Why Donald Trump's good-looking cabinet can't stop making him look bad
At a White House lunch with African leaders on Wednesday, Trump engaged in a bizarre exchange with the New York Times White House reporter Shawn McCreesh.
The day before, when CNN's Kaitlan Collins asked the president who authorised the pause on weapons shipments to Ukraine – at a time when Russia is engaged in a barbarous onslaught, indiscriminately killing civilians – Trump replied, defensively: 'I don't know. Why don't you tell me?'
The Pentagon's puer aeternus, Pete Hegseth, was sitting right beside Trump. And reporters soon ferreted out the information that perennial screw-up Hegseth had ordered the pause without telling Trump, Marco Rubio and other top officials.
Trump reversed the Pentagon chief, reflecting a belated awareness of the fact that Vladimir Putin is playing him for a fool. Like a spurned lover, he keened that his Russian boyfriend's promises are 'meaningless.'
In a follow-up the next day, McCreesh asked Trump if he had figured out who had ordered the munitions to Ukraine halted.
When Trump said no, McCreesh pressed him: 'What does it say that such a big decision could be made inside your government without your knowing?'
Trump bristled. A jester like Hegseth had kept the king in the dark on a consequential move.
'If a decision was made, I will know,' Trump blustered. 'I'll be the first to know. In fact, most likely I'd give the order, but I haven't done that yet.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Former US President Barack Obama issues blunt message to Democrats
Former US President Barack Obama issued a call to action for Democrats at a private fundraiser in New Jersey on Friday evening, urging those frustrated by the state of the country under President Donald Trump to 'stand up for the things that you think are right.' 'I think it's going to require a little bit less navel-gazing and a little less whining and being in foetal positions. And it's going to require Democrats to just toughen up,' Obama said at the fundraiser, according to excerpts of his remarks exclusively obtained by CNN. 'You know, don't tell me you're a Democrat, but you're kind of disappointed right now, so you're not doing anything. No, now is exactly the time that you get in there and do something,' he said. 'Don't say that you care deeply about free speech and then you're quiet. No, you stand up for free speech when it's hard. When somebody says something that you don't like, but you still say, 'You know what, that person has the right to speak.' … What's needed now is courage.' Obama's comments come as the Democratic Party searches for its path forward in the second Trump term and beyond. Many in the party's base have called for a more forceful response from Democratic leaders at a time when the party is locked out of power. As Democrats debate who should lead the party, Obama encouraged them to channel their energy into the governor's races in New Jersey and Virginia, saying the off-year elections could be 'a big jumpstart for where we need to go.' 'Stop looking for the quick fix. Stop looking for the messiah. You have great candidates running races right now. Support those candidates,' Obama said, calling out the New Jersey and Virginia elections, according to the excerpts of his remarks. 'Make sure that the DNC has what it needs to compete in what will be a more data-driven, more social media-driven cycle, which will cost some money and expertise and time,' he continued. Obama spoke at a private fundraiser hosted by New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy and his wife, Tammy Murphy, at their home in Red Bank, New Jersey. The intimate dinner drew in US$2.5 million ($3.8m) through in-person and online donations for the Democratic National Committee, a source familiar with the event said. A portion of the haul will be allocated to Democratic efforts in the governor's race in New Jersey. The Democratic nominee, Rep. Mikie Sherrill, and DNC Chair Ken Martin were on hand for the event. Obama described Sherrill and former Rep. Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic nominee for governor in Virginia, as 'powerful spokespersons for a pragmatic, commonsense desire to help people and who both have remarkable track records of service.' 'The most important thing you can do right now is to help the team, our candidate to win,' he said. 'And we've got to start building up our coffers in the DNC.' Obama also argued that Democrats need to focus on how to 'deliver for people,' acknowledging the different views within the party about how best to do that. 'There's been, I gather, some argument between the left of the party and people who are promoting the quote-unquote abundance agenda. Listen, those things are not contradictory. You want to deliver for people and make their lives better? You got to figure out how to do it,' he said. 'I don't care how much you love working people. They can't afford a house because all the rules in your state make it prohibitive to build. And zoning prevents multifamily structures because of NIMBY,' he said, referring to 'not in my backyard' views. 'I don't want to know your ideology, because you can't build anything. It does not matter.' Obama has spoken selectively since Trump's return to power in January. He has criticised the president's tariff policy and warned the White House was infringing on Americans' rights. Last month, Obama warned the country was 'dangerously close' to a more autocratic government. At the closed-press fundraiser on Friday, the former president said he has not been 'surprised by what Trump's done' or that 'there are no more guardrails within the Republican Party.' He repeated his calls for institutions, including law firms and universities, to push back on intimidation efforts by the Trump administration. 'What's being asked of us is make some effort to stand up for the things that you think are right. And be willing to be a little bit uncomfortable in defence of your values. And in defence of the country. And in defence of the world that you want to leave to your children and your grandchildren,' he said. 'And if we all do that, if we do our jobs over the next year and a half, then I think we will rebuild momentum and we will position ourselves to get this country moving in the direction it should.'

