
Judge gives ex-officer nearly 3 years in Breonna Taylor raid, rebuffs DOJ call for no prison time
Brett Hankison, who fired 10 shots during the raid but didn't hit anyone, was the only officer on the scene charged in the Black woman's death in 2020. He is the first person sentenced to prison in the case that rocked the city of Louisville and spawned weeks of street protests over police brutality five years ago.
U.S. District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings sentenced Hankison at a hearing Monday afternoon in which she said no prison time 'is not appropriate' for Hankison. She also said she was 'startled' that there weren't more people injured in the raid.
She sentenced him to 33 months in prison as well as three years of supervised probation. Hankison will not report directly to prison. Jennings said the Bureau of Prisons will determine where and when he starts his sentence.
Jennings expressed disappointment with federal prosecutors' sentencing memo filed last week, saying the Justice Department treated Hankison's actions as 'an inconsequential crime,' and said the memo was 'incongruous and inappropriate.'
Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who helped Taylor's family secure a $12 million wrongful death settlement against the city of Louisville and was present Mondya, had called the Justice Department recommendation 'an insult to the life of Breonna Taylor and a blatant betrayal of the jury's decision.'
He said Monday afternoon that he had hoped Hankison would get more time. But, he said: 'We are grateful that he is at least going to prison and has to think for those 3 years about Breonna Taylor and that her life mattered.'
And afterward, before a crowd gathered outside the courthouse, Crump yelled: 'Say Her name.' The crowd yelled back: 'Breonna Taylor!'
Hankison fired his weapon the night of the March 2020 botched drug raid, his shot flying through the walls of Taylor's apartment into a neighboring apartment without hitting or injuring anyone.
The 26-year-old's death, along with the May 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, sparked racial injustice protests nationwide that year.
Last week, the U.S. Justice Department recommended no prison time for Hankison, in an abrupt about-face by federal prosecutors that has angered critics after the department spent years prosecuting the former detective.
The Justice Department, which has changed leadership under President Donald Trump since Hankison's conviction, said in a sentencing memo last week that 'there is no need for a prison sentence to protect the public' from Hankison. Federal prosecutors suggested time already served, which amounts to one day, and three years of supervised probation.
Prosecutors at his previous federal trials aggressively pursued a conviction against Hankison, 49, arguing that he blindly fired 10 shots into Taylor's windows without identifying a target. Taylor was shot in her hallway by two other officers after her boyfriend fired from inside the apartment, striking an officer in the leg. Neither of the other officers was charged in state or federal court after prosecutors deemed they were justified in returning fire into the apartment. Louisville police used a drug warrant to enter the apartment, but found no drugs or cash inside.
A separate jury deadlocked on federal charges against Hankison in 2023, and he was acquitted on state charges of wanton endangerment in 2022.
In their recent sentencing memo, federal prosecutors wrote that though Hankison's 'response in these fraught circumstances was unreasonable given the benefit of hindsight, that unreasonable response did not kill or wound Breonna Taylor, her boyfriend, her neighbors, defendant's fellow officers, or anyone else.'
On Monday, the Louisville Metro Police Department arrested four people in front of the courthouse who it said were 'creating confrontation, kicking vehicles, or otherwise creating an unsafe environment.' Authorities didn't list the charges those arrested would face.
'We understand this case caused pain and damaged trust between our department and the community,' a police statement said. 'We particularly respect and value the 1st Amendment. However, what we saw today in front of the courthouse in the street was not safe, acceptable or legal.'
A U.S. Probation Office presentencing report had said Hankison should face a range of 135 to 168 months imprisonment on the excessive force conviction, according to the memo. But federal prosecutors said multiple factors — including that Hankison's two other trials ended with no convictions — should greatly reduce the potential punishment.
The memorandum was submitted by Harmeet Dhillon, chief of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division and a Trump political appointee who in May moved to cancel settlements with Louisville and Minneapolis that had called for overhauling their police departments.
In the Taylor case, three other ex-Louisville police officers have been charged with crafting a falsified warrant, but have not gone to trial. None were at the scene when Taylor was shot.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
Ghislaine Maxwell seeks immunity or clemency for testimony to Congress: What to know
From immunity to stepping outside prison bars to waiting out her appeals, Ghislaine Maxwell has a series of demands if Congress wants her testimony. She also has a back-up option: clemency from Trump. Convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell wants immunity and an advance look at the questions if Congress expects her to publicly testify about her ex-boyfriend, Jeffrey Epstein. She also wants a pardon. Maxwell's defense lawyer, David Markus, laid out his client's conditions in a July 29 letter to Rep. James Comer, R-Kentucky, who issued a subpoena for Maxwell's testimony last week. Comer, who heads the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, has said he wants to hear from Maxwell as he looks at how the federal government enforces sex-trafficking laws and what happened in the cases against her and Epstein. Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting a federal sex-trafficking trial. He was previously convicted in 2008 of two Florida prostitution offenses, in what many consider a sweetheart plea deal. The disgraced financier was sentenced to just 18 months behind bars, despite facing serious allegations of sex crimes involving minors. About a decade later, New York federal prosecutors brought a sex-trafficking indictment against him. Last week, Maxwell spoke with Justice Department officials over the course of two days as the Trump administration seeks to quell public outrage over its early July announcement that it didn't find evidence in its Epstein-related files to justify investigating anyone else, and that it won't be releasing the files. Here's the latest on what Maxwell wants if she's going to talk to Congress: Maxwell demands immunity for testimony Maxwell will only speak publicly to Congress if she is first granted full immunity for her testimony, according to Markus's letter. He said the immunity will shield her from getting into more criminal trouble for coming forward. "Ms. Maxwell cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity," according to the letter. That arrangement would be similar to the reported conditions of Maxwell's interview with the Justice Department. It granted her a limited form of immunity in exchange for her participation, according to ABC News and NBC News. Testifying from outside prison? Maxwell also insisted that she won't talk to Congress from behind bars, even though Comer arranged for her to be deposed at a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida. A prison setting wouldn't be conducive to getting "truthful and complete testimony" from Maxwell, according to Markus' letter. "The potential for leaks from such a setting creates real security risks and undermines the integrity of the process," Markus added. An advance look at questions? Congress should also give Maxwell its questions in advance, Markus insisted. That arrangement, he said, is "essential" for allowing her to meaningfully prepare, and will also let her find documents to corroborate her testimony. Markus suggested the arrangement is especially important because she has been incarcerated for several years, rendering surprise questions unproductive. "Years after the original events and well beyond the criminal trial, this process cannot become a game of cat-and-mouse," Markus wrote in the letter. Waiting for Supreme Court to address appeal Maxwell currently has an appeal pending at the U.S. Supreme Court. According to Markus' letter, she wants to wait to talk to Congress until after the high court resolves that appeal, and also until after a separate court appeal she is planning has run its course. "Proceeding before those matters are resolved would unfairly prejudice her if she is successful," Markus wrote. Maxwell is arguing in her Supreme Court appeal that Epstein's 2008 plea deal should have shielded her from being charged. The agreement included a provision protecting potential co-conspirators from criminal charges. However, the government says the prosecution against Maxwell in the Southern District of New York was permitted because the deal only applied to prosecutions in the Southern District of Florida. The Supreme Court hasn't yet decided whether to hear Maxwell's appeal. If that doesn't work? Maxwell would also accept a pardon If those conditions don't work, Markus said there's an "alternative" Maxwell would be happy with: If President Donald Trump grants Maxwell clemency, "she would be willing — and eager — to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress in Washington, D.C." The president has the power to fully pardon Maxwell as well as to commute her 20-year prison sentence. Trump noted that power during questioning by reporters on July 28 in Scotland, but added it would be 'inappropriate' to discuss it.


