logo
To host UN climate talks, Brazil chose one of its poorer cities. That's no accident

To host UN climate talks, Brazil chose one of its poorer cities. That's no accident

Independent19 hours ago
When world leaders, diplomats, business leaders, scientists and activists go to Brazil in November for the United Nations' annual climate negotiations, poverty, deforestation and much of the world's troubles will be right in their faces — by design.
In past conference cities — including resort areas and playgrounds for the rich such as Bali, Cancun, Paris, Sharm El-Sheikh and Dubai — host nations show off both their amenities and what their communities have done about climate change. But this fall's conference is in a high-poverty city on the edge of the Amazon to demonstrate what needs to be done, said the diplomat who will run the mega-negotiations in Belem known as COP30, or Conference of Parties.
What better way to tackle a problem than facing it head on, however uncomfortable, COP30 President-designate André Corrêa do Lago, a veteran Brazilian diplomat, said in an interview with The Associated Press at United Nations headquarters.
"We cannot hide the fact that we are in the world with lots of inequalities and where sustainability and fighting climate change is something that has to get closer to people,' do Lago said. That's what Brazilian President President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has in mind, he said.
'When people will go to Belem, you are going to see a developing country and city with considerable infrastructure issues still with, in relative terms, a high percentage of poverty and President Lula thinks it's very important that we talk about climate thinking of all the forests, thinking of poverty and thinking of progress,' do Lago said. 'He wants everybody to see a city that can improve thanks to the results of these debates.'
The rich and powerful — as well as poorer nations, activists and media — are already feeling a bit of that discomfort even before getting to Belem. Even with two years of notice, Brazil is way behind in having enough hotel rooms and other accommodations for a global conference that has had 90,000 attendees.
The official United Nations COP30 website says Brazil would have an official booking portal by the end of April. But specific plans weren't announced till last week when Brazil said it arranged for two cruise ships with 6,000 beds to help with lodging, saying the country is ensuring 'accommodation for all countries' and starting a system where 98 poorer nations have the option to reserve first.
Skyrocketing lodging costs are a problem, do Lago conceded. Some places have been charging $15,000 a night for one person and activists and others have talked of cutting back. But he said prices 'are already going down,' even as local media report otherwise.
Do Lago said it will be a local holiday so residents can rent out their homes, adding "a significant supply of apartments.'
Big year for climate negotiations
This is a significant year for climate negotiations. The 2015 Paris climate agreement required countries to come up with their own plans to reduce the emissions of heat-trapping gases from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas and then to update those plans every five years.
This year nearly every nation — the United States, the No. 2 carbon dioxide emitter and historically biggest polluter, withdrew from the accord earlier this year — has to submit their first plan update. Most of those updates are already late, but the United Nations wants countries to complete them by September when world leaders gather in New York. That would give the United Nations time to calculate how much they would curb future climate change if implemented — before the COP six weeks later.
UN Secretary-General Antonio-Guterres, in an interview with AP, reiterated what officials want in those plans: that they cover each nation's entire economy, that they include all greenhouse gases and that they are in line with efforts to limit long-term human-caused warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times. That target is the Paris agreement goal. And it's tough since the world is only a couple of tenths of a degree away and last year even temporarily shot past the 1.5 degree mark.
Do Lago said he expects the countries' plans will fall short of keeping warming below the 1.5 degree mark, so tackling that gap will be a crucial element of negotiations.
Some big things aren't on agenda, like $1.3 trillion for poorer nations
Some of the negotiations' most important work won't be on the formal agenda, including these plans, do Lago said. Another is a road map to provide $1.3 trillion in financial help to poorer nations in dealing with climate change. And finally, he said, Brazil 'wants very much to talk about nature, about forests.'
The nearby Amazon has been an important part of Earth's natural system to suck large amounts of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, but deforestation is a major threat to that. At times, parts of the Amazon have gone from reducing carbon dioxide in the air to increasing it, a 2021 study found.
On Wednesday, the United Nation's top court ruled that a clean and healthy environment is a basic human right, a decision that may bolster efforts to come up with stronger action at the November climate conference, some activists said.
'Failure of a state to take appropriate action to protect the climate system ... may constitute an internationally wrongful act,' court President Yuji Iwasawa said during the hearing.
Do Lago said the challenge for countries is to think of these emission-reduction plans not as a sacrifice but as a moment to change and grow.
'One of the objectives of this COP is that we hope we will be remembered as a COP of solutions, a COP in which people realized that this agenda is creating more opportunities and challenges,' do Lago said.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UN tells Australia, Turkey to end COP31 hosting standoff
UN tells Australia, Turkey to end COP31 hosting standoff

