Kremlin says a Putin-Trump meeting is essential but needs advance preparation and must yield results
Also Read | Trump downplays Putin's decision to skip Istanbul peace talks with Zelenskyy
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov was commenting after Mr. Trump said he would meet Mr. Putin "as soon as we can set it up".
"...Such a meeting is certainly necessary. It is necessary both primarily from the point of view of bilateral Russian-U.S. relations and from the point of view of having a serious conversation at the highest level about international affairs and on regional problems, including, of course, about the crisis over Ukraine," Mr. Peskov said.
Russian and Ukrainian negotiators were in Istanbul on Friday (May 15, 2025) for what was billed as their first direct peace talks in more than three years, under pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump to end Europe's deadliest conflict since World War Two.
Commenting on the Istanbul talks, Mr. Peskov said that the Russian negotiating team was in constant communication with Moscow and that President Putin was receiving real-time updates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump Cozying Up To Pakistan – Will It Push India Closer To China?
New Delhi: A meeting in Washington last month between former U.S. President Donald Trump and Pakistan Field Marshal Asim Munir sparked concern in New Delhi. Just days earlier, a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam, South Kashmir, had killed 26 innocent civilians. India blamed Pakistan after a group linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba claimed responsibility. Foreign policy watchers are now weighing a critical question: could this renewed U.S.-Pakistan engagement unsettle India's fragile equation with China? For years, Beijing has served as the strategic common threat binding India and the United States. Both nations view China as a geopolitical rival and have steadily expanded cooperation to counter its influence. But Trump's warm overtures toward China-backed Pakistan are forcing India to rethink its calculus. Diplomatic experts say India is unlikely to pivot dramatically toward China based solely on the Trump-Munir meeting. Moves to de-escalate tensions with Beijing had already been set in motion months earlier. Still, the symbolism of the meeting and its implications for India's long-term strategy are difficult to ignore. Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center in Washington D.C., said the meeting must be viewed in light of recent India-Pakistan military flare-ups during Operation Sindoor. 'It is not that India is suddenly leaning toward China because of Trump's outreach to Pakistan. But the context matters, especially given that Pakistan used Chinese weapons against India for the first time during that conflict,' he explained. He added that uncertainty around U.S.-India ties under Trump remains a major concern in New Delhi. 'There is no clear indication of how Trump plans to deal with China. At times, he talks tough, at others, he calls for cooperation. India is wary of assuming that the United States will always align with its strategic interests on China.' That ambiguity, Kugelman said, is one reason India has begun hedging its bets by stabilising ties with Beijing. A Subtle Thaw Between India and China Since October 2024, signs of a diplomatic thaw have emerged. Border troops from both sides have started withdrawing from several flashpoints along the disputed Line of Actual Control (LAC). Earlier this month, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar met Chinese President Xi Jinping during the SCO foreign ministers' summit, marking his first visit to Beijing in six years. Direct commercial flights between India and China are set to resume. The long-suspended Kailash Mansarovar Yatra has reopened for Indian pilgrims. In a move with economic implications, the government think tank NITI Aayog has proposed allowing up to 24% Chinese equity in Indian companies without special clearance. Foreign policy commentator Indrani Bagchi believes India is proceeding cautiously. 'The government is trying to introduce a degree of stability into its relationship with China. We may see some Chinese investment flowing in, but it's unlikely to go much beyond that,' she said. She also warned against overreacting to Trump's overtures to Pakistan. 'This is not the first time Washington has leaned toward Islamabad. Whenever it does, the trust factor in U.S.-India ties takes a hit. If the United States resumes military aid to Pakistan, it will definitely raise red flags in New Delhi,' she added. At the same time, she noted, India has been attempting to diversify its defense partnerships, gradually reducing dependence on Russia and increasing procurement from the United States. 'If America is using Pakistan as a bridge to reach China, India will be forced to reassess,' she added. What Is Beijing's Game? Some former diplomats argue that if India extends a hand, China will likely respond with caution but openness. Achal Malhotra, a former ambassador, said New Delhi's foreign policy is guided by realism, not alignment. 'Our relations with China stand on their own merit. We are prudent but sovereign in our choices. The United States knows this. Trump's meeting with Munir likely reflects Pakistan's geographic utility in Afghanistan and Central Asia. Unless that directly threatens India, it is not an alarming development,' he said. Strategic analyst Zakir Hussain suggested it is U.S. inconsistency that might be nudging India toward China. 'The way Washington handles its ties with India is part of the reason New Delhi may explore a less confrontational path with Beijing. Economically, some of India's moves may lower tensions. But let us be clear that China will never abandon Pakistan for India,' he said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump signs NIL executive order to stop pay-for-play in college sports and protect scholarships
