logo
Unison members accept two-year council pay deal

Unison members accept two-year council pay deal

Independent07-07-2025
Members of the trade union Unison have voted to accept a two-year pay deal.
Cosla offered staff an increase of 4% this year and 3.5% next year, with 83% of Unison members voting in a ballot to accept the offer.
Unison Scotland's local government committee chairwoman Suzanne Gens said: 'This pay deal is a crucial step in turning round cuts to council staff pay.
'It gives local government workers some financial security now they know their pay will be higher than inflation over the next couple of years.
'This has only been achieved because of the determination of council workers to demand better.'
The union's co-lead for local government David O'Connor said there was 'no room for complacency', despite the offer being accepted.
'Local government has suffered over a decade of cuts,' he added.
'This pay deal shows what can be done when people stand together. Our campaign to protect council services continues.'
Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison welcomed the news, urging other unions to also accept the offer.
'I am delighted that Unison members have voted to accept this improved pay offer, which will see valued local government workers receive pay increases of 4% in 2025-26 and 3.5% in 2026-27,' she said.
'Although the Scottish Government has no formal role in local government pay negotiations, we recognise the importance of an agreement being reached by Cosla – as the employer – and trade unions.
'I would urge members of Unite and GMB to join Unison members in recognising the clear benefit of this offer so that all workers can get the pay they deserve without delay.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lenders deserve a pasting over the motor finance misselling scandal, says ALEX BRUMMER
Lenders deserve a pasting over the motor finance misselling scandal, says ALEX BRUMMER

Daily Mail​

time9 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Lenders deserve a pasting over the motor finance misselling scandal, says ALEX BRUMMER

The cloud of mistrust surrounding British finance will not be lifted by the Supreme Court ruling on motor finance. Modern history of the Square Mile is littered with examples of unwitting consumers being gulled into buying products they don't need and being cheated by finance providers. Pensions mis-selling and payment protection insurance come to mind. The Great Financial Crisis of 2008 may be a distant memory, but it was only two months ago that NatWest escaped from government ownership after an eye-popping £45.5billion taxpayer rescue. Indeed, the lingering costs of 2008 and the compensation culture it engendered are among the reasons why the UK's public finances are in the worst condition since the 1950s. Yet despite this, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves felt it was fine to go to the Mansion House and declare it time to place 'the boot on the neck' of the red tape of financial regulation. Quite the contrary. After scandals such as motor finance, the collapse of the Neil Woodford investment empire and the London Capital & Finance mini-bond scam, ever more vigilant enforcement is required if consumer confidence is to be nurtured. Tracing back victims of motor finance scandals to 2007 will be hard, and finding the data difficult. Yet it is unbecoming for Stephen Haddrill, who represents the Finance and Leasing Association, to shout foul and describe the proposal to pay out up to £18billion in compensation as 'completely impractical'. 'Caveat emptor' is fine as a mantra, but we shouldn't underestimate the deviousness of second-hand car merchants acting as agents for finance groups. I recall buying a second-hand VW and being told by the dealer that he didn't want cash because he would miss out on finance commissions. Investors in Lloyds Bank, Close Brothers et al yesterday enjoyed a relief rally at the expense of consumers treated unfairly. They should not escape retribution for unfitting behaviour. Private grief There is a prevalent view, fuelled by fee-hungry investment banks, that fending off private equity offers for FTSE-listed companies is impossible. Yet the bidding war which ended up with Primary Health Properties (PHP) fending off KKR and merging with rival Assura shows there are other choices. The outcome should be a plus for the NHS as it adopts Wes Streeting's desire to switch from big hospital provision of medical services to community-based health. PHP and Assura fended off private equity by fully engaging UK long-investors with 35 per cent of the votes, such as Schroders and Baillie Gifford. If the deal is approved next week, then it could free up to £300million for investment in updating and expanding facilities and building new health hubs. This is a more satisfactory outcome than some other recent private equity bids. Corporate ghouls Advent outbid rival KKR for Spectris, a vital British precision engineering firm which serves two critical industries: pharma and semiconductors. It is disappointing that no white knight offers emerged or that the Spectris board showed such little fight. Similarly, at a time when warehouses and data centres are all the rage, Warehouse REIT threw in its lot with Blackstone, reversing a decision to merge with Tritax Big Box. As customers of private equity-owned vet practices and dental surgeries would testify, unscrupulous owners rarely benefit the end-user. Lost love All hell has broken loose after Donald Trump fired the independent Bureau of Labour Statistics commissioner Erika McEntarfer because he didn't like 'rigged' jobs data which didn't suit his claims. The reality is that there is concern among some economists about the quality of data which showed that 258,000 fewer US jobs were created in May and June. Sound familiar? Here, the head of the Office for National Statistics Ian Diamond stepped down in May and UK Statistics Authority chair Robert Chote resigned in July. The departures came amid loud criticism from the Bank of England, among others, of poor labour force data. Lies, lies and damned statistics...

Shipping giant Clarksons profits fall as Trump tariffs and turmoil in the Middle East hit demand
Shipping giant Clarksons profits fall as Trump tariffs and turmoil in the Middle East hit demand

Daily Mail​

time9 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Shipping giant Clarksons profits fall as Trump tariffs and turmoil in the Middle East hit demand

Shipping giant Clarkson suffered a hit to profits as trade tariffs and turmoil in the Middle East hit demand. Boss Andi Case blamed the 'highly complex global environment' after profit fell to £37.5million in the six months to June from £50.1million the previous year. Donald Trump's tariffs, followed by a chaotic 'shifting' of the levies, meant exporters held off shipping goods. Sales were down to £298million from £310million in 2024. The decline followed a warning in March that rising global tensions were likely to hit performance. It has also been affected by wars in Gaza and the wider Middle East, which caused many clients to pause long-term contracts.

Elon Musk handed £22bn of Tesla shares to stop him quitting the electric car maker
Elon Musk handed £22bn of Tesla shares to stop him quitting the electric car maker

Daily Mail​

time9 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Elon Musk handed £22bn of Tesla shares to stop him quitting the electric car maker

Tesla has handed Elon Musk £22billion worth of shares after the tycoon threatened to quit the electric car maker. The firm said its board agreed to give its billionaire head 96m shares as part of a pay deal, according to a recent filing. Tesla's share price of $309.60 values the package at £22.3billion, but under the plan Musk must pay the company $23.34 a share – about £1.7billion. The firm said it was 'an important first step' in compensating Musk for 'his extraordinary work', adding: 'Retaining Elon is more important than ever before', and crucial in attracting new talent as Tesla shifts its business towards AI and self-driving robo-taxis. Daniel Ives, analyst at Wedbush Research, said the package would be enough to 'keep Musk as chief executive of Tesla at least until 2030,' and that he was the firm's 'most important asset'. Musk, the largest shareholder with a 12.7 per cent stake, threatened to quit if he was not given more shares, saying activist shareholders could 'easily' oust him. He and the company remain embroiled in a legal battle in Delaware over a £42billion pay award granted to Musk in 2018. That was struck down by a judge last year, who ruled it excessive. Tesla said that if the ruling is reversed on appeal, Musk will forgo the £22billion package. Its shares rose 2.2 per cent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store