Wider Canvey Island ban would eradicate boy racers, councillor says
Common issues reported for a number of years included racing, dangerous driving and large gatherings, according to the council.People's Independent Party councillor Russ Savage said extending the ban would "ensure those particular individuals who are causing all the distress to residents are eradicated".He added: "Without a doubt this is very much what the residents are telling us they want." Breaching a PSPO is a criminal offence and may result in a fixed penalty notice of £100 or a fine of up to £1,000 on conviction.The council's consultation is due to run until 1 August.
This article was written by a trusted journalist and then edited for length and style with the help of AI, before being checked again by a BBC Journalist. It's part of a pilot.
Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Deloitte probed over Glencore audits after commodities giant is hit by bribery and corruption lawsuits
Deloitte is being investigated by the UK accounting watchdog over its audits of Glencore's finances. The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) will probe the Big Four firm's work for the Swiss commodities giant over an eight-year period. It will look into whether Deloitte gave 'sufficient consideration to the risk of non-compliance with laws and regulations' when signing off accounts between 2013 and 2020. Glencore has been rocked by bribery and corruption lawsuits in the last few years. The FRC noted that the FTSE 100 commodities trader and miner and a UK subsidiary had been 'subject to investigations by government agencies into misconduct'. In total Glencore, which produces coal, copper, nickel, zinc and cobalt, has had to pay out over £1billion after legal action in Brazil, the UK, and US. Probe: Big Four accountancy firm Deloitte is being investigated by the Financial Reporting Council over its audits of Glencore's finances In 2022, it was fined £281million following an investigation by the UK's Serious Fraud Office. The SFO found Glencore paid nearly £21million in bribes to gain preferential access to oil in Africa. It flew cash to Africa and falsified documents. In 2022 Glencore admitted bribery and failure to prevent bribery after transactions in Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Ivory Coast, Nigeria and South Sudan. Six former executives have been charged with bribery. A trial is yet to begin. Regulators are probing Deloitte's work on four audits, including for bus operator Go-Ahead, fashion brand Joules, car seller Lookers and fintech Stenn. Deloitte UK said: 'We are committed to the highest standards of audit quality and will fully co-operate.' The FRC can impose fines and non-financial penalties if it finds wrongdoing. In 2019 Deloitte was fined £4.2million for its audit of outsourcing firm Serco, which had paid more than £20million to settle fraud and false accounting charges. This year PwC was hit with a £4.5million fine for 'serious failings' in its 2019 audit of Wyelands Bank. Big Four peer KPMG paid out £4.5million after 'serious failures' in its audit of Rolls-Royce's 2010 accounts. In January, the FRC probed KPMG's audit of Ladbrokes-owner Entain's 2022 accounts. The gambling giant paid a £615million settlement to resolve a probe into alleged bribery at its former Turkish online betting business.