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

UN tells Australia, Turkey to end COP31 hosting standoff

SYDNEY, July 28 (Reuters) - The United Nations climate chief on Monday urged Australia and Turkey to resolve their long-running tussle over who will host next year's COP31 summit, calling the delay unhelpful and unnecessary. Australia and Turkey submitted bids to host the high-profile conference in 2022 and both countries have refused to concede to the other, opens new tab ever since. Simon Stiell, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which oversees COP summits, said the deadlock was undermining preparations. 'A decision needs to be made very quickly,' he said at a Smart Energy Council event in Sydney. 'The two proponents need to come together and between themselves and within the group to make that decision. The delay in making that decision is unhelpful to the process.' The annual UN talks rotate through five regional groups. COP31's host must be unanimously agreed upon by the 28 members of the Western Europe and Others Group (WEOG) bloc. The UN had set a deadline of June for the group to reach consensus. Australia is seeking to co-host next year's summit with the Pacific to showcase its renewable energy transition. It had hoped to secure the bid, which has majority backing among WEOG members, at COP29 in Azerbaijan. But Turkey has rebuffed calls to drop out of the race, and instead doubled down on its efforts during interim talks in Bonn last month. Turkey argues its Mediterranean location would help reduce emissions from flights bringing delegates to the conference, and has pointed out its smaller oil and gas industry compared to Australia. Stiell said the deadlock was now affecting the planning of the COP process, involving thousands of delegates from 200 member countries. 'In negotiations that are as complex as they are, that lack of clarity creates tensions that are completely unnecessary at this stage,' he said. Asked for comment, the office of Australian Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen referred to an interview where he said Australia's bid had the backing of 23 out of 28 WEOG members. Australia had also approached Turkey multiple times to find a 'win-win' solution, he said. 'We've got the votes. We could have all the votes in the world. If Turkey is not going to withdraw, that's still a challenge,' Bowen told The Conversation Politics Podcast on Thursday. At the same event, Stiell also called on Australia to set an ambitious 2035 emissions target and accelerate its clean energy transition. Australia's national climate plan, due in September, would be a 'defining moment' that could send a message that 'this country is open for clean investment, trade, and long-term partnerships', he said.

This outrageous new climate change scam will bankrupt Britain
This outrageous new climate change scam will bankrupt Britain

