Attorneys for suspended Orlando commissioner want trial witness barred for ‘contradictory and false answers'
The 17-page motion filed Friday by Hill's defense team seeks to remove Sandra Lewis from the case against Hill, who was indicted last year. Hill is accused of exploiting a 96-year-old woman by draining her savings of more than $100,000 after getting control of her finances. Prosecutors say Hill used a document notarized by Lewis to purchase a west Orlando home in her own name, with the elderly woman as a co-signer.
Lewis is expected to testify against Hill in the trial, which is for now slated for the fall, though could be delayed further.
Hill's attorney Fritz Scheller said in the Friday filing that his team had a difficult time interviewing Lewis over the course of two depositions, finding her answers evasive and at times dishonest. The defense attorneys asked Lewis about her political activity and her work for the City of Orlando in the past year.
Central to the motion's claims are questions about Lewis' time as a canvasser for former Orange-Osceola State Attorney Andrew Bain, who held the post when Hill was indicted. Bain's political committee paid Lewis more than $41,000 for 'outreach services' in his failed campaign last year to keep the job.
She also evaded questions about working for Hill's replacement, interim City Commissioner Shan Rose. Lewis worked for Rose as a temporary employee following her special election win.
The filing further targets Lewis' work with Eboni Beauty Academy, a nonprofit that apparently doubles as a political strategy firm.
'In her depositions, Lewis demonstrated both a willful and blatant disregard for her obligations as a state witness – a witness who was under subpoena and oath,' Scheller wrote. 'She intentionally avoided questions and provided contradictory and false answers throughout her depositions. The notion that the State would proceed with this witness is disturbing.'
The Orange-Osceola State Attorney's Office led by Monique Worrell, which is prosecuting Hill along with the Office of Statewide Prosecution, did not immediately respond to questions about the motion. Lewis declined to comment.
The charges against Hill go beyond what Lewis is expected to have relevant testimony about, so it is not clear how much damage Lewis' removal would do if a judge agrees with the defense attorneys.
The case against Hill is expansive, charging she used the older woman's money on expenses like rental cars, hotel rooms and vitamin injections, none of which benefited the woman.
At the time Hill was indicted in 2023, Gov. Ron DeSantis had removed Worrell from office and had appointed Bain as state attorney. Worrell, a Democrat, returned to the job in January after defeating Bain, running as an independent.
Rose didn't respond to a request for comment.
Records obtained and reviewed by the Orlando Sentinel appear to lend credence to some of the arguments made in the filing regarding the activities involving Eboni Beauty Academy.
First formed as a for-profit business in 1989, it was later reorganized as a nonprofit in 1992 only to fold and restart on-and-off in the ensuing years, state business filings show. The school's most recent reinstatement was in 2017, based out of a house on Lenox Boulevard near Lake Mann.
Despite its existence as an active nonprofit in both state and federal records, Eboni Beauty Academy is not licensed to operate as a cosmetology school — and it never was, according to a database from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Records confirm Lewis had a cosmetology license that expired in October 2017.
In her depositions described in the filing, she testified that Eboni is a 'mobile beauty school' that hosts students at her residence while also traveling to clients' homes and sometimes operating out of beauty salons. Lewis refused to answer which salons were used, stating: 'That's not your business.'
The filing also claims Lewis couldn't recall 'the name of any student that graduated from Eboni,' nor the names of the company's board members.
Additionally, in her application to work for the City of Orlando, which was obtained by the Sentinel, 'Eboni' is listed as part of her job experience without reference to it being a beauty school. That business — based out of the same Lenox Boulevard residence as the alleged school — is instead described as a political strategy firm where she worked from 2010 to 2021 advising elected officials and candidates as a field coordinator.
Among the candidates she consulted, according to the depositions described by Hill's legal team, are Bain and Rose. Neither the beauty school nor the firm appear to have a website nor any other online presence, nor does the latter appear to exist in state or federal databases.
Furthermore, campaign finance reports don't show Rose having paid Eboni or Lewis for canvassing, though Bain's campaign paid Lewis $41,095 for 'outreach services' between August and November. No payments were made to Eboni, an entity through which she said she paid other canvassers.
Those payments came months after Hill's indictment.
Hill's lawyers characterized her testimony regarding Eboni as 'suffused with falsehoods.'
'First, it was a beauty school with students she could not remember, then it was a canvassing company for Bain and Rose, and then it was both,' according to their filing.
The questions of Eboni Beauty Academy's legitimacy didn't stop it from receiving a $3,200 donation from Insomniac Cares on Feb. 10, the result of a years-old agreement between the city and the nonprofit tied to the organizers of the Electric Daisy Carnival.
