
A roadmap to beat Trump? How rise of Zohran Mamdani is dividing Democrats
The Friday night before election day, Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old democratic socialist running for mayor of New York City, walked the length of Manhattan, from Inwood Hill Park at its northern tip to the Battery – about 13 miles. Along the way, he was greeted by a stream of New Yorkers enjoying the sticky summer night – men rose from their folding chairs to shake his hand, drivers honked in support and diners leapt up to snap a selfie with the would-be leader of their city.
A feelgood video of his trek, produced by Mamdani's campaign, captures the 'only in New York' quality of his ascendance, from little-known assembly member to the all-but-official Democratic nominee for mayor of America's largest city.
His stunning political upset, triumphing over the better-financed, establishment-backed former governor, Andrew Cuomo, who conceded the race on Tuesday night with only the first round of votes counted, carries what many Democrats hope is an unmistakable message to their party's old guard: it's time to pass the torch.
Mamdani himself said he viewed the election as a referendum on a crumbling status quo. In his election party speech, delivered in the first minutes of Wednesday morning, he vowed 'to govern our city as a model for the Democratic party – a party where we fight for working people with no apology'.
With a relentless focus on the cost of living, a relatable online presence and an army of volunteers tens of thousands strong, Mamdani – who would be the first Muslim mayor in the city's history – defied conventional wisdom that said Cuomo – the 67-year-old scion of a prominent New York political family with a massive war chest – was invincible. And he did it in a way that many Democrats from across the ideological spectrum believe might offer a roadmap for winning back the voters they have lost touch with, in the first major primary election since Donald Trump reclaimed the White House.
'The establishment, at this point, is suicidally clinging to a version of power it no longer even has,' said Amit Singh Bagga, a Democratic strategist and former New York City official. 'We have made this choice to not evolve – and if you do not evolve, you will walk your party – and potentially our democracy – up to the brink of extinction.'
Early data suggests Mamdani's youth-powered campaign stitched together a new multiracial coalition, activating disengaged voters across the five boroughs, particularly in predominantly Asian and Hispanic districts. He won big in Ridgewood, Queens (where he notched 80% of the vote), and in nearby Bushwick, Brooklyn (79%) – the kinds of gentrifying neighborhoods where his younger fanbase lives. On election night, popular bars projected the results to amped-up patrons as if it were their Super Bowl. (The New York Times called this area 'the Commie Corridor', to the delight of the neighborhood's out-and-proud leftists.) Even residents of the financial district – the symbolic heart of American capitalism – voted for the democratic socialist.
Speaking at a thinktank in Washington on Thursday, Democratic senator Elissa Slotkin, a relative moderate who represents battleground state Michigan and is viewed as a rising star in the party, said New Yorkers made two demands crystal clear.
'People, just like in November, are still really focused on costs and the economy and their own kitchen-table math – and they're looking for a new generation of leadership,' she said. Of Mamdani's campaign, Slotkin added: 'We may disagree on some key issues but understanding that people are concerned about their family budget – that is a unifying thing for our coalition.'
Yet other corners of the party were raising alarms, warning that Mamdani's populist economic policies and pro-Palestinian views placed him beyond the pale of swing-voter consensus. 'What can work in Brooklyn is not the path for the battlegrounds,' said Kate deGruyter, communications director at the centrist Democratic thinktank Third Way. 'And I think we need to be really clear about that.'
Whether the Democratic establishment ultimately decides to embrace Mamdani before the November general election may provide a clue as to its future.
Polls and focus groups make clear that voters view Democrats as elitist and out of touch. In 2024, voters said Kamala Harris came across as overly scripted in her presidential campaign, especially compared with Trump's free-wheeling approach.
'You've got to let the candidate be themselves,' said Debbie Saslaw, co-founder of Melted Solids, the Brooklyn-based production studio that crafted some of Mamdani's most viral videos. Saslow and co-founder Anthony Dimieri said their work looked to amplify Mamdani's authenticity.
