"Britain Has Gone To Hell": UK Billionaire Puts $337 Million Home On Sale, Heads To Dubai
Mr Fredriksen, who has an estimated wealth of 13.7 billion pounds, owns a vast oil tanker fleet and has interests in offshore drilling, fish farming, and gas. He recently announced his relocation to the United Arab Emirates, expressing his views on the Western world in an interview with Norwegian publication E24, stating that "the entire Western world is on its way down". He cited tax changes and the political climate as reasons for relocating to the UAE, where he intends to spend most of his time while continuing to oversee his global business operations.
This move comes after the billionaire closed the London headquarters of Seatankers Management, one of his private shipping businesses, earlier this year. His twin daughters, Cecilie and Kathrine Fredriksen, are set to take the reins of the family business. Both have been involved in the family business, holding board positions in several of their father's companies.
Britain's Billionaire Exodus And Reasons Behind It
In recent years, the United Kingdom has witnessed a significant exodus of its billionaire and millionaire population, a trend that has raised alarms about the country's economic competitiveness and appeal as a global wealth hub. According to various reports, the UK is losing high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) at an unprecedented rate, with tax policy changes, economic uncertainty, and other factors driving this migration. Other notable billionaires who have recently left the UK include Christian Angermayer and Nassef Sawiris, owner of Aston Villa.
In 2024 alone, an estimated 10,800 millionaires left the country, a 157% increase compared to the previous year, making the UK second only to China in terms of millionaire outflows globally. Projections for 2025 are even more concerning, with Henley & Partners estimating that 16,500 millionaires will depart, taking approximately 66 billion pounds in investable assets abroad. London, once a magnet for global wealth, has been particularly hard hit. Since 2014, the capital has lost 30,000 millionaires.
Several factors are driving this wealth migration, with tax policy changes at the forefront.
The most significant is the Labour government's overhaul of the non-domicile (non-dom) tax regime, a system dating back to 1799 that allowed wealthy individuals living in the UK but domiciled abroad to avoid UK taxes on foreign income and assets.
In April 2025, Chancellor Rachel Reeves abolished this regime, replacing it with a residency-based system and imposing inheritance tax on worldwide assets for foreigners who have lived in the UK for over 10 years. This policy, combined with increases in capital gains tax (from 10% to 18% for the basic rate and 20% to 24% for the higher rate) and a rise in National Insurance contributions, has been widely cited as a deterrent for wealthy residents.
Beyond taxation, Brexit has played a significant role, introducing economic uncertainty, a weaker pound, and visa requirements for UK nationals moving to the EU, which have reduced the UK's appeal as a wealth hub.
The dwindling prominence of the London Stock Exchange and the UK's slow recovery from the 2008 recession have also been noted as factors pushing millionaires to rival financial centres like Paris, Dubai, and Amsterdam.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 hours ago
- Business Standard
'Western vs Indian': Differing management approaches reflect cultural roots
Western management abhors ambiguity. Indians tolerate and thrive in it R Gopalakrishnan Mumbai Listen to This Article Several Indian thinkers (me included) place an emphasis on an 'Indian' way as compared to a 'Western' way of management. They refer to Swami Vivekananda or the Mahabharata to draw lessons. Is this relevant or valid? There is some degree of validity, but only some, particularly in the equilibrium between efficiency and effectiveness. Our assumptions about life and work are shaped by deep and unmanifest influences of culture, for example, deference to power, authority, and age, as seen in Indian business leaders genuflecting before ministers and bureaucrats. When I saw North Atlantic Treaty Organization chief Mark Rutte, a blunt Dutchman,
Scroll.in
6 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Wealthy countries have a wide immigrant pay gap
As many countries grapple with ageing populations, falling birthrates, labour shortages and fiscal pressures, the ability to successfully integrate immigrants is becoming an increasingly pressing matter. However, our new study found that salaries of immigrants in Europe and North America are nearly 18% lower than those of natives, as foreign-born workers struggle to access higher-paying jobs. To reach this conclusion, we analysed the salaries of 13.5 million people in nine immigrant-receiving countries: Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United States. Data was taken from the period of 2016 to 2019. Immigrants in these countries earned less primarily because they were unable to access higher-paying jobs. Three-quarters of the migrant pay gap was the result of a lack of access to well-paid jobs, while only one-quarter of the gap was attributed to pay differences between migrant and native-born workers in the same job. The high-income countries we examined in Europe and North America all face similar demographic challenges, with low fertility rates resulting in an ageing population and labour shortages. Pro-natalist policies are unlikely to change this demographic destiny, but sound immigration policies can help. Across these countries with vastly different labour market institutions and immigrant populations, a common theme emerged: countries are not making good use of immigrants' human capital. Stark regional differences We found that immigrants earn 17.9% less than natives on average, although the pay gap varied widely by country. In Spain, a relatively recent large-scale receiver of immigrants, the pay gap was over 29%. In Sweden – a country where many employed immigrants find work in the public sector – it was just 7%. These