
Faithful Companions: The Best Printers We've Tried
Skip to main content
It's a boring tool, but you need one. Here are the best home printers we have tested, from ink tank to lasers.
All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links.
Everybody prints. At least everyone I know. Yet as digital tickets and phone camera scanning become increasingly common, more homes are operating without a printer at all. For those who have realized they do need to print stuff from time to time, or who just moved to a home office and really need a workhorse, I've got you covered.
In addition to writing for WIRED as a freelancer, I have a side hustle selling trading cards online. I'm printing packing slips, shipping labels, and even scanning cards on a daily basis. A printer is a commonly used tool in my life, so I can understand how frustrating it is when they don't work right.
I've spent hours printing out countless labels, slips, coloring book pages, and full-color photos of my dog on every printer I could get my hands on. Below are my favorites based on their printing quality, cost efficiency, and how often they gave me a headache. While I prefer laser printers for their ease of use and consistency, ink tank options are quickly becoming more appealing, and I have great options for both, as well as your classic ink cartridge-based devices.
Looking for more of the best home office gear? Be sure to check out our guides to the Best Computer Monitors, Best Standing Desks, Best Office Chairs, and Best Laptops. AccordionItemContainerButton
Before anything else, you'll have to decide between ink and laser. I'll get into the details when it comes to each model, but the most important consideration is paper type, because it's a limitation rather than a benefit. Laser printers use heat in the bonding process, which means if you regularly print on windowed envelopes or photo paper, you'll need to either use an ink printer or change to a thermally-safe alternative, which can be cost prohibitive if you print a lot.
Inkjets are the most common flavor of home printer, and they work like you might expect, by boiling ink until it splatters through a series of tiny holes. You didn't expect that? Me neither! Pretty exciting stuff.
Inkjet printers come in two flavors, with either pre-filled cartridges or built-in tanks. The latter is quickly becoming more popular thanks to better pricing, more convenience, and a massive reduction in wasted plastic. If you're buying a new printer in 2025 you should opt for an ink tank, if not a laser printer. They're a little more work to setup and maintain, since you have to keep the tanks topped off, and they should remain in one place on a flat surface to avoid leaks. I can't imagine many situations where a printer would be constantly moving and tilting, but it's a consideration.
You thought InkJets were cool? Laser printers work by blasting a tube full of dried plastic particles, then fusing them to the paper with heat. They tend to cost more upfront, but the cost per page is overall much lower. Where a $20 ink cartridge might print 200 pages, a $60 toner cartridge could print 2000. They tend to be a lot faster than inkjet printers, and you don't have to worry about them drying out. Plus, the pages come out of the printer nice and warm, and you can't really put a price on that.
Laser printers are my preferred type, as long as your paper type and budget can support them. AccordionItemContainerButton
While Wi-Fi is increasingly common, especially on high-end printers, it isn't a given. If your home has a dedicated desktop, you can often plug in the printer through USB and share the connection over the network, but otherwise you may need to find a spot with an Ethernet cable. If you don't have a desktop or a convenient spot next to the router, Wi-Fi will make your life a lot easier.
You'll also want to keep an eye out for different interface options. Basic models may have no screen at all, or a single line of dot-matrix characters. Upgrades often include a color LCD for clearer error messages, or even a touchscreen for advanced configuration without an app. I generally find these are most important during the initial setup, and become less useful over time. The exception here is on machines with copying and scanning features, where a good interface can save you time shuffling through settings. AccordionItemContainerButton
I can't tell you definitively whether you need a scanner, but if you've used the feature in the last two years, and your phone camera hasn't sufficed, it's worth the upgrade. You don't want to have to shop for a standalone scanner, or buy an entirely new printer just to make copies twice a year. Most models come in scan-ful and scan-less varieties that are otherwise identical, so it shouldn't complicate the decision much.