He spoke about 'halal-inflation' in front of food trucks and cut campaign videos in English and Spanish. In others, he explained the city's ranked-choice voting system in Hindi and Urdu – and likened Cuomo to a 'Bollywood villain'.
'[Mamdani] spoke the language of all New Yorkers, because people don't want to be pandered to,' she said. 'A meme only speaks to people who are extremely online. Our priority was going all around New York City and speaking to hundreds of people about the issues.'
In 2024, the Harris campaign raised an eye-watering billion dollars, but many Democrats now believe a too-cautious media strategy cost her dearly.
Mamdani – who once tried to launch a rap career under the name Mr Cardamom – had no hestitation talking to everyone. He appeared on just about any media platform that would have him – from popular TikTok shows like Subway Takes, where host Kareem Rahma discusses current events while riding the train, and Gaydar, where a comedian named Anania cheekily tries to guess if someone is 'gay, straight or a homophobe' while quizzing them on queer history. He spoke to more mainstream and moderate audiences on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert and The Bulwark, a never-Trump conservative news website.
'Mamdani clearly understands the value of our platform,' said Amelia Montooth, a 28-year-old New Yorker and CEO of Mutuals Media, who produces Gaydar. 'I was in awe of the fact that they said yes to appearing on the show right away, and they didn't try to change anything about the show or edit us.'
Mamdani's flood-the-zone, 'go everywhere' approach proved popular, especially when he was asked, and sometimes cornered, in debates and discussions about his views on Israel, a topic long viewed as crucial for electability in New York. Both Cuomo and conservatives continued to try to paint Mamdani's rhetoric, including an explanation of the controversial phrase 'globalize the intifada', as antisemitic.
But in a sign that times may have changed, Mamdani's pro-Palestinian views did not prevent his decisive victory – nor were they central to his campaign. Instead, he kept a laser-focus on affordability – with policy goals that included a rent freeze, free buses and universal childcare.
Groups like Hot Girls for Zohran staged canvassing parties, lookalike contests, and DJ nights at queer clubs in Brooklyn.
The duo behind Hot Girls for Zohran – Cait and Kaif, two gen-Z New Yorkers who keep their last names private for security reasons – said they ran the group as if it were a 'marketing' campaign.
'We wanted it to be very accessible to people who normally aren't politically active,' Cait said. 'We brought them in with fun events, and then we got them to go canvas. We made it a cultural thing: you go with your friends to volunteer, and then you go party.'
Yet Mamdani's victory has rattled the Democratic establishment, triggering a wave of panic that his politics will further alienate the voters they need to win back power in 2026 and 2028.
As the ranked-choice tabulations continue, business leaders and some major Democratic donors are debating whether to coalesce around an independent bid by Cuomo or to rally behind the city's deeply unpopular incumbent mayor, Eric Adams, who is also running as an independent.
Lis Smith, a veteran Democratic strategist who previously worked for Cuomo but is now a critic, said many of the leading Democrats 'freaking out' over Mamdani's win had only themselves to blame.
'They looked around a city of more than 8 million people and said: 'You know what, let's nominate the guy who was run out of office 4 years ago,'' she observed on X in reference to Cuomo, who resigned as governor over multiple sexual assault allegations.
Mamdani has quickly pivoted to the general election, seeking to build moment from his powerful showing in the Democratic primary. But his path to City Hall – in a city where Democrats outnumber Republicans six to one – could be unusually competitive. Centrist Democrats could rally around Cuomo or Adams, who until recently was beset by corruption charges that were dropped by the Trump administration. The same goes for billionaires such as Bill Ackman, who promised to 'take care of the fundraising' for a strong centrist challenger.
He also risks damage from a rightwing campaign that has already kicked into gear. Republicans gleefully seized on Mamdani's success, seeking to make him the new face of the Democratic party, with some criticism veering into outright Islamophobia and bigotry. Trump assailed Mamdani as a '100% Communist Lunatic' who looks 'terrible', has a 'grating voice' and is 'not very smart'.