CNN
16 minutes ago
- CNN
Habba is confident she'll be the top US attorney in New Jersey, but it's chaos in the meantime
Federal criminal cases in New Jersey remain in chaos with judges postponing sentencings, plea hearings and status conferences this week as questions swirl about the authority of former Donald Trump lawyer Alina Habba to serve as the acting US attorney. It's not clear how long the pause in activity will last. 'Right now in the District of New Jersey there are bail hearings happening and initial appearances, but otherwise the practice of criminal law is at a standstill,' said a criminal defense lawyer who practices in the state. 'You can't have that happen.' The issue is currently playing out in a drug case, where a lawyer is attempting to have charges dismissed based on the argument that Habba is not serving legally. A federal judge from Pennsylvania, who was transferred the case to hear the arguments, said Tuesday he will first decide whether the defendants, Julien Giraud Jr. and Julien Giraud III, are entitled to any benefit – including the dismissal of his indictment – even if Habba was appointed illegally. The judge said he will only decide the issue of whether Habba is appointed lawfully if necessary. Judge Matthew Brann said the Justice Department provided 'persuasive authority' that even if Habba was appointed illegally that the case should proceed. The Justice Department argued the indictment was handed up last year under a Senate-approved US attorney and authority is conferred to prosecutors on the case through the attorney general. 'It may be the case that determining what relief is available to the Girauds is inextricably bound up with the extent of the statutory or constitutional violation, if any, thereby rendering consideration of the merits question necessary in any event,' said Brann, the chief judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, in an order Tuesday. Habba told CNN, 'I am confident we will win any and all attempts to thwart the well established Article II powers of the Executive Branch and the President of the United States.' The tug of war over whether Habba is legally the acting US attorney in New Jersey comes as the White House has faced difficulty getting its picks for US attorney positions through Congress or adopted by federal judges. The fallout in New Jersey could foreshadow potential challenges in other districts, which could have broader implications on the criminal justice system. The broad near-term impact was referenced by the New Jersey judge overseeing the Giruads' case, before it was transferred to Pennsylvania. 'I don't know ultimately how it's going to end up; but that motion, depending on how it's resolved, may affect how this case is going to proceed. And as a result of that, I think you'll soon find out that other judges are going to stay whatever criminal matters there are pending,' Judge Edward Kiel said during a hearing on Monday when he postponed the trial, according to a transcript of the proceeding. Kiel said decisions made now, such as plea agreements, may need to be redone in the future if the US attorney is invalidated. Plea hearings scheduled for this week were postponed with no future date, according to several lawyers and court dockets. Sentencing in other cases were also postponed. The federal public defender's office in New Jersey is urging the judge to rule narrowly on the issues before him in the Giruads' case. In a letter Tuesday, the defenders' office noted the potential ramifications of the ruling, adding there are other circumstances that could warrant further legal briefing, such as indictments, grand jury subpoenas and other documents that are signed by Habba. 'Because that is a separate question that is not raised by the facts of this case and has not been fully briefed, I respectfully request that the Court not address it at this time,' wrote K. Anthony Thomas, the federal public defender in the state. It's unclear whether other defendants will challenge Habba's authority. Habba was first appointed by Trump as interim US attorney in March, a position that expired at 120 days. Habba selected as First Assistant US Attorney Desiree Grace, a well-respected prosecutor in the office. The district court in New Jersey earlier this month declined to appoint Habba US attorney and instead elected Grace to serve as US attorney. Attorney General Pam Bondi fired Grace and Habba resigned her position. Bondi appointed Habba as a special attorney and designated her as the first assistant US attorney, effectively making her acting US attorney again. The Justice Department argues Habba's appointment is valid under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act and other executive powers. 'Whether or not Ms. Habba technically qualifies as Acting United States Attorney, the Attorney General has validly delegated to her the authority to supervise all pending prosecutions and other matters in the USAO-NJ, subject in turn to the supervision by the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General, both of whom are Senate-confirmed,' the Justice Department wrote in a court filing Tuesday. 'The FVRA therefore permits her to 'perform the functions and duties of the office' of United States Attorney 'in an acting capacity' for as long as she serves as First Assistant, until the statutory time limits expire or a permanent officeholder is nominated and confirmed.' Lawyers say whether the uncertainty helps or hurts clients is a case-by-case matter but for now it's causing chaos. One attorney, who did not want to be identified, said everyone is trying to figure out what to do. 'I think right now they're building the plane as they're flying it,' the attorney said.

Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Alina Habba's future as New Jersey's top federal prosecutor faces legal test
President Donald Trump's effort to keep Alina Habba in charge of the U.S. attorney's office in New Jersey is facing a legal challenge that could influence his ability to extend terms for some of his other controversial picks to lead prosecutor's offices across the country. Defendants in a drug and gun case set to go to trial in New Jersey this week are urging a federal court to toss the charges, arguing that Habba, a former Trump defense lawyer, has no legal standing to exercise prosecutorial powers. 'The executive branch has exceeded its lawful authority,' defense lawyer Thomas Mirigliano wrote in a court filing. 'Thus, all subsequent prosecutorial actions taken by Ms. Habba or any assistant U.S. attorneys relying on her purported authority lack constitutional legitimacy.' A judge who briefly considered the matter Monday called that argument 'nonfrivolous' before the issue was transferred to a judge in Pennsylvania who will now rule on the merits of Mirigliano's filing. Trump appointed Habba, whom the state's Democratic senators have panned as a 'partisan warrior,' to a 120-day term as New Jersey's interim U.S. attorney this year. With that tenure having expired last week, the state's federal judges voted not to renew her appointment and chose Desiree Leigh Grace, a veteran prosecutor from the office, to replace her. The Justice Department quickly fired Grace, and Trump administration officials deployed a complex series of procedural moves that it maintains will allow Habba to remain on the job indefinitely. Those steps included Habba resigning as interim U.S. attorney before the official expiration of her term on Saturday, and the president withdrawing her pending nomination for a full four years as the Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney. Attorney General Pam Bondi then appointed Habba to the No. 2 job in the New Jersey office — a role the Justice Department maintains will allow Habba to continue serving as its de facto leader since no one is currently appointed to fill the office's top position. Experts have questioned the legality of those unconventional maneuvers and whether Habba still holds the authority to act as the Garden State's top prosecutor. But Bondi and others have accused New Jersey's federal judges, many of whom were appointed by Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, of working to frustrate Trump's agenda. Mirigliano — a lawyer for Julien Giraud Jr., one of the defendants contesting the charges on grounds that Habba 'holds office unlawfully' — argued that 'the illegitimacy of Habba's appointment' undermines his client's due process rights. U.S. District Judge Edward S. Kiel described Mirigliano's gambit as a 'nonfrivolous argument' and suggested during a brief court hearing Monday that other federal judges in New Jersey might be preparing to pause proceedings in other criminal cases as they wait for questions over Habba's legal authority to be settled. Until then, the issue threatens to cast much of the work of that U.S. attorney's office into doubt. Hours after Mirigliano's motion, Michael A. Chagares, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, transferred the matter to a federal judge in Pennsylvania to sort out, apparently because New Jersey's federal bench had already voted against extending Habba's term. That new judge, U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann, huddled with lawyers on both sides Tuesday to review how to handle the matter. Brann — a former Republican Party official, member of the conservative Federalist Society and an Obama appointee — gained notoriety in 2020 with a withering dismissal of Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the election in Pennsylvania that year. In court filings Tuesday, the Justice Department insisted on the legality of the president's effort to keep Habba on the job and said Trump intended to immediately fire Grace, the judge's pick, even if she'd assumed the role of U.S. attorney. 'Ultimately, the President has both constitutional and statutory authority to remove from office any U.S. attorney — whether appointed by the President, the Attorney General, or the courts --- and to replace that person … with someone he believes better suited to fulfill that role,' government lawyers wrote. They maintained that even if Brann disagrees, Giraud's case — and countless others pending in New Jersey — could still move forward because they were launched by Senate-confirmed U.S. attorneys in prior administrations. That still would not address the status of any charges Habba's office has brought since the legality of her position was called into doubt. A review of federal court dockets since Saturday, when Habba's interim term officially expired, showed prosecutors had filed cases against at least three new defendants on charges including bank fraud and fraudulent possession of a government ID. K. Anthony Thomas, the chief federal public defender in New Jersey, urged Brann in a separate filing Tuesday to consider what would become of those cases and others that Habba's office will continue to bring separately from the issue now being raised by Giraud. 'It is critical that the court decide these issues as they are presented by the facts of each case,' Thomas wrote, noting the 'complexity and importance of the legal issues involved.' Brann has sought further briefing on the matter and has not yet indicated whether he will hold a hearing before ruling on Giraud's motion to dismiss his case. The Justice Department has deployed maneuvers similar to those used to keep Habba on behalf of at least two of Trump's other controversial appointments as interim U.S. attorneys — John E. Sarcone III, in the Albany-based Northern District of New York, and Sigal Chattah, in the District of Nevada. Unlike Habba, neither of them had been nominated by Trump for a full, four-year term in their posts. That could be due in part to headwinds working against them in the Senate. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has said he intends to continue to honor a custom, known as the 'blue slip,' that allows either of a state's two senators to block the president's nominees for judicial or U.S. attorney roles. New Jersey's senators — Cory Booker and Andy Kim, both Democrats — opposed Habba's nomination. And Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nevada) has made clear she would oppose Chattah were she to be nominated. Trump urged Grassley to reconsider in a post to social media Tuesday evening, calling the blue slip tradition 'a hoax' that has stymied his ability to get his nominees confirmed. 'The only way to beat this Hoax,' he wrote, 'is to appoint a Democrat or, a weak and ineffective Republican. Therefore, I would never be able to appoint Great Judges or U.S. Attorneys in California, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Virginia, and other places.'