Catholic Church warns of rise in scam e-mails impersonating Cardinal William Goh
The archbishop noted that all e-mail correspondence from him or his office uses only the catholic.org.sg domain name, according to the notice, issued by the Reverend Terence Pereira.
Any e-mail originating from a different domain should be considered inauthentic, said Rev Pereira, who is the chancellor of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Singapore.
"The faithful in Singapore are advised to immediately report any requests for money or fund transfers received via e-mail that appear suspicious or fraudulent to www.csa.gov.sg or www.scamshield.gov.sg," he added.
In an advisory on June 30, the Archbishop's Communications Office said the deceptive communications often mimic genuine conversations, building false trust over several messages before initiating a scam.
Noting the 51,501 scam cases in Singapore in 2024 with losses exceeding $1.1 billion, the office said the threat of online fraud is growing. It added: "For 2025, we anticipate and are already seeing AI-powered phishing attacks becoming highly personalised and alarmingly accurate.
"Beyond e-mail, vigilance is crucial on platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and Telegram, where scam activities are also on the rise. We must collectively safeguard our community from those who seek to exploit it."
The Archbishop's Communications Office also encouraged the Catholic community to inspect e-mail addresses carefully, by always scrutinising the sender's e-mail address even if the display name seems familiar, and to ensure the authenticity of websites.
"Be cautious when visiting websites that ask for personal details for event registrations or online donations... Verify through official archdiocesan or parish channels if in doubt," the office added.
It urged the community to utilise trusted resources such as https://www.scamshield.gov.sg/, https://www.csa.gov.sg/ and https://www.catholic.sg/scams-fake-news/
In April 2024, ahead of the late Pope Francis' visit to Singapore in September 2024, the archdiocese warned of phishing scams related to the visit.
It said that it had received reports of misrepresentation, with people claiming to be associated with the ticketing process for the papal mass.
These people had attempted to acquire the personal information of others.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
28 minutes ago
- Straits Times
High Court orders Instagram seller to pay Louis Vuitton $200,000 in damages over counterfeit goods
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The fakes were passed off as genuine and sold at a fraction of the price of the real items. SINGAPORE - An Instagram seller who sold fake Louis Vuitton items as authentic and ghosted the High Court during court proceedings has been ordered to pay $200,000 in damages to the French luxury fashion house for trademark infringements. Mr Ng Hoe Seng, operating under Instagram accounts 'emcase_sg' and 'emcrafts_sg', sold counterfeit goods such as phone cases, passport covers, card holders and purses through the social media platform. The fakes were passed off as genuine and sold at a fraction of the price of the real items – a fake passport cover, for instance, was priced at $159, compared with $560 to $945 for the real thing. Louis Vuitton Malletier (LVM) discovered the infringements in July 2022 and conducted a sting operation. A representative made test purchases worth $2,100 from Mr Ng's first Instagram account 'emcase_sg'. LVM confirmed the goods were counterfeit and issued a cease-and-desist letter in March 2023. Instead of stopping, Mr Ng shifted operations to a new Instagram account, 'emcrafts_sg', and resumed sales. To catch him again, an LVM representative made a second undercover purchase. The company later filed a lawsuit in August 2023. Mr Ng ignored the proceedings and did not appear in court. On Nov 30, 2023, the High Court ruled in LVM's favour and went on to assess damages. Computing its damages, LVM said it should be awarded $4.84 million in damages but claimed $2.9 million against Mr Ng – based on 29 infringing acts at $100,000 each, the statutory cap. But Justice Dedar Singh Gill disagreed with the claims. 'The claimant's proposed quantum of $2.9 million is grossly excessive,' he said in a written judgment on July 2. He limited the maximum award to $900,000, or $100,000 for each of the nine different types of goods where there were infringements, ultimately awarding $200,000. While LVM argued that the counterfeits dilute its brand, the judge questioned the financial impact. 'I have my doubts as to whether the claimant will suffer lost sales in any significant way... knock-offs of luxury goods are usually not substitutable with the genuine goods.' He added: 'One must bear in mind that the defendant is a sole proprietor operating through a social media channel. He is not a large-scale manufacturer who has distributed the offending goods to other retailers and sparked other chains of infringement.' In his judgment, Justice Gill highlighted the deceptive marketing tactics Mr Ng used to promote the fake products on Instagram. 'The defendant's modus operandi when it came to promoting his products was to re-post Instagram posts and/or stories by customers who had purchased his products... ostensibly with the aim of thanking them and showing off their rave reviews,' he said. 'In my view, this has the effect of compounding the defendant's false representations.' He added that Mr Ng had 'deployed his coterie of 'influencers' to propagate the misrepresentation about his 'authentic' products more widely to his followers and the public at large'. In his judgment, Justice Gill highlighted the deceptive marketing tactics Mr Ng used to promote the fake products on Instagram. PHOTO: HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT Justice Gill also addressed Mr Ng's claim on Instagram that the products were 'upcycled' from real Louis Vuitton goods. 'This was a lie upon a lie which compounded the false representation perpetrated upon members of the public,' he wrote. Upcycling typically refers to the reuse of discarded material or waste to create a product of higher value or quality than the original. The judge further warned of the risks posed by online sellers who can easily evade enforcement. 'Such online retailers can easily spread out all of their eggs in multiple baskets by setting up different online platforms at relatively low costs to sell their goods,' he said. 'An online retailer can avail himself of a hydra-like approach to continuing his infringement – in that even if one head is sliced off, another can easily spring up.' Mr Ng Hoe Seng, operating under Instagram accounts 'emcase_sg' and 'emcrafts_sg', sold counterfeit goods such as phone cases, passport covers, card holders and purses through the social media platform. PHOTO: HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT Justice Gill criticised Mr Ng for flouting a previous court order by making his Instagram account private – while still allowing his followers to view it. 'It was clearly an attempt by the defendant to mask his infringing activities (and potentially continue the infringement).' The judge also rebuked Mr Ng over his refusal to take part in the legal proceedings. 'The defendant did not participate in any part of these proceedings, thus depriving the claimant of an opportunity to discover the full extent of his infringement to prosecute its claim and quantify its losses,' he wrote. 'A strong message needs to be sent to the defendant that he may be able to run from the claimant, but he will not be able to hide from the long arms of the law.' The judge further warned of the risks posed by online sellers who can easily evade enforcement. PHOTO: HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT Justice Gill concluded: 'The defendant has shown himself to be a recalcitrant infringer, and he will need to face the consequences accordingly.' LVM was represented by lawyers Ravindran Muthucumarasamy, Chan Wenqiang and Neo Xuan Hao Edwin from Ravindran Associates. Mr Ng was unrepresented. Despite the High Court victory, it remains uncertain whether LVM will recover the $200,000. As at July 3, Mr Ng's registered business EMCASE SG has ceased registration with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority and his two known Instagram accounts have vanished. However, a similarly named account – ' – remains active, appearing to sell Louis Vuitton-branded goods.
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
Russian air defences shoot down four drones headed for Moscow, mayor says, World News
Russian air defences shot down four Ukrainian drones headed for Moscow on Saturday (July 5), the city's mayor said, while one of the capital's main airports temporarily halted outgoing flights. Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said emergency services were working at the sites of the downed drones, but gave no information on potential damage. Russia's Defence Ministry, in a report on Telegram, said air defence units had destroyed 48 Ukrainian drones in a period of just over five hours into Saturday evening. Those included five drones in the region surrounding Moscow, two of which were headed for the capital. The Defence Ministry report said the total included 17 drones over Bryansk Region on the Ukrainian border and 11 in adjacent Oryol Region. The governor of Belgorod Region on the border said four Ukrainian drones had injured a bus driver and a man driving a car. An earlier Defence Ministry report said 94 drones had been destroyed over Russia overnight on Saturday and 45 more in just under six hours during the day. [[nid:719877]] Officials at Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport reported delays in departures after flights were temporarily paused. Civil Aviation Authority Rosaviatsiya said the measures were taken in response to "restrictions" over the capital's airspace as well as strong winds. Rosaviatsiya said incoming and outgoing flights at airports in several other Russian cities were also temporarily halted, including at St Petersburg's Pulkovo airport, citing safety concerns.
International Business Times
21 hours ago
- International Business Times
Italian Tourist Who was Fatally Mauled by Bear in Romania, Ignored Warnings to Stay Away from Wildlife, Posted Selfie with Cub Before Death
An Italian tourist was fatally mauled by a bear in Romania's Carpathian Mountains on Thursday after it stopped to take a selfie with a bear cub. Omar Farang Zin, a 49-year-old motorcyclist from Italy, had been exploring the rugged landscapes of Argeș County when he encountered the wild animal. As reported by BBC News, Zin had parked his motorbike next to a warning sign that explicitly advised tourists not to feed or approach the bears. The sign, tragically ignored, stood just meters away from where the bear launched its deadly attack. As previously reported, Zin was dragged down a 262-foot ravine by the bear. By the time rescuers arrived, it was too late. "The injuries were extremely severe. Even though he was wearing a helmet and full protective gear, it wasn't enough," said Ion Sanduloiu, head of the Argeș County Mountain Rescue Service. Just a day before the deadly incident, an excited Zin shared images and videos on Facebook of a bear standing alarmingly close to him on the roadside. In one clip, he is heard exclaiming, "Here's the bear! How beautiful. It's coming towards me." Emergency services and police were alerted by other tourists in the hours that followed by tourists who witnessed the incident. After conducting an hour-long search of the area, authorities discovered Zin's body at the bottom of the ravine. Romania's Carpathian Mountains are home to the Eurasian brown bear, the largest terrestrial predator in Europe and a subspecies of the brown bear. Even adolescent Eurasian brown bears—particularly those in their second or third year of life—can weigh anywhere between 200 and 300 pounds. While not fully grown, these juvenile bears have enough strength to tear a human apart, especially if startled, hungry, or fearful of humans. However, in Zin's case, it's implied that it was the cub's mother who attacked, instinctively trying to protect her cub from the man. The bear involved in the attack was later tracked down and euthanized by Romanian authorities—a standard response in fatal bear encounters that nevertheless sparked debate among conservationists and animal welfare advocates. The incident brought into question the country's handling of its brown bear population, which is estimated to be around 10,000 and 13,000 specimens, the largest in Europe behind Russia.