The establishment has certainly felt the jolt of Mamdani's political earthquake, as it did in 2018, when Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez toppled one of the highest-ranking House Democrats. Ocasio-Cortez, also of Queens, was one of Mamdani's most prominent progressive supporters along with Senator Bernie Sanders.
So far, Mamdani has received a mixed reception from Democrats in New York and nationally. While progressives are elated, many centrist Democrats are alarmed by the ascension of a democratic socialist who previously called for defunding the police and is vocally pro-Palestine.
New York congressman Jerry Nadler, one of the city's most prominent Jewish leaders, endorsed Mamdani after previously supporting one of his opponents. But Senator Chuck Schumer and Representative Hakeem Jeffries – both New Yorkers who lead the Senate and House Democrats – congratulated him without extending an endorsement. Others distanced themselves entirely.
Representative Laura Gillen, a first-term Democrat who flipped a Long Island House district last year, called Mamdani 'the absolute wrong choice for New York'. Representative Tom Suozzi, another Long Island Democrat in a competitive district, said he had 'serious concerns' about Mamdani before the election and 'those concerns remain'.
The response has infuriated progressives. 'Tell them what they love to tell us: vote blue no matter who,' declared David Hogg, the Florida activist who recently stepped down as a national party official after clashing with the leadership at the Democratic National Committee over his decision to support primary challenges against long-serving Democratic incumbents.
Bagga, the former city official, urged Democratic leaders to engage young political talent such as Mamdani – candidates who are resonating with the young and working-class voters that abandoned the party last year.
'We have to be able to not eat ourselves for lunch,' he said, 'because the more we continue to do that, the Maga authoritarian right will eat us all for dinner'.
A wave of young Democrats running for office are taking hope from Mamdani's campaign – validation that campaigns built on TikTok, door-knocking and a focus on bread-and-butter economic issues can shake even the most entrenched political machines.
In southern Arizona, 25-year-old Deja Foxx is running in a special election for a solidly blue seat held for most of her life by the congressman Raúl Grijalva, until he died in office in March. A reproductive rights activist and digital strategist, Foxx is hoping to channel the same desire for generational change that powered Mamdani's political upset in New York.
Facing a competitive field that includes Grijalva's daughter, Foxx is making the case that her youth and lived experiences – the daughter of a single mom who struggled with addiction, a 'free lunch kid' who relied on Medicaid and public housing and an organizer for reproductive rights before she was old enough to vote – make her a credible voice for the working-class people of the district.
In an interview as she drove across the border-spanning district on her 'Crashout or Congress' tour, Foxx called on the party's leaders to show more 'courage' and support young candidates.
'We need to be really clear-eyed, even in these blue seats, about who we're sending into these positions of power,' she said. 'It's not enough to just check the boxes. We need real champions.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump makes his return to Disney World ride with new speaking role
Donald Trump has made a centerstage return to Disney World's freshly reopened Hall of Presidents - with a new and improved look from his first term. The animatronic political attraction in Magic Kingdom discreetly opened its doors on Sunday morning after being closed for five months. It shuttered on January 20 after Trump was inaugurated into his second term. The display shuts down after every presidential transition so Disney can update the show. Disney World did not announce the well-known display's sudden reopening - leaving both guests and employees confused. Cast members inside the Hall of Presidents' theater on Sunday morning told The Park Place they had no clue the show was returning and only found out when they came to work. Other than Trump's animatronic having a speaking role, no major changes have been made to the mechanized performance. The 20-minute demonstration begins with a narrated history lesson featuring all the country's former commander-in-chiefs, with Joe Biden's robot seen on stage behind Trump. A robotic Abraham Lincoln recites the Gettysburg Address, followed by a speech from George Washington. This time around, those invested in Disney's portrayal of the president have noticed the robotic figure has been upgraded to bear more resemble to the real life Trump The realistic Trump figure, situated in the middle of all the presidents, then gives his oath of office speech while mimicking Trump's hand gestures and mannerisms. He states: 'I, Donald John Trump, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, so help me God.' When Trump was elected for his first term, people accused the theme park of creating a Hillary Clinton animatronic and sloppily switching it to Trump after she lost the 2016 election. Critics on pointed out how the robot meant to look like Trump looked far more like Clinton. 'Here (sic) me out on this. Clearly Disney had Hilary's (sic) robot ready to go and then had to try to make it look like Trump,' one user wrote on X, which was Twitter at the time. 'Don't hate me. This is just a necessary and painful fact we all need to deal with.' 'The more I see of Disney's 'Hall of Presidents' Trump, the more I'm convinced they made a Hillary one first and had to redo it,' another user agreed. 'Disney was so sure Hillary would win they just made a Hillary robot for their hall of presidents and when Trump won they just put a trump skin over it and it looks like something straight from hell,' someone joked. This time around, those invested in Disney's portrayal of the president have noticed the figure has been upgraded to better resemble to the real life Trump. 'Damn. I will miss Hilary (sic) Trump,' one person joked on X, as another added 'I guess that's an improvement.' 'AA [audio animatronic] was fixed and looks much much better now,' one man agreed. 'Maybe they could update the animatronic to better look like him. The last one they did was poorly done,' a user, who had not yet seen the new version, asserted.


