
Microsoft's access to OpenAI tech is focus of contract talks
Corp. is in advanced talks to land a deal that could give it ongoing access to critical
OpenAI
technology, an agreement that would remove a major obstacle to the startup's efforts to become a for-profit enterprise.
The companies have discussed new terms that would let Microsoft use OpenAI's latest models and other technology even if the startup decides it has reached its goal of building a more powerful form of AI known as artificial general intelligence (
AGI
), according to two people familiar with the negotiations. Under the current contract, OpenAI attaining AGI is seen as a major milestone at which point Microsoft would lose some rights to OpenAI technology.
Negotiators have been meeting regularly, and an agreement could come together in a matter of weeks, according to three people with knowledge of the situation, who requested anonymity to discuss a private matter. OpenAI Chief Executive Officer
Sam Altman
and
Satya Nadella
, his Microsoft counterpart, discussed the restructuring at the Allen & Co. conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, earlier this month, two of the people said.
While the tone of the talks has been positive, some of the people cautioned that the deal isn't finalized and could hit new roadblocks. Moreover, OpenAI's restructuring plans face other complications, including regulatory scrutiny and a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk, an early backer who split with the company and accused the startup of defrauding investors about its commitment to its charitable mission. (OpenAI has pushed back at Musk's claims and said the billionaire is trying to slow down the company.)
Negotiations over OpenAI's future as a profit-company have dragged on for months. Microsoft, which backed OpenAI with some $13.75 billion and has the right to use its intellectual property, is the biggest holdout among the ChatGPT maker's investors, Bloomberg previously reported. At issue is the size of Microsoft's stake in the newly configured company.
The talks have since broadened into a renegotiation of their relationship, with the software maker seeking to avoid suddenly losing access to the startup's technology before the end of the current deal, which expires in 2030.
Microsoft and OpenAI declined to comment.
A fraying partnership
The partnership between the two companies helped inaugurate the AI age. Microsoft built the supercomputer that OpenAI used to develop the language models behind ChatGPT and, in exchange, won the right to bake the technology into its software offerings. The relationship began to fray when the OpenAI board fired (and then rehired)
Altman
in November 2023, an episode that shook Microsoft's faith in its partner.
The rift only widened when the two companies began competing for the same customers — consumers who use their chatbots at home and corporations that have deployed the AI assistants to boost office productivity.
Even as executives publicly touted their close ties, OpenAI sought to loosen its dependance on Microsoft, winning permission to build data centers and other AI infrastructure with rival companies.
OpenAI is eager to alter its complicated nonprofit structure, in part to secure additional funding to keep building data centers to power its next-generation AI models. SoftBank Group Corp., which has said it would back OpenAI with tens of billions of dollars, has the option to reduce that outlay if OpenAI's restructuring isn't completed by the end of the year.
OpenAI wants a larger slice of the revenue currently shared with Microsoft, and has sought adjustments to Microsoft's access to its intellectual property, two of the people said. Microsoft is looking for continued access to OpenAI technology after the current contract expires in 2030.
There are range of concerns for OpenAI. The startup wants to ensure its business is well-positioned with whatever share of revenue and equity Microsoft receives in part to guarantee its nonprofit will be well-resourced with a significant stake in OpenAI, one person said. OpenAI also wants the ability to offer customers distinct products built on top of its models even if Microsoft has access to the same technology, the person said. And OpenAI wants to be able to find a way to provide its services to more customers, including government providers, not all of which are on Azure, Microsoft's cloud computing platform, the person said.
At the same time, OpenAI seeks to guarantee that Microsoft adheres to strict safety standards when deploying OpenAI's technology, especially as it gets closer to AGI, the person said.
The AGI question
Reaching agreement on what happens once OpenAI achieves artificial general intelligence has been particularly thorny. It's not clear why the language is in the contract, but it gives OpenAI a built-in way to strike out on its own just as its technology matures.
The startup publicly defines AGI as 'highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work.' The existing contract has separate clauses related to that threshold, which can be triggered by technical or business milestones, according to two people familiar with the matter.
OpenAI's board has the right to determine when the company has reached AGI on a technical level. Under that scenario, Microsoft would lose access to technology developed beyond that point, one of the people said.
The business milestone would arrive once OpenAI has demonstrated it can reach around $100 billion in total profits for investors including Microsoft — giving it the wherewithal to repay the return Microsoft is entitled to under the existing contract, one person said. In that scenario, Microsoft would lose its rights to OpenAI technology, including products developed before that trigger, another person said.
Microsoft has the right to weigh in on the business milestone, but if the two companies end up at odds over the claim, they could wind up in court, two people said. Another provision in the current contract bars Microsoft from pursuing AGI technology itself, some of the people said.
Microsoft, for its part, has demonstrated some flexibility in revised contract terms. The company agreed to waive some intellectual property rights related to OpenAI's $6.5 billion acquisition of io, the startup co-founded by
iPhone
designer Jony Ive, two of the people said.
