Trump announces travel ban and restrictions on 19 countries
Mr Trump, who signalled plans for a new ban upon taking office in January, appears to be on firmer ground this time after the Supreme Court sided with him.
Some, but not all, of 12 countries also appeared on the list of banned countries in Mr Trump's first term. The new ban includes Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.
There will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.
In a video released on social media, Mr Trump tied the new ban to Sunday's terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas.
Mr Trump said some countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their own citizens.
His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report of visa overstays of tourists, business visitors and students who arrive by air and sea, singling out countries with high percentages of remaining after their visas expired.
'We don't want them,' Mr Trump said.
The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban makes exceptions for Afghans on Special Immigrant Visas, generally people who worked most closely with the US government during the two-decade war there.
Afghanistan was also one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Mr Trump suspended refugee resettlement on his first day in office.
'To include Afghanistan – a nation whose people stood alongside American service members for 20 years – is a moral disgrace. It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold,' said Shawn VanDiver, president and board chairman of #AfghanEvac.
Mr Trump wrote that Afghanistan 'lacks a competent or co-operative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures'. He also cited its visa overstay rates.
Haiti, which avoided the travel ban during Mr Trump's first term, was also included for high overstay rates and large numbers who came to the US illegally.
Haitians continue to flee poverty, hunger and political instability deepens while police and a UN-backed mission fight a surge in gang violence, with armed men controlling at least 85% of its capital, Port-au-Prince.
'Haiti lacks a central authority with sufficient availability and dissemination of law enforcement information necessary to ensure its nationals do not undermine the national security of the United States,' Mr Trump wrote.
The Iranian government offered no immediate reaction to being included. The Trump administration called it a 'state sponsor of terrorism', barring visitors except for those already holding visas or coming into the US on special visas America issues for minorities facing persecution.
Other Middle East nations on the list – Libya, Sudan and Yemen – all face ongoing civil strife and territory overseen by opposing factions. Sudan has an active war, while Yemen's war is largely stalemated and Libyan forces remain armed.
International aid groups and refugee resettlement organisations roundly condemned the new ban.
'This policy is not about national security – it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America.
The travel ban results from a January 20 executive order Mr Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the US and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk.
During his first term, Mr Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the US by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries — Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.
It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travellers from those nations were either barred from getting on their flights to the US or detained at US airports after they landed.
They included students as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family.
The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban', was retooled amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.
The ban affected various categories of travellers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families.
Mr Trump and others have defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was aimed at protecting the country and not founded on anti-Muslim bias. However, the president had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Is it time to put Margaret Thatcher on our banknotes?
The Bank of England wants to rethink banknotes and has announced a public consultation in order to generate suggestions about what to put on them. 'Banknotes are more than just an important means of payment,' declares Victoria Cleland, the Bank's chief cashier, whose signature is on notes. 'They serve as a symbolic representation of our collective national identity and an opportunity to celebrate the UK.' So, who should we put on our next banknotes? My vote, 35 years after she left office, would be to put Margaret Thatcher on the ten pound note. The 'Maggie' would become the go-to note. How better to celebrate a free-marketeer and our first woman prime minister – a committed monetarist at that – who also helped defeat Communism, than with a note of her own? Talk about putting money where her mouth was. Putting Thatcher on our banknotes would ensure that we continue the tradition of being able to gaze upon the scrunched-up visage of a noble or great personage from our past, every time we reach into our pockets to pay for something, however mundane. Consider Sir Christopher Wren, bewigged and magisterial on the old, enormous, copper-coloured fifty (from 1981 to 1994). Or what about Charles Darwin (2000-2018) on the less recently out of date tenner? Then there was Wellington (1971-1990) on the old grey fiver, the one that had the Queen in seventies Silver Jubilee pomp. These were banknotes that fizzed with pride and self-assurance. In the years since, our currency has worn Charles Dickens, Elizabeth Fry, Turner and Churchill. Every one of them made you feel slightly better about the world, one financial exchange at a time. So good they have been, in fact, that you might argue that choosing who to put on the banknotes is one of the things that the Bank of England has actually got right in recent decades. But now they think we might want something different – not necessarily people, though they are good enough for our American friends and their precious Greenbacks. Is this a desire to ape the bland architectural motifs of the euro notes? Or is it that in our modern times, since so many figures of English and British history have been 'problematised', it's simply easier to do without them at all? Erasing the past is easier than understanding it. After all, if like public museums our notes need to be 'decolonised' that poses problems for figures such