logo
European universities struggle to stay neutral amid global political crises

European universities struggle to stay neutral amid global political crises

Time of India27-04-2025
Live Events
Universities on both sides of the Atlantic were under intense pressure to deal with campus conflict over political issues long before the Trump administration started cracking down on higher education.In the past three years, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and Israel's war on Gaza, prompted by a Hamas attack, have led to student protests around the world and put university administrators in the uncomfortable position of having to take political positions – or try their best not to.'These days, there is hardly a crisis that doesn't hit the campus with unbridled force,' said Ulrich Rüdiger, rector of RWTH Aachen, one of Germany's top research universities.(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates)In countries like Switzerland and Germany, universities have generally tried to stay neutral, which has in turn raised questions about whether that's a realistic goal, and what such neutrality might be in service of.At the beginning of March, ETH Zurich received a questionnaire from the Trump administration asking whether a research project that receives US funding was in line with new government policies on diversity, equity and inclusion. The university, which has received about $2.5 million on average over the last ten years from the US government, decided not to respond, according to ETH Zurich spokesperson Vanessa Bleich. Later in March, the university announced that it would not make official statements on geopolitical issues.Switzerland guarantees freedom of research and teaching. At the same time, Swiss universities have to abide by laws restricting the export of technologies that can have both civil and military applications, including those designed in universities. As a result, ETH Zurich announced last year that it would increase scrutiny in the admission of foreign students, especially from China. The decision was denounced by students and researchers, including some who described the policy as in conflict with the country's geopolitical neutrality.In Germany, where the most universities are financed by the government, institutions have to be politically neutral when it comes to party politics, and follow German law. But that's the extent of it – universities are free to take stands when not doing so would threaten their functioning, and they are allowed to uphold values enshrined in the country's constitution, a policy that allows for broad interpretation.Often, these actions are relatively uncontroversial. After Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, universities in Constance, Halle and Cologne, among others, issued statements expressing solidarity with Ukraine. The following year, the Technical University of Dresden campaigned for their research fellow, economist Gubad Ibadoghlu, to be released from prison in Azerbaijan. In early 2024, the HRK, an organization that represents Germany's university rectors, called on the country's scientific community to stand against discrimination in response to a secret meeting between members of the far-right AfD party and neo-Nazi sympathizers.Israel's war in Gaza, however, has complicated matters. As universities around the world have erupted in protest, German institutions have been influenced by the so-called reason of state doctrine, which mandates that the country defend and preserve the state of Israel. Consequently, many German universities have held fast to partnerships with Israeli universities, and in some cases, doubled down on them.The Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, a German research university that considers itself politically neutral, said in March it was going to intensify its relationships with Tel Aviv University, the University of Haifa and Hasoub, an Arab-Israeli innovation center. KIT does not want to 'exclude or separate itself,' but rather foster dialogue, the university said.German society at large is more critical of Israel's actions. A ZDF Politbarometer survey, one of Germany's most important opinion polls, indicates that already in early 2024, only 18% of respondents still believed Israel's military activity in Gaza was justified and 87% wanted Western governments to increase pressure on the Jewish state to ensure that aid reaches civilians.As the government has taken additional steps to defend Israel under the banner of fighting antisemitism, questions have been raised about how far is too far. Last November, the HRK pushed back against news that Germany's parliament intended to call out the country's higher eduction sector for failing to act more decisively against antisemitism. The rectors' organization called the move 'objectively not necessary' and 'not useful against the backdrop of university autonomy and academic freedom.' Three months later, the Bundestag passed a resolution calling on universities to take stronger stands against antisemitism.While she thinks universities should try to steer clear of taking geopolitical positions, Jutta Günther, the rector of the University of Bremen, believes no one should be prevented from standing up for Germany's constitution, the Basic Law. 'We are not neutral towards the Basic Law, we are committed to it. It is the foundation that guarantees freedom of research and teaching in the first place,' she said. In an article Günther wrote for a German science and education website, she appealed to the scientific community to fight for democracy at a moment in which it is under attack.Such actions are important, said Jonathan Dreusch, the political secretary at the German National Union of Students, but he cautioned that political stands must be taken organically, and not in response to outside pressures. 'Universities must not become pawns. And this also includes instrumentalizing them for short-term political purposes, even with the best of intentions,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Germany's Dobrindt, EU ministers propose radical shift in asylum policy to ease migration strain
Germany's Dobrindt, EU ministers propose radical shift in asylum policy to ease migration strain

First Post

time17 minutes ago

  • First Post

Germany's Dobrindt, EU ministers propose radical shift in asylum policy to ease migration strain