results don't include immigrants who are unemployed or in the informal economy. Where immigrants were born also mattered. The highest average overall pay gaps were for immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa (26.1%) and the Middle East and North Africa (23.7%). For immigrants from Europe, North America and other Western countries, the difference in average pay compared to natives was a much more modest 9%. Our results suggest that the children of immigrants faced substantially better earning prospects than their parents. For the countries where second-generation data was available – Canada, Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, Norway and Sweden – the gap narrowed over time, and the children of immigrants had a substantially smaller earnings gap, earning an average of 5.7% less than workers with native-born parents. High-paying jobs Beyond quantifying the gap, we wanted to understand the roots of pay disparities. To create better policies, it is important to know whether immigrants are paid less than natives when they're doing the same job in the same company, or whether these differences arise because immigrants typically work in lower-paying jobs. By a wide margin, we found that immigrants end up working in lower-paying industries, occupations and companies; three-quarters of the gap was due to this type of labour-market sorting. The pay gap for the same work in the same company was just 4.6% on average across the nine countries. These differences represent a failure of immigration policy to incorporate immigrants, as immigrants are relegated to jobs where they cannot contribute to their full potential. Our analyses rule out that the lack of access to higher-paying jobs simply reflects a difference in skill between immigrants and native-born workers. We also found that the size of the pay gap and the key role of unequal access to well-paid jobs is similar for immigrants with and without a university education. This means that the immigrant-native pay gap in large part represents a market inefficiency and policy failure, with significant social consequences for both immigrants and immigrant-receiving countries. Policy implications Although equal pay for equal work policies may seem like a viable solution, they won't close the immigrant pay gap. This is because they only help those who have already secured work, but immigrants face barriers to employment that begin long before even applying for a job. This includes convoluted processes to validate university degrees or other qualifications, and exclusion from professional networks. The policy focus should therefore be on improving access to better jobs. To make this happen, governments should invest in programmes such as language training, education and vocational skills for immigrants. They should ensure immigrants have early access to employment information, networks, job-search assistance and employer referrals. They should implement standardised and transparent recognition of foreign degrees and credentials, helping immigrants to access jobs matching their skills and training. This is particularly important for Europe as it races to attract – and retain – skilled immigrants who may be having second thoughts about the US in the Trump era. In the European Union, around 40% of university-educated non-EU immigrants are employed in jobs that do not require a degree, an underutilisation of skills known as brain waste. Some countries are already taking steps to remedy this. Germany's Skilled Immigration Act – which took effect in 2024 – allows foreign graduates to work while their degrees are being formally recognised. In 2025, France reformed its Passeport Talent permit to attract skilled professionals and address labour shortages, especially in healthcare. These kinds of policies help ensure that foreign-born workers can contribute at their full capacity, and that countries can reap the full benefits of immigration in terms of productivity gains, higher tax revenue and reduced inequality. If immigrants can't get access to good jobs, their skills are underutilised and society loses out. Smart immigration policy doesn't end at the border – it starts there.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Tech firms to showcase AI innovations in a China under US sanctions
Tech firms huge and small will converge in Shanghai this weekend to showcase their artificial intelligence innovations and support China's booming AI sector as it faces US sanctions. Chinese companies from heavy hitters Huawei and Alibaba to ambitious startups will dominate the two-day World AI Conference , but Western names like Tesla, Alphabet and Amazon will also participate. Chinese Premier Li Qiang will address the opening of the conference, highlighting the sector's importance to the leaders of the world's second-largest economy. Beijing has made AI and self-sufficiency in other cutting-edge technologies a pillar of its national development plan, saying it aims to make China the global leader in AI by 2030. These ambitions have set China on a collision course with the US as the superpowers compete for technological dominance. President Donald Trump's administration has imposed export restrictions on advanced technology to China, including AI chips and chipmaking equipment, citing concerns that it could enhance Beijing's military capabilities. Still, China has continued making AI breakthroughs that have drawn close scrutiny from US officials. Chinese AI startup DeepSeek unsettled the global AI industry this year with a low-cost model that rivals the performance of leading US systems from companies like OpenAI - but was developed at a fraction of the cost. Jensen Huang, CEO of AI chip titan Nvidia, described AI models from Chinese firms DeepSeek, Alibaba and Tencent as "world class" during a visit to Beijing this month. More than 800 companies are set to participate in this year's AI forum, showcasing over 3,000 high-tech products, 40 large language models, 50 AI-powered devices and 60 intelligent robots, organisers say. In addition to the industry behemoths, the show will feature startups such as humanoid robot maker Unitree.