as Sir Francis Drake or even good old Sir Winston – and just remember what he did to the French navy, too … tut-tut, that's no good for Anglo-French relations either. Then there's the inevitable issue of diversity that comes from history. It was back in 2013 that people were upset about the lack of women on our notes – except for the Queen, of course, who was on all of them. So that got fixed, thanks in part to Jane Austen, who arrived on the tenner in 2017. But still, women are represented in proportion to the demographic reality. And what about representation from Britain's ethnic minorities and the disabled? The problem is that, with only four notes to go with, you can't possibly tick every box, so someone gets let down, unlike – say, the casting of EastEnders or the television news where you can scrupulously try to enforce a quota so everyone feels included. There are, however, potential solutions without resorting to bland pictures of road and rail infrastructure: you could introduce more notes, such as a £100 note to account for inflation (about which I've written on Coffee House). Perhaps even a £200 note; that way you have more notes to go around to represent different groups. Or you could, of course, just retreat altogether and decorate banknotes with something else, like Mini Metros or pictures of new towns like Harlow or Milton Keynes, or public buildings, or HS2 or even ships. The Titanic would be popular. The fact is that none of it quite floats the boat like the human connection with great individuals and inspiring lives. 'Things' are not what make our nation great, it's the people – the statesmen, artists, scientists, the writers, the businessmen. So, who should join Thatcher on our banknotes? Would it be acceptable to adorn the £5 note with Mahatma Gandhi? He's a pretty different successor to Sir Winston in the fiver slot, wouldn't you agree? He was, after all, a British subject for 77 of his 78 years, and if we wish to appropriately cleanse ourselves of our colonial past (which, of course, we do), then who could be better than the visionary who successfully drove the British out of India, armed only with a spinning wheel? It would surely also be popular with many Britons of south Asian descent, too. And if we want to celebrate the role of women in our society, why don't we put JK Rowling on the £20? She isn't just a global literary phenomenon, but she's a philanthropist of the highest order. She is also unarguably a determined champion of women's rights. It would be a positive move for the union, too, for the Bank of England to go for a Scot. That leaves us with the £50. My vote would be the Queen. Not the current Queen, much as I like her, but the Queen that made us and whose reign still defines us. A 'QE2′ would be a fine fifty. But whatever we end up doing with our bank notes, we shouldn't resort to profiles of bridges or the outline of buildings, drawings with all the soul of architects' models. That's what you do when – unlike Britain – you don't have a unified national story to celebrate. The faces on our banknotes are like those on Mount Rushmore. The good news is we can change them from time to time. Like them or not, these are the people that made us and that made us great – and sometimes angry. If we take the people from our banknotes then, know this, we'll De La Rue the day.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Why is Paramount paying Trump $16m?
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 David Blevins and Mark Stone discuss how Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' is progressing in the House - and also dig into a few other stories: the potential of a Gaza ceasefire, Paramount's payout to the president, and a setback on his immigration policy. If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scotch whisky sector and Women's Scottish Open in focus
He also looks at emerging markets for Scotch whisky, including Vietnam. Scott notes the Trump tariffs are 'presenting a huge challenge for the Scotch whisky industry at arguably the worst possible time'. Kristy Dorsey catches up with what is going on at Dundonald Links in Ayrshire as it gears up to host the Women's Scottish Open, with world number one Nelly Korda scheduled to play. Read more Craig Reekie, general manager of Dundonald Links, tells Kristy: 'It's a world-class field we've got this year, and we're excited to be doing it in the middle of Ayrshire, which has obviously got a rich golfing history.' I interview Graeme Malcolm, co-founder and chief executive of M Squared Lasers, who recalls: 'My journey began with a fascination for lasers, inspired by a great physics teacher and a summer job at Barr & Stroud.' He declares: 'I'm proud that we've developed some of the world's purest light sources, powering breakthroughs in science and industry.' And he talks about how the lasers of M Squared support European Space Agency missions and 'are used in healthcare imaging for early diagnosis of conditions like Parkinson's and dementia'. Read more Mark Williamson speaks to Offshore Energies UK chief executive David Whitehouse about the outlook for investment in the North Sea. João Sousa, deputy director of the University of Strathclyde's Fraser of Allander Institute, considers the following question: 'One year on, how different has economic and fiscal policy been under Labour?' Stephen Boyd, director of IPPR Scotland, writes: 'Economic development is a tortuously difficult endeavour, wrought with difficult decisions, trade-offs and sheer bad luck.' And he gives his view on how the Scottish Government is faring on these fronts. In her regular column, fashion entrepreneur Antoinette Fionda-Douglas writes: 'In Scotland, being an entrepreneur already takes grit. Being a female entrepreneur? That takes something more, something closer to defiance.' Gareth Cole talks to Sarah Campbell about putting Café Canna up for sale and his plans to take over a new space on Coll. Also on an island theme, Colin Cardwell profiles Bute Boatbuilders following the successful delivery of the ferry Arranmore Blu to its a new home in Donegal, proving in the process that bespoke ship building on the Clyde is alive and well. The Herald's business writers share their expert perspectives on a range of business and economic developments as they reflect on what they have been writing about during the past month. Scott Wright contemplates who has had a good month, and who has not. Tech entrepreneur Ian Ritchie, and business and life coach Ed Haddon offer their insights in their regular columns. I hope you enjoy this month's edition.