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Flawed white collar justice: Fraud Office must act faster to bring prosecutions, says ALEX BRUMMER
Top-level fraud convictions in Britain are rare. The decision by the Supreme Court to overturn the verdict on former Citigroup and UBS trader Tom Hayes will not make the task any easier. Hayes was involved in the manipulation of trades in the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate used in billions of transactions across the globe. In the search for justice, when the scandal erupted in 2012, Hayes became the poster person for City wrongdoing. He received a 14-year sentence after a jury trial (he served five-and-a-half years). The Supreme Court reversal of the verdict, wildly celebrated by Hayes, was less about market abuse and more about over-zealous directions of the judge to the jury at the trial. It has become fashionable to suggest that because many traders indulged in similar efforts to fix market outcomes, that what Hayes did was ordinary rather than exceptional. Cheating should never be acceptable. Market participants on the other side of the transaction will have lost out because of a lack of honesty and transparency. The context of Hayes' conviction and sentencing must be understood. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) needed victories, having failed to bring anyone to justice during the Great Financial Crisis in 2008. Taxpayer anger was running high and Hayes, by his own confession, was an easy target. Nothing could be pinned on more senior executives. But in one of his best moments, the then Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, summoned Barclays grandees to Threadneedle Street and demanded the head of chief executive Bob Diamond. For as long as I can remember reviews into the judiciary have made the case against jury trials for fraud. It is argued that City malfeasance is too complex for ordinary mortals and some kind of tribunal system should be established. This was first recommended by the Roskill Report in the 1980s, repeated by Lord Justice Auld in 2001 and endorsed again by Lord Leveson this month. All wanted to substitute financial experts sitting with a judge. The target should not be the jury system. The real villains are overpaid City law firms and barristers who shut witnesses down by claiming 'privilege', long delays for white-collar cases and efforts to drown jurors in thousands of pages of incomprehensible testimony. The SFO takes far too long to investigate and bring prosecutions, overcomplicates, and then claims the law is not fit for purpose. Contrast Britain's sclerotic justice with that in the US where bitcoin rascal Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX was indicted, tried and sentenced in just over a year. It was ever thus. Instead of cheering Hayes' triumph, we should bemoan the fact that the route to financial justice is so deeply flawed. Wrong boot Rachel Reeves' purpose in seeking to remove the 'boot on the neck' of business by slashing red tape is to gee-up investment in British innovation. One fears that taxes already imposed on wealth, abolition of non-domicile status, higher capital gains and inheritance tax levies already are driving the companies we want in Britain to cash out and scram. Latest is fintech-forex group Alpha, which is accepting a £1.8billion bid from US competitor Corpay. The 55 per cent premium based on the share price in May appears generous. It is less convincing when one considers the infamous 'London discount' to New York. Some recent tech bids achieved a whopping 96 per cent upside. One might have hoped that chairman Jayne-Anne Gadhia, of Virgin Money fame, and Clive Kahn, chief executive of Travelex in its glory days, might have shown more resistance. Pressure, however, to take the money and run is overwhelming. Sinking sun In the 1980s and 1990s the rising economic power of Japan and its investment in the US were seen as an enormous threat to US hegemony, as portrayed in Michael Crichton's novel 'Rising Sun' and subsequent movie. In Trump's America it is very different. The price for lowering car tariffs is that Japan spends £405billion on inward investment in the US. How the world turns!
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Serious Fraud Office under fire after Hayes Libor conviction is quashed by the Supreme Court
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) faced intense criticism yesterday after the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of traders Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo for Libor rate rigging. Hayes and Palombo were jailed for manipulating the Libor benchmark rate to benefit their own trading positions. But yesterday Britain's highest court ruled that the judge in Hayes' case had misdirected the jury in a way that effectively removed from them the ability to consider his defence. 'That was an error,' it said. Palombo's conviction was unsafe for similar reasons. And it could pave the way for seven others convicted of similar offences to be cleared. For Hayes, who was convicted in 2015 and spent five-and-a-half years in jail – destroying his career and marriage – it completes a decade-long fight for justice. And the case raises serious questions about the SFO after setbacks in other major cases including prosecutions involving executives at Tesco, G4S and Serco. Tory MP David Davis, who backed the traders, said: 'This is a major scandal in which traders were made scapegoats for the sins of the financial crisis. 'Lives ruined, families torn apart, careers and reputations destroyed and of course for Tom and Carlo, loss of liberty. Their cases serve as yet another example of a justice system gone badly wrong.' Davis claimed the SFO was part of a 'scapegoating exercise' also including the banks and the City regulator. Karen Todner, Hayes' solicitor, said: 'The SFO failed spectacularly. The result destroyed people's lives who frankly did not deserve it.' Todner called for a public inquiry and said the right of bodies such as the SFO as well as the Post Office and the RSPCA to prosecute individuals should be removed. 'The dual role of the SFO as investigator and prosecutor creates a substantial conflict of interest which creates miscarriages of justice,' she added. 'It should be disbanded. I think they really failed as a team.' Hayes said: 'The behaviour of the SFO is shocking. The SFO is a conflicted organisation that's not fit for purpose. It's got a history of criminalising the non-criminal.'
