Palm Coast man facing felony after choking one of his dogs to death, report says
Howard Taft Blair, 55, was charged with felony cruelty to animals, a third-degree felony punishable by up to five years in prison.
Blair was booked into the Flagler County jail on Thursday where he remained Saturday on $2,500 bond, according to online jail records.
The investigation began after Blair's wife called the sheriff's office asking for a deputy to stand by at the home while she picked up her belongings Jan. 24. The wife said she was leaving Blair after what happened the night before.
While the deputy stood by, Blair, who smelled of alcohol and had bloodshot eyes, began speaking, the affidavit stated. He told the deputy that he and his wife owned five dogs which all lived inside the house. He said one of the dogs, Nutmeg, was a 60-pound mix between an American bulldog and a Labrador.
Blair also said they had three teacup chihuahuas named Jackson, Pico and Squirrel and another small mixed-breed dog.
Blair said after he and his wife finished dinner, he put his plate on the floor so the dogs could finish the gravy. But then Jackson, the chihuahua, growled at 60-pound Nutmeg, causing Nutmeg to attack Jackson. The chihuahua suffered fatal injuries, according to the affidavit.
Blair said Nutmeg had 'gotten ahold' of Jackson once before, but had not caused as much damage as this time.
Blair said he separated Nutmeg from Jackson and then chased Nutmeg back into the living room. Blair then choked Nutmeg to death, the affidavit stated. Then he buried her under a slab in the backyard.
Blair said about Nutmeg, 'there was no spanking her and putting her in the crate, it was that moment emotion,' the affidavit stated.
Blair said his wife had asked why he didn't instead put Nutmeg in a crate. Blair said he had contacted a vet about 'behavioral euthanasia' but due to the violence, he could not wait to take her to a vet, the affidavit stated.
The report noted that Blair had separated Nutmeg and she was no longer a threat to Jackson or any of the other dogs but Blair still choked her to death next to her crate.
Deputies asked the wife if Blair had 'violent tendencies' and she said told them 'typically he does not and he is a very loving person, but this was cruel and sick.'
The dog's body was not retrieved, the affidavit stated.
Blair was arrested in 2019 on a less serious misdemeanor charge.
In that case, a neighbor said Blair "sucker punched" him during a disagreement over the neighbor's mother-in-law, according to a charging affidavit. The neighbor "admitted to purposely agitating" Blair's dogs, the affidavit stated. He said Blair told him to leave and as he did, Blair struck him in the face, the affidavit stated.
Blair told police that the neighbor had been stirring up and making gestures at his dogs, causing them to bark, the affidavit stated. Blair admitted to hitting the neighbor.
Blair entered a deferred prosecution agreement in which he successfully completed an eight-hour anger management class. Prosecutors then dropped the battery charge against him.
This article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: Florida man kills his dog after it attacks his chihuahua, report says
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Thinking Is Becoming a Luxury Good
When I was a kid in the 1980s, my parents sent me to a Waldorf school in England. At the time, the school discouraged parents from allowing their kids to watch too much TV, instead telling them to emphasize reading, hands-on learning and outdoor play. I chafed at the stricture then. But perhaps they were on to something: Today I don't watch much TV and I still read a lot. Since my school days, however, a far more insidious and enticing form of tech has taken hold: the internet, especially via smartphones. These days I know I have to put my phone in a drawer or in another room if I need to concentrate for more than a few minutes. Since so-called intelligence tests were invented around a century ago, until recently, international I.Q. scores climbed steadily in a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. But there is evidence that our ability to apply that brain power is decreasing. According to a recent report, adult literacy scores leveled off and began to decline across a majority of O.E.C.D. countries in the past decade, with some of the sharpest declines visible among the poorest. Kids also show declining literacy. Writing in the Financial Times, John Burn-Murdoch links this to the rise of a post-literate culture in which we consume most of our media through smartphones, eschewing dense text in favor of images and short-form video. Other research has associated smartphone use with A.D.H.D. symptoms in adolescents, and a quarter of surveyed American adults now suspect they may have the condition. School and college teachers assign fewer full books to their students, in part because they are unable to complete them. Nearly half of Americans read zero books in 2023. The idea that technology is altering our capacity not just to concentrate but also to read and to reason is catching on. The conversation no one is ready for, though, is how this may be creating yet another form of inequality. Think of this by comparison with patterns of junk food consumption: As ultraprocessed snacks have grown more available and inventively addictive, developed societies have seen a gulf emerge between those with the social and economic resources to sustain a healthy lifestyle and those more vulnerable to the obesogenic food culture. This bifurcation is strongly class-inflected: Across the developed West, obesity has become strongly correlated with poverty. I fear that so, too, will be the tide of post-literacy. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
UnitedHealth Grew to Be a Leviathan. Then Came the Backlash.
UnitedHealth Group emerged as a health care colossus over the past decade and a half, earning one of the highest stock market values in the nation. But in the last two years, it has been hit with just about every misfortune that can befall a company: A gargantuan cyberattack. Federal investigations, including a criminal inquiry into one of its most important businesses. The killing of a top executive. A public relations crisis. Disappointing profits. A plummeting stock price. In May, facing a collapse of confidence among investors and the public at large, its chief executive, Andrew Witty, stepped aside, and the company abruptly summoned its former C.E.O., Stephen Hemsley. Mr. Hemsley, 73, agreed to serve a second stint for at least three years in exchange for $60 million in stock options. He is betting on the same strategy he employed when he last ran the company in 2017: UnitedHealth, with $400 billion in revenue, can use its size and scale to wring steady profits from its vast portfolio of businesses, which include the nation's largest health insurer. He promised an intensive review of the company's operations, and he will report its latest financial results on Tuesday. Mr. Hemsley may be able to reassure investors by offering them more clarity about UnitedHealth's profits and what steps it has taken to improve them. But it is unclear what the company can do to repair its tarnished image and its financial prospects over the long haul. Regulators have resisted allowing the conglomerate to make major acquisitions because it is already so big. And the American public is deeply skeptical that it can deliver better, cheaper care rather than milking the system for profits. As care has shifted from different locations, moving from hospitals to doctors' offices to nurses caring for patients in their homes, UnitedHealth is 'just following that and trying to integrate, coordinate it and make money off it,' said James C. Robinson, a health policy and management professor at the University of California, Berkeley. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
America's crime drop isn't a coincidence. Trump's immigration policies are working
A new report from the Council on Criminal Justice brought welcome news: crime is down across much of America. But what the report doesn't say out loud is that the timing is no coincidence. President Donald Trump is simply enforcing immigration laws already on the books — proof that we don't need more laws; we just need leaders with the backbone to enforce the laws we have. The results are undeniable: communities nationwide are seeing tangible improvements in public safety. According to the report, homicides dropped 17% in the first half of 2025 compared to the same period last year. Gun assaults are down 21%. Robberies fell 20% and carjackings plummeted by 24%. Even property crimes — like burglary and larceny — saw double-digit declines. These aren't just statistics. They reflect real communities seeing real results. While violent crime fell, ICE arrests surged — more than doubling in places like Sacramento and climbing over 500% in California overall. Nationwide, immigration arrests have already topped 300,000 in 2025 alone. That's not political theater. That's law enforcement doing its job. This data shows the power of real deterrence, the effect of giving law enforcement respect and support to do their job. The fact that these historic drops occurred in the absence of passing new laws gives strong evidence to the power of simply letting law enforcement do their jobs. Conservative Americans have always known that lawlessness — whether from violent repeat offenders or criminal illegal aliens — makes our cities less safe. Under Trump's unwavering leadership, the pendulum is finally swinging back toward sanity. He is proving what we've long known: you can't have public safety without border security. Thanks to the "UPLIFT Act" (H.R. 1680), sanctuary jurisdictions are being forced to cooperate with federal immigration authorities. Cities shouldn't be safe havens for known criminals simply because their mayors want to make headlines on cable news. Critics claim the administration's immigration agenda is harsh. But what's truly harsh is letting gang members, human traffickers and drug smugglers remain on American soil out of fear of being labeled "xenophobic." That's not compassion, that's cowardice. Trump's approach to public safety is working. As ICE ramps up operations, violent offenders are being taken off the streets. In Texas, immigration arrests are up 92%. In Florida, 219%. These are hardened criminals — many with prior convictions — who are no longer free to endanger our communities. Anyone who wants to call this immigration enforcement "overreach" should ask the families in Chicago, Los Angeles or Miami who no longer fear nightly gunfire and mayhem. Ask the parents whose kids are no longer walking past open-air drug markets on their way to school. Americans don't care about D.C. talking points. They care about the results. The CCJ report notes that today's violent crime levels are even lower than they were in 2019 — before the pandemic and the defund-the-police chaos. While liberals spent the last five years demonizing law enforcement, Trump stood with the men and women in uniform. Now we're seeing the payoff. This data shows the power of real deterrence, the effect of giving law enforcement respect and support to do their job. Make no mistake: the Biden-era border crisis led to an influx of dangerous individuals, and blue-state sanctuary policies allowed them to disperse into our major cities. But as those policies are being reversed, public safety is being restored. As the newly sworn in Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott said, "The biggest reason right now that we're seeing that massive reduction is because people are held accountable for violating the law, and they're quickly removed from the United States." President Trump is doing what he promised: protecting the innocent, restoring law and order, and making America safe again. The data speaks for itself. And for the first time in a long time, Americans can feel it in their neighborhoods and homes. Ja'Ron K. Smith is the special assistant to the president of the United States for domestic policy.
