Digital threats a top concern for Indonesian national security
She said threats to national sovereignty increasingly originate in the digital domain, not just from land, sea, or air, amid a rise in cyberattacks and the spread of online disinformation.
"Cyberspace is the heart of our modern defence. Safeguarding it means securing the nation's future,' she said during a recent public lecture at the National Resilience Institute, according to a statement from her ministry.
Among recent high-profile incidents, Meutya cited a ransomware attack on Bank Syariah Indonesia in June 2024 by the LockBit 3.0 group, which demanded US$20 million and disrupted services for 15 million customers.
She also warned of the dangers posed by online falsehoods-including misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation, which she said could undermine national unity, inflame political tensions, and erode public trust.
"These aren't just digital disturbances; they can threaten the ideological and social fabric of our society,' she said, adding that investment in digital security infrastructure is an urgent necessity.
To tackle these challenges, the ministry has introduced key regulations, including Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025 on Electronic Systems Governance for Child Protection, Law No. 1 of 2024 revising the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and Presidential Regulation No. 47 of 2023 on the National Cybersecurity Strategy.
Noting that regulations alone are insufficient, Meutya urged leaders across the civil service, military and police to spearhead digital literacy efforts throughout government institutions.
Indonesia has reported a sharp increase in cyber threats in recent years, in line with rapid digital transformation. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
25 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
EU, US seal ‘biggest-ever' trade pact, scrapping tariffs on industrial goods to avert transatlantic clash
TURNBERRY, July 28 — The United States and European Union on Sunday clinched what President Donald Trump described as the 'biggest-ever' deal to resolve a transatlantic tariff stand-off that threatened to explode into a full-blown trade war. Trump emerged from a high-stakes meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his golf resort in Scotland to announce that a baseline tariff of 15 per cent would be levied on EU exports to the US. The deal, which the leaders struck in around an hour, came as the clock ticked down on an August 1 deadline to avoid an across-the-board US levy of 30 per cent on European goods. 'We've reached a deal. It's a good deal for everybody. This is probably the biggest deal ever reached in any capacity,' said Trump. Trump said the 15-per cent tariff would apply across the board, including for Europe's crucial automobile sector, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. As part of the deal, Trump said the 27-nation EU bloc had agreed to purchase 'US$750 billion worth of energy' from the United States, as well as make US$600 billion (RM2.5 trillion) in additional investments. Von der Leyen said the 'significant' purchases of US liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels would come over three years, as part of the bloc's bid to diversify away from Russian sources. Negotiating on behalf of the EU's 27 countries, von der Leyen had been pushing hard to salvage a trading relationship worth an annual US$1.9 trillion in goods and services. 'It's a good deal,' the EU chief told reporters. 'It will bring stability. It will bring predictability. That's very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic,' she said. She said bilateral tariff exemptions had been agreed on a number of 'strategic products,' notably aircraft, certain chemicals, some agricultural products and critical raw materials. Von der Leyen said the EU still hoped to secure further so-called 'zero-for-zero' agreements, notably for alcohol, which she hoped to be 'sorted out' in coming days. Trump also said EU countries — which recently pledged to ramp up their defence spending within Nato — would be purchasing 'hundreds of billions of dollars worth of military equipment.' 'Best we could get' The EU has been hit by multiple waves of tariffs since Trump reclaimed the White House. It is currently subject to a 25-per cent levy on cars, 50 per cent on steel and aluminium, and an across-the-board tariff of 10 per cent, which Washington threatened to hike to 30 per cent in a no-deal scenario. The bloc had been pushing hard for tariff carve-outs for critical industries from aircraft to spirits, and its auto industry, crucial for France and Germany, is already reeling from the levies imposed so far. 'Fifteen per cent is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get,' acknowledged von der Leyen. Any deal will need to be approved by EU member states — whose ambassadors, on a visit to Greenland, were updated by the commission Sunday morning. They were set to meet again after the deal struck in Scotland. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz rapidly hailed the deal, saying it avoided 'needless escalation in transatlantic trade relations'. But German exporters were less enthusiastic. The powerful BDI federation of industrial groups said the accord would have 'considerable negative repercussions' while the country's VCI chemical trade association said the accord left rates 'too high'. The EU had pushed for a compromise on steel that could allow a certain quota into the United States before tariffs would apply. Trump appeared to rule that out, saying steel was 'staying the way it is', but the EU chief insisted later that 'tariffs will be cut and a quota system will be put in place' for steel. 'The big one' While 15 per cent is much higher than pre-existing US tariffs on European goods, which average around 4.8 per cent, it mirrors the status quo, with companies currently facing an additional flat rate of 10 per cent. Had the talks failed, EU states had greenlit counter tariffs on US$109 billion (€93 billion) of US goods including aircraft and cars to take effect in stages from August 7. Trump has embarked on a campaign to reshape US trade with the world, and has vowed to hit dozens of countries with punitive tariffs if they do not reach a pact with Washington by August 1. Asked what the next deal would be, Trump replied: 'This was the big one. This is the biggest of them all.' — AFP
Malay Mail
25 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
What we know so far about the EU-US trade deal: 15pc tariff set, energy billions pledged
BRUSSELS, July 28 — EU chief Ursula von der Leyen clinched an agreement Sunday with US President Donald Trump to avoid crippling tariffs from hitting the bloc, with both leaders hailing a 'good deal'. The stakes were high with a looming August 1 deadline and $1.9 trillion transatlantic trading relationship on the line. Many European businesses will breathe a sigh of relief after the leaders agreed the 27-country bloc will face a baseline levy of 15 per cent instead of a threatened 30 per cent — but the deal will not satisfy everyone. Here is what we know so far: What did EU, US agree? Both sides confirmed there will be a 15-per cent across-the-board rate on a majority of EU goods — the same level secured by Japan this month — with bilateral tariff exemptions on some products. The deal will bring relief for the bloc's auto sector, employing around 13 million people — and hit by Trump with 25-per cent tariffs, on top of a pre-existing 2.5 per cent. 'Obviously, it is good news for the car industry. So Germany will be happy. And all the EU members with auto supply chains, they go from 27.5 to 15 per cent,' said Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute For International Economics. A 15-per cent levy will remain 'costly' for German automakers, 'but it is manageable', said trade geopolitics expert Elvire Fabry at the Jacques Delors Institute. While 15 per cent is much higher than pre-existing US tariffs on European goods — averaging 4.8 per cent — it mirrors the status quo, with companies currently facing an additional flat rate of 10 per cent imposed by Trump since April. The EU also committed to buy US$750 billion (RM3.16 trillion) of liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels from the United States — split equally over three years — to replace Russian energy sources. And it will pour US$600 billion more in additional investments in the United States. Trump said EU countries — which recently pledged to ramp up their defence spending within Nato — would be purchasing 'hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of military equipment'. Are there exemptions? Von der Leyen said the 15-per cent rate applied across most sectors, including semiconductors and pharmaceuticals — a critical export for Ireland, which the bloc has sought to protect. Trump in April launched probes that could lead to significantly steeper tariffs on the two key sectors, warning this month he could slap 200-per cent levies on drugs. Brussels and Washington agreed a bilateral tariff exemption for key goods including aircraft, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products and critical raw materials, von der Leyen said. The EU currently faces 50-per cent tariffs on its steel exports to the United States, but von der Leyen said a compromise on the metal had been reached with Trump. 'Between us, tariffs will be cut and a quota system will be put in place,' she said. It is understood that European steel would be hit with 50-per cent levies only after a certain amount of the metal arrived in the United States, but no details were initially provided on the mechanism. What happens next? The deal needs to be approved by EU member states, whose ambassadors will meet first thing Monday morning for a debrief from the European Commission. And there are still technical talks to come, since the agreement needs to be fully fleshed out. Von der Leyen described the deal as a 'framework' agreement. 'Details have to be sorted out, and that will happen over the next weeks,' she said. In particular, she said there has yet to be a final decision on alcohol, critical since France and The Netherlands have been pushing for carve-outs for wine and beer respectively. 'This is something which has to be sorted out in the next days,' von der Leyen said. — AFP