Donald Trump signs NIL executive order to stop pay-for-play in college sports and protect scholarships (Image via Getty) On July 24, 2025 in Washington, President Donald Trump signed a new executive order. It aims to bring federal rules around name, image and likeness (NIL) in college sports. The move follows growing concern that uncontrolled booster spending and state-by-state NIL laws have disrupted fair competition. The White House fact sheet says the order seeks to protect scholarships, women's and non‑revenue sports, and clarify whether student‑athletes count as employees or not. What Donald Trump wants to change in college sports with his NIL and pay-for-play decision On July 24, 2025 in Washington, President Donald Trump issued the 'Saving College Sports' executive order. It explicitly bans third‑party 'pay‑for‑play' NIL payments to college athletes, while still allowing fair‑market value endorsements from brands. The White House states that booster payments used to recruit athletes threaten competitive balance and siphon resources from smaller sports programs. The order requires athletic departments with $125 million or more in revenue during the 2024‑25 season to expand scholarships and roster spots in women's and non‑revenue sports. Departments earning between $50 million and $125 million must at least maintain current support, and those below $50 million must not cut opportunities for non‑revenue sports. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Donald Trump joins Charlie Baker and Congress in reshaping college sports and athlete status laws NCAA President Charlie Baker commented on July 24 at a Washington event, saying the NCAA is open to executive ideas but stressed that real change needs lawmakers: 'our focus needs to be on the legislative process.' He supports clearer rules via Congress, not just executive orders. That same day, House committee leaders,Reps. Brett Guthrie, Tim Walberg and Jim Jordan praised the order and said the SCORE Act, a bill to reinforce NIL and antitrust protections, will move forward in the fall session. They stated: 'We thank President Trump for his commitment to supporting student‑athletes and strengthening college athletics in the NIL era.' The order also told U.S. officials including the Secretaries of Labor, Education, and Health and Human Services and the FTC chair to define athlete employment status and use regulatory or legal tools to support stability in college sports. Many legal experts question how much lasting impact the order will have without congressional backing. Also Read: Donald Trump Backs Possible UFC Fight As Michael Chandler Targets White House Battle With Conor McGregor FAQs 1. What does Donald Trump's NIL executive order mean for college athletes? It bans pay-for-play deals but still allows fair brand endorsements for student-athletes. 2. Will Trump's executive order affect college sports scholarships? Yes, it aims to protect and expand scholarships, especially in women's and non-revenue sports. 3. Is pay-for-play now illegal under Trump's NIL order? Yes, the order stops colleges from using third-party money to recruit athletes unfairly. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Trump asks Supreme Court to approve cuts to health grants tied to diversity
The Trump administration urged the US Supreme Court to allow it to carry out major funding cuts to National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants, arguing that current diversity-related programmes are 'undisputedly counter to the administration's priorities.'The move is the latest in President Donald Trump's ongoing push to reduce federal spending and eliminate government support for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives — including those related to biomedical research and transgender Justice Department filed an emergency request to the court, seeking to lift a June order by U.S. District Judge William Young in Boston. That ruling blocked the administration's plan and ordered the government to restore access to more than $783 million in NIH grant funding. The lawsuit was brought by researchers and 16 Democratic-led states, led by Massachusetts. In its filing, the Justice Department argued that the district court's injunction forces the government to 'continue paying $783 million in federal grants that are undisputedly counter to the administration's priorities.'The NIH, considered the world's largest biomedical research funder, has come under increasing pressure since Trump's return to the presidency in January. Critics say his administration's broad effort to dismantle diversity and health equity programs is politicizing science and jeopardizing public health.'The cuts harm the health of Americans and people across the globe,' warned an open letter signed in June by dozens of NIH scientists and staff. The signatories accused the agency of turning its back on inclusive research and of being complicit in 'a political agenda that undermines evidence-based health policy.'The Trump administration has frequently turned to the Supreme Court — now dominated by a 6-3 conservative majority — to clear legal roadblocks to its sweeping policy changes. So far, the high court has largely sided with the administration on most contested issues since request in the NIH case could have long-term consequences for government-funded research programs, particularly those aimed at addressing racial, gender, and LGBTQ+ disparities in health ruling came in two lawsuits challenging the cuts. One was filed by the American Public Health Association, individual researchers and other plaintiffs who called the cuts an "ongoing ideological purge" of projects with a purported connection to gender identity, DEI "or other vague, now-forbidden language." The other was filed by the states, most of them Democratic-led.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersMust Watch
