Security guard who assaulted Uber driver keeps licence
A man who badly assaulted an Uber driver who wouldn't transport him and his drunk mates will be able to continue working as a security guard despite police opposition.
Leon Saufoi also damaged the driver's car and another vehicle, according to a recently released Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority decision.
Saufoi was convicted of assault with intent to injure and wilful damage, and sentenced to community detention on June 9.
Police say he is no longer suitable to work in private security, but Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority head Trish McConnell says he deserves another chance.
McConnell, in her decision, confirmed the assault conviction was grounds for disqualification and therefore a mandatory ground for cancelling Saufoi's certificate unless a waiver from disqualification was granted.
She accepted his actions were out of character and that he had taken full responsibility for them and all reasonable steps to ensure he did not offend in a similar way again.
McConnell said the convictions did not establish that he was no longer suitable to be a certificate holder.
"At the time of his offending Mr Saufoi was facing personal and family issues which he had kept bottled up inside.
"His actions on the night in question were out of character and he accepts he just exploded and reacted violently and irrationally to very minor provocation."
Speaking to NZME, Saufoi said what happened was out of character.
"Leading up to the incident I was going through a lot. My dad had just been diagnosed with cancer and the location where everything happened was a place connected to the recent loss of one of my closest friends.
"That context does not excuse my actions, but it helps explain where I was mentally and emotionally at that time.'
He said after his security licence was suspended he took time to reflect on how he manages his emotions.
"I self-referred myself to a 20-week living without violence programme and also completed the Tupu programme.
"Initially my lawyer suggested I apply for a Section 106 (discharge without conviction) since it was my first offence.
"But as I worked through the programmes, I realised I needed to take full responsibility, so I withdrew the application.'
Saufoi advised the authority that he had stopped drinking alcohol after his offending and had remained sober since.
He had completed a Man Alive anti-violence programme and a Te Whatu Ora alcohol programme.
McConnell said Saufoi had explained what he had learned from the courses and counselling he had attended.
McConnell waived the grounds for disqualification.
'In particular, he now talks about the issues he is facing rather than bottling them up inside him and has learnt to recognise and appropriately address his trigger points,' she said in her decision.
Instead of cancelling Saufoi's security certificate, she extended the suspension period that had already been imposed to a total of 20 months with provision for him to be able to apply to get the suspension lifted after he had completed his sentence of community detention.
Saufoi's certificate of approval was suspended for 18 months from July 19.
He will be able to apply to have the suspension revoked and his certificate reinstated once he has completed his community detention sentence.
To do so he must provide the licensing authority with confirmation he has completed his sentence without any breaches.
He must also supply a letter from a security licence holder confirming that they know about his convictions and are willing to employ or engage him if his security certificate is reinstated.
They will also be required to outline what supervision will be in place for him when he commences working.
Saufoi told NZME he was grateful for the grace shown to him.
'I accept the outcome and feel the conditions are fair. What happened was out of character and the programmes have given me practical tools to recognise my triggers, process emotions better and avoid letting things bottle up again.
He said he wanted to return to security as it is the work he was most comfortable with.
"It's what I have the most experience with and where I've found I fit in the most.
"I've grown a lot since the last time I was in the industry and now have a deeper understanding of my personal impact and how to better stay steady in high pressure moments. Less reactive and more mindful."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Woman avoids conviction for on-sharing image of partly naked woman
By Tracy Neal, Open Justice multimedia journalist A woman ended up in court for on-sharing an image of a partly naked woman which had been sent to a social media chat group she was part of. The action of sharing the image resulted in the 52-year-old woman being charged, but ultimately she avoided a conviction because of her lesser involvement in the reposting 'equation'. For that reason her name was also permanently suppressed. 'She did little to add to a problem created by someone else,' a judge found. The charge of posting an intimate visual recording carried a maximum two-year prison term or a $50,000 fine. It was a 'salutary lesson' in how easy it was to end up facing criminal charges by sending digital material that could harm someone, police told NZME outside the Nelson District Court this week. 'This really was a perfect storm of factors that led to the offending,' defence lawyer Amanda Godwin said inside the court at the woman's hearing. The defendant was charged after the victim complained to the police. Judge Stephen Harrop said it was a serious charge, and the court recognised the serious harm caused to people by the posting of such material, but the defendant had since suffered 'serious abuse' online, making her a victim of harmful social media too. She had suffered other consequences, including the loss of a contract linked to her business. The court heard that in January this year, the defendant met on TikTok an Australian man, who had received the intimate image from the complainant via Snapchat. He shared the image to a Messenger group of about 13 people, to which the defendant belonged. Another member of the group 'doctored' the image to make it animated and shared it with the defendant, who sent it to the TikTok acquaintance to 'double check' that he had seen it. The person who doctored the image and shared it has been charged and will be sentenced in a South Island court next month. Judge Harrop said the 'real culprit' was the man who shared it initially, but he acknowledged that the victim was concerned about it having been reposted. He said the circumstances were 'very different' to someone surreptitiously taking an image and posting it, and that the woman who had taken the image and sent it was part of the equation. 'We have a situation where the victim put it out in the first place, which was intended for one person but was then published to a group of 13,' Judge Harrop said. 'It does mean the seriousness of the offending is less than what appeared.' He said the defendant had afterwards suffered a 'sustained campaign of harassment and abuse' online and that she too had become a victim. She had since been diagnosed with a mental health condition that was likely to make her act impulsively, which was recognised by a psychologist in the pre-sentence report writing process. The consequences of a conviction were therefore likely to be greater than they might be for someone more resilient, Judge Harrop said in granting a discharge without conviction. The defendant was ordered to make a $200 emotional harm payment to the victim. The judge also granted permanent name suppression. He said the public 'may well conclude' that the woman should have been convicted and that it was unfair to discharge her and then allow her name to be published, even though that did not automatically follow. 'I'm satisfied for the reasons you were granted interim name suppression, and a discharge without conviction, the test for final suppression has been met,' Judge Harrop said.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
52-year-old in court for sharing image of partly naked woman
By Tracy Neal, Open Justice multimedia journalist A woman ended up in court for on-sharing an image of a partly naked woman which had been sent to a social media chat group she was part of. The action of sharing the image resulted in the 52-year-old woman being charged, but ultimately she avoided a conviction because of her lesser involvement in the reposting 'equation'. For that reason her name was also permanently suppressed. 'She did little to add to a problem created by someone else,' a judge found. The charge of posting an intimate visual recording carried a maximum two-year prison term or a $50,000 fine. It was a 'salutary lesson' in how easy it was to end up facing criminal charges by sending digital material that could harm someone, police told NZME outside the Nelson District Court this week. 'This really was a perfect storm of factors that led to the offending,' defence lawyer Amanda Godwin said inside the court at the woman's hearing. The defendant was charged after the victim complained to the police. Judge Stephen Harrop said it was a serious charge, and the court recognised the serious harm caused to people by the posting of such material, but the defendant had since suffered 'serious abuse' online, making her a victim of harmful social media too. She had suffered other consequences, including the loss of a contract linked to her business. The court heard that in January this year, the defendant met on TikTok an Australian man, who had received the intimate image from the complainant via Snapchat. He shared the image to a Messenger group of about 13 people, to which the defendant belonged. Another member of the group 'doctored' the image to make it animated and shared it with the defendant, who sent it to the TikTok acquaintance to 'double check' that he had seen it. The person who doctored the image and shared it has been charged and will be sentenced in a South Island court next month. Judge Harrop said the 'real culprit' was the man who shared it initially, but he acknowledged that the victim was concerned about it having been reposted. He said the circumstances were 'very different' to someone surreptitiously taking an image and posting it, and that the woman who had taken the image and sent it was part of the equation. 'We have a situation where the victim put it out in the first place, which was intended for one person but was then published to a group of 13,' Judge Harrop said. 'It does mean the seriousness of the offending is less than what appeared.' He said the defendant had afterwards suffered a 'sustained campaign of harassment and abuse' online and that she too had become a victim. She had since been diagnosed with a mental health condition that was likely to make her act impulsively, which was recognised by a psychologist in the pre-sentence report writing process. The consequences of a conviction were therefore likely to be greater than they might be for someone more resilient, Judge Harrop said in granting a discharge without conviction. The defendant was ordered to make a $200 emotional harm payment to the victim. The judge also granted permanent name suppression. He said the public 'may well conclude' that the woman should have been convicted and that it was unfair to discharge her and then allow her name to be published, even though that did not automatically follow. 'I'm satisfied for the reasons you were granted interim name suppression, and a discharge without conviction, the test for final suppression has been met,' Judge Harrop said.