Every year, Insomniac Cares donates tens of thousands of dollars to organizations in District 5 as a way to help the community following the annual rave, which often draws complaints of booming noise and other disruptions. The donations, disbursed by city-run nonprofit Strengthen Orlando, primarily go to surrounding neighborhood associations, which this year received $45,000.
The rest, totaling $30,000, went to local community organizations with the stipulation that the money be used 'to benefit the entire neighborhood in the form of building improvements, landscaping projects and other community needs.'
The address for Eboni Beauty Academy falls outside of the city limits, according to city property records.
In response to questions about the protocols for distributing the donations, city spokesperson Andrea Otero said that is determined by the district commissioner, which is now Rose.
'The intent of the monies are to those neighborhoods directly affected by the EDC event. However, there are no requirements,' she added.
That detail, Hill's attorneys said, is one Lewis claimed she didn't know despite the donation appearing to have been granted while working for Rose's office, where Otero said she remains employed 'in a temporary status.'
Lewis denied knowing where the $3,200 came from in her sworn testimony, even though a document confirming the donation appears to contain her signature. Hill's legal team called her denial 'ludicrous.'
'It is likely Lewis' answer was designed to evade the inconvenient fact that Eboni improperly received money that was intended for entities in District Five where the EDC was held,' their filing argued.
_____
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump reacts to Tulsi Gabbard reveal: ‘Irrefutable proof of Obama coup'
President Donald Trump is furious with former President Barack Obama, whom he is accusing of participating in a 'coup' against him in 2016. Trump is referring of course to recent disclosures from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who has released documents showing it was Obama who encouraged intelligence officials to reach stronger conclusions about Russia's alleged meddling in the 2016 election. According to Gabbard, the intelligence community was well aware that Russia did not hack voting machines, nor did the country have much impact on the outcome, but Trump's enemies in the Democratic Party wanted to paint him as a Russian collaborator, and so they overreached. The media, of course, followed suit, publishing headline after headline suggesting that Trump was a Russian stooge. Here is President Trump reacting to the latest news: 'We found absolute — this isn't like evidence, this is like proof, irrefutable proof, that Obama was seditious. That Obama was trying to lead a coup. And it was with Hillary Clinton and with all these other people, but Obama headed it up. And, you know, I get a kick when I hear everyone talks about people I never even heard of. […] It was Obama, he headed it up. And it says so right in the papers.' These allegations are extremely serious. Now, it's far too premature to throw around the word treason; in fact, I don't like when anybody, Democrat or Republican, starts accusing their opponents of treason. This reads less like treason to me and more like political weaponization of national intelligence for partisan purposes, which has become a recurring theme. Make no mistake: There was an effort to de-legitimize Trump's election to the presidency, and the argument was made by mainstream media mouthpieces leveraging the expertise of deep-state spymasters. Hillary Clinton and Jimmy Carter both said that Trump was an illegitimate president, in response to media reporting on Russia's meddling. This was the original 'stolen election' theory, and it's only been overshadowed because Trump's false contention that the 2016 election was stolen has subsequently received much more media coverage and much more vigorous pushback. Let me be perfectly clear: Trump should have never claimed that the 2020 election was stolen from him. But he's in good company: Look at the Democrats who said the same thing about 2016! And their main theory backing that up was Russian malfeasance — something intelligence officials privately discounted, until they went to the White House and had a chat with outgoing President Barack Obama.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New collective-bargaining bill looms as historic day arrives
Within college athletics over the last several months, few topics have garnered more interest than collective bargaining — from football and basketball coaches as well as top athletic administrators. On Capitol Hill, at least two lawmakers are interested too. Two Democrats, Rep. Summer Lee and Sen. Chris Murphy, are reintroducing on Wednesday a bill to affirm and expand college athletes' rights to organize, form unions and collectively bargain with their universities and/or conferences, according to the legislation obtained by Yahoo Sports. The bill's introduction comes on what could be a historic day for the college sports industry: Two House committees are expected to consider a separate bill, the SCORE Act, and potentially advance that legislation to the House floor. In the NCAA's more than five-year lobbying effort for congressional legislation, no all-encompassing college sports bill, such as the SCORE Act, has advanced out of a committee in either chamber. A full House of Representatives vote could come as soon as this fall — a potentially groundbreaking moment but one that should come with a caveat. The NCAA-friendly SCORE Act, while bipartisan, faces stiff pushback in a divided U.S. Senate, where at least seven Democrats are needed to overcome the filibuster and reach the 60-vote margin for any bill passage. Murphy and Lee's bill, perhaps a longshot to pass in this Congress, serves as a reminder of what could transpire in the future as the college sports industry barrels toward a more professionalized model with the approval of the House settlement's athlete revenue-share concept. The bill would amend the National Labor Relationship Board Act to cover both private and public universities and require the board to recognize conferences and schools as 'multi-employer bargaining units.' The bill establishes 'equitable terms and conditions' for college athletes to choose representation in order to negotiate collective-bargaining agreements. 