Ireland to rely on foreign navies for undersea threat detection until 2027, says Tánaiste
Ireland will have to continue until at least July 2027 to rely on 'friendly' foreign navies to detect underwater threats off our coast from Russian spy ships and submarines.
Tánaiste and Minister for Defence Simon Harris has said he expects contract negotiations for the supply of advanced sonar technology to conclude in the coming months. However, the first sonar system is not expected to be delivered until July 2027.
Irish navy ships were equipped with the technology up until the mid-1980s. However, when it was in need of upgrading or replacing, the Department of Defence at the time decided this was too expensive.
Sonar is the only way the Navy can get a picture of underwater threats, especially to critically important subsea cables which carry millions of financial and other data transactions between Europe and North America.
About 75% of all transatlantic cables pass through Ireland's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). In total, our EEZ covers 220 million acres (880,000 km²) — around ten times the size of our landmass.
The Russians have repeatedly sent so-called spy ships, such as Yantar, to the cable areas.
It is believed that such ships deploy submersibles that have been mapping the cables' coordinates and could potentially plant explosives that might be triggered in the event of a major war — severely hampering allied communications and economies. However, none have been discovered to date.
The British, French, NATO, and occasionally the US Navy have been monitoring Russian activity in our EEZ.
Two years ago, the Irish Examiner exclusively revealed that a Russian submarine surfaced just outside the entrance to Cork Harbour.
Because the Irish Navy had no sonar, it was unable to monitor the submarine's movements underwater. A British helicopter soon arrived and deployed sonar into the sea to track it. Shortly afterwards, a Royal Navy warship helped drive it away.
The submarine surfaced just outside Ireland's 12-nautical-mile sovereign waters limit. It is now believed that the submarine's commander knew the Naval Service had no undersea tracking capability and was waiting for a British response as part of war gaming, while also testing the level of military cooperation between Ireland and the UK.
Meanwhile, Mr Harris has responded to a Dáil question from Fianna Fáil Cork South-Central TD Seamus McGrath by revealing that the current strength of the Navy is 745 personnel — far short of the minimum 1,094 required to run the force.
He said 97 personnel were inducted into the Navy last year. These included 80 enlisted members, 13 officers, and two former members who had previously left the service but decided to re-enlist.
The Navy has been working hard to recruit experienced specialists from the private sector. However, it only managed to attract one chef and one engine room fitter—skilled roles the service is critically short of.
Mr Harris said three Atlantic-capable P60-class vessels are currently available for operations, but they conduct patrols on a rotation basis — usually just one at a time.
In addition, a smaller ship, LÉ Aoibhinn, purchased from New Zealand, is currently on duty. However, it is not robust enough for Atlantic patrols and primarily operates close to the coastline in the Irish Sea.
He did not comment when asked about when her sister ship, LÉ Gobnait, might become operational.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
UK police studying Glastonbury performances after anti-Israel chants
British police said they were considering whether to launch an investigation after performers at Glastonbury Festival made anti-Israel comments during their shows. "We are aware of the comments made by acts on the West Holts Stage at Glastonbury Festival this afternoon," Avon and Somerset Police, in western England, said on X late yesterday. Irish hip-hop group Kneecap and punk duo Bob Vylan made anti-Israeli chants in separate shows on the West Holts stage. One of the members of Bob Vylan chanted "Death, death, to the IDF" in a reference to the Israel Defense Forces. "Video evidence will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation," the police statement said. The Israeli Embassy in Britain said it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival". Prime Minister Keir Starmer said earlier this month it was "not appropriate" for Kneecap to appear at Glastonbury. The band's frontman Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh was charged with a terrorism offence last month for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah at a concert in November. He has denied the charge. A British government minister said it was appalling that the anti-Israel chants had been made at Glastonbury, and that the festival's organisers and the BBC broadcaster - which is showing the event - had questions to answer. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he was also appalled by violence committed by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank. "I'd also say to the Israeli Embassy, get your own house in order in terms of the conduct of your own citizens and the settlers in the West Bank," Mr Streeting told Sky News. "I wish they'd take the violence of their own citizens towards Palestinians more seriously," he said.
