Elections To Chandigarh Mayoral Polls Can Now Be Held By Show Of Hands
Chandigarh:
Election to the posts of mayor, senior deputy mayor, and deputy mayor of the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation can now be held by a show of hands instead of a secret ballot.
Punjab Governor and Administrator of the Union Territory of Chandigarh, Gulab Chand Kataria, on Tuesday approved an amendment to Regulation 6 of the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation (Procedure and Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1996.
"With this amendment, the mayor, senior deputy mayor, and deputy mayor will now be elected through a show of hands instead of the earlier secret ballot method," said an official statement here.
Kataria said the new system will bring greater transparency in the election process and make the role of elected representatives clearer and accountable.
He expressed hope that this change will help improve the functioning and governance of the municipal corporation and will further strengthen trust in democratic processes.
The amendment was earlier passed in the House meeting of the Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh.
It was proposed under the legal powers granted by Section 398(2) of the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 (as extended to the Union Territory of Chandigarh under the Chandigarh UT Act, 1994).
The proposal was then sent to the Administrator for approval, which has now been formally granted.
A controversy had erupted during the 2024 mayoral polls when the then presiding officer, Anil Masih, was caught on camera invalidating eight ballot papers which were in favour of the AAP-Congress.
The matter had then reached the Supreme Court, which overturned the result of the Chandigarh mayoral poll in which the BJP candidate had won.
The apex court declared AAP's Kuldeep Kumar the mayor of the Chandigarh MC.
Meanwhile, Chandigarh Congress president H S Lucky welcomed the decision and thanked the Administrator for this step.
He said the Chandigarh Congress and MP Manish Tewari had been demanding for allowing voting by showing of hands.
"This will pave the way for cleaner politics and help in enhancing the image of Municipal Corporation of Chandigarh and its councillors who constantly face charges of horse trading," he said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
When LS passed 42nd Amendment, Indira said: ‘Secular, socialist in Preamble echo Constitution'
In the midst of the Emergency, the Lok Sabha in October 1976 debated and passed the 42nd Constitutional Amendment, which brought sweeping changes to the Constitution, when the Opposition leaders had been in jail. On October 27, 1976, participating in the discussion on this legislation, then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi said in the House that the inclusion of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' in the Preamble of the Constitution through it was just spelling out 'what was already there in the Constitution'. 'The founding fathers of our Constitution and of our country had intended Indian society to be secular and socialist. These are not new definitions. They have guided our laws all these years. All we are doing now is to incorporate them in the Constitution itself for they rightly deserve to be mentioned there,' Indira told the Lok Sabha. Recently, RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale sought a discussion on whether 'socialist' and 'secular' should continue to remain in the Preamble. Union Ministers Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Jitendra Singh have lent their weight to Hosabale's pitch, even as Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar and Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma have castigated the insertion of 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble. The 42nd Constitutional Amendment was passed with a special majority by both the Houses but in 1977, when the Janata Party government came to power after winning the Lok Sabha polls, it reversed almost all the changes that this law brought into force while still retaining 'socialist' and 'secular' and fundamental duties. With the Opposition members in prison, the 42nd Constitutional Amendment got widespread support in the House, with a note of caution sounded by political scientist and Independent MP P G Mavalankar, the son of the first Lok Sabha Speaker G V Mavalankar. P G Mavalankar, who was not arrested because of the stature of his family, also criticised the Emergency. 'I ask: are there conditions conducive to a free debate today? Is there a free press? Is the public forum in continuous and free possession of the people? Are the media of radio and TV equally serviceable to differing, opposing and conflicting viewpoints and opinions? The answer is obviously and most categorically 'No'. The publicity has been almost entirely one-sided; there has been practically a one-way traffic,' he said in the House, questioning how free the debate on the Constitutional Amendment Bill could be. 