Downtown alderman considering Cook County Board run against Preckwinkle
Reilly, 42nd, told the Tribune he would make a final decision in the coming weeks, but claimed he'd been approached to take on Preckwinkle — who is so far uncontested for her fifth term — in recent weeks. He made similar overtures for a Congressional run against Democratic Rep. Danny Davis in 2015 and has also explored mayoral runs in past cycles but has stayed put in City Hall.
Reilly, 42nd, one of the City Council's moderates, has represented downtown for nearly two decades. An ally to the business community, he has been one of the best fundraisers on the council and has run uncontested for the seat since defeating longtime alderman Burt Natarus in 2007. He closed the last fundraising quarter with more than $700,000 in the bank.
Preckwinkle ended the same quarter with a little over half of that, $365,000, in her main campaign committee.
But Preckwinkle also chairs the Cook County Democratic Party, which gives her additional political power and fundraising heft.
Even so, Democrats have increasingly broken from the county organization's slated picks in ways once unthinkable, including Preckwinkle's own endorsed candidate for State's Attorney last year. Her selection, Clayton Harris III, lost in the State's Attorney primary to Eileen O'Neill Burke, with several Democrats defecting to support Burke.
Reilly himself bucked the party in 2020, backing Republican State's Attorney candidate Pat O'Brien over Preckwinkle mentee Kim Foxx. Foxx won.
Preckwinkle, 78, announced her plans for re-election last month, suggesting she wanted to lend a steady hand at the county during a second Trump administration. She also pointed to the ways she had stabilized the county's finances and launched meaningful criminal justice reform since 2010 that helped usher in the Pretrial Fairness Act.
She told her fellow Democrats at a party meeting on April 16 that 'if I wasn't doing this job, I would just find another one, which I probably wouldn't find as interesting, challenging, or as impactful. So I decided that I would ask you and the good people of Cook County for another shot at this.'
A spokesman for Preckwinkle's political organization did not immediately comment Wednesday about Reilly saying he's thinking about running against her.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
a few seconds ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Wisconsin Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez enters 2026 governor's race, calls Trump a ‘maniac'
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Democratic Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez entered the battleground state's open race for governor Friday by calling President Donald Trump a 'maniac,' as she attempts to differentiate herself in what is expected to be a crowded primary. A second Democrat, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley, said in a statement Friday that in the weeks ahead he 'will be taking steps toward entering the race.' Wisconsin's 2026 governor's race is open with no incumbent running for the first time since 2010. Democratic Gov. Tony Evers announced Thursday that he will not seek a third term. Both Rodriguez and Crowley would make history if elected. Rodriguez, a former emergency room nurse, would be Wisconsin's first woman governor and Crowley would be the first Black governor. Several other Democrats are expected to join the race. 'We've got a maniac in the White House,' Rodriguez said in a campaign launch video. 'His tariffs are killing our farmers and his policies are hurting our kids.' Evers has not endorsed anyone in the race. His spokesperson had no immediate comment Friday. Rodriguez has been lieutenant governor since 2023, after previously serving one two-year term in the state Assembly representing suburban Milwaukee, where she lives. She won a seat that had been under Republican control for years. Rodriguez emphasized her background working previously as a nurse in a Baltimore emergency room, saying she wanted to continue Evers' emphasis on fighting to protect reproductive freedom, invest in public schools and rebuild the economy. She noted that the state Legislature is within reach of Democratic control, meaning that with a Democratic governor, they could finally enact policies Republicans have blocked for years like expanding Medicaid. A registered nurse, Rodriguez previously worked as a health care executive and an epidemic intelligence service officer with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. She has a master's degree in public health. Rodriguez emphasized the importance of health care, including protecting abortion rights, in a brief speech she delivered on the first night of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago last year. Rodriguez, who is married with two children, launched her candidacy on her 50th birthday. In her first run for office in 2020, when she was elected to the Legislature, Rodriguez said she was motivated to get into politics because of how Republicans handled the COVID-19 pandemic. Rodriguez won the Democratic primary for lieutenant governor in 2022 after then-Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, who held the office in Evers' first term, decided to run for the Senate. Barnes, who lost that race to Republican Sen. Ron Johnson, is among several Democrats considering a run for governor next year. Others include Attorney General Josh Kaul, state Sen. Kelda Roys, Secretary of State Sarah Godlewski and Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson. On the Republican side, Washington County Executive Josh Schoemann and suburban Milwaukee businessman Bill Berrien are the only announced candidates. Others, including U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany and state Senate President Mary Felzkowski, are considering it. Berrien called Rodriguez 'the very embodiment of Tony Evers' and the Madison Democrats' failed record over the last six years.'
