Asos has made a huge change to deliveries after hiking fees – and it's good news for shoppers
Published: Invalid Date,
ASOS has made a huge change to deliveries just months after introducing a new fee, and it's welcome news for shoppers.
The online fashion giant has extended the cut-off time for placing orders that qualify for next day delivery.
2
2
This follows a change by ASOS several weeks ago, when the cut-off time for next-day delivery was reduced from 9pm to 7pm.
However, the retailer has told The Sun that the shorter time window has been scrapped.
Customers can now qualify for next day delivery on all orders placed before 9pm, Monday to Sunday.
ASOS is in the process of notifying customers about the change.
An email seen by The Sun reads: "Good news – you now have even longer to place your next-day delivery order.
"Our cut-off time has moved from 7pm to 9pm, giving you two extra hours to shop.
"Whether you're planning ahead or making a last-minute purchase, order by 9pm and get it tomorrow."
A spokesperson for ASOS added: "We had to temporarily introduce a shorter next day delivery cut off time of 7pm several weeks ago.
"However now we're back to 9pm.
"Sometimes we need to move it forward due to high order volumes or other events."
I chase refunds for a living - how to get your money back
ASOS offers several delivery options within the UK.
Standard delivery costs £4.50, but is free for orders over £40.
Next day delivery costs £5.95 and arrives between 7am and 10pm.
Next day delivery is available Monday to Sunday, excluding public holidays, but is not available for certain postcodes.
ASOS Instant guarantees delivery before 12 noon the next day, Monday to Sunday.
For frequent next day deliveries, the Premier Delivery subscription offers unlimited next day delivery for £9.95 per year.
What is ASOS Premier?
ASOS Premier is a yearly subscription service costing £9.95.
It provides unlimited next-day and nominated-day delivery on orders over £15 (after discount).
Premier members also receive free standard delivery on all other orders (under £15 after discount) and gain access to exclusive discounts and promotions, such as Premier Party, with up to 50% off selected styles.
Given the standard cost of next-day delivery, the subscription can pay for itself in as little as two uses.
What else has changed at ASOS?
Last year, ASOS introduced a return fee for certain customers, targeting those with "frequently high return rates."
Shoppers affected by the change are charged £3.95 for returning unwanted items unless they keep goods worth a set value from their original order.
The retailer stated at the time that only a "small number of shoppers" would be impacted but did not disclose exactly how many. For those subject to the fee, they need to keep items totalling £40 to avoid the charge.
Even customers subscribed to ASOS Premier – a £9.95 annual membership offering perks like free next-day delivery – aren't exempt from the extra fee.
However, Premier members only need to keep £15 worth of items to sidestep the charge.
ASOS is just the latest in a growing list of retailers introducing return fees as they grapple with the rising costs of processing returns.
Fast fashion rival PrettyLittleThing, owned by Boohoo, rolled out a flat £1.99 return fee for all customers last June.
Only those who pay the £9.99 a year fee for the PLT loyalty programme, are spared the return fee.
River Island angered customers by introducing a £2 charge to return items ordered online back in February.
The charge is deducted from the total amount refunded after the customer has posted back the items.
Other big retailers, including Debenhams, Zara, H&M and New Look, have introduced similar changes over the past few years.
In December 2023, Debenhams introduced a £1.99 fee amid fears shoppers have been abusing free returns by ordering items, wearing them briefly and then sending them back.
H&M introduced a £1.99 charge for returns back in September 2023.
New Look began charging £1.99 to return online orders as part of a nationwide trial in February 2023.
Before that Boohoo also began the practise in July 2022, but it continues to offer free returns for its "premier" customers.
In May 2022, fashion chain Zara introduced a fee for those looking to bring back parcels, it now charges £1.95 for the service.
Next gives customers 14 days to return their orders, but still charges £2.50 to take them back.
A host of retailers including Mountain Warehouse, THG and Moss Bros have also added a charge for shoppers to return items bought online.
Companies have started to charge for returns as the costs of shipping have risen.
The cost of processing is also higher.
Retailers with stores can make it easier for consumers to return goods for free as they can be dropped off in a store, which saves the shipping charges.
YOUR RETURN RIGHTS EXPLAINED
THE Sun's Head of Consumer, Tara Evans, explains your return rights:
Your right to return items depends on where you purchased it and why you want to return it.
If you bought an item online then you are covered by the Consumer Contracts Regulations, which means you can cancel an item 14 days from when you receive it.
You then have a further 14 days to return the item, once you've notified the retailer that you want to return it.
If an item is faulty - regardless of how you bought it - you are legally able to return it and get a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
Most retailers have their own returns policies, offering an exchange, refund or credit.
Shops don't have to have these policies by law, but if they do have one then they should stick to it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK politics live: Rachel Reeves says she was ‘clearly upset' but it was her job to support government at PMQs
Rachel Reeves has appeared in public with Sir Keir Starmer a day after breaking down in tears alongside the prime minister in the Commons. The pair were both at the launch of the government's 10-year plan for the NHS in London. Speaking to broadcasters following following the launch, Ms Reeves declined to give the reason behind her tears. 'Clearly I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that,' the chancellor said. 'My job as chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the prime minister, supporting the government and that's what I tried to do. 'I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that.' She appeared to reject suggestions that her tears at PMQs were related to a conversation with Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle or another member of government. Welfare reform has been postponed, but it isn't going away Welfare reform has been postponed, but it isn't going away Editorial: Labour's overhaul of the benefits system failed because it was clearly a raid by the Treasury looking for savings at speed. The government should produce a Beveridge report for the 21st century – or risk a future, right-wing government taking up the challenge Holly Evans4 July 2025 05:00 Rachel Reeves's brave face cannot mask the challenges she now faces If there were any doubts about Sir Keir Starmer 's plans for Rachel Reeves, the prime minister and his chancellor have gone all out to try and put them to bed. A day after she sat crying through Prime Minister's Questions on live television, the chancellor sat smiling and cheering through the prime minister 's speech outlining a 10-year plan for the NHS. For his part, Sir Keir shouted 'wahey' as Ms Reeves got to her speech to lay the financial framework for the plan. Reeves's brave face cannot mask the challenges she now faces The chancellor has come out fighting after her teary PMQs moment... but much tougher challenges now await Holly Evans4 July 2025 04:00 For crying out loud: Are you ready for the 'politics of pain' about to hit us? Keir Starmer promised that the last Budget would be 'painful'. In a speech in the Downing Street garden in August, two months earlier, he tried to manage expectations, saying that the state of the public finances was 'worse than we ever imagined', and asked people to 'accept short-term pain for long-term good'. It was a forlorn hope. Far from 'accepting' the pain, public opinion turned against the government further after Rachel Reeves announced £25bn a year of tax increases, rising to £40bn a year by the end of this parliament. Business leaders reacted particularly badly to the rise in employers' national insurance contributions, causing the chancellor to over-correct when she addressed the CBI the following month. She told representatives that she was 'not coming back with more borrowing or more taxes'. Read the full analysis from John Rentoul here: For crying out loud: are you ready for the 'politics of pain' about to hit us? I once accused the PM and his chancellor of being too gloomy, writes John Rentoul. Turns out they were not gloomy enough – and they'll have to lead the nation through another vale of tears Holly Evans4 July 2025 03:00 Which tax rises could Rachel Reeves introduce to pay for the £5bn welfare U-turn? This week's embarrassing climbdown on welfare saw the government's benefits reforms gutted almost entirely, while savings from the bill were slashed from £5bn to nothing. In the wake of the U-turn, there are now growing questions over how the government will raise the money to fill the black hole in the public finances. Ministers have already squeezed significant savings out of their departments in cuts that were unveiled at last month's spending review, meaning there is now a mounting expectation that the chancellor will be forced to raise taxes instead. Which tax rises could Rachel Reeves introduce to pay for the £5bn welfare U-turn? Labour's pledge not to raise taxes on 'working people' leaves the chancellor with a limited number of workable options to fill the £5bn hole in the public finances left by this week's welfare climbdown Holly Evans4 July 2025 02:00 Ex-Labour MP Zarah Sultana to set up new party with Jeremy Corbyn A former Labour MP has announced her intention to co-lead the formation of a new political party with Jeremy Corbyn, the ex-Labour leader. Zarah Sultana, whose Labour whip was suspended last year, confirmed her resignation from Sir Keir Starmer 's party. In a statement posted on X, Ms Sultana, who represents Coventry South, stated the initiative would also involve "other independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country". Ex-Labour MP Zara Sultana to set up new party with Jeremy Corbyn The independent MP lost the Labour whip last year when she voted to abolish the two-child benefit cap Holly Evans4 July 2025 01:00 Kemi Badenoch's lack of empathy over Rachel Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her The trouble with Kemi Badenoch is that if she sees someone lying on the ground, she can't resist the temptation to kick them. She lacks empathy, to put it politely. There she was at Prime Minister's Questions, facing an open goal for a change, and attacking the prime minister, who, even three days later, can look after himself. Then she spots the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, her lip quivering, seemingly on the brink of crying. Straight in goes the Badenoch boot – she said Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and described her as Starmer's 'human shield'. After Starmer failed to confirm Reeves in post for the rest of the parliament – a tall order for any appointee – Badenoch piled on the punishment: 'How awful for the chancellor that he did not confirm she would be in post.' Badenoch's lack of empathy over Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her Neither her party nor the public seems to like the Badenoch style, writes Sean O'Grady. Her tasteless lack of empathy for the chancellor is indicative of a leadership marked by arrogant dismissiveness Holly Evans4 July 2025 00:00 The markets have spoken – and it is they, not the prime minister, that saved Rachel Reeves The markets have delivered their verdict. They want Rachel Reeves, and no one else will do. If the chancellor needed saving, they've done the job, boosting her political clout in the process. The events of the last 24 hours have been quite remarkable, almost on a level with the Truss mini-Budget, when the City's appalled reaction resulted in the near collapse of several big pension funds, and ultimately led to the end of a premiership before a now-infamous lettuce had rotted. The tearful expression on the face of a visibly upset Reeves, and a less than ringing endorsement from a prime minister who had previously said she would be in place for the full parliament, triggered a panic, with some of the biggest movements in UK government bond prices recorded since the 'Trussterf***' Budget. The markets have spoken – and it is they, not the PM, that saved Rachel Reeves In its response to the chancellor's possible resignation, in the face of market jitters the City has made it clear that she is Labour's only candidate for No 11, says James Moore – and any attempt to replace her could prove very expensive for the country Holly Evans3 July 2025 23:00 Labour respond to Zarah Sultana resignation Responding to Ms Sultana's statement, a Labour spokesperson said: 'In just 12 months, this Labour government has boosted wages, delivered an extra four million NHS appointments, opened 750 free breakfast clubs, secured three trade deals and four interest rate cuts lowering mortgage payments for millions. 'Only Labour can deliver the change needed to renew Britain.' Holly Evans3 July 2025 22:28 MP Zarah Sultana resigns from the Labour Party MP Zarah Sultana has said that she is resigning from the Labour Party to 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with Jeremy Corbyn. Ms Sultana, who has sat in the Commons as an independent MP since she had the Labour whip withdrawn last year, represents the Coventry South constituency. She said in a statement posted on X that she was 'resigning from the Labour Party'. 'Jeremy Corbyn and I will co-lead the founding of a new party, with other independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country.' She said that 'Westminster is broken but the real crisis is deeper' and the 'two-party system offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises'. She added: 'A year ago I was suspended by the Labour Party for voting to abolish the two-child benefit cap and list 400,000 children out of poverty. I'd do it again. I voted against scrapping winter fuel payments for pensioners. I'd do it again. Now, the Government wants to make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much.' She urged people to 'join us'. Holly Evans3 July 2025 21:33 MP likens Government to flat-earthers over refusal to compensate Waspi women Sir Keir Starmer's Government has been likened to flat-earthers by one of its own MPs, over its refusal to compensate women affected by state pension age changes. Labour's Rebecca Long Bailey said the arguments against compensation for the 1950s-born women are 'bizarre' and akin to those made by people who believe the Earth is flat. The Government last December ruled out a compensation package for women born in the 1950s, whose state pension age was raised so it would be equal with men. This is despite Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves being among the senior ministers to support the Waspi campaign when Labour was in opposition. A report by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) had recommended the UK Government pay compensation to women born in the 1950s whose state pension age was raised so it would be equal with men. The watchdog also said the women should be paid up to £2,950 each, a package with a potential total cost of £10.5 billion to the public purse, as poor communication meant they had lost out on the chance to plan their retirement finances. Holly Evans
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Ipswich businesses' frustrations at Orwell Bridge work 'failure'
Nine major employers have joined forces to express their frustration about the effect of the partial closure of the Orwell Bridge. The businesses and institutions, which collectively employ more than 3,000 people, have voiced concerns about the consequences of a £6m repair project. In an open letter they called for either a northern bypass to be built past Ipswich, which could link the A14/A140 and the A12, or a "practical alternative" to try to prevent a repeat of the disruption seen in recent weeks. Chris Chambers, cabinet member for transport at Conservative-run Suffolk County Council, previously said no decision was likely to be made until after the elections for a new mayor-led authority for Norfolk and Suffolk in May 2026. The Orwell Bridge on the A14 south of Ipswich is currently operating with lane closures while the repair works are carried out to replace expansion joints. National Highways started work on 16 June, shutting one lane on the eastbound carriageway which caused severe Fellows, regional director for the east region at National Highways, said he was hopeful the work would finish in mid to late August."We do recognise the significant effect work on the bridge has on road users, businesses and local communities," he previously week an additional lane - on the westbound carriageway - was also closed, further affecting motorists and also businesses which have reported the open letter, the nine businesses referenced how the closures had "had a significant impact on our bottom line and our employees' wellbeing". "We have all seen employees stuck in traffic for up to two-and-a-half hours on their journeys to work," they said. "Apart from the loss of productivity caused by their lateness, being stuck in traffic in hot weather isn't good for people's wellbeing or work-life balance." 