'Throughout my life, I have been wedded to socialist and secular ideals,' Mavalankar said on the insertion of the two terms, 'But I want to ask you: can we change the Preamble which was passed on 26 November 1949 and that was specifically mentioned in the Preamble which says: 'We the people of India etc?' The Preamble is a part of the Constitution, not strictly; though undoubtedly it is the key of the Constitution. Therefore, if you put words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble, I am afraid a time will come when some people might say: remove the word 'democracy'. Already the substance has gone; the word may also go next time.' Notwithstanding this dissent, the changes received support from the entire House, mainly the Treasury bench MPs. 'The objectives which we had always in view, namely, socialism and secularism, which we have tried to implement, will be more and more implemented and will be more accurately and correctly reflected in a basic part of our Constitution, namely, the Preamble,' then Union Law Minister H R Gokhale said. 'Let anyone say that 'socialism' or 'secularism' is incapable of definition. Well, if that argument were to be accepted, even 'democracy' in that sense is incapable of definition because, is it not understood in different ways in different countries? But, we understand what kind of democracy we stand for. In the same way, we understand what 'socialism' stands for and what 'secularism' stands for.' CPI leader Indrajit Gupta said, 'It is very welcome also that the word 'secular' is being introduced. We want to understand what is the significance behind this. Because our State is a secular State, our State respects and recognises, and gives equal rights to people belonging to all religions or faiths or to people of no religion, in law.' Indrajit Gupta also said: 'When the government itself has come forward to add the word 'secular', particularly here, I take it to mean something; I take it to mean that the secular aspect of our democracy requires to be strengthened; otherwise it is superfluous to introduce this word here… I take it that what we want to assure the people of all faiths and communities and religions particularly the minorities is that we mean to take some further action, legislative and others, to strengthen and secularise the content of our democracy.' Supporting the Bill, Congress MP P R Shenoy dismissed as emotional the concern that sweeping changes were being made to the Constitution, with Opposition MPs in prison. 'Certain events in the country have made it necessary to lay emphasis on certain concepts like nationalism and secularism…. One of the serious objections to the Constitutional Amendment is that it should wait for certain men, men who are under detention and men who are not willing to express their views as long as there is Emergency – not that they are not allowed to express their views but they do not want to express their views until there is Emergency – and men who will occupy the seats of this House after the next elections. This objection, I feel, is more of a sentimental nature. There is no rationality behind it. In the history of a nation, time and tide wait for no man.' Then Union Minister Swaran Singh said that the inclusion of the word secular was 'very vital for our country to grow from strength to strength and to remain united and a strong nation'. He added that the word had become very popular across India. 'You may go to the Punjab, to Gujarat, even to the South; when they make speeches in their own languages they always use the word 'secular' because it has assumed a definite meaning and that meaning is that there will be equality before the eye of the law in our Constitution with regard to people professing different religions. Not only that but more than that there is no connotational element of any anti-religious feeling but it is really respect for all religions.' Taking a dig at the Jana Sangh, Congress MP C M Stephen said, 'There are people who are speaking about communal authority. Jana Sangh is going about with a sectarian point of view and a divisive philosophy. Therefore, it is necessary that the Preamble reminds the nation that the nation has been committed to secularism and there can be no going away from secularism. This is the sentiment of the nation; this is the will of the nation; this is the faith of the nation and the Constitution reflects the new found faith and the belief, commitment and promises which they are giving to themselves.' He added that this was the same Constitution that was given to the people in 1949, but with a few amendments.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Indians to benefit as Trump's Big Beautiful Bill reduces remittance tax to 1%
