
Trump may yet smash apart the axis of evil
The support Russia has received from China, Iran and North Korea since Putin launched his 'special military operation' in Ukraine in February 2022 has brought into sharp focus the deepening cooperation between autocratic states whose primary goal is challenging the West's primacy.
China's heavy reliance on Russia for its oil supplies – at a significant discount to the global market rate – makes a significant contribution to funding Putin's war effort. Beijing has provided technical support for Russia's war effort, supplying much-needed drones and vital semi-conductors for military equipment.
Iran, too, has provided drones and missiles to support the Kremlin's offensive in Ukraine, while the 'comprehensive strategic partnership' Putin agreed with Pyongyang last year has resulted in the deployment of North Korean troops to Ukraine in support of Russia's war.
Trump's announcement this week of a sweeping package of sanctions that will target countries that continue to trade with Moscow will have a profound impact on the unholy 'coalition of autocracies' seeking to undermine the West.
Trump's mounting frustration with Putin's refusal to take Washington's ceasefire plan seriously has led the American leader to authorise a new arms package for Ukraine – including Patriot air defence systems. He is also threatening to impose punitive tariffs on any country that continues to do business with Putin's repressive regime if no agreement to end the war is reached within 50 days.
And it is the latter measure, with talk in Washington of tariffs ranging from 100-500 per cent, that will send alarm bells ringing in Beijing, Pyongyang and Tehran about the wisdom of maintaining ties with Putin.
It is a threat that has the potential to inflict great damage on the Russian economy, severely limiting Putin's ability to continue prosecuting the war in Ukraine. Even more significantly, it could bring to an end the shaky coalition between some of the world's most despotic regimes that was forged more through necessity than any genuine interest in pursuing common goals.
Putin's belief that the Russian economy is strong enough to withstand any further punitive measures that are imposed by the US and its allies is based on the failure of sanctions originally imposed against Moscow after the invasion of Ukraine to have the desired effect.
While the Russian economy has been badly hit by the measures, with interest rates and inflation well into double figures, it has still managed to summon the resources to fund Putin's war effort. This is primarily due to the steady income stream it receives from countries like China that are willing to buy Russian oil and gas despite the sanctions.
Secondary sanctions that target states still trading with Russia, as opposed to measures imposed directly against Moscow, would seriously disrupt this arrangement, not least because it is highly unlikely that any of Moscow's so-called allies would be prepared to tolerate economic hardship of their own simply to protect their relationship with the Kremlin.
Chinese President Xi Jinping's response to Trump's latest tariff threat was to insist that Moscow and Beijing would strengthen their 'mutual support on multilateral platforms ' because the two states were 'setting a model for a new type of international relations'. Yet, with China struggling to cope with the end of its economic miracle, it is questionable whether Xi really wants to see his country endure further economic pressure.
Beijing's relationship with Moscow has always been one-sided, with China exploiting Russia's economic woes to its own advantage. Many of those around Xi view Russia as being little more than a convenient gas station.
Iran, too, will have qualms about standing by Russia's side. Putin, despite the defence pact he recently signed with Tehran, did nothing to protect the Iranian regime when it came under attack from Israel and the US.
The ayatollahs currently have enough problems of their own without compounding them by attracting further US sanctions. Even the North Koreans, whose forces have suffered heavy losses fighting on Russia's behalf, must be wondering about the wisdom of persisting with an alliance that causes them so much pain and so little gain.
