Council's deep dive: review finds Newcastle pools' tender process 'compliant'
Davidson Business Advisory was brought on to independently review the council's policies, processes and procedures.
While regular pool users previously described the council's handling of the tender process as "disappointing" and "mind-boggling", Davidson found the tender process adhered to council policy and the Local Government Act.
"The City of Newcastle has developed a detailed Inland Pool Strategy 2043, which we believe is of very high quality," Davidson consultant Justin Hanney said.
While it may have ticked the legal boxes, the community was left less than impressed with the council's efforts to notify the public about the proposed lease.
A notice inviting comments on the proposed lease of the five public pools appeared in Sydney newspaper the Daily Telegraph classified section on July 3, 2023.
The notice also appeared on the council's website on the public notices page as a link titled 'Proposed Lease'.
The Local Government Act requires the council to give public notice of community land lease proposals that are for a term of more than five years. The public must be given 28 days to make a submission, and if someone makes a submission objecting to the proposal, the council cannot grant the lease without the Minister's consent.
At the time, regular pool users said they were not aware of the call for public submissions, as did several Newcastle councillors.
Mr Hanney said contracting out the inland pools was supported by a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis and capital investment benchmarking, which was presented to councillors to inform the tender process.
"The tender process adhered to the council policy and the Local Government Act," Mr Hanney said.
"Additionally, there's evidence of effective management of conflicts of interest demonstrated by the former lord mayor and six councillors exiting the chamber during the tender discussion due to a declared conflict of interest."
The decision was delegated to the CEO after Labor councillors declared conflicts of interest in the matter, meaning a quorum of councillors could not be reached to vote on awarding a tender.
City of Newcastle's seven Labor councillors recused themselves from a confidential debate on awarding a contract to lease and operate the five council pools because they said interactions with an unnamed politician had created a conflict of interest.
While Davidson said the pool decision showed "evidence of effective management of conflicts of interest", the firm found room for improvement generally in how conflicts of interest were managed within the council.
The review did not find issues with illegality or a lack of compliance around conflicts of interest, but instead noted there were issues with "how members of the public perceive conflicts of interest being handled".
"There is a need, however, for constant vigilance in conflict of interest declarations and to ensure consistency in the way that councillors actually make them," Davidson consultant Colin Jensen said.
The full review report will be publicly released on May 21.
A CONTROVERSIAL tender awarded to BlueFit to manage City of Newcastle's five inland pools was "compliant", an independent review has found.
Davidson Business Advisory was brought on to independently review the council's policies, processes and procedures.
While regular pool users previously described the council's handling of the tender process as "disappointing" and "mind-boggling", Davidson found the tender process adhered to council policy and the Local Government Act.
"The City of Newcastle has developed a detailed Inland Pool Strategy 2043, which we believe is of very high quality," Davidson consultant Justin Hanney said.
While it may have ticked the legal boxes, the community was left less than impressed with the council's efforts to notify the public about the proposed lease.
A notice inviting comments on the proposed lease of the five public pools appeared in Sydney newspaper the Daily Telegraph classified section on July 3, 2023.
The notice also appeared on the council's website on the public notices page as a link titled 'Proposed Lease'.
The Local Government Act requires the council to give public notice of community land lease proposals that are for a term of more than five years. The public must be given 28 days to make a submission, and if someone makes a submission objecting to the proposal, the council cannot grant the lease without the Minister's consent.
At the time, regular pool users said they were not aware of the call for public submissions, as did several Newcastle councillors.
Mr Hanney said contracting out the inland pools was supported by a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis and capital investment benchmarking, which was presented to councillors to inform the tender process.
"The tender process adhered to the council policy and the Local Government Act," Mr Hanney said.
"Additionally, there's evidence of effective management of conflicts of interest demonstrated by the former lord mayor and six councillors exiting the chamber during the tender discussion due to a declared conflict of interest."
The decision was delegated to the CEO after Labor councillors declared conflicts of interest in the matter, meaning a quorum of councillors could not be reached to vote on awarding a tender.
City of Newcastle's seven Labor councillors recused themselves from a confidential debate on awarding a contract to lease and operate the five council pools because they said interactions with an unnamed politician had created a conflict of interest.