Document feeders are really only necessary for situations where you're regularly scanning stacks of pages, like signed invoices for digitizing. A flatbed is more than sufficient for occasional forms, preferable for photos, and will often produce a higher quality scan anyway. Photograph: Brad Bourque Even though the Brother HL-L2460DW runs nice and quiet, it was one of the faster printers in my testing, making it a great choice for a home office or classroom that doesn't need color. If you're printing out dozens of pages per day, all of them in black and white, and never scanning, you'll save a lot of cash going with the laser option. Setup isn't entirely intuitive. There's only a single line readout, and limited buttons for entering a Wi-Fi password, but I only had to struggle with it once. Once it's running, it requires little to no upkeep or changing settings. It's fast, cheap to run daily, fits cleanly onto any shelf, and just needs a power cable.
Photograph: Brad Bourque
As long as you don't need a scanner, I'd check out the Brother HL-3280CDW. It printed slower than the black and white model, but still fast for the group, with a nice crisp detail level, and it isn't too noisy. The touchscreen makes setup and adjusting options straightforward, and I was able to set it and forget it.
This no-frills printer is great for mostly black and white with occasional color printing, with a fairly compact footprint and a second manual feed paper tray. The only downside here is that it's fairly new, so the updated toner cartridges haven't had a chance to come down in price yet.
Setting up and maintaining an ink tank printer adds a few extra steps, and I was a little wary of them at first. This Epson EcoTank ET-2980 was the most straightforward and non-threatening I tested. The ink bottles mount right into keyed holes, so you can't mix them up, with no extra drips or dribbles, and there were no extra bits to install or configure, just a one-time scan sheet to check the alignment. It was also the easiest to secure if I needed to move it without getting ink everywhere. Print quality is excellent, and slower than the laser printers, but quick enough for most home use. It also includes a flatbed scanner, making it one of the best equipped printers for the price, particularly when you take into account the savings from refillable ink. My only minor complaint here is that it uses a vertical feeding paper tray from the rear, which means a lower 100 page print capacity. The upshot is that means better paper compatibility, since the pages don't have to make a complete turn.
The HP Color LaserJet Pro MFP 3301sdw is probably more feature-packed than most casual users would need, but if I showed up to work one day and it was near my desk, I'd say Santa came early. This would be a great fit for a home office where multiple people are often printing out full color promotional sheets or invitations.
It's fully connected, with Dual-Band Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and USB, so you could park this anywhere in your small office and have the whole team printing. It's fast enough I won't be waiting on someone else to finish their job, and quiet enough I wouldn't be mad to sit nearby.
My only minor complaint here is that the document feeder up top likes to crunch documents if you don't get the holders positioned exactly right, so just make sure to use the flatbed for anything important.
While I think Ink Tank and laser printers offer a better value and user experience, I can understand feeling more comfortable dealing with classic ink cartridges. This upgraded HP OfficeJet Pro 9125e is the newer model of the printer that powered my business for the last year or so. It's fully featured, with both a flatbed and document scanner, and it was one the speedier printers I tested with full color printing.
It also boasts the widest support for paper types and sizes on the list, although it doesn't always grab the right number of pages when working with thicker stock, something I noticed on the older version as well. With an easy setup process, minimal software needed, and wide feature set, this would be a great option for people who don't want to think about their printer often, they just want it to work when they need it.
HP LaserJet M209d ($130): While HP's minimalist black and white laser printer might be wallet-friendly, it's quite noisy and lacks some crucial connectivity. Even just adding Ethernet would sweeten the pot here a lot, but if you want something basic for USB-only use, it'll get the job done.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Moto G Stylus 2025 gets so much right that I don't miss my flagship
It's been two months since I reviewed the Moto G Stylus 2025, and I'm still impressed. I picked the phone back up last week to see what stood out to me after recently using flagship phones like the Motorola Razr Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. No one would confuse those more expensive devices with the midrange power found on the Moto G Stylus 2025, but you'd be surprised. I expected compromises when moving back to the Moto G Stylus, and they were there. But I was unbothered by them. Highlighting value in midrange and budget phones is what I enjoy most about my job, and the Moto G Stylus 2025 is a prime example of how much you can get for your money. If you're unsure which smartphone you should buy next, here's why this midrange Moto should be near the top of your list for $400. Motorola made efforts to improve durability across its entire 2025 lineup, and the Moto G Stylus is no exception. I would never confuse it with a flagship phone made from premium materials, but it can withstand a few drops without breaking apart. This year's G Stylus is IP68 dust- and water-resistant and MIL-STD-810H compliant for drop testing. Your best bet for protecting your phone is still a case, but sometimes I want to enjoy the design of my device, and Motorola has made that safer this year. I'm using the Samsung Galaxy A36 for an upcoming review. It features a high-quality AMOLED panel, but the Moto G Stylus 2025 has a vibrancy and brightness it can't match. Motorola fitted the G Stylus with a fantastic 6.7-inch OLED screen with a 1220 x 2712 Super HD resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate. It looks incredible, and I can say it's the most impressive display I've seen on a device under $400. It becomes even more remarkable when I consider that the Moto G Stylus will be available for most of its lifecycle for around $300 new. Moto puts the best displays on budget and midrange devices, and the G Stylus 2025 proves this. I'm pleased with the performance I get from the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 in the Moto G Stylus. The phone's 8GB of RAM also keeps things running smoothly, and I'm glad Motorola recognizes the importance of more RAM in budget phones. The aforementioned Galaxy A36 only has 6GB of RAM, and even with the same powerplant, I can tell the difference in performance — the G Stylus is snappier. If you're a big gamer, you might consider spending a few extra dollars on the OnePlus 13R or an older flagship, but for productivity apps and daily tasks, the G Stylus is excellent. I love that I can easily stretch my Moto G Stylus 2025's battery life for two days if needed, often ending a second day of mixed use with 20% battery remaining. Software's still a mixed bag with the Moto G Stylus, but it has nothing to do with Hello UI or Android 15. I enjoy Moto's flavor of Android, and the company does an excellent job balancing added features and a stock experience. I wish the company didn't lean so heavily on AI, as I think it's wasted effort at this point, but overall, Moto does a solid job. Unfortunately, software support is weak, and although I've made peace with it, it remains a negative aspect of the phone. You might not care, and if you're trading your phone in after two or three years, taking advantage of the next juicy Motorola carrier deal, it's not something that would prevent you from making a purchase. I love that I can easily stretch my Moto G Stylus 2025's battery life for two days if needed, often ending a second day of mixed use with 20% battery remaining. Its 5,000mAh cell combined with a power-efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 does the job, and I'm still getting similar performance two months later. The 68W wired charging helps me top off quickly, and the 15W wireless charging is an unexpected perk from a Motorola device in this price range. I'm impressed with the shots I get from the 50MP primary sensor on the G Stylus. Images are saturated and crisp in good lighting. Sure, the 13MP ultrawide photos fall off, but the 50MP main camera makes up for it, giving excellent, Instagram-ready photos that'll please your friends. It's not a Pixel, but I'm not expecting it to be, especially if I can grab one on a carrier deal or a sale later in the year. More people should consider using budget and midrange Motorola phones. The company does a fantastic job blending value and performance, and we need more competition here in the US. I promise that Samsung and Google aren't the only Android manufacturers making solid smartphones, and the Moto G Stylus 2025 is an excellent opportunity to break the cycle and try something new.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin Soars, Altcoins Fade in $300 Billion Crypto Shakeout
