logo
Starmer focused on grooming victims not ‘grandstanding', says Reeves

Starmer focused on grooming victims not ‘grandstanding', says Reeves

After initially resisting pressure to implement a full probe, the Prime Minister said he had read 'every single word' of an independent report into child sexual exploitation by Baroness Louise Casey and would accept her recommendation for the investigation.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is set to address Parliament on Monday about the findings of the review.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described the move as a 'welcome U-turn', while Kemi Badenoch called on him to apologise for 'six wasted months'.
Asked whether the Prime Minister had changed his mind about the idea of a national inquiry, the Chancellor told the Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme: 'I think Keir Starmer, our Prime Minister, has always been really focused, as he was when he was director of public prosecutions, on the victims and not grandstanding.
'But actually doing the practical things to ensure that something like this never happens again, but also to ensure that the victims of this horrific abuse over many, many years is got to grips with and that people have answers to their questions.'
Earlier this year, the Government dismissed calls for a public inquiry, saying its focus was on putting in place the outstanding recommendations already made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay.
Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride criticised the Government's 'very late' decision to launch the inquiry, and claimed it had only come after pressure from the Tories.
Shadow chancellor of the Exchequer Mel Stride arrives at BBC Broadcasting House (James Manning/PA)
Sir Mel told BBC One's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: 'It's a very late decision – it should have happened far, far earlier.
'We've been calling for this for many, many months.'
He accused Sir Keir of previously dismissing concerns from senior Tory figures.
'Kemi Badenoch, Chris Philp and others have been derided by the Prime Minister for hopping on some kind of far-right bandwagon, dog-whistle politics and the rest of it,' Sir Mel said.
'That was the wrong response. This is just another example of the Prime Minister being pressurised by us into U-turning.'
The inquiry will be able to compel witnesses to give evidence, and it is understood that it will be national in scope, co-ordinating a series of targeted local investigations.
Baroness Louise Casey (Kirsty O'Connor/PA)
Speaking to reporters travelling with him on his visit to Canada on Saturday, the Prime Minister said: 'I have never said we should not look again at any issue.
'I have wanted to be assured that on the question of any inquiry.
'That's why I asked Louise Casey who I hugely respect to do an audit.
'Her position when she started the audit was that there was not a real need for a national inquiry over and above what was going on.
'She has looked at the material she has looked at and she has come to the view that there should be a national inquiry on the basis of what she has seen.
'I have read every single word of her report and I am going to accept her recommendation.
'That is the right thing to do on the basis of what she has put in her audit.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Petition to repeal Online Safety Act reaches 340K signatures
Petition to repeal Online Safety Act reaches 340K signatures

The Herald Scotland

time28 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Petition to repeal Online Safety Act reaches 340K signatures

The changes from the act apply across the UK and include age checks on pornography websites, as well as other platforms like Reddit, X and Bluesky. The Act was passed into law on October 26, 2023, and was implemented on July 25, 2025, with platforms now requiring users to prove their age by ID verification. Well done to everyone who campaigned to ensure age verification for pornography was in the Online Safety Act! Today it comes into force and while no doubt there will be some who get around it, it means young kids in particular won't be stumbling on violent and harmful porn. — Jess Asato MP (@Jess4Lowestoft) July 25, 2025 The measures, as part of the Online Safety Act and set to be enforced by regulator Ofcom, require online platforms to have age checks – using facial age estimation or credit card checks. Since the act was implemented, a petition has been launched and has surpassed more than 340,000 signatures. Calls for the Online Safety Act to be repealed in viral petition Sharing why the petition was made, the creator behind it Alex Baynham, wrote: "We believe that the scope of the Online Safety act is far broader and restrictive than is necessary in a free society. "For instance, the definitions in Part 2 covers online hobby forums, which we think do not have the resource to comply with the act and so are shutting down instead. "We think that Parliament should repeal the act and work towards producing proportionate legislation rather than risking clamping down on civil society talking about trains, football, video games or even hamsters because it can't deal with individual bad faith actors." At the time of writing, the petition had surpassed the needed 100,000 signatures for Parliament to consider debating the petition. On TikTok, the Act has received a large amount of debate. Recommended Reading Content creator Thomas Pearson branded the act "pointless", sharing that he believes the act "is a fundamental betrayal of one of the core principles of British democracy; governing and policing by consent." Previously discussing the Act, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle told Sky News: "I have very high expectations of the change that children will experience. "And let me just say this to parents and children, you will experience a different internet really, for the first time in from today, moving forward than you've had in the past. And that is a big step forward."

Nigel Farage rattled by Donald Trump question - 'am I wrong?'
Nigel Farage rattled by Donald Trump question - 'am I wrong?'

Daily Mirror

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Nigel Farage rattled by Donald Trump question - 'am I wrong?'

Nigel Farage was challenged over Donald Trump's felony convictions and sexual abuse ruling and asked if his pal was the sort of person Britain should be letting in Nigel Farage has been confronted over Donald Trump's criminal history and a sex abuse ruling against him - moments after vowing to crack down on sex offenders from overseas. The Reform UK leader was asked whether the US President was "the right sort of person to be letting into this country". In 2023 a civil ruling that saw Mr Trump ordered to pay $5million after jurors ruled he had sexually abused a columnist. The Republican is set to meet Keir Starmer in Scotland today during a four-day visit to a golf course he owns - and will return for a state visit in September. During a press conference in central London, Mr Farage said his relations with Mr Trump were "good". He was asked by a journalist: "You talked about at the start letting the right sorts of people into the country. Donald Trump's been convicted of a number of offences and found liable in court for sexual assault. Do you see him as the right sort of person to be letting into this country?" The Reform leader responded: "I think there was a civil case, not a criminal case, am I right or am I wrong? Thank you." He was referring to a US District Court ruling in New York, which saw jurors find Mr Trump had sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the 1990s. In June Mr Trump lost a federal court legal appeal over the ruling. He became the first US President to be convicted of felony crimes in 2024 after a jury found him guilty of all 34 charges over hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels, who said they had sex while he was married. He was also facing criminal charges accusing him of trying to illegally overturn the 2020 election, which he lost to Joe Biden. He was accused of conspiracy to defraud the US and conspiracy against the rights of citizens. Despite the conviction and the questions about Mr Trump's conduct, Mr Farage was clear that his pal is not the sort of person he was referring to when he hit out at foreign offenders. " I'm talking about huge numbers of undocumented young males who throw their iPhones and their passports into the English Channel as they reach the 12 mile line," Mr Farage clarified. He said many of these men are from Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Eritrea - countries where he said women "aren't even second class citizens". Mr Farage went on: "We will be talking over the next couple of weeks about the direct link between people like that from those backgrounds and the rise in sexual violence against women and girls in this country." Asked whether his relations with Donald Trump have cooled, Nigel Farage claimed that rocking up to Scotland to talk to his friend "wouldn't work". He claimed: "I'm in a slightly awkward position now, or he's in a slightly awkward position with me. You know, I can't just bowl up on a friendly trip for diplomatic reasons, you know, whilst he's there with the Prime Minister negotiating steel tariffs and much else, it just doesn't work." The Reform leader went on: "I'm in good terms with the administration. My relationship with Trump has always been one of friendship, but right at the moment, diplomatically, it doesn't really work."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store