BBC News
37 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump's budget may cost millions healthcare as Senate debates bill
A sprawling budget bill in the US Senate could cut healthcare for nearly 12 million Americans and add nearly $3.3 trillion in new debt, according to new assessement from the Congressional Budget Office, a non-partisan federal agency, is all but certain to complicate Republicans' efforts to pass Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" in the coming days. It narrowly cleared a preliminary vote Saturday. Party leaders scrambled to win over lawmakers concerned about debt and the bill's healthcare cuts, among other critic, Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, announced Sunday that he would not seek reelection after voting against the president's signature legislation. Democratic lawmakers have also criticised the bill, arguing it delivers tax cuts for the wealthy at the expense of vulnerable Americans. The CBO numbers calculate a $1 trillion (£730bn) cuts to healthcare funding if the bill passes. The latest version of the bill was brought to the Senate floor late Saturday night thanks to a 51-49 vote. Two Republicans joined Democrats in opposing the senators voted to open debate on the bill, it is unclear whether it has enough support to ultimately pass. Republicans have a small majority in the Senate with 53 seats. With vice-president JD Vance holding the tie-breaker vote, the party can only afford three senators are using chamber rules to force a reading of the nearly 1,000-page bill in an attempt to delay a vote on its Senate rules, lawmakers now have 20 hours allocated to debate the bill. It is expected that Democrats will use all of their time to further delay a vote, while Republicans will try to speed up the could also propose amendments to the bill. If the revised bill passes the Senate, it still must return to the House of Representatives for final approval before landing on the president's has pushed for a quick passage of the bill before a self-imposed 4 July deadline, and the White House said a failure to pass it would be the "ultimate betrayal".Senate Republicans advance Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' but final vote hangs in balanceA look at the key items in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky has said he opposes the bill because it raises the US debt limit. Tillis voiced concern that the bill would cost his state billions of dollars in healthcare cited the cuts the bill proposes to Medicaid, a healthcare programme that is relied on by millions of elderly, disabled and low-income cuts have become a hotly debated issue on both sides of the Senator Mark Warner told CNN on Sunday that the bill will negatively impact millions. "This is tax cuts for the wealthiest to end up cutting health care, plain and simple," he Republican senators, however, have defended the bill as a needed step for the US government. Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma told NBC on Sunday that the legislation aims to eliminate fraud, waste and abuse. He argued that many Americans using Medicaid are not under the poverty line."We don't pay people in this country to be lazy," he said. "We want to give them an opportunity. And when they're going through a hard time, we want to give them a helping hand." What is in the Big Beautiful Bill? Some parts of the spending bill were revised in the Senate in order to appease Republican still contains some of its core components: tax cuts that Trump campaigned on, such as a tax deduction on Social Security benefits, and the elimination of taxes on overtime work and would also extend tax cuts passed by Republicans in its latest estimate, the Congressional Budget Office said the measures in their current form would add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next bill proposes cuts to certain programmes in order to pay for the tax healthcare, the spending bill proposes a work requirement on most adults in order to qualify for benefits. It also reduces the amount of taxes states can charge medical providers, the funds from which are used heavily to finance Medicaid some Republican senators voiced concern that these cuts would negatively impact rural hospitals in their districts, lawmakers added a provision in the latest bill that increases the size of a rural hospital relief fund from $15bn to $25bn. The bill also includes additional restrictions on the US food stamps programme, by asking most adults with children 14 or older to show proof of work in order to qualify. It also shifts some costs from the federal government to states starting in 2028.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US Senate pushes ahead on Trump tax cuts as nonpartisan analysis raises price tag