In a big relief to Indian professionals working in the US and non-resident Indians (NRIs) sending money to India, the updated draft of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) has reduced the tax rate on remittances to 1%, down from the 5% proposed tax will apply to remittances made via cash, money orders, or cashier's at 5% in May, the tax rate was brought down to 3.5% in the House version of the The revised One Big Beautiful Bill states: "There is hereby imposed on any remittance transfer a tax equal to 1% of the amount of such transfer.""The tax imposed by this section with respect to any remittance transfer shall be paid by the sender with respect to such transfer," the updated draft also Bill also exempts remittances made from "an account held in or by a financial institution" and those "funded with a debit card or a credit card issued in the United States".The earlier version of the bill, passed by the House of Representatives in May this year, had many Indian professionals concerned, as it had proposed a 5% tax on remittances sent from the US to foreign proposal is relevant for non-US citizens, including Green Card holders and workers on temporary visas such as H-1B or THE TAX ON REMITTANCES MATTERS TO INDIANSadvertisementRemittances form a substantial part of India's foreign to The Times of India, citing data from the Migration Policy Institute, the US hosted approximately 2.9 million Indians as of 2023, making them the second-largest foreign-born population in the according to 2024 World Bank data, India was the top recipient of international remittances, receiving $129 billion, followed by Mexico with over $68 billion. In 2023-24, 28% of all remittances to India originated in the also accounted for 14.3% of global remittances during this period, the highest share by any country since the turn of the states like Kerala, Uttar Pradesh, and Bihar, remittances remain a financial lifeline for millions of STATUS OF TRUMP'S ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILLThe US President's flagship bill passed a key Senate hurdle on Saturday (US time) with a narrow 51-49 vote and is now set to be discussed in the Senate. According to Al Jazeera, Trump wants Congress to pass the bill before July legislation includes a $150 billion boost in military spending, mass deportation measures, and border wall funding. To finance these, it proposes deep cuts to federal programmes, including Medicaid and clean energy has triggered outrage across party lines, including within Republican bill also triggered a public rift between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, with the Tesla CEO denouncing it as "utterly insane" and warning it would destroy millions of American jobs.- Ends
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Sikkim Assembly passes Lokayukta (Amendment) Bill
Gangtok, The Sikkim Lokayukta Bill, 2025 was passed in the assembly of the Himalayan state on Monday. Sikkim Assembly passes Lokayukta (Amendment) Bill The Scholars University of Skills and Innovation, Sikkim Bill, 2025 was also introduced in the House during a day-long session. Law Minister Raju Basnet introduced the amendment Bill in the House with permission of Speaker M N Sherpa, proposing to amend Section 5 of the Sikkim Lokayukta Act, 2014 for the extension of tenure of the chairperson and members of the Lokayukta. He said that an amendment was made in 2018 in the Sikkim Lokayukta Act, 2014, incorporating Section 5 regarding extension of tenure of the chairperson and members of the Lokayukta, but the said provision for extension, however, got omitted by the Sikkim Lokayukta Act, 2019. Now, to ensure continuity and to allow the chairperson and the members sufficient time to deal with pending matters, the state government deems it expedient to amend Section 5 of the Sikkim Lokayukta Act, 2014 to insert the provision for extension of the tenures of the chairperson and the members of the Lokayukta, the law minister said, while elaborating on the objectives of the Sikkim Lokayukta , Bill 2025. The House subsequently considered and passed the Bill by voice vote. Basnet, who also holds the education portfolio, further introduced the Scholars University of Skills and Innovation, Sikkim Bill, 2025. He said that the objective of the Bill is to provide higher education in skilled and entrepreneurial courses in Sikkim through world-class infrastructure and international networking. The university is proposed to be established at Melli in Namchi district, he said. The discussion and voting on the Scholars University of Skills and Innovation, Sikkim Bill, shall take place during the next session of the House, the Speaker ruled. Chief Minister Prem Singh Tamang, who holds the charge of the finance department, presented the Annual Consolidated Audit Report on the accounts of Panchayati Raj Institutions and municipalities for the financial year 2023-24. Thereafter, the Speaker announced the laying of the Annual Reports of the Agriculture Department , Fisheries Department , Sikkim Public Service Commission , and and Civil Supplies Department . At the conclusion of legislative and financial business scheduled for the day, Sherpa adjourned the House sine die. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