(Bloomberg) -- On the face of it, 2025 looks like a banner year for crypto: Bitcoin hitting a record, an industry-boosting US president whose family is venturing headlong into the sector, and key legislation widely expected to be passed by Congress. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown But look beyond the bullish headlines and the rally in Bitcoin, and a vastly different landscape comes into view. Most of the so-called altcoins once touted as competitors to the original cryptoasset are nursing steep declines, with more than $300 billion of market value wiped out so far this year. The sea of red points to a wider malaise that's forcing parts of the industry to confront existential questions. Crypto was imagined by early enthusiasts as a universe where a host of coins competed for investor money, offering a diverse set of use cases. But as Bitcoin reigns supreme, that's giving way to predictions that large swathes of the sector will become a digital wasteland. 'I think they're just going to die, frankly,' Nick Philpott, co-founder of trading platform Zodia Markets, said of altcoins. 'They'll just wither away. Technically, a lot of this stuff will just sit there and gather dust in perpetuity.' Bitcoin's share of the total market value of cryptoassets has climbed by nine percentage points this year to 64%, the highest since January 2021, according to CoinMarketCap. Back then, cryptocurrencies were a largely unregulated space, crypto lending was roaring with few safeguards and nonfungible tokens were just starting to take off. In sharp contrast, altcoins — the catch-all term for all digital assets outside of Bitcoin and stablecoins — are faltering. A MarketVector index tracking the bottom half of the largest 100 digital assets, which more than doubled in the aftermath of Donald Trump's Nov. 5 election victory, has since given up all those gains and is down around 50% in 2025. With Bitcoin soaking up the bulk of capital flows from investors in exchange-traded funds, other parts of the market are increasingly left behind. Even Ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency, remains about 50% below its all-time high after a modest rebound fueled by inflows to spot ETFs investing in the token. 'Historically, Bitcoin's moved and then that's passed down into altcoins,' said Jake Ostrovskis, an OTC trader at Wintermute. 'We've not really seen that yet this cycle.' Crypto is no stranger to mass extinction events. The 2022 market crash, punctuated by the implosions of algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD and Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX exchange, led to the demise of hundreds of projects. Thousands of coins still exist on their blockchains, with little or no activity — relegated to the status of 'ghost chains' in crypto parlance. What's different this time is that crypto is becoming a more regulated, institutionally-driven marketplace, and that stablecoins appear to be the only tokens with a real shot at achieving means-of-payment status, due to the fact that they eliminate volatility. In the past year alone, the market value of stablecoins has swelled by $47 billion, and some of the world's largest banks are entering the field. The Wall Street Journal reported this month that Inc. is studying a potential stablecoin. That's putting pressure on altcoin projects to find ways to shore up their status and appeal to a wider base of investors. 'I've talked to a couple of projects that have been thinking about merging foundations, putting it up for governance, saying, 'Hey, we can now be governed under this other authority' — that authority being another altcoin community,' said Kanyi Maqubela, managing partner at venture capital firm Kindred Ventures. The shifting tides are also reflected in corporate behavior. Modeled on Michael Saylor's Strategy, a new breed of Bitcoin accumulators has emerged. In April, a special-purpose acquisition company affiliated with Cantor Fitzgerald LP partnered with Tether Holdings SA and SoftBank to launch Twenty One Capital Inc., seeded with nearly $4 billion in Bitcoin. The Trump family, which is also getting involved in Bitcoin mining, has raised $2.3 billion via Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. to create a Bitcoin treasury. While similar vehicles have been set up recently to accumulate smaller tokens like Ether, Solana and BNB, they are much smaller. Glimmers of Hope Not all altcoins are floundering. Tokens like Maker and Hyperliquid that are linked to thriving decentralized-finance protocols have notched big gains this year. 'There's certainly a subset of the market doing incredibly well — generally companies with real businesses, real revenues, and those revenues are being used to buy back tokens,' said Jeff Dorman, chief investment officer of digital asset investment firm Arca. There's also the prospect of more favorable regulations. The potential for US Securities and Exchange Commission approval of ETFs backed by coins like Solana are stirring hopes of wider adoption. Another possible catalyst is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, informally referred to as crypto's market structure bill. The CLARITY Act aims to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework, including delineating responsibilities between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the SEC. 