The software giant was less accomodating over OpenAI's proposed acquisition of AI coding startup
Windsurf
, the people said. That deal fell apart earlier this month, in part because of the tension with Microsoft, Bloomberg reported. Windsurf, which sells coding tools that compete with Microsoft's products, didn't want the tech giant to have access to its intellectual property — a condition that OpenAI was unsuccessful in getting Microsoft's agreement on, people familiar said. Ultimately, Windsurf's co-founders and a small group of staffers agreed to join Alphabet Inc.'s Google in a $2.4 billion deal.
In recent weeks, the companies have been negotiating Microsoft's ownership in a restructured OpenAI — with the two sides discussing an equity stake for Microsoft in the low- to mid-30% range, according to a person familiar with the matter. The
Financial Times
previously reported on the stake talks. But if Microsoft deems the stake and other changes to the contract insufficient, the company is willing to abandon the talks and stick with the current contract terms, another person said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
2 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Broadcom launches Jericho chip to advance AI data center networks
Broadcom's silicon division launched its next-generation Jericho networking chip on Monday, which is designed to connect data centers over 60 miles (96.5 km) apart and speed artificial intelligence computation The company's Jericho4 introduces and improves several features that increase the amount of networking traffic speeding across large networks that operate inside and between data and deploying artificial intelligence has become more computationally intensive and requires stringing together thousands of graphics processors (GPUs). Cloud computing companies such as Microsoft and Amazon require faster, more sophisticated networking chips to ensure data moves when transferring data beyond the physical walls of a data center is crucial for cloud companies because of the potential attacks that could intercept it ahead of reaching its engineers designed the Jericho chips to be deployed at a massive scale, and a single system can encompass roughly 4,500 chips, according to Ram Velaga, senior vice president and general manager of Broadcom's Core Switching help mitigate issues around network congestion, the Jericho4 chips use the same high-bandwidth memory (HBM) designers such as Nvidia and AMD use for their AI processors. It's necessary because of the volume of data that needs to be stuffed into memory at any given moment of operation."The switch is actually holding that traffic (in memory) till the congestion frees up," Velaga said. "It means you need to have a lot of memory on the chip."The longer the distance the data must travel from the chip to its destination, the more memory designers must include in the chip as addition to performance improvements, the Jericho4 also beefs up security by encrypting opted to use TSMC's three nanometer process for the Jericho4.


Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
AI is listening to your meetings. Watch what you say.
Tiffany N. Lewis was worried she was being duped. A potential client had reached out about working with her digital marketing agency on a pro-bono basis, but his message went straight to spam. Then he blew off several scheduled meetings with Lewis. Was he a fraud? When the client asked her to meet again, Lewis added him to a call she was already on with her assistant. Before he joined, Lewis joked: 'Is he, like, a Nigerian prince?" Despite the scammy red flags, he turned out to be a legitimate person. Lewis was relieved—until she realized her new client had received a full summary of the call in his inbox, including her 'Nigerian prince" remark. She was running an AI notetaker the whole time. 'I was very lucky that the person I was working with had a good sense of humor," said Lewis, who lives in Stow, Ohio. AI is listening in on your work meetings—including the parts you don't want anyone to hear. Before attendees file in, or when one colleague asks another to hang back to discuss a separate matter, AI notetakers may pick up on the small talk and private discussions meant for a select audience, then blast direct quotes to everyone in the meeting. Nicole and Tim Delger run a Nashville branding firm called Studio Delger. After one business meeting late last year, the couple received a summary from Zoom's AI assistant that was decidedly not work-related. Zoom AI documented a private conversion between Nicole and Tim Delger, who run a branding firm. 'Studio discussed the possibility of getting sandwich ingredients from Publix," one bullet point said. Another key takeaway: 'Don't like soup." Their client never showed up to the meeting, and the studio had spent the time talking about what to make for lunch. 'That was the first time it had caught a private conversation," Nicole said. Fortunately the summary didn't go to the client. Andrea Serra, an account-strategy coordinator at a communications agency, has experienced this firsthand. In one transcript, an AI notetaker caught her describing her frustration with the new Whole Foods in her neighborhood; though she'd set her preferences so that notes go to the host only, she shared the email with two other people on the call for laughs. Another meeting recap featured bullets of her discussing almost burning down her kitchen trying to make a new sweet potato recipe. 'It'll be like all of our action steps, all the strategy we discussed during the meeting, and then randomly in there, something about our personal lives that we had talked about last week and wanted to catch up on this week as well," Serra said. 'Just one little sentence as a surprise in there." Though her boss, Debora Lima, had hoped the AI summaries would reduce work for the team, she's still waiting for the technology to improve. Meanwhile, she and her colleagues have embraced them as comic relief. As she was looking over notes from a meeting she recently hosted, she noticed the phrase 'hey cutie pie" in the transcript. Lima said there should be a companywide Slack channel to archive the funniest examples. Notetakers can do a variety of tasks from recording and transcribing calls, generating action items for teams and recapping what's already been said to anyone joining late. Many signal to attendees that a meeting is being recorded and transcribed. A demo of what Google's AI notetaker looks like during a meeting. Zoom's AI Companion, which generated more than 7.2 million meeting summaries by the end of January 2024, flashes a dialogue box at the top of the screen to let participants know when it's turned on. As long as it's active, an AI Companion diamond icon continues to flash in the top right hand corner of the meeting. People can also ask the host to stop using the AI companion. 'We want users to feel they're really in control," said Smita Hashim, chief product officer at Zoom. Google's AI notetaker functions similarly, where only meeting hosts or employees of the host organization have the ability to turn it on or off. When it's on, people will see a notification and hear an audio cue, and a blue pencil icon will appear in the top right corner. 'We put a lot of care into making sure meeting participants know exactly if and when AI tools in Meet are being used," said Awaneesh Verma, senior director of product management and real time communications at Google Workspace. The automatic summaries can be informative and timesaving, or unintentionally hilarious. Kelsey Ogletree, chief executive of a tech platform for media professionals, received a Zoom AI summary titled 'Monty's Messy Morning," describing how her dog, Monty, ate leftover food on the counter and threw up in the house. It went on to say that 'Kelsey was disgusted by the incident and considered washing Monty's head with Dawn dish soap." It was a conversation between her and her husband, who's also her business partner. (And Monty is a cat, not a dog.) John Barentine, an astronomer and consultant in Tucson, Ariz., doesn't use AI notetakers but has been on plenty of calls with them. He was most recently surprised by the AI summary of one call that was sent to him, summarizing the small talk at the beginning of the call. It said: 'John Barentine humorously notes that there is a lethal dose of water for humans." Barentine said he was discussing the devastating Texas floods with a client; the AI had completely misunderstood the context. He says he's now more likely to use the private chat feature in meetings instead of saying something aloud while AI is listening. 'At least I know that if I make a remark to somebody privately for now, that's not being swept up by the AI notetaker," he said. Write to Ann-Marie Alcántara at


Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
Why Nvidia is the biggest risk to the stock market—not tariffs
Nvidia has lost half its market value seven times since going public in 2000. While worries persist over the impact of shifting trade policy and higher tariffs on markets, the bigger risk may be the hundreds of billions invested in artificial U.S. stocks have forged new highs despite rising geopolitical risks. For Louis Gave, head of investment and research firm Gavekal, the worry is how dependent markets have become on AI spending—and one of its main beneficiaries, Nvidia. Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, U.S. total market cap has expanded by $23 trillion—more than the market caps of Japan, Europe, and the U.K. combined, Gave wrote in a note to clients Monday. Though the capital spending on AI—about 11% of GDP—isn't as extreme as the tech boom in 1999, Gave sees parallels. Over seven years in the 1990s, capital spending rose from 8% to 11.5% of GDP. The consensus view had been that growth was structural and companies would have to buy computers and spend on broadband and e-commerce. But the spending did eventually stall, causing stocks to tumble. This time the surge in AI-oriented spending is shifting the traditionally asset-light businesses of Microsoft, Meta, and Alphabet into being asset heavy. Nvidia has been the biggest sees the possibility that the hundreds of billions of dollars invested in artificial intelligence turns out to be a dud as the bigger risk for markets. He posits the recent disappointment in semiconductor-equipment manufacturing stocks could foreshadow trouble ahead. While Tokyo Electron last week said the outlook for cutting-edge chips—such as Nvidia's—remained strong, Gave notes the company's warning that demand from logic manufacturers had markedly weakened. ASML in mid-July offered a similarly sober outlook and warned it couldn't guarantee 2026 growth amid tariff uncertainty. Gave sees a couple reasons behind these warnings, including the impact of higher tariffs and threats making Asian companies hesitant to spend billions of dollars when they are unsure if the rules of the game will change on them, Gave says. It is possible consumers could be rethinking spending, with Tokyo Electron noting softness in global sales of mobile phones, laptops, and personal computers. It could also be the semiconductor capex cycle is starting to feel the weight of the China embargo, Gave says. China has spent aggressively in recent years to build its own semiconductor supply chain and reduce its reliance on foreign inputs, but now in many subsectors, China is pushing ahead faster than most anticipated, Gave says. While the stocks of other companies have suffered, Nvidia has continued to forge higher. Gave is concerned what happens to the market when Nvidia, with its $4.2 trillion market cap, disappoints. He notes Nvidia has lost half its market value seven times since going public in 2000. The fallout from a repeat could be far-reaching. Gave notes the aggregate wealth of consumers everywhere has burgeoned amid the boom in large-cap tech, U.S. megacap stocks, crypto, and gold—and a not insignificant part of that wealth creation is reliant on the premise AI ushers in a new era of productivity gains. If those gains don't materialize or venture capital and big tech companies rethink the their expanding AI capital spending, Gave says the market could suffer a pullback in valuations that triggers a nasty negative wealth effect. It could also fuel investor concerns about what could replace AI as a driver for both earnings and economic growth. 'The recent rollover in what had been a strong momentum trade for the tech boom feels like it could be a proverbial canary in the coal mine," Gave cautions. Write to Reshma Kapadia at