Trump's threat of new sanctions might be aimed at forcing Putin to the negotiating table. But they could also result in the breakup of an autocratic alliance which never had any common purpose in the first place – save for making life difficult for the West.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
India's Nayara exports first gasoline since sanctions, sources say
NEW DELHI/SINGAPORE, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Russia-backed Indian refiner Nayara Energy has exported its first gasoline cargo since the privately-owned company was sanctioned by the European Union on July 18, according to four shipping sources and LSEG data. The tanker Tempest Dream, carrying about 43,000 metric tons (363,350 barrels) of gasoline, sailed on Monday, according to the sources and LSEG shipping data. The vessel, sanctioned by Britain in June, is headed to Sohar, Oman, shipping data showed, although buyer details could not be verified. Mumbai-based Nayara Energy did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. A second vessel, the Sard, is currently at the western Indian port of Vadinar used by Nayara, set to lift about 43,000 tons of diesel, according to two sources and LSEG shipping data. Nayara has been forced to reduce crude runs at its 400,000-barrel-per-day refinery in Vadinar due to difficulties in obtaining ships and selling fuel from the port in the wake of the sanctions, Reuters has reported. Nayara, which runs 6,600 fuel stations in India, has approached state fuel retailers for domestic sale of products, industry sources have said. It recently used tanker Leruo to move about 43,000 tons of diesel to Mundra port in western India, data from traders and Kpler shiptracking showed. The Leruo and Sard have been sanctioned by the EU since July and May respectively.


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
A look at the top buyers of Russian oil as Trump pressures China and India to stop buying it
U.S. President Donald Trump is pushing China and India to stop buying oil from Russia and helping fund the Kremlin's war against Ukraine. Trump is raising the issue as he seeks to press Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire. But cheap Russian oil benefits refiners in those countries as well as meeting their needs for energy, and they're not showing any inclination to halt the practice. Three countries are big buyers of Russian oil China, India and Turkey are the biggest recipients of oil that used to go to the European Union. The EU's decision to boycott most Russian seaborne oil from January 2023 led to a massive shift in crude flows from Europe to Asia. Since then, China has been the No. 1 overall purchaser of Russian energy since the EU boycott, with some $219.5 billion worth of Russian oil, gas and coal, followed by India with $133.4 billion and Turkey with $90.3 billion. Before the invasion, India imported relatively little Russian oil. Hungary imports some Russian oil through a pipeline. Hungary is an EU member, but President Viktor Orban has been critical of sanctions against Russia. The lure of cheaper oil One big reason: It's cheap. Since Russian oil trades at a lower price than international benchmark Brent, refineries can fatten their profit margins when they turn crude into usable products such as diesel fuel. Russia's oil earnings are substantial despite sanctions The Kyiv School of Economics says Russia took in $12.6 billion from oil sales in June. Russia continues to earn substantial sums even as the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations has tried to limit Russia's take by imposing an oil price cap. The cap is to be enforced by requiring shipping and insurance companies to refuse to handle oil shipments above the cap. Russia has, to a great extent, been able to evade the cap by shipping oil on a 'shadow fleet' of old vessels using insurers and trading companies located in countries that are not enforcing sanctions. Russian oil exporters are predicted to take in $153 billion this year, according to the Kyiv institute. Fossil fuels are the single largest source of budget revenue. The imports support Russia's ruble currency and help Russia to buy goods from other countries, including weapons and parts for them.


Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil steadies as OPEC+ output hikes counter Russia disruption concerns
LONDON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Oil was little changed on Tuesday as traders assessed rising OPEC+ supply and worries of weaker global demand, against U.S. President Donald Trump's threats to India over its Russian oil purchases. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, together known as OPEC+, agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September, a move that will end its most recent output cut earlier than planned. Brent crude futures were down 26 cents, or 0.4%, to $68.50 a barrel at 0800 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was down 7 cents at $66.22. Both contracts fell by more than 1% on Monday to settle at their lowest in a week. Trump on Monday again threatened higher tariffs on Indian goods over the country's Russian oil purchases. New Delhi called his attack "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening a trade rift between the two countries. Oil's limited move since then indicates that traders are sceptical a supply disruption will happen, said John Evans of oil broker PVM in a report. He questioned whether Trump would risk higher oil prices, which "would be the inevitable outcome of penalising Russian energy customers". India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million bpd from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. Trump's threats come amid renewed concerns about oil demand and some analysts expect faltering economic growth in the second half of the year. JPMorgan said on Tuesday the risk of a U.S. recession was high. Also, China's July Politburo meeting signalled no more policy easing, with the focus shifting to structural rebalancing of the world's second-largest economy, the analysts said.