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

This outrageous new climate change scam will bankrupt Britain

Rachel Reeves, beware. Britain could soon be facing yet more eye-watering demands for reparations. But not just because of all the slaves our distant ancestors owned. Now we could be sued for all the coal they burned. That's because, according to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), countries could potentially be entitled to seek damages from other countries for their historic contributions to climate change. Which is particularly bad news for the British. Nowadays we're responsible for less than one per cent of the world's carbon emissions. Two hundred and fifty years ago, however, we were responsible for practically all of them. Effectively, therefore, we could be sued for starting the industrial revolution. Following this logic, of course, you might ask: why stop at the 18th century? Why not go back further? Mankind is believed to have originated in Kenya, and all pollution is caused by mankind, ergo it's all Kenya's fault. So let's sue it. And if Kenya tells the ICJ that it's too poor to pay up, not to worry, because there are other juicy targets we could fleece. As soon as we've tracked down the descendants of whichever caveman invented the wheel, we can sue them for all the world's car exhaust fumes. At present, however, it would seem that Britain is the nation likeliest to fall victim to this brazen legal opportunism. But in the event that other countries do try to sue us, I hope we'll politely explain something. We don't owe them. They owe us. This is because the industrial revolution and its countless associated benefits didn't just make the world richer. They caused people to live longer. In the mid 1700s, just before the industrial revolution began, life expectancy in this country alone was about 40. Now it's double that. And after other countries joined the industrial revolution, the life expectancy of their populations shot up, too. Of course, this increase wasn't due solely to greater prosperity. It was also due to revolutionary medical advances: for example, antibiotics. And which country does the world have to thank for discovering the very first antibiotic? Oh yes: Britain. Which also happens to be the country responsible for coming up with the smallpox vaccine: a breakthrough that is said to have saved more than 200 million lives worldwide. Overall, then, it seems perfectly clear that our forefathers did the world vastly more good than harm. Which is why, if any countries have the brass neck to sue us, we should respond by billing them. 'Dear Sirs, 'But for the dazzling historic ingenuity of this nation, half your people would never have been born, and the other half would have died by their 30th birthday. We therefore enclose an invoice for your quarterly GDP. Kind regards, Britain.' Why millennial women are sick of men Have you heard about the dramatic new trend that has apparently gripped the millennial generation? It's called 'heterofatalism'. And it describes the decision by growing numbers of straight women to give up on romantic relationships – because they've concluded that all men are rubbish. In the past week, upmarket liberal newspapers have been bursting with articles by women setting out the reasons for their disillusionment. In the New York Times, for example, a female author accused prospective male partners of 'not wanting me badly enough, not communicating with me clearly enough, not devoting themselves to me… Men are what is rotten in the state of straightness.' Meanwhile, a young woman writing for the London Times revealed that many of her single female friends feel equally disenchanted. 'I just don't think the men out there are good enough,' said one. 'I hate them all,' said another. Of course, since I myself am a man, you might expect me to be scandalised by these sweeping generalisations about members of my sex. You might also expect me to speculate as to how upmarket liberal newspapers would respond to single men declaring, 'I just don't think the women out there are good enough' and 'I hate them all'. Would such men be treated sympathetically? Or would they be recognised as embittered, sexist incels who are simply attempting to blame others for their own romantic failures? As a matter of fact, however, I'm not put out at all. Far from it. Indeed, I'm strongly supportive of these women's 'heterofatalist' stance – for one very simple reason. It will take the Western world's whiniest, most melodramatic and most insufferably self-absorbed young people out of the gene pool. After all, if they permanently abstain from relationships, they'll never have children, and thus won't pass on their self-pitying, navel-gazing narcissism to the next generation. Instead, the task of human reproduction will be left to people who are likeable, self-aware and emotionally well-adjusted. In the long term, therefore, millennial heterofatalism will result in enormous benefits to humanity. So, to all the 30-something singles featured in these articles, I say: you're absolutely right. Men are awful. Every last one. So please do stick to your vow of abstinence. The world is right behind you, all the way.

UN urges Australia to step up climate action
UN urges Australia to step up climate action

Reuters

time5 hours ago

  • Reuters

UN urges Australia to step up climate action

SYDNEY, July 28 (Reuters) - The United Nations climate chief has called on Australia to set an ambitious 2035 emissions target and accelerate its clean energy transition, warning a failure to act risks eroding living standards and regional stability. Simon Stiell, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said Australia should "go for what's smart by going big". "Don't settle for what's easy. Bog standard is beneath you," he said at a Smart Energy Council event in Sydney. Australia faces scrutiny for backing new fossil fuel projects while seeking to co-host the UN COP31 climate summit with the Pacific next year. The centre-left Labor government, which took power in 2022 with a mandate to reduce carbon emissions, cleared the country's largest gas plant to run until 2070 in May – a decision that critics said called into question Australia's commitment to tackling climate change. Australia is also among the highest polluting countries per capita due to its coal power generation. Consultancy Wood Mackenzie has projected Australia is set to fall far short of its target of 82% renewable generation by 2030 due to state-level rollbacks, grid connection delays and inadequate investment. Stiell said the country's 2035 emissions reduction target, due in September, would be a 'defining moment' that could send a message that 'this country is open for clean investment, trade, and long-term partnerships'. Australia also had the opportunity to become a global leader in renewables and that 'doubling down on clean energy is an economic no-brainer', he said. He warned that a lack of action would erode living standards and destabilise Australia's neighbours in the Pacific and Southeast Asia, which were more susceptible to rising sea levels and extreme weather. 'This is the moment: to get behind a climate plan that doesn't just write that vision into policy – but delivers in spades for your people,' Stiell said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store