Entire flight crew is suspended after passenger makes shock discovery
An entire cabin crew was suspended after a passenger tracked their missing phone to a hotel that airline staff had been staying in.
Michael Tjendara claimed his device had been stolen while travelling from Indonesia's capital Jakarta to Melbourne on Garuda Indonesia flight GA716 on June 6.
Mr Tjendara said he had placed it in the backseat pocket before moving seats after takeoff and then returning to his old seat to find the device was gone.
He detailed the theft on his Instagram account and shared a series of screenshots of the Find My iPhone feature.
They showed he had traced the device to a location near the Southbank Promenade.
Mr Tjendara claimed the device had been placed close to the Mercure Hotel, where Garuda crew members were believed to be staying.
Mr Tjendara said the phone's signal was last tracked between 3.50pm and 4.40pm before it appeared the device was moving towards the Evan Walker Bridge.
The final Find My iPhone screenshot appeared to show the device had been dropped into the Yarra River.
Mr Tjendara called on local businesses to share information and CCTV footage that could help expose the unknown thief.
'This isn't just about a phone − it's about the safety of all passengers in the future. Please help tag and share this story so the right people see it,' he wrote.
The shocking incident has gained widespread attention in Indonesia.
In a statement issued on June 9, Garuda Indonesia's Director of Commercial and Cargo, Ade R. Susardi, confirmed the crew members on duty had been suspended.
'We are in continuous communication with the concerned passenger and remain committed to supporting him throughout the follow-up process,' he told Indonesia Business Post.
Garuda Indonesia said a company representative had been sent to assist Mr Tjendara on the ground in Melbourne and to help him file a police report.
Mr Susardi apologised for the incident on behalf of the airline.
'We can confirm that upon receiving the report, all cabin crew had followed standard operating and safety procedures, including promptly coordinating with airport authorities to initiate a search,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
London phone thefts hit record high with 37 people having mobiles stolen every DAY in the West End alone
Phone thefts in London have hit a record high with a shocking 37 people having their mobile stolen every day in the capital's West End alone. New data has revealed that almost 231,000 phone thefts and robberies were recorded over the past four years in the capital, a threefold increase. The epicentre for these brazen crimes is in the world's theatre capital, the West End, a magnet for tourists where around 40,000 phones were reported stolen over the same period, data by the Metropolitan Police shows. Phone thefts in London have soared to record levels, with organised gangs targeting busy areas like the West End and St James's, where luxury streets and royal residences sit side by side with swarms of unsuspecting tourists and shoppers. One major hotspot identified is the area surrounding St James's Park, where Piccadilly and Haymarket meet Pall Mall and Clarence House, home to exclusive members' clubs and high-profile buildings. Analysis by The Times show the West End and St James's now account for a third of all phone thefts reported in the capital, up from a quarter in 2021. Scotland Yard figures show a staggering 81,256 mobile phone crimes were recorded in 2023, a 20 per cent year-on-year rise, and the highest on record. Police believe the true number is even higher, as many incidents go unreported. Other major hotspots include Bloomsbury, Holborn, Covent Garden, Shoreditch, Borough, London Bridge, Waterloo, South Bank, Camden Town, Regent's Park and Stratford. Since 2022, theft rates have risen in more than 200 suburbs across the capital — meaning over a third of London is now affected by the growing crisis. Most thefts are carried out by gangs on electric bikes, who either snatch phones directly from people's hands or operate in crowded areas to pickpocket victims. Police say the surge is fuelled by international black markets, where stolen devices are either sold on or stripped for parts — an illicit industry now worth over £50 million a year. Officers are urging Londoners to stick to well-lit, busy areas, remain alert, and keep valuables out of sight to avoid falling prey to the increasingly brazen criminals. As previously reported the shocking moment a phone snatcher is captured being knocked off his bike by furious Londoners before losing a shoe that police later used to catch him was caught on CCTV. Spencer Duarte, of Saffron Walden, was tackled off his e-bike by members of the public after he stole a phone from an innocent victim's hand in Ludgate Hill, London, on August 7 last year. Dramatic video footage showed the moment a quick-thinking pedestrian leapt into the street and intercepted the robber, who fell into the road while on his bike. Duarte, who initially stood up and was able to get back on his bike, was then chased down by two more members of the public. Cornered on the side of the pavement, he was pulled from his bike a second time as he attempted to flee. The phone thief, dressed in a flourescent top and helmet, then proceeded to run across the road away from the furious Londoners. In a last minute attempt at halting the robber, another four pedestrians reached out to try and grab hold of Duarte, who darted at speed between the different men before making a successful exit down the road. During the ensuing struggle, Duarte lost a shoe, which police detectives later used to catch him for his crimes as a result of the DNA it held. The 28-year-old, who was spotted and arrested by Metropolitan Police officers on September 9, admitted to one count of theft at Inner London Crown Court this week. He also accepted that he had items in his rucksack going equipped to steal. Duarte is due to be sentenced on September 12. Dubbed the 'Cinderella phone snatcher', Andrew Walker, physical forensics manager of the City of London Police, described how Duarte was ultimately caught as a result of his trainer being left at the scene. He said: 'We were able to get sufficient levels of DNA from the shoe to obtain a single, major profile that was suitable for searching against the national DNA database. 'This search generated a 'hit' to a male whose profile had previously been uploaded. 'The slipper fitted our Cinderella and we were able to bring him before the courts.' Meanwhile, dramatic scene unfolded in Westminster where a cyclist, wearing all black clothes, overtook some cars on the road before suddenly swerving to the left. The video shows the cyclist clearly turning their attention towards a pedestrian walking on the pavement. The man, wearing running clothes, was on his phone as the thief brazenly mounted onto the pavement and quickly snatched it from him. The victim puts his hands to his head in disbelief before making a belated attempt to run after the thief.