'College athletes exhibit the markers of employment as established under the common law definition of the term 'employee,'' the bill says. 'The NCAA and its member institutions have denied college athletes a fair wage for their labor by colluding to cap compensation; they maintain strict and exacting control over the terms and conditions of college athletes' labor; and they exercise the ability to terminate an athlete's eligibility to compete if the athlete violates these terms and conditions.' The bill is contradictory to the mostly Republican-backed SCORE Act, which provides the NCAA, power conferences and new enforcement arm, the College Sports Commission, with many of its requests from Congress: (1) limited antitrust protection to enforce rules; (2) the preemption of various state NIL laws; (3) codification of the House settlement terms; and, perhaps most notably, (4) a clause deeming athletes as students and not employees. The bill is facing pushback not only from Democrats but from a variety of avenues, including players associations of the NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL and MLS; the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committees; and one of the leading Democrats in the Senate, Maria Cantwell. 'If you thought the dissolution of the Pac-12 was a heist, the SCORE Act is the National Championship of all heists,' said Cantwell, representing the state of Washington. 'This legislation is a power grab by the two biggest conferences that will leave athletes, coaches, and small and mid-sized institutions behind.' All three entities — the players associations, Olympic committee and Cantwell — each provide a criticism to the SCORE Act: It prevents a path for collective bargaining and employment of athletes; and codifies a House settlement that, many believe, will negatively impact women and Olympic sports and grows the already looming financial gaps between major conference programs and those other lower-resourced schools in Division I. In a recent letter to House lawmakers, four state attorney generals — from Florida, Tennessee, Ohio and New York — urged Congress to reject the SCORE Act, describing it as 'a misguided effort that will enshrine in federal law the arbitrary and biased authority of the NCAA at its worst.' But the bill has plenty of supporters who point to the many benefits, such as the legislation's oversight of agents and its requirement to provide athlete degree completion and post-graduate healthcare. Meanwhile, Murphy and Lee's bill gestures toward a completely different system, one that turns athletes into employees who can collectively bargain — a concept that many in college athletics believe should be explored deeply as a way to bring stability and regulation. 'Collective bargaining and employment status shouldn't be seen as negative terms,' Tennessee athletic director Danny White told Yahoo Sports last month. 'I think there's a lot of people who think the same way I do. We can go through another three or five or 10 years of a difficult environment. Or we can accept the reality and fix it right now.'


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
John Brennan ignored ‘veteran' CIA officers to push claim Putin wanted Trump to win in 2016: bombshell House intel report
WASHINGTON — Former CIA Director John Brennan ignored warnings from 'veteran' officers and ordered the publication of a 'substandard' intelligence report that claimed Russian President Vladimir Putin 'aspired' to help Donald Trump win the 2016 election, according to a bombshell congressional report released Wednesday. The House Intelligence Committee had compiled the 'egregious' errors by the CIA back in 2020 — errors that included burying intelligence that the Kremlin was preparing for a possible victory by Democrat Hillary Clinton, according to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The committee's findings also show that 'fabricated' information from the since-debunked Steele Dossier — funded by Clinton's campaign and put together by an ex-MI6 spy — was crammed into the CIA product over the objections of senior officials. Advertisement 3 President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin are seen during the G20 leaders summit in Buenos Aires, Argentina November 30, 2018. REUTERS 'Not only did CIA Director Brennan, FBI Director [James] Comey, DNI [James] Clapper and others include the Steele Dossier in the 2017 ICA, they overruled senior Intel officials who warned them it was fabricated and should not be used,' Gabbard said, calling the move 'the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history.' 'In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people, working with their partners in the media to promote the lie, in order to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump, essentially enacting a years-long coup against him,' she added. 'The Russia Hoax was a lie that was knowingly created by the Obama Administration to undermine the legitimacy and power of the duly elected President of the United States, Donald Trump.' Advertisement 3 Former CIA Director John Brennan arrives for a meeting at the Capitol in Washington, May 21, 2019. AP 3 Trump shakes hands with Hillary Clinton during a OCt. 9, 2016 presidential debate. Getty Images According to the House report, only a 'scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of the substandard reports constitutes the only classified information cited to suggest Putin 'aspired' to help Trump win.' 'CIA officers said that some of this information had been held on the orders of [Brennan], while other reporting had been judged by experienced CIA officers to have not met longstanding publication standards,' the report noted. Advertisement Other information was 'unclear, of uncertain origin, potentially biased, implausible, or in the words of senior operations officers 'odd,'' the report also stated, and was 'published after the election–over the objections of veteran officers–on orders of DCIA [Brennan] and cited in the [January 2017] ICA to support claims that Putin aspired to help Trump win.'