While Davidson said the pool decision showed "evidence of effective management of conflicts of interest", the firm found room for improvement generally in how conflicts of interest were managed within the council.
The review did not find issues with illegality or a lack of compliance around conflicts of interest, but instead noted there were issues with "how members of the public perceive conflicts of interest being handled".
"There is a need, however, for constant vigilance in conflict of interest declarations and to ensure consistency in the way that councillors actually make them," Davidson consultant Colin Jensen said.
The full review report will be publicly released on May 21.
A CONTROVERSIAL tender awarded to BlueFit to manage City of Newcastle's five inland pools was "compliant", an independent review has found.
Davidson Business Advisory was brought on to independently review the council's policies, processes and procedures.
While regular pool users previously described the council's handling of the tender process as "disappointing" and "mind-boggling", Davidson found the tender process adhered to council policy and the Local Government Act.
"The City of Newcastle has developed a detailed Inland Pool Strategy 2043, which we believe is of very high quality," Davidson consultant Justin Hanney said.
While it may have ticked the legal boxes, the community was left less than impressed with the council's efforts to notify the public about the proposed lease.
A notice inviting comments on the proposed lease of the five public pools appeared in Sydney newspaper the Daily Telegraph classified section on July 3, 2023.
The notice also appeared on the council's website on the public notices page as a link titled 'Proposed Lease'.
The Local Government Act requires the council to give public notice of community land lease proposals that are for a term of more than five years. The public must be given 28 days to make a submission, and if someone makes a submission objecting to the proposal, the council cannot grant the lease without the Minister's consent.
At the time, regular pool users said they were not aware of the call for public submissions, as did several Newcastle councillors.
Mr Hanney said contracting out the inland pools was supported by a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis and capital investment benchmarking, which was presented to councillors to inform the tender process.
"The tender process adhered to the council policy and the Local Government Act," Mr Hanney said.
"Additionally, there's evidence of effective management of conflicts of interest demonstrated by the former lord mayor and six councillors exiting the chamber during the tender discussion due to a declared conflict of interest."
The decision was delegated to the CEO after Labor councillors declared conflicts of interest in the matter, meaning a quorum of councillors could not be reached to vote on awarding a tender.
City of Newcastle's seven Labor councillors recused themselves from a confidential debate on awarding a contract to lease and operate the five council pools because they said interactions with an unnamed politician had created a conflict of interest.
While Davidson said the pool decision showed "evidence of effective management of conflicts of interest", the firm found room for improvement generally in how conflicts of interest were managed within the council.
The review did not find issues with illegality or a lack of compliance around conflicts of interest, but instead noted there were issues with "how members of the public perceive conflicts of interest being handled".
"There is a need, however, for constant vigilance in conflict of interest declarations and to ensure consistency in the way that councillors actually make them," Davidson consultant Colin Jensen said.
The full review report will be publicly released on May 21.
A CONTROVERSIAL tender awarded to BlueFit to manage City of Newcastle's five inland pools was "compliant", an independent review has found.
Davidson Business Advisory was brought on to independently review the council's policies, processes and procedures.
While regular pool users previously described the council's handling of the tender process as "disappointing" and "mind-boggling", Davidson found the tender process adhered to council policy and the Local Government Act.
"The City of Newcastle has developed a detailed Inland Pool Strategy 2043, which we believe is of very high quality," Davidson consultant Justin Hanney said.
While it may have ticked the legal boxes, the community was left less than impressed with the council's efforts to notify the public about the proposed lease.
A notice inviting comments on the proposed lease of the five public pools appeared in Sydney newspaper the Daily Telegraph classified section on July 3, 2023.
The notice also appeared on the council's website on the public notices page as a link titled 'Proposed Lease'.
The Local Government Act requires the council to give public notice of community land lease proposals that are for a term of more than five years. The public must be given 28 days to make a submission, and if someone makes a submission objecting to the proposal, the council cannot grant the lease without the Minister's consent.
At the time, regular pool users said they were not aware of the call for public submissions, as did several Newcastle councillors.