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Ireland's €550m hospitality VAT cut seems based on little evidence
PICTURE THIS – YOU'RE a politician. 'Hey, hey!' says you. 'Don't threaten me with a good time!' But wait – it gets better. Because you're a senior politician. A cabinet minister. You have a say in how the government spends billions of euros every year. With that in mind, how should you make decisions? 1: Make evidence-based calls using the best data available 2: Make vibes-based calls using personal testimony / lobbying 3: A mix – evidence a fair bit of the time, but vibes when it suits If you chose Number 3 – congratulations, you have what it takes to be a minister! You see, the government recently made a 'solemn pledge' to cut the VAT rate for the hospitality sector. The move would cost the state at least €550 million in foregone tax revenue, if only applied to food businesses. As it means losing out on a lot of tax money, you would think the government would have a good reason for the move. But as we'll discover – the rationale seems murky at best. Billions at stake — but based on what evidence? Let's take a look. First of all, a quick reminder on what the hospitality VAT rate is. A VAT rate of 13.5% applies to businesses working in 'hospitality' – restaurants, cafes, hotels, etc. Restaurants say they're in crisis — but the numbers tell a different story. However, for much of the last decade or so, the rate was set at a lower 9%. This lower rate was introduced after the financial crisis, to help businesses lower prices. The state collects VAT on all products sold by hospitality firms. If the rate is lowered from 13.5% to 9%, in theory this means profitable companies can lower their prices without impacting their bottom line. So, this would make the services sold by hospitality businesses more affordable. Then, people would be more likely to, say, eat out in a restaurant. In turn, this would get people more confident about spending money, at a time when the economy desperately needed a boost. As explored previously, that original idea has now been lost . More recently, the lower VAT rate has essentially functioned as a support to the sector. For example, during Covid the rate was dropped as many restaurants could not operate. Instead of lowering prices, the idea was the lower rate would boost the profits of struggling businesses. The rate was increased from 9% back to the normal 13.5% in 2023 as the economy returned to normal. But last week, Tánaiste Simon Harris made a 'solemn promise' to once again reduce the VAT rate for the hospitality sector. He acknowledged the move would cost the state a 'significant amount of money'. However, he argued 'it's not about a tax cut for businesses'. 'It's about recognising that in every town and every village there are small businesses creating employment that want to be able to keep going and need to be supported,' he said. So the Tánaiste argued that hospitality firms are struggling and need financial support from the state. Where did he get that idea? Restaurants are closing — or are they? The most obvious source for the claim is lobbying from the likes of the Restaurants Association of Ireland (RAI). Advertisement Ever since the hospitality VAT rate was put back to 13.5% in 2022, the RAI has waged an exceptionally effective campaign to bring it back down to 9%. It has also made it clear the lower VAT rate won't be used to lower prices. Food businesses will take the extra money from paying less tax. At the core of the RAI's argument is its claim that a slew of restaurants across Ireland are closing due to high trading costs. It argues lowering VAT will reduce costs and help these firms survive. The key evidence it provides for this claim is closure statistics, which the RAI compiles itself. For the last year and a half or so, this survey has claimed about 600 restaurants are closing every year in Ireland . This statistics has been the basis for countless articles about the 'crisis' facing Irish hospitality. See examples here , here , here , here … you get the idea. What almost all of these share in common is citing the RAI figures. It's something I've done myself . But we should consider – do these figures reflect reality? As noted previously, the RAI only tracks restaurant closures – not openings. It's a shortcoming the group has previously acknowledged , saying: 'We don't have all the data'. But that caveat rarely appears in media reporting. In fact, the most recent data from the CSO (Central Statistics Office) found that openings were very strong in the sector . While the figures are from 2022 and possibly Covid-influenced, they certainly give no indication of a crisis. This leads onto the next point – you would expect huge numbers of food businesses closing to lead to a drop in the number of people employed in the sector. But that's not happening. But employment in this sector rose by 7% over the last year to 186,000 . By most metrics, the sector looks fine. More than that – it looks like it's doing well. What the numbers actually say The CSO tracks the number of people employed per industry. 'Accommodation and food services' is the one which is relevant for hospitality food businesses – the type the RAI claims are closing en masse. For instance, in November the CSO reported 'Accommodation & Food Services' recorded the largest increase in hours worked of any sector in the country . This simply doesn't match up with the claims of a supposed closure crisis. We even have a perfect, recent reference point for a closure crisis in the industry. In 2020, employment in 'Accommodation & Food Services' plunged to 139,000. There's no question that was a disaster, and the lower VAT rate was needed. But the same evidence is not there right now. The Department of Finance has also staunchly opposed reducing the hospitality VAT rate. It pointed out that 14 EU countries have a VAT rate of 12% or higher on food services – meaning Ireland's current 13.5% rate is fairly typical. The OECD, an intergovernmental group of wealthy countries, also recently pointed out that reducing hospitality VAT will likely 