powerful family's South African empire now reduced to crumbling mansions and unresolved questions.