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Taranaki rapist Allan Rosewarne denied parole, remains a risk of violent, sexual reoffending
By Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter of Photo: 123RF Warning: This story discusses a case of extreme violence and sexual offending. Allan Neil Rosewarne has been described as a sex monster. He took control of two of his partners across 18 years, alienating them from family and friends while he regularly raped and mercilessly beat them. One was often injected with a cocktail of drugs by Rosewarne, who would then brutally violate her while she was unconscious. The other took an opportunity to run for her life along a highway and across farmland after 17 years of torture. It's now been 11 years since Rosewarne, of Taranaki, was jailed to preventive detention for his reign of rape, extreme violence, sadism and cruelty to children. But he continues to minimise the abuse, "emphatically" denies he raped his former partners, and remains a risk to the public, according to the Parole Board. Recently, the board made its second consideration of releasing Rosewarne, now 59, on parole. He became eligible for release about two years ago, but he waived his appearance before the board at his first hearing in July 2023. Late last month, he was called again, and this time he appeared. He did not want a lawyer to assist him, and he filed written submissions. Rosewarne was unsure he wanted parole but wished to know what conditions might be imposed if he did get out. However, any chance he would be freed has been shelved for at least three years, as the board declined his parole and made a postponement order so he would not have another hearing until 2028. A decision released to NZME this week detailed how Rosewarne was told at the hearing that his victims never wanted him released, and they were "doing well" despite his offending against them. In response to this, he said he only pleaded guilty because so many charges were laid against him, and he accepted a plea bargain. "He accepted that he was violent towards both his partners, although he said he only hit them with an open hand and never punched them. This is contrary to the summary of facts," the decision read. "He emphatically denied ever raping his partners. He did accept that his partners may have been scared of him, but he could not see that their fear may have led them to have sex with him despite not consenting." The decision stated that Rosewarne did not meet with the psychologist for a risk assessment before the hearing or with his case manager to assist in preparing a report for the board. He had no release proposal, and no support was referred to. However, Rosewarne has participated in three sessions of treatment with a psychologist during his time behind bars and told the board he would be willing to engage in more. The board said further treatment was needed to "begin to try and address" his offending. "We remain concerned about the risk posed by Rosewarne, given the very serious offending that he committed and his minimisation of most of that offending in our discussion today," the board wrote. "He needs to do extensive work to address both his risk of violent re-offending and his risk of sexual reoffending. He is an undue risk, and parole is declined." The board said it would not be suitable to consider him for release for another three years. In 2014, Rosewarne was sentenced in the High Court at New Plymouth to an indefinite prison term with a minimum period of imprisonment of 10 years. According to senior courts' decisions on the case at the time, he was 24 when he met his first victim, who was 15 at the time. When she moved in with him in 1990, he "had emotionally taken control of her and had alienated her from her family and friends", an earlier Court of Appeal decision, declining his appeal against sentence, read. "[He] began to subject [her] to frequent and devastating emotional, physical and sexual abuse, which escalated as time passed". Rosewarne threw her into walls, punched her repeatedly about her face and body, pulled out chunks of her hair, severely beat her with weapons, and jumped on her with both feet while she was pregnant. She received black eyes, on occasion her nose was broken, and she was subjected to "forceful and painful sexual intercourse… for lengthy periods of time". The woman escaped one day in 2007 when he fell asleep and she left, making her way along Forgotten World Highway and across farmland. Rosewarne began a 20-month relationship with his second victim around 2008. According to court documents, he also subjected her to frequent emotional, physical and sexual abuse. "Over the course of their relationship, [Rosewarne] injected her with a cocktail of drugs. He controlled what [she] took and administered the drugs to her. Often she did not know exactly what was being given to her." He often raped her while she was unconscious from the drugs. She eventually developed a substance addiction, and he would torture her with withdrawals. Rosewarne beat the woman with household objects, grabbed her by her hair and dragged her through the house, and repeatedly punched her in the head. He was also convicted on cruelty charges relating to the women's children. At the time, Rosewarne was dubbed a "sex monster" by the media that covered the case. Sexual Violence: Family Violence: If it is an emergency and you feel like you or someone else is at risk, call 111. - This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald
