Nigerian communities set to have oil pollution High Court claims tried in 2027
The two communities began legal action in 2015, claiming they have suffered systemic and ongoing oil pollution for years due to the companies' operations in the African country, including pollution of drinking water.
They are seeking compensation and asking for the companies to clean up the damage caused by the spills.
The companies are defending the claims, saying that the majority of spills are caused by criminal acts of third parties or illegal oil refining, for which they are not liable.
On Friday, Mrs Justice May ruled on more than 20 preliminary issues in the claims, following a hearing held in London over four weeks in February and March.
She said that 'some 85 spills have, so far, been identified', but added that the case was 'still at a very early stage'.
Her findings included that Shell could be sued for damage from pipeline spills caused by third parties, such as vandals, in efforts to steal oil, a process known as bunkering.
She also said that while there was a five-year limitation period on bringing legal claims, a 'new cause of action will arise each day that oil remains' on land affected by the spills.
The cases are due to be tried over four months, starting in March 2027.
Reacting to the ruling, the leader of the Ogale community, King Bebe Okpabi, said: 'It has been 10 years now since we started this case, we hope that now Shell will stop these shenanigans and sit down with us to sort this out.
'People in Ogale are dying; Shell need to bring a remedy.
'We thank the judicial system of the UK for this judgment.'
Matthew Renishaw, international development partner at law firm Leigh Day, which represents the claimants, said: 'This outcome opens the door to Shell being held responsible for their legacy pollution as well as their negligence in failing to take reasonable steps to prevent pollution from oil theft or local refining.'
He continued: 'Our clients reiterate, as they have repeatedly for 10 years, that they simply want Shell to clean up their pollution and compensate them for their loss of livelihood.
'It is high time that Shell stop their legal filibuster and do the right thing.'
A Shell spokesperson said that the company welcomed the judgment.
They said: 'For many years, the vast majority of spills in the Niger Delta have been caused by third parties acting unlawfully, such as oil thieves who drill holes in pipelines, or saboteurs.
'This criminality is the cause of the majority of spills in the Bille and Ogale claims, and we maintain that Shell is not liable for the criminal acts of third parties or illegal refining.
'These challenges are managed by a joint venture which Shell's former subsidiary operated, using its expertise in spill response and clean-up.
'The spills referenced in this litigation were cleaned up by the joint venture regardless of the cause, as required by Nigerian law, working closely with government-owned partner NNPC Ltd, Nigerian government agencies and local communities.
'Clean-up certificates were issued by the Nigerian regulator NOSDRA.'
The High Court and the Court of Appeal ruled in 2017 and 2018, respectively, that there was no arguable case that Shell owed the claimants a duty of care, but the Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that there was a 'real issue to be tried'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
43 minutes ago
- Spectator
The horror of ‘cutting season'
Yesterday as I went through boarding at Gatwick Airport I smiled as I watched all the excited children going off on their holidays with their families. Everyone had on their new holiday clothes, and despite the crowded check-ins, people were in a good mood. I boarded my flight to Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia. Addis is a busy hub with connections across Africa. As we began to cruise, I noticed that many of the women on my flight were wearing full black abayas with hijabs, as were the girls they were with, who were aged between eight and 12. I soon realised that these groups consisted only of women: little girls with their mothers and grannies. There were no men. I remembered that this was the start of the long summer holiday, and that these children did not know what was going to happen to them. It is the start of the 'cutting season'. Every year, African women living across the world will take their pre-pubescent daughters back to their place of origin to suffer female genital mutilation – or FGM, for those who are in the trade of trying to stop it. In Somalia, FGM consists of adult women holding the girls down whilst a 'cutter' uses a razor blade to remove the girls' genitals. Their clitoris, their labia minora and majora. They are then sewn up with just a small hole left for urination and menstruation. They don't get any anaesthetics. The cutter is paid perhaps a pound or two per girl. When the girls marry, the man opens them up with a knife for intercourse. Why is FGM done in the school holidays? The families know that FGM is a criminal offence in the UK, so, to avoid being caught, they take their girls in July, knowing that any infection and immediate pain will have eased by the start of school in September. It is not just Somalis, but Sierra Leonians, Ethiopians, some Nigerians and Sudanese who put their girls through FGM. Even the Masai of Tanzania and Kenya do it to their children. Indeed, so do some Kurds, Indonesian, Malaysian and Egyptian families. I am in the business of trying to stop this violence. With 40 years working in policing, either in the UK or advising on it in trouble spots, protecting the vulnerable is in my blood. As one of the first police and crime commissioners, I elevated this issue into public conscience more than ten years ago. I embarrassed the police chiefs into trying to do more, and it worked for a while. I remember being delighted to see plain clothes officers approaching people at the departure gates at Heathrow and Gatwick. Once, I was impressed by the diligence of two detectives from the Sussex Police at Gatwick, who had worked out that the mothers were avoiding detection by routing to Africa by indirect routes: via Istanbul, for example. I watched them as they 'pulled' likely groups and warned them that they might be checked on their return. Over the years, however, these interventions appear to me to have stopped. I imagine it is another case of police, social services and educationalists fearing being called racist. I remember Border Force once produced a training video to inform staff about FGM, but neutered it by using white characters. I have a message for Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. Instead of grandstanding to your union paymasters and wasting tens of millions we do not have on an Orgreave enquiry, put your money where your mouth is and do something effective to stop violence against women and girls. Save these innocent little girls from horrific torture and a life of pain. Stop this abomination.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Highland Fuels buys Carnegie Fuels in start of 'new chapter'
It said of its acquisition of Brechin-based Carnegie Fuels: 'This carefully considered partnership represents the coming together of two respected, values-led businesses with deep roots in the Scottish energy sector. 'The decision by the Carnegie family to entrust Highland Fuels with the future of the business follows an extensive sale process. Highland Fuels was selected as the preferred partner due to a strong cultural alignment, shared ethos, and a longstanding reputation for service excellence and community focus.' Highland Fuels became employee-owned in August 2023, and this played a key part in the deal, with the Carnegie Fuels leadership highlighting the importance of ensuring the employees of the Brechin-based business were "looked after" by a new owner. Commenting on behalf of Carnegie Fuels, Kevin Carnegie said: 'This [employee ownership] was a key factor in our decision. We wanted to ensure that our team, many of whom have been with us for years, are looked after not just today but into the future. Joining an employee-owned company like Highland Fuels gives them that stability and a real stake in what comes next.' Highland Fuels said: 'Carnegie Fuels has built a legacy of reliability, trust and local service - qualities that strongly reflect Highland Fuels' own values as a customer-centric and employee-focused company.' It added that, as part of the transaction, Carnegie Fuels would 'continue to operate under its established name and management structure', with Ryan Carnegie appointed as director and Kevin and Rosie Carnegie 'supporting a smooth transition'. Read more Highland Fuels describes itself as 'Scotland's leading independent fuel distributor', operating 11 depots, 16 petrol stations and a fleet of 50 road tankers serving the country. It has 260 employees based across operations which stretch from Lerwick in Shetland to Manchester. Stephen Rhodes, managing director of Highland Fuels, said: 'This is a very positive step for both businesses and for the communities we serve. We're honoured to be continuing the Carnegie legacy and welcoming the team into the Highland Fuels family. This partnership is built on shared values and a commitment to long-term success." He added: "This transaction lays a strong foundation for operational continuity and sustainable growth, delivered with a focus on people, communities, and service excellence. Highland Fuels and Carnegie Fuels share a deep-rooted commitment to professionalism, integrity and reliability. By uniting the strengths of the two companies customers can be confident in a trusted energy partner that is well equipped to meet Scotland's evolving energy needs - today and into the future.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Shareholders urged to vote in Scottish battle over trust