The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Why Elon Musk may have reached the end of the road at Tesla
'In real life he would be sacked from Tesla and somebody would actually run the company,' says Ross Gerber, an early investor who has called for Musk to go. 'If he's going to do politics, then he shouldn't be the chief executive. There's a lot of work that needs to be done at Tesla.' Political distractions Most investors have said they want Musk to stay in charge of the company, but they want him to commit to the job full time. Despite his frequent controversies, he is recognised as a uniquely talented executive who has repeatedly defied his doubters. Sales may be in decline, but the company is pressing ahead with the launch of driverless taxi rides in the US, a business that Musk has said is Tesla's future. In May, a group of shareholders wrote to Tesla's board asking that Musk commit to working 40 hours a week at the company. 'The current crisis at Tesla puts into sharp focus the long-term problems at the company stemming from the CEO's absence, which is amplified by a board that appears largely uninterested and unwilling to act,' it said. At the time, Musk acknowledged the concerns, promising to pare back his work at the White House's department of government efficiency and return '24/7″ to his businesses, which also include rocket company SpaceX and social network X. But his spat with Trump and promises to end America's two-party system indicated that he had once again become distracted. Loading On Monday, Tesla's shares fell 8 per cent as Musk's launch of the America Party reignited questions about his commitment to Tesla. James Fishback, a Trump-supporting investment manager, has written to Tesla's board asking it to force Musk to clarify his political ambitions. 'This [running a party] is a full-time job, and the question is whether this full-time job is compatible with his full-time job as Tesla chief executive,' he says. 'When Elon deviates from its core competency and does things that are self-destructive, the share price rightfully responds.' Individual shareholders, however disgruntled, have little influence over Musk. The company's board, which would be formally responsible for firing him if it came to it, contains several Musk allies. In May, Robyn Denholm, the company's chairman, swiftly denied a Wall Street Journal report that the company had started looking for a successor. And the majority of shareholders last year backed a $US56 billion pay package for its chief executive. Who could replace Musk? There would also be the tricky task of replacing Musk, who, as the company's largest shareholder, would continue to be actively involved. Last week X's chief executive Linda Yaccarino resigned after two years in which she had regularly been undermined by Musk's behaviour. The most likely candidate would be an insider such as JB Straubel, the company's former technology chief, or Tesla's chief designer Franz von Holzhausen. Musk would bristle at any attempt to replace him. He has said he wants to run Tesla for another five years, predicting that it will be the most valuable company in the world. When Wall Street analyst Dan Ives last week called on the board to rein him in, Musk tweeted back: 'Shut up, Dan'.

Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Why Elon Musk may have reached the end of the road at Tesla
'In real life he would be sacked from Tesla and somebody would actually run the company,' says Ross Gerber, an early investor who has called for Musk to go. 'If he's going to do politics, then he shouldn't be the chief executive. There's a lot of work that needs to be done at Tesla.' Political distractions Most investors have said they want Musk to stay in charge of the company, but they want him to commit to the job full time. Despite his frequent controversies, he is recognised as a uniquely talented executive who has repeatedly defied his doubters. Sales may be in decline, but the company is pressing ahead with the launch of driverless taxi rides in the US, a business that Musk has said is Tesla's future. In May, a group of shareholders wrote to Tesla's board asking that Musk commit to working 40 hours a week at the company. 'The current crisis at Tesla puts into sharp focus the long-term problems at the company stemming from the CEO's absence, which is amplified by a board that appears largely uninterested and unwilling to act,' it said. At the time, Musk acknowledged the concerns, promising to pare back his work at the White House's department of government efficiency and return '24/7″ to his businesses, which also include rocket company SpaceX and social network X. But his spat with Trump and promises to end America's two-party system indicated that he had once again become distracted. Loading On Monday, Tesla's shares fell 8 per cent as Musk's launch of the America Party reignited questions about his commitment to Tesla. James Fishback, a Trump-supporting investment manager, has written to Tesla's board asking it to force Musk to clarify his political ambitions. 'This [running a party] is a full-time job, and the question is whether this full-time job is compatible with his full-time job as Tesla chief executive,' he says. 'When Elon deviates from its core competency and does things that are self-destructive, the share price rightfully responds.' Individual shareholders, however disgruntled, have little influence over Musk. The company's board, which would be formally responsible for firing him if it came to it, contains several Musk allies. In May, Robyn Denholm, the company's chairman, swiftly denied a Wall Street Journal report that the company had started looