
Is this the end of Milorad Dodik's political life?
The Office of the High Representative (OHR) oversees the implementation of the civilian aspects of the Dayton Peace Accords, which were signed in 1995 and ended the war in Bosnia. This office has been headed for almost three decades by a succession of European officials. The OHR's current chief is Christian Schmidt, a former politician from Germany. Dodik has been at odds with Schmidt since the latter's arrival in Bosnia in 2021.
For domestic and international observers, the court ruling is an interesting twist and heralds uncertainty ahead. Dodik's coming to power as the president of Republika Srpska in 2006 ushered in a period of constant and continuous crises for Bosnia. For the better part of the past two decades, he has worked to empower himself and the political entit y over which he currently presides while undermining and hollowing out the country's state-level institutions..
Compared with his record of obstructing Bosnia's progress, failing to abide by Bosnia's Constitutional Court rulings, denying the genocide and hurling repeated insults at Bosniaks, Dodik's confrontation with the OHR may have seemed a political offence of lesser magnitude. Yet the sentence, and particularly the ban on his political life for six years, may very well portend the beginning of the political fall of Dodik – or a renewed attempt by him to push Bosnia to the brink.
In response to the sentencing, the Republika Srpska assembly adopted a document late on Wednesday rejecting the court's ruling and Schmidt's authority. Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic, engulfed in his own problems at home amid growing protests, flew the same day to Banja Luka to meet Dodik. Dodik's lawyer has indicated he would appeal the ruling. Meanwhile, the Republika Srpska assembly adopted draft legislation aimed at preventing the state-level judicial and police institutions from exercising sovereignty in this part of Bosnia.
What lies ahead is more uncertainty. The political stability in Bosnia in the weeks and months ahead could hang in the balance as the country awaits the appeals process to unfold.
As things currently stand, Dodik is powerful in Republika Srpska. He controls his party – the Alliance of Independent Social Democrats (SNSD) – and holds sway over instruments of power both in Republika Srpska and at the state level through his appointees in many institutions. His ability to generate a deeper crisis is real.
On the other hand, he has also overstayed his political welcome. Dodik has been a fixture in Bosnian Serb politics for almost two decades. His dominance in politics and media means that a whole generation currently enrolled in undergraduate studies has known no other political leader. For many Bosnian citizens, he has become synonymous with crises, conflicts and outlandish rhetoric.
While media reports indicate support for Dodik from Vucic, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Croatian President Zoran Milanovic, Dodik's political future depends on how Bosnia's state institutions respond as well as on the depth of his own support base. In other words, his future depends on what happens on the ground in Bosnia.
For years, Dodik had been able to generate and escalate crises to extract concessions in exchange for backing down. And then he kept repeating the pattern. This led some politicians in Sarajevo and many foreign officials to be willing to give in to Dodik for years for the sake of stability. As a result, Dodik accumulated power and resources and exhibited ever-growing arrogance.
A firm stand of Bosnia's state institutions to implement decisions and stand up to Dodik has long been overdue. This is new to Dodik and may be a key test of how far he is willing to go and how much support he actually commands.
In the weeks and months ahead, three factors are likely to shape the unfolding situation and, by extension, Dodik's political future: Bosnia's State Court, Dodik's power base and Vucic's support – or the lack thereof.
If the Appeals Chamber rejects Dodik's appeal and reaffirms the sentence – and particularly the political ban – the Bosnian Serb leader will be vulnerable, and that will mark another standoff with the Bosnian state-level institutions. The ability and willingness of state institutions to enforce such a court ruling will be crucial.
However, if the court overturns the ruling – including due to potential external pressure lest the situation in Bosnia spiral out of control – Dodik would claim victory and feel emboldened.
Second, a weakened Dodik will gauge his support within his party and among his levers of power. Growing fissures within his power base would be a sign that the court rulings are undermining his support. However, the legislation passed by Bosnia's entity of Republika Srpska on Friday barring the national police and judiciary from its territory signals the Bosnian Serb leader still has loyal supporters and a considerable hold over the Republika Srpska's major institutions. Dodik could use this legislation to up the ante and serve as a bargaining chip. He has done this before.
Third, as things currently stand, Vucic's concern with his own domestic protests in Serbia means that he may be less willing and has fewer resources to divert to stoking tension in Bosnia.
Furthermore, as with other long-running political leaders, signs of Dodik's political weakness may encourage political ambitions of his proteges or close associates to replace him. It would not be surprising if jockeying within his party picks up.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Qatar Tribune
3 days ago
- Qatar Tribune
As US and Europe cut aid budgets, China's star is on the rise in Southeast Asia: Report
Agencies China's role as Southeast Asia's largest infrastructure financier is increasing its regional influence at a time when the United States and the European Union are slashing their foreign aid budgets, a new report by an Australian think tank said. With the Trump administration in the United States scrapping about US$60 billion in aid and European countries pulling back more than US$25 billion, 'the centre of gravity' in Southeast Asia's development finance landscape 'looks set to drift East, notably to Beijing, but also Tokyo and Seoul', the Lowy Institute report, which was released today, said. 'China is the single largest partner on infrastructure financing in Southeast Asia, but traditional donors combined still outspend it,' the report's lead authors, Alexandre Dayant, Grace Stanhope and Roland Rajah, wrote. 'As Western aid declines and China recalibrates its strategy, Beijing is well positioned to regain dominance.' Southeast Asia's traditional partners include countries such as the US and Australia, and international organisations such as the United Nations, the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank. With the US expected to cut its foreign assistance by 83 per cent this year, the retrenchment of funds from Europe and tariff uncertainties undermining trade ties between the US and other countries, China is enhancing its influence in the region through infrastructure connections. Recent examples include work on high-speed railway links with Vietnam and Thailand. China International Development Cooperation Agency spokesman Li Ming told a news conference in March that China's 'principles related to foreign aid, including non-interference in internal affairs, no political strings attached and no empty promises made, will not change'.'A major country should act like a major country by shouldering its due international obligations and fulfilling its responsibilities, rather than renege on its promises, be mercenary or bullying,' he Lowy Institute report said that in 2023, China had 'ramped up' non-concessional loan disbursements by almost 50 per cent compared to 2022, accelerating major infrastructure projects such as the Jakarta-Bandung High-Speed Railway in Indonesia and the East Coast Rail Link in Malaysia. 'Even as the infrastructure race slows, China's relative importance as a development actor in the region will rise as Western development support recedes,' the report said. 'Beijing retains a substantial pipeline of infrastructure projects and has shown continued appetite to take on major projects.' Lower-middle-income economies such as the Philippines and Vietnam would engage with China when doing so aligned with their domestic priorities, the report said, while poorer economies such as Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar – which had limited access to alternative financing – remained 'heavily reliant' on China and had 'much less room to negotiate'. There was a fourfold increase in Chinese infrastructure project commitments from a low of US$2.5 billion in 2022 to almost US$10 billion in 2023 due to the revival of the Kyaukphyu Deep Sea Port project in Myanmar, the report said. It said the European Union and the governments of seven European countries – France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Austria and Italy – had announced plans last year to implement US$17.2 billion in foreign aid cuts between this year and 2029, while the United Kingdom was cutting around US$7.6 billion a year. Total development finance to Southeast Asia could decline by 8 per cent, or more than US$2 billion, to US$26.5 billion next year, according to Lowy Institute estimates based on budget documents, public announcements and calculations by other researchers.


Al Jazeera
6 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Slovenia bars far-right Israeli ministers for ‘genocidal statements'
Slovenia has banned far-right Israeli cabinet ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich from entering the country. Foreign Minister Tanja Fajon declared the pair personae non gratae on Thursday in what she said was a first for a European Union country. 'We are breaking new ground,' she said. In a statement, the Slovenian government accused Israel's National Security Minister Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Smotrich of inciting 'extreme violence and serious violations of the human rights of Palestinians' with 'their genocidal statements'. It also noted that both cabinet ministers 'publicly advocate the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, the forced evictions of Palestinians, and call for violence against the civilian Palestinian population'. There was no immediate reaction from Israel's government. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, key coalition partners in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government, have drawn international criticism for their hard-line stance on the Gaza war and on illegal settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank. Smotrich, who lives in a West Bank settlement, has supported the expansion of settlements and has called for the territory's annexation. Settlements are illegal under international law. Last July, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel's continued presence in occupied Palestinian territory was unlawful, a decision Israel has ignored. Smotrich has previously called for 'total annihilation' in Gaza and said that a Palestinian town in the West Bank should be 'wiped out'. Ben-Gvir was an open admirer of Baruch Goldstein, an Israeli who massacred 29 Palestinians as they prayed in Hebron in 1994. He has been convicted multiple times by Israeli courts for 'incitement to racism'. Despite the ministers' positions, Netanyahu relies heavily on support from the two and from their factions in parliament for the survival of his government. On May 21, Slovenia's President Natasa Pirc Musar told the European Parliament that the EU needed to take stronger action against Israel, condemning 'the genocide' in Gaza. Fajon said Slovenia had decided to make the move after EU foreign ministers did not agree on joint action against Israel over charges of human rights violations at a meeting in Brussels on Tuesday. She said other measures were being prepared, without going into detail. In June, Britain, Norway, Australia, New Zealand and Canada imposed sanctions on the two Israeli ministers, accusing them of inciting violence against Palestinians. Last year, Slovenia announced it was recognising a Palestinian state, following on the heels of Norway, Spain, and the Republic of Ireland.


Qatar Tribune
7 days ago
- Qatar Tribune
Palace will appeal against Europa League exclusion: Parish
PA Media/dpa London Crystal Palace will mount a legal challenge to UEFA's decision to exclude them from next season's Europa League, with chairman Steve Parish announcing the club will appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The FA Cup winners have been demoted to the Conference League owing to what Europe's governing body says is a conflict of interest regarding former director and co-owner John Textor, who also owns part of Ligue 1 side Lyon. The American stepped away from Palace at the start of July, but the ownership issue relates to the end of last season when the club secured a first European appearance by beating Manchester City at Wembley. UEFA's ruling would mean Nottingham Forest, who finished seventh in the Premier League, taking Palace's place in the Europa League. 'We are still fighting,' Parish told the The Rest is Football podcast. 'There's an appeal process, so we go to CAS which is the court for arbitration and, you know, we're very hopeful. We think we've got great legal arguments. 'We don't think this is the right decision by any means. We know unequivocally that John didn't have decisive influence over the club. 'We know we proved that beyond all reasonable doubt because it's a fact.' UEFA rules say that no owner or co-owner can have a controlling interest in more than one club competing in the same European competition during the same season.