It has also recommended that investors should vote for the resolutions to reappoint the existing directors, ahead of crunch meetings which will determine the future path for the fund. Mr Jourdan and other shareholders have requisitioned a general meeting of Maven Renovar VCT, which will be held on August 13. They have put forward resolutions seeking to remove the board of the trust and appoint four replacement directors, including Mr Jourdan, in their place. The management contract for the venture capital trust, formerly known as Amati AIM VCT, was moved by the board from Amati to Glasgow-based private equity house Maven Capital Partners with effect from May. The board then faced shareholder opposition at the trust's annual meeting on June 19. Bill Nixon, managing partner of Maven, declared the private equity house had 'a proven track record to turning round a VCT in a near-identical situation'. He told The Herald: 'It is clear that the last time there was a disproportionately small number of shareholders - about 100 - voted against the board at the AGM which arguably created a distorted outcome relative to the [total] number of shareholders. 'All we would say is whatever way you vote, get out and vote.' Read more Mr Nixon observed that the Bluehone AIM VCT2 fund had delivered an 84% total return and its total net asset value had 'grown 3.6 times' since its management was taken on by Maven in 2011. He said: 'It has got very similar parallels to the Amati fund [now Maven Renovar VCT]. It was an AIM VCT which had lost a lot of value and we materially turned it around.' Mr Nixon added: 'I would like to emphasise we have done this before. We have done this turnaround. We understand that when managers are terminated they don't like it, but I am afraid that is just business. 'We have a much larger resource. We have the capability. We have 11 offices across the UK to execute on this recovery plan.' Mr Jourdan told The Herald: 'There are a significant group of shareholders who were upset at what happened and they want a capital return strategy. 'This is not about me. It is not about trying to get the contract back. It is just about what is the best strategy to pursue from here for the shareholders.' He highlighted his view that the situation 'shouldn't have got as heated as it has'. Flagging the key point of difference from his perspective, he noted the board wanted to let Maven do more unquoted investments for the VCT whereas his group of investors believed shareholders would be better off having capital returned. Mr Nixon said: 'The most important thing is people vote. Shareholder democracy will prevail. Rather than leave the decision to a small group of shareholders, it is important as many shareholders as possible vote. 'We believe that the best approach is to adopt the plan which the experienced board have concluded is best for the company, and where we have a proven track record to turning round a VCT in a near-identical situation.' Read more Claiming the alternative was 'going with a who have a strategy to progressively wind down the company', he declared: 'There is common acceptance in the risk asset space it is better to have large, vibrant portfolios than wind down a VCT which has a significant fixed cost base. 'What this should really be about is performance and capability.' In a response to a circular issued on July 21 by the directors of Maven Renovar VCT, Mr Jourdan, Charles McMicking, Kathleen McLeay and Hector Kilpatrick, the four proposed replacement directors, say: 'At its heart, the question being asked of shareholders is whether they wish the VCT to continue to make new qualifying investments, which involve substantial risks, where these will be mostly in private companies, despite not having any requirement to do this under the VCT legislation; or whether they would prefer to have all surplus capital returned, whilst maximising shareholder value by keeping exposure to the best companies in the existing portfolio, potentially for many years. 'The requisitioning shareholders are proposing the latter and have proposed a new board of directors to implement this strategy. It's that simple.' Mr Nixon said: 'We are encouraging shareholders to vote. Whatever way people vote, the most important thing is they vote and they decide what strategy they want to adopt, and what board they want to run or determine the future strategy for this VCT.' He added: 'To give the company the best prospects of restoration in shareholder value, we think a broader investment policy would be helpful. This is not a policy that is going from AIM to private equity. It is a policy that is going from AIM to AIM and private equity. 'Shareholder democracy will prevail. They will have a choice to appoint the existing experienced board or the choice to appoint a new board including the former investment manager.'