'Absolute chaos, it's a joke' The businesses which have signed the letter are Birketts, the Willis Tower Watson group, University of Suffolk, Suffolk New College, Ashtons Legal, UK & Ireland OCS, Barnes Construction, Associated British Ports, and the Tru 7 Nichols is the CEO and owner of the Tru7 Group, which supplies goods to the construction, demolition and agriculture industries. He told the BBC his trucks were "doing less than half of the work they would normally do" each day because of the severity of traffic. "It's absolutely horrendous, absolute chaos, it's a joke," he said."We're fortunately an older family business, so there's a bit of meat on the bone, but there's a lot of smaller businesses who are really going to hurt." "A northern bypass needs to happen, otherwise all these high paid jobs will just gradually disappear," added Mr open letter from the businesses said they "fully accept maintenance of the bridge is required" and that "contractors and National Highways have done all they can to minimise" the they added they were "genuinely concerned" prospective employees may choose to work elsewhere. In a different letter, recently sent to MP Heidi Alexander, secretary of state for transport, Mr Chambers said "strategic investment in Suffolk's transport infrastructure" "has not been forthcoming". "Suffolk's continued exclusion from significant transport investment programmes cannot continue if we are to meet our ambitions for growth, sustainability, and connectivity," he said. The Department for Transport, meanwhile, said it remained "committed to supporting reliable, safe transport links in Suffolk and beyond"."While works to improve safety on the Orwell Bridge have increased congestion, some closures remain necessary to protect road users and maintain vital routes," a spokesperson added. Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Mixed feelings on closure of Lowestoft's last remaining nightclub
A coastal town is set to lose its last remaining nightclub after its closing event on Nightclub, on the first floor of The Harbour Inn in Lowestoft, has faced increased costs and dwindling customer young people who spoke to the BBC said they prefer to go out in Norwich where there is a greater variety of venues, or watch live music David Moss said the ground-floor pub would remain open, but for the club space, he added: "We've tried everything we can to keep Lowestoft's only club going, but it's just become unviable now." Mr Moss, who employs 220 staff across nine venues in Suffolk, began his business in Colchester in the 1980s."Times have changed. Since Covid, youngsters today are not like 25 years ago [where] people couldn't wait to finish work to go out on a Thursday night, Friday night and Saturday, always clubbing," he said."Now you've got pubs which are open until one o'clock in the morning. They've got live music. They [customers] don't need to go anywhere else."Also, they've changed. Young people who come out of university and work for me, so many of them don't even drink."I go around the different places and have a look at what's going on. I go down to Norwich and even those streets are quiet." Mr Moss said employment costs, with increases in the National Minimum Wage and National Insurance, undermined the club's viability, but added that he hopes to redeploy the club's staff. "From April we knew it would start putting things into the wrong position."To be fair, we couldn't put our prices up. People have only got so much to spend and the more you're getting taxed and everything increased."We didn't want to come to this, but even with the simple licencing, we have to have six security people on."You're [paying] £21 an hour [to each of them] and they've got to be there five or six hours, and that's before you've got your DJs and everything. With the sheer cost of everything, it's not viable." The BBC spoke to some young people in Plant, 24, said: "I started off at 18, it was [called] Faith [then], so I was used to the sticky floors. But when it turned to Mossy's it was quite nice, had a nice atmosphere."You had lots of 18 year olds who wanted to get drunk but a nice group of people. The drinks were alright; it was just a fun atmosphere."It's sad because we had the [club] on the pier and that didn't last very long, and there's not much nightlife here any more."She added: "Most people my age tend to go to Norwich. There's a lot more nightlife in Norwich... and that's where everyone seems to go."There's train stations in Lowestoft and Oulton Broad so it's easy to get there, so that's probably why there's not a lot here." Emily Stedman, 18, said: "I've never been there but what I've heard is it's made for teenagers who want to have a good night out. They have music and have a drink and socialise, and I think it's a good opportunity to make friends."Sophie Scupham, 22, said: "I think it does bring people together in Lowestoft. It is a good place to go and it allows people to be themselves. It will be sad to see it close." Bailey Woollard, 20, said he goes out in Oulton Broad, and enjoyed live music at the First Light Festival in Lowestoft, rather than going clubbing."I think the clubbing scene is dying out now. I think the younger generation is getting a bit distant with it," he said. "It does include me. I've had my days, done my years, and had my fun. I think it might upset the generation which is now coming up, but for most of us, I don't think a lot of us will be that bothered." Poppy Stopforth, 21, was surprised to hear about Mossy's closure: "That's kind of crazy. It's been one of Lowestoft's landmarks for a while."I'm 21 and I used to go a bit more when I was 18, but I stopped drinking completely so it's not going to be a big change in my life, but I have a few friends who are probably going to be devastated." Follow East of England news on X, Instagram and Facebook: BBC Beds, Herts & Bucks, BBC Cambridgeshire, BBC Essex, BBC Norfolk, BBC Northamptonshire or BBC Suffolk.