'disproportionately benefit' people on higher incomes . What cutting VAT really means Finally, it's worth considering the impact reducing the VAT rate will have more broadly. Reducing the rate and foregoing €550 million per year means the government has less money to spend in other areas. Cutting the VAT rate to 9% would make it much less likely for the government to adjust income tax bands for inflation – meaning workers will lose more money in tax. This is exactly what the Department of Finance has warned against, saying the lower VAT rate will mean an 'enormous fiscal transfer of taxpayer's money to the sector, which the evidence available at present does not support.' Given all of this – what is the evidence for reducing hospitality VAT? The Journal asked representatives for Simon Harris the studies or data he cited to decide on cutting the VAT rate. In response, a spokesperson said: 'The Programme for Government commits to bring forward measures to support SMEs. In particular, the retail and hospitality sectors, acknowledging the increased cost pressures on these sectors.' Asked again what evidence the Tánaiste's decision was based on, there was no response. Now, look – we all know most restaurants and cafes operate on fine margins. That's not in question. What is in doubt is whether this very specific measure – which will cost taxpayers a lot of money – is needed. To date, the government has not provided good evidence to indicate why it is choosing to forgo hundreds of millions of euros. When politicians are playing with so much taxpayer money, the least they can do is explain their decisions. So far, the government has completely failed to do that. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Flogging beef tongue and Irish whiskey: Taoiseach and ministers travel to Japan in major trade push
Christina Finn TAOISEACH MICHEÁL MARTIN is due to travel to Japan tomorrow, where he will visit Tokyo, Osaka, and Hiroshima. A total of six ministers, not including the Taoiseach, have travelled or are due to travel to Japan this year for a major charm offensive trade push amidst the threat of US tariffs. Enterprise Minister Peter Burke and Agriculture Minister Martin Heydon, Minister of State Hildegarde Naughton, Media Minister Patrick O'Donovan have already made the trip this year, with Higher Education Minister James Lawless heading there during the summer and Transport Minister Darragh O'Brien due to travel in the autumn. Japan is Ireland's second-largest trading partner in the Asia-Pacific region, with annual two-way trade totalling €21.5 billion. There is a big demand for some Irish produce, such as beef, Irish whiskey, seafood and grain products. Irish beef tongue 'very big' in Japan Irish beef tongue is 'very big' in Japan, said one official, who added that Donegal oysters and Flavins oatmeal are among highly-sought after commodities in Japan. Japan is the third biggest market for Irish whiskey and the market is growing. In 2020, 55,000 cases of Irish whiskey were sold to Japan, with 206,000 cases sold last year. Advertisement With the deadline for Europe to strike a trade deal with the US approaching, Ireland has been on the charm offensive with other nations in a bid to attempt to fill the gap of any trading holes that might emerge. Market diversification is the main show in town right now, said one official. Japan is a growing export market with over 300 Enterprise Ireland clients doing business in Japan and over 50 Irish companies having representations or presence in the country. The aim of the Ireland Japan 2025 programme is part of the government's high-level trade mission programme whereby ministers are tasked with showcasing Ireland's world-class agri-food sector. Food market, Osaka Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Japan, which has a population of 123 million people, holds lots of opportunities for Ireland, particularly when a cloud of uncertainty is on the horizon. The country gained access to Irish beef in 2013 and sheep-meat access in 2019. The Irish agri-food sector exported 34% dairy to Japan, along with 28% pig meat, 10% fish, 12% beverages and 6% animal feed. There is a big push in particular to sell Irish whiskey and gin to Japan. Expo 2025 Osaka As part of the Taoiseach's visit, Martin will attend the Ireland Pavilion at Expo 2025, which is a key part of the Ireland Japan 2025 programme. A year long series of activities at the Expo have been designed to increase Ireland's presence and visibility in Japan and this includes the opening of the new Ireland House. Related Reads 'Wait and see': Taoiseach says Trump's extension on tariff threat could stifle economic growth Trump says 50% tariffs on EU delayed until 9 July after 'very nice call' with von der Leyen Potential risk of differential tariff rates to all-island economy averted for now, Cabinet to hear Irish Pavilion at Osaka Expo 2025 Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo The overall approved budget for the programme is €16.8 million over the three years from 2023 to 2026. Tánaiste Simon Harris has said Ireland completed its pavilion on time and within budget. Designed by Office of Public Works architects, the Ireland Pavilion is inspired by the ancient Celtic motif of the triskele. The Ireland Pavilion serves as a hub for Irish organisations, Team Ireland and the diaspora, and involves an immersive visitor experience. It is expected that Expo will attract approximately 28 million visitors, with the government hoping its participation in the Expo will provide a platform for public diplomacy for Ireland. 'Ireland can still remain relatively unknown among the wider Japanese public. The Ireland pavilion has been operating at maximum capacity on a daily basis. We reckon that in excess of six million visitors have attended Expo already,' Tánaiste Simon Harris has said. As part of the Taoiseach's trip next week, he will also visit the Peace Memorial Park and Museum at Hiroshima to mark the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima City and Nagasaki City by the United States in 1945. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