'The Clarity Act has the potential to do for altcoins what ETFs did for Bitcoin and Ethereum: provide the regulatory legitimacy that unlocks real institutional capital,' said Ira Auerbach, a senior executive at Offchain Labs. Yet according to Maqubela, the issue ultimately boils down to utility. He compares Bitcoin to gold and Ether to copper — the former has a capped final supply and the latter's blockchain underpins much of crypto's functionality — and says most altcoins are stuck in a sort of twilight zone, underpinned by big promises and not much else. 'I think a lot of them are going to whittle down to zero because they were driven by speculation without that mimetic value like Bitcoin, and they tried to be utilitarian without achieving any real scale,' he said. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Does a Mamdani Victory and Bezos Blowback Mean Billionaires Beware? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brad Stevens reveals Celtics' ‘foundation' amid Jaylen Brown, Derrick White trade rumors
The post Brad Stevens reveals Celtics' 'foundation' amid Jaylen Brown, Derrick White trade rumors appeared first on ClutchPoints. BOSTON — The Boston Celtics have dominated trade conversations since the end of the 2024-25 season. And because they recently moved center Kristaps Porzingis and guard Jrue Holiday, two key members of their 2024 championship core, numerous teams across the league have reportedly been calling about the availability of two other Cs: Jaylen Brown and Derrick White. Despite the fact that most reports have clarified that the Celtics would prefer not to lose Brown and White, the NBA rumor mill hasn't stopped. However, perhaps Brad Stevens' comments from a Wednesday evening presser will change that. Advertisement Following the first round of the 2025 NBA Draft, the Celtics' President of Basketball Operations sat down to speak with the media just minutes before midnight. Even though he didn't want to delve into trade talk details, the de facto general manager referred to Brown and White — and a few other C's — as integral parts of the Celtics' 'foundation.' 'We'll do our best to put the right group together,' Stevens said of the future roster. 'We've got the foundation, obviously, with Jaylen and Jayson [Tatum] and D-White and Payton [Pritchard] and all those guys that a lot of teams would love to have.' Why Brad Stevens' 'foundational guys' could survive a busy offseason Celtics star Jayson Tatum is perhaps the only Green Teamer who's largely avoided trade rumors. It's no secret that Boston wants to duck under the second apron and shed salary this summer, and although the six-time All-Star is set to earn around $54 million next season, he's the cornerstone of the franchise in the eyes of the front office. Advertisement Brown, the longest-tenured Celtic, hasn't been immune to trade chatter. Yet, it doesn't seem like Stevens is seriously considering any of the offers he's heard for the 2024 NBA Finals MVP. In fact, the coach-turned-GM emphasized the importance of letting Brown recover from a partial meniscus tear so he can return to action in time for training camp and carry the load while Tatum sits for longer due to an Achilles injury. 'We've got to prioritize JT's health and make sure that he comes back fully strong,' Stevens asserted. 'JB had a surgery, although his timeline to be back will be much quicker, obviously, and ready at the start of the season. So, I think the biggest thing for us is just making sure that we balance [financial flexibility and health], maximizing what we can with regard to what we bring back so we can continue to build and grow.' Because Stevens is primarily focused on Tatum and Brown's rehabs, it doesn't sound like the seasoned stars are being shopped to other teams. Advertisement 'We have to, again, prioritize the health of those two guys,' Stevens reiterated. He made no further comment about White or Payton Pritchard, but the latter's name hasn't appeared in any serious trade gossip. As for White, the Toronto Raptors reportedly proposed a deal for him involving the ninth pick in the draft, per ClutchPoints insider Brett Siegel. That never came to fruition, as the Raptors went on to select forward Collin Murray-Boyles at no. 9 while the C's didn't conduct a single trade during the draft. Rather than shaking up the roster again, Boston held onto its foundational players on Wednesday and picked 19-year-old Spanish forward Hugo González late in the first round. Many question marks still remain for the Celtics this offseason, and more moves could be on the way if they continue to pursue financial freedom. But, for now, Stevens and the rest of the front office seem content to build around a terrific tandem, a fringe All-Star guard, and the reigning Sixth Man of the Year. Advertisement Related: Celtics rumors: The 7-footer who 'makes sense' at No. 32 Related: Jonathan Givony praises Celtics for major draft steal