Mr Hanney said contracting out the inland pools was supported by a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis and capital investment benchmarking, which was presented to councillors to inform the tender process.
"The tender process adhered to the council policy and the Local Government Act," Mr Hanney said.
"Additionally, there's evidence of effective management of conflicts of interest demonstrated by the former lord mayor and six councillors exiting the chamber during the tender discussion due to a declared conflict of interest."
The decision was delegated to the CEO after Labor councillors declared conflicts of interest in the matter, meaning a quorum of councillors could not be reached to vote on awarding a tender.
City of Newcastle's seven Labor councillors recused themselves from a confidential debate on awarding a contract to lease and operate the five council pools because they said interactions with an unnamed politician had created a conflict of interest.
While Davidson said the pool decision showed "evidence of effective management of conflicts of interest", the firm found room for improvement generally in how conflicts of interest were managed within the council.
The review did not find issues with illegality or a lack of compliance around conflicts of interest, but instead noted there were issues with "how members of the public perceive conflicts of interest being handled".
"There is a need, however, for constant vigilance in conflict of interest declarations and to ensure consistency in the way that councillors actually make them," Davidson consultant Colin Jensen said.
The full review report will be publicly released on May 21.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Work from home a legal right in Australian-first reform
Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Victorian Premier launches push to make work from home legal right
Working from home for two days a week could become a legal right in Victoria, under new plans proposed by Premier Jacinta Allan. The state government is promising to introduce the law — covering both public and private sectors — by next year, with it applying to anyone who can 'reasonably' carry out their work away from the office. Ms Allan will tell the annual state Labor conference: 'Working from home works for families and it's good for the economy. 'Day after day, unions are being contacted by workers who have been denied reasonable requests to work from home, and across the country, Liberals are drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office and back to the past. 'That's why the Allan Labor government is acting. Enshrining work from home in law means this life-changing practice isn't something you or your loved ones have to politely ask for. It's a right you'll be entitled to.' She will add that a consultation will take place on the proposed Australia-first law, but added it won't determine if the plans should go ahead. 'We're already clear on that: it should be. We just need the appropriate laws to reflect it,' she said. Ms Allan said the new policy is aimed directly at supporting families, promising average savings of $110 per week, or $5308 annually in commuting costs. 'Work from home supports women with children, carers and people with a disability to work,' Ms Allan said. 'Thanks to work from home, workforce participation is 4.4 per cent higher than before the pandemic.' The legislation is expected to be introduced later this year. The move follows significant debate about work from home policies during the federal election, with Peter Dutton forced to backtrack on a proposed policy to limit remote work for public servants due to public backlash. Originally published as Victorians could soon have the right to work from home two days a week
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
WFH could become legal right
Working from home for two days a week could become a legal right in Victoria, under new plans proposed by Premier Jacinta Allan. The state government is promising to introduce the law — covering both public and private sectors — by next year, with it applying to anyone who can 'reasonably' carry out their work away from the office. Ms Allan will tell the annual state Labor conference: 'Working from home works for families and it's good for the economy. 'Day after day, unions are being contacted by workers who have been denied reasonable requests to work from home, and across the country, Liberals are drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office and back to the past. 'That's why the Allan Labor government is acting. Enshrining work from home in law means this life-changing practice isn't something you or your loved ones have to politely ask for. It's a right you'll be entitled to.' Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan is set to announce the law on Saturday. NewsWire / Nadir Kinani Credit: News Corp Australia She will add that a consultation will take place on the proposed Australia-first law, but added it won't determine if the plans should go ahead. 'We're already clear on that: it should be. We just need the appropriate laws to reflect it,' she said. Ms Allan said the new policy is aimed directly at supporting families, promising average savings of $110 per week, or $5308 annually in commuting costs. 'Work from home supports women with children, carers and people with a disability to work,' Ms Allan said. 'Thanks to work from home, workforce participation is 4.4 per cent higher than before the pandemic.' The legislation is expected to be introduced later this year. The move follows significant debate about work from home policies during the federal election, with Peter Dutton forced to backtrack on a proposed policy to limit remote work for public servants due to public backlash.