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
German heavy industry stuck with dirty tech
BERLIN: In Geseke, a small town in Germany's western industrial heartland, plans to launch a large-scale carbon capture project at a local cement plant have been put on ice. Operator Heidelberg Materials AG had received European Union (EU) subsidies for the green project that's set to save 700,000 tonnes of carbon emissions annually, and planned to start construction next year. But the company – which last month started capturing and liquefying emissions in Norway – is no longer staking out a timeline for its German project because the conditions for a prompt, final investment decision aren't given. Germany's new conservative-led government has thrown its weight behind carbon capture and storage (CCS), touting it as a pragmatic path to meeting legally-binding climate goals in sectors that are hard to decarbonise. But while Chancellor Friedrich Merz has pledged to fast-track the technology by lifting regulatory barriers, the government's sweeping budget cuts are undercutting the very projects it says it supports. The result is a climate strategy caught between political convenience and fiscal restraint – leaving the country's most emissions-intensive industries facing a rising cost of carbon emissions in the coming years with German industry already struggling to stay in business. Berlin recently revived a draft proposal that was left unfinished by the previous government to legalise CCS. Yet funds for a clean industry programme – which was developed to support everything from hydrogen to carbon capture – are set to be cut to €1.8bil (US$2.1bil) from €24.5bil in the mid-term, according to this year's draft budget law that's currently being discussed in Parliament. While the ruling coalition has promised to stick to the nation's 2045 climate neutrality goal, it's becoming increasingly unclear who will foot the bill. 'If the government deprioritises funding for the decarbonisation of industry, this would be by far the most problematic measure in terms of climate protection,' said Jens Burchardt, co-founder of Boston Consulting Group's Centre for Climate and Sustainability. The nation's manufacturers are already struggling with layers of red tape, high energy prices and a shortage of skilled staff. They will come under additional pressure in the coming years as costs for polluting the environment increase. 'Against this backdrop, withdrawing the financial support companies need to invest in green alternatives at the same time is a recipe for the further deindustrialisation of Germany,' said Burchardt. Swiss building materials specialist Holcim AG, which plans a carbon capture project near Hanover, said the budget cuts have led to uncertainty throughout the industry as to how decarbonisation funding will continue overall. A representative for industry group Carbon Management Alliance said the cuts are a setback for climate targets. The government's key programme to help clean up its heavy industries relies on an auction instrument to bridge the pricing difference between conventional processes and cleaner, more expensive alternatives. While a first auction last October awarded contracts to 15 projects, an economy ministry spokesperson said preparations for a potential second round were 'complex,' though it's technically possible for another to take place this year. One company that could be eligible to participate is Hamburg-based copper recycler Aurubis AG. It installed two hydrogen-ready anode furnaces last year, but with no hydrogen available at competitive prices, it continues to burn natural gas in its state-of-the-art ovens. At an energy conference last month, economy minister Katherina Reiche explained that the expected demand for hydrogen isn't materialising, or is very delayed. Meanwhile, the German budget envisions slashing two-thirds of the funding the previous administration allocated to hydrogen. Of course, the lack of state support isn't the only reason why decarbonisation projects are stuck or failing. For example, when steelmaker ArcelorMittal SA last month announced it would hand back a €1.3bil subsidy for two local green steel units, it pointed to 'unprecedented' market pressure, weak demand, unfavourable European policy and high electricity prices. That's an even bigger problem for the chemical industry in Germany, which is facing factory closures, layoffs and production cuts. 'I can only spend every euro once,' said Martin Naundorf from Infraleuna GmbH, operator of a chemical hub in the country's east. Given the current conditions, 'nobody can afford to invest in technologies where it's unclear when they'll become profitable.' Major industrial competitors, such as China, are investing massively in new technologies to help manufacturers decarbonise, said Julia Metz, director of think tank Agora Industry. 'If Germany wants to keep up, it must not miss the boat and must invest massive amounts of money in new climate protection technologies.' — Bloomberg