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
How a family's beef wellington lunch ended with three dead and a mother on trial for murder
No-one has disputed that death cap mushrooms were in the beef wellington that killed three people and left another in a coma for week after a fateful lunch on a July Saturday in 2023. But the key question in the Australian murder trial of Erin Patterson was how those deadly mushrooms got there. The mother-of-two has been charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents Don and Gail Patterson, as well as Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, and charged with the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian. The trial is due to conclude next week, with the jury expected to retire to consider its verdict. Over two months the court has heard in great detail about what happened but questions about why still linger. In her own words, Patterson was a big fan of mushrooms. 'They taste good and are very healthy,' she told the regional Victorian court. 'I'd buy all the different types that Woolies would sell.' She got so into mushrooms that she began foraging for wild ones during Covid lockdowns, Patterson said, but admitted that identifying safe varieties was sometimes difficult. She testified that she couldn't remember, but it was possible she had searched online for death cap mushrooms. All the while, the accused agreed during her two weeks on the witness stand that her relationship with her estranged husband Simon Patterson had become strained. The Pattersons had separated several times after the birth of their son in 2009, and separated in 2015 but maintained a friendly relationship, as both told the court. Mr Patterson told the court that the issue seemed to begin when he had listed himself as separated on a tax return. 'She wasn't happy with that,' he said, explaining that the change would affect their family tax benefit, and they mutually agreed she would pursue child support payments. In the months before the fatal lunch she had tried to involve her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, in their dispute over school fees. She acknowledged in court that was unfair. 'They were doing nothing but trying to support us,' she said. 'I was asking them to agree with me that I was right and Simon was wrong, and that wasn't fair.' She revealed that, in private messages to friends, she had vented frustration by calling the Patterson family a 'lost cause' and saying, 'so f*** 'em.' Growing visibly emotional in court, she told the jury she 'needed to vent'. 'The choice was either go into the paddock and tell the sheep or vent to these women,' she said, adding that she had probably 'played up the emotion' to get support from her online friends. 'I wish I'd never said it. I feel ashamed for saying it and I wish that the family didn't have to hear that I said that,' she told the court. 'They didn't deserve it.' Patterson had been a 'fundamentalist atheist' when she met her future husband, a Christian, in 2004, while working at a Melbourne council. But she told the court she had a 'spiritual experience' at the Korumburra Baptist Church, led by Mr Patterson's uncle and the only surviving lunch victim, Mr Wilkinson. The court heard Patterson inherited $2 million (£950,000) from her grandmother two years later, and she used the money to buy properties and loan money to her husband's siblings. She also admitted to having low self-esteem, and to struggling with her weight. Patterson lied to her lunch guests about having cancer because she felt ashamed that she was really having bariatric surgery for weight loss, she told the court. Her estranged husband had also been invited, but he turned the invitation down the day before, the jury heard, and in messages shown to the court she expressed disappointment at his decision. 'That's really disappointing, I've spent many hours this week preparing lunch for tomorrow,' Patterson allegedly responded. 'It's important for me that you're all there… I hope you change your mind.' In closing arguments, prosecutors in Patterson's triple-murder trial outlined four calculated deceptions at the heart of their case: a fake cancer diagnosis to lure her guests, the deliberate death cap mushroom poisoning, lies that she too had fallen ill and an ongoing cover-up to hide the alleged truth. 'She had complete control over the ingredients that went into the lunch,' chief prosecutor Nanette Rogers said. Two of the lunch guests had also noted that Patterson's lunch meal was served on a different coloured plate to that of her guests, the court heard. Afterwards, the prosecution said Patterson gave inconsistent and vague accounts about where she got the mushrooms from, and was slow to respond to the Department of Health which was trying to get to the bottom of the source of the deadly fungi. The prosecution also told the jury Patterson had pretended to be sick to family and to medical workers to suggest she had also eaten the same meal as her guests, in an attempt 'to disguise her crime'. But Patterson denied these allegations. At the end of her cross examination, three accusations were put to her: that she deliberately got death cap mushrooms, that she knowingly put them in the beef wellingtons and that she intended to kill her lunch guests. To each accusation, she said: 'disagree'. Her defence said she panicked after learning her lunch may have poisoned her guests, and she had not been prepared for the intense reaction she received when first arriving at hospital with symptoms of loose stools following the meal. Summarising the trial, Chief Justice Christopher Beale told the jury that her defence said 'she found it difficult to accept she may have suffered death cap mushroom poisoning. She had not come prepared to be admitted overnight. She needed to make arrangements for the children and the animals … and was intending to return to hospital.' From Monday afternoon, the jury will have to weigh the nine weeks of testimony to decide whether the prosecution has proven beyond reasonable doubt that Patterson committed murder.
Reuters
10 hours ago
- Reuters
Australia's mushroom trial
Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. A triple murder case with a culinary twist is transfixing Australia and the rest of the world. Erin Patterson is accused of using poisonous mushrooms concealed in a Beef Wellington lunch to kill three elderly relatives of her estranged husband. The jury in her trial is expected to begin considering its verdict next week. In this special episode of Reuters World News, we look at the prosecution and the defense in this case. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter here. Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast here. Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit to opt out of targeted advertising. Further Reading Erin Patterson trial: Australia awaits verdict in mushroom murder case Key facts in Australia's mushroom murder trial