The meeting at Germany's highest peak, the Zugspitze, follows Berlin's decision in May to reject asylum seekers at the border, a policy it said was coordinated with neighbouring countries but drew significant criticism read more European Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration Magnus Brunner, Danish Minister of Immigration and Integration Kaare Dybvad Bek, French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, Parliamentary State Secretary to the Federal Minister of the Interior Daniela Ludwig, Polish Interior Minister Tomasz Siemoniak, Austrian Interior Minister Gerhard Karner, and Czech Interior Minister Vit Rakusan meet to discuss migration policies, during Zugspitze Summit, near Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany. Reuters Germany's Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt and five European counterparts agreed on a set of goals on Friday to tighten asylum rules in the bloc, including allowing deportations to Afghanistan and Syria. The meeting at Germany's highest peak, the Zugspitze, follows Berlin's decision in May to reject asylum seekers at the border, a policy it said was coordinated with neighbouring countries but drew significant criticism. It comes almost exactly a decade after former German Chancellor Angela Merkel opened the country's borders to nearly a million refugees fleeing war and persecution, a landmark decision that reshaped European politics. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Dobrindt met counterparts from France, Poland, Austria, the Czech Republic and Denmark, as well as EU Home Affairs Commissioner Magnus Brunner. The agreed asylum policy goals, which require approval from Brussels, include removing legislative obstacles to transferring rejected asylum seekers to secure centres outside the EU and enabling asylum procedures in third countries. Germany's new government has already placed curbs on migration including suspending family reunification and resettlement programmes, as it seeks to regain support from voters drawn to the far-right Alternative for Germany, which made historic gains in February's federal election. On Friday Germany deported 81 Afghan men to Afghanistan. 'We are all concerned that the overburdening of our countries by illegal migration is also contributing massively to the polarization of society. We want to push back this polarization,' Dobrindt said. Deportations to countries such as Afghanistan and Syria should be reinstated as standard practice, with citizens from countries failing to cooperate on deportations to face visa restrictions, a joint declaration said. Trade, and development aid will also be used as leverage to boost returns and strengthen migration cooperation, the document said, pressing for increasing deployment of drones and more EU funding for border infrastructure and personnel. The countries agreed to combat smugglers and work to dismantle human trafficking networks. Asylum seekers who have already been granted protection in another EU country will be quickly rejected if they claim asylum elsewhere in the bloc. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Once we seal the external border, there will be no need for internal border controls,' Polish Interior Minister Tomasz Siemoniak said. Siemoniak said he discussed the border controls Germany introduced unilaterally at its border with Dobrindt, adding that Poland is ready to waive the controls at its border once Germany does the same.

Trump says there is no ‘smoking gun' in the Jeffrey Epstein files, blames Democrats for controversy
Trump says there is no ‘smoking gun' in the Jeffrey Epstein files, blames Democrats for controversy

Indian Express

time17 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump says there is no ‘smoking gun' in the Jeffrey Epstein files, blames Democrats for controversy

US President Donald Trump on Friday, once again sought to downplay the Jeffrey Epstein controversy that has long captivated his MAGA base, arguing there is no 'smoking gun' in the files linked to the disgraced financier. 'If there was a 'smoking gun' on Epstein, why didn't the Dems, who controlled the 'files' for four years, and had Garland and Comey in charge, use it? BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!' Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social. The post followed Trump's Thursday night announcement that he had directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue the release of additional Epstein-related materials. 'Produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony' Trump said Bondi had been instructed to 'produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval'. In response, Bondi confirmed she would pursue court action, potentially as soon as Friday. However, any release of grand jury records would require a legal process, including judicial review and consideration of victims' privacy. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump allegedly sent Epstein a letter for his 50th birthday in 2003 — a claim the President now disputes. The report claimed that Trump contributed a 'bawdy' letter — featuring a typewritten personal message alongside a drawing of a naked woman's silhouette — to an album Ghislaine Maxwell had compiled as a gift for Epstein's birthday. In an interview with the Journal, Trump denied writing the letter and has threatened legal action. 'I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third-rate newspaper,' Trump wrote last night. 'I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper, the WSJ. That will be an interesting experience!!!' Trump posted online Friday. DOJ denies Epstein 'client list' theories Trump's order comes amid pressure from MAGA-aligned voices to 'do more' after the Justice Department and FBI issued a memo stating no further disclosures in the Epstein case were 'appropriate or warranted.' The memo concluded there was no evidence Epstein kept a so-called 'client list' or that he blackmailed prominent individuals. It also confirmed, again, that Epstein died by suicide in prison while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Earlier, Bondi had responded to the DOJ memo, saying it 'speaks for itself.' Trump, meanwhile, has tried to distance himself from the growing intrigue that conspiracy theorists and far-right influencers continue to stoke around Epstein's ties to elites. He has repeatedly called the Epstein files a 'Democratic hoax' and dismissed Republican supporters pressing for deeper investigation as 'stupid' and 'foolish.' Despite some media speculation, the White House has ruled out appointing a special prosecutor. 'The idea was floated from someone in the media to the president. The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case. That's how he feels,' said press secretary Karoline Leavitt at Thursday's briefing.

President Donald Trump will sign new cryptocurrency bill into law on Friday
President Donald Trump will sign new cryptocurrency bill into law on Friday

Business Standard

time17 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

President Donald Trump will sign new cryptocurrency bill into law on Friday

The measure is meant to bolster consumer confidence in the rapidly growing crypto sector. Its passage comes as Trump makes it a mission to make the US the crypto capital of the world AP Washington President Donald Trump on Friday will sign into law a new set of regulations for a type of cryptocurrency that are seen as a way to legitimise the burgeoning industry. The GENIUS Act sets initial guardrails and consumer protections for stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency that is tied to a stable asset like the US dollar to reduce price volatility. It passed both the House and Senate with wide bipartisan margins. The measure is meant to bolster consumer confidence in the rapidly growing crypto sector. Its passage comes as Trump makes it a mission to make the U.S. the crypto capital of the world. Congratulations to our GREAT REPUBLICANS for being able to accomplish so much, a record, in so short a period of time," Trump wrote on his social media site Friday morning as he announced the bill signing. The House also passed two other bills Thursday that are meant to boost the legitimacy of the crypto industry. One creates a new market structure for cryptocurrency, and the other bans the Federal Reserve from issuing a new digital currency. Both measures now go to the Senate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store