NBC News
a minute ago
- NBC News
Rep. Ro Khanna thinks the Epstein files could help Democrats 'fight Trump effectively'
CLEVELAND — Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who has been asserting himself as his party's leading voice for releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files, brought the noisy national fight to an unlikely audience Friday: a gathering of policy-oriented Democratic mayors. Khanna acknowledged that it was a departure from his usual emphasis on economics. 'I'm less in the news for the new economic patriotism and more in the news for the Epstein files,' he said in his remarks at a Democratic Mayors Association conference at a skyscraping hotel overlooking Lake Erie. 'I'll tell you why it matters. It matters because before you can ask people to support government initiatives, you need people to trust government.' Khanna's appearance here came at the end of a week in which the House broke for summer recess as Democrats repeatedly pushed the Epstein issue. He and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., joined to co-sponsor a measure that aims to force President Donald Trump's administration to publish 'all unclassified records' on Epstein, the late financier and convicted sex offender who died by suicide awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges in 2019. That resolution is expected to come up after the recess has ended. Epstein counted Trump and other powerful people as friends before he was criminally charged, though the president long ago disavowed him. The case has exposed a rift between Trump and key figures in his MAGA movement who for years have demanded more transparency on Epstein and are upset that Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi have not provided it. 'People say, 'Well, why did you lead this fight on the Epstein files?' And to me, it's about trust in government and transparency,' Khanna said in an interview with NBC News. 'If you don't have trust and transparency, how are you going to get Medicare for all? How are you going to get a 21st century Marshall Plan? It's maybe the kryptonite that gets MAGA to unravel.' Khanna's speech was also notable for its narrow focus on Vice President JD Vance, who was previously among the MAGA leaders pushing for the release of the Epstein files. Vance is a likely Republican presidential candidate in 2028, when Trump is term-limited. Khanna, meanwhile, has been open about his interest in seeking the Democratic nomination that year — and conspicuous in his attention to Vance. 'Because I'm in the vice president's hometown again, I thought I would remind him of some of the things he said,' said Khanna, briefly confusing Cleveland with Vance's downstate home base in Cincinnati before reading from some of the vice president's old social media posts about the Epstein case. Vance, for example, had posted as a Senate candidate in December 2021: 'If you're a journalist and you're not asking questions about this case you should be ashamed of yourself. What purpose do you even serve? I'm sure there's a middle class teenager somewhere who could use some harassing right now but maybe try to do your job once in a while.' Khanna shot back Friday: 'Maybe you should be doing your job now. You were passionate about this issue when you were asking people in this state for their votes. What happened?' A spokesperson for the vice president declined to comment Friday on Khanna's remarks. Vance has mentioned Epstein sparingly in recent weeks, with the White House tightening its grip over the messaging on what has become a thorny subject. In a post Thursday on X, Vance criticized The Wall Street Journal's recent coverage of Trump's relationship with Epstein. Asked in the interview if he was attempting to position himself as Vance's strongest Democratic rival in 2028, Khanna did not answer directly. He instead argued that he and Vance have different views about what it means to be an American, pointing to Vance's recent speech at the conservative Claremont Institute. Vance asserted there that 'the modern left seems dedicated … to saying you don't belong in America unless you agree with progressive liberalism in 2025.' Vance, Khanna said, is 'trying to articulate a more parochial vision of American identity. And I think that he's a real foil in my conception of American identity.' Khanna also said he believes an Epstein-centric message helps Democrats — and him. 'I've never gotten this kind of Republican support on anything I have done before from the MAGA base,' Khanna said. 'There have been a lot of things that the Democrats have screamed our heads off about, but it's always just the Democrats. Sometimes it's the Democrats combined with establishment Republicans such as Liz Cheney or Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan. 'But it's never been the Democrats who are combined with the loudest voices in the MAGA world, and that is, I think, the key to not just fighting Trump, but fighting Trump effectively.' Asked why he didn't call for more transparency around the Epstein files while President Joe Biden was president, Khanna pointed to a 2019 social media post in which he expressed support for congressional Democrats investigating the circumstances of Epstein's death. Trump and his administration 'raised the stakes,' Khanna added, when he previously indicated support for releasing the files and when Bondi previously said an Epstein client list existed. 'It [was] when the Justice Department issued a memorandum saying there was no list or need to release more information that Massie and I thought legislation was needed,' he said. Khanna marveled at how much attention the issue is driving for him now, especially since House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., called for an early recess as his members complained about Democrats repeatedly offering Epstein-related amendments. Khanna said he and Massie are scheduled to appear together on two Sunday news programs this weekend, including NBC's 'Meet the Press.' The congressmen have been friendly for years and agreed to work together on the resolution after Khanna's attempt to introduce an amendment to push for the files to be released. Massie 'texted me right away and said, 'Ro, why don't we do this as bipartisan? Are you fine with that?'' Khanna recalled. 'And I said, 'That'd be great, but can we really make it work?'' That remains a question as House members go home to their districts for the summer recess. When they return to Washington in September, Massie and Khanna will work to secure the 218 signatures needed to file a so-called discharge petition and force a vote on their resolution. Khanna said he is confident they will have the support they need. He also expressed little concern that partnering with Republicans, including hardcore MAGA supporters who on many other issues hold views that most Democrats find objectionable, will backfire on the party. 'I think there are two ways of fighting Trump and MAGA,' he said. 'One is the view, which has been our party's view for almost 10 years, which is they said we have to disassociate from them, condemn them, and not get our hands dirty and fight them all, and not try to listen to why there is anger or what their causes are. I have never taken that approach. I have taken the approach of respecting the voters who voted for Trump, and trying to understand where they're coming from, while being firm in my convictions.' Such collaboration could be a tough sell. Khanna's Epstein-heavy speech to the Democratic mayors received polite applause but some puzzled reactions from a few attendees who privately wondered whether it was the appropriate venue for such a message. No other speaker Friday dwelled as much on Epstein as Khanna did, though Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin briefly mentioned him in passing. 'It's also not our job to protect Donald Trump and his rich, excuse my language, asshole friends who are pals with Jeffrey Epstein, which seems to be a clear priority for Republicans right now,' Martin said in his remarks. Pennsylvania Lt. Gov. Austin Davis, a Democrat who also addressed the mayors Friday, said in an interview after his speech that he saw room for Epstein in the party's messaging. 'I think broadly, it's not necessarily about Jeffrey Epstein or Donald Trump. I think it's about transparency and accountability, and I think that's what voters expect from their elected officials,' Davis said. 'I think we can do multiple things at one time. I think we can talk about the affordability issues. I think we can talk about how we're going to make our economic situation better, while also holding government leaders in Washington accountable for the things that they've done.'
a minute ago
Trump administration investigates Oregon's transgender athlete policies
The Trump administration said Friday it's investigating the Oregon Department of Education after receiving a complaint from a conservative non-profit group alleging the state was violating civil rights law by allowing transgender girls to compete on girls sports teams. It's the latest escalation in the Republican administration's effort to bar transgender athletes from women's sports teams nationwide. President Donald Trump signed an executive order in February to block trans girls from participating on sports teams consistent with their gender identity. The administration says transgender athlete policies violate Title IX, the 1972 federal law that bans discrimination in education based on sex. Proponents of Trump's ban say it restores fairness in athletic competitions, but opponents say bans are an attack on transgender youth. The U.S. Education Department's Office of Civil Rights opened the Oregon investigation based on a complaint by the America First Policy Institute that alleges high-school aged female athletes had lost medals and competitive opportunities to transgender athletes. It follows a probe launched earlier this year into Portland Public Schools and the state's governing body for high school sports over alleged violations of Title IX for allowing trans girls to compete in girls sports. Earlier this month, the administration sued the California Department of Education for allowing transgender girls to compete on girls sports teams, alleging the policy violates federal law. Trump also filed a lawsuit in April alleging Maine violated Title IX by allowing trans girls and women to compete against other female athletes. Oregon law allows trans students to compete on sex-segregated sports teams consistent with their gender identity. Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor said in a release Friday that the administration won't let educational institutions receive federal funds "to continue trampling upon women's rights.' 'If Oregon is permitting males to compete in women's sports, it is allowing these males to steal the accolades and opportunities that female competitors have rightfully earned through hard work and grit, while callously disregarding women's and girls' safety, dignity, and privacy," Trainor said. Messages seeking comment from the Oregon education officials were not immediately returned. Nate Lowery, spokesman for the Oregon School Activities Association, said they were reviewing the administration's notice with its legal counsel and doesn't have additional comments at this time. Three high school track-and-field athletes filed a lawsuit against Oregon in early July that seeks to overturn all sports records set by transgender girl athletes and prevent them from participating in girls sporting events. The complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Oregon alleges the state policy prohibiting schools from excluding student athletes from events that align with their gender identity violates Title IX. The students say it has harmed them through loss of competition, placements, and opportunities to advance to higher-level events. Jessica Hart Steinmann, executive general counsel at the America First Policy Institute, said the investigation is a step toward restoring equal opportunities for women's athletics. 'Title IX was meant to protect girls — not to undermine them — and we're hopeful this signals a return to that original purpose,' Steinmann said in a release. More than two dozen states have enacted laws barring transgender women and girls from participating in certain sports competitions. Some policies have been blocked in court.