WASHINGTON, June 29 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate version of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill will add $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt, about $800 billion more than the version passed last month by the House of Representatives, a nonpartisan forecaster said on Sunday. The Congressional Budget Office issued its estimate of the bill's hit to the $36.2 trillion federal debt as Senate Republicans sought to push the bill forward in a marathon weekend session. Republicans, who have long voiced concern about growing U.S. deficits and debt, have rejected the CBO's longstanding methodology to calculate the cost of legislation. But Democrats hope the latest, eye-widening figure could stoke enough anxiety among fiscally-minded conservatives to get them to buck their party, which controls both chambers of Congress. The Senate only narrowly advanced the tax-cut, immigration, border and military spending bill in a procedural vote late on Saturday, voting 51-49 to open debate on the 940-page megabill. Trump on social media hailed Saturday's vote as a "great victory" for his "great, big, beautiful bill." In an illustration of the depths of the divide within the Republican Party over the bill, Senator Thom Tillis said he would not seek re-election next year, after Trump threatened to back a primary challenger in retribution for Tillis' Saturday night vote against the bill. Tillis' North Carolina seat is one of the few Republican Senate seats seen as vulnerable in next year's midterm elections. He was one of just two Republicans to vote no on Saturday. Trump wants the bill passed before the July 4 Independence Day holiday. While that deadline is one of choice, lawmakers will face a far more serious deadline later this summer when they must raise the nation's self-imposed debt ceiling or risk a devastating default on $36.2 trillion in debt. 'We are going to make sure hardworking people can keep more of their money,' Senator Katie Britt, an Alabama Republican, told CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, said this legislation would come to haunt Republicans if it gets approved, predicting 16 million Americans would lose their health insurance. "Many of my Republican friends know ... they're walking the plank on this and we'll see if those who've expressed quiet consternation will actually have the courage of their convictions," Warner told CBS News' "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." The legislation has been the sole focus of a marathon weekend congressional session marked by political drama, division and lengthy delays as Democrats seek to slow the legislation's path to passage. Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer called for the entire text of the bill to be read on the Senate floor, a process that began before midnight Saturday and ran well into Sunday afternoon. Following that lawmakers will begin up to 20 hours of debate on the legislation. That will be followed by an amendment session, known as a "vote-a-rama," before the Senate votes on passage. Lawmakers said they hoped to complete work on the bill on Monday. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, the other Republican "no" vote, opposed the legislation because it would raise the federal borrowing limit by an additional $5 trillion. "Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???" Trump said on social media. The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. Representative Michael McCaul, however, warned that fellow Republicans who do not back Trump on the bill could face payback from voters. "They know that their jobs are at risk. Not just from the president, but from the voting -- the American people. Our base back home will not reelect us to office if we vote no on this," McCaul also told CBS News. Senate Republicans, who reject the CBO's estimates on the cost of the legislation, are set on using an alternative calculation method that does not factor in costs from extending the 2017 tax cuts. Outside tax experts, like Andrew Lautz from the nonpartisan think tank Bipartisan Policy Center, call it a "magic trick." Using this calculation method, the Senate Republicans' budget bill appears to cost substantially less and seems to save $500 billion, according to the BPC analysis. If the Senate passes the bill, it will then return to the House of Representatives for final passage before Trump can sign it into law. The House passed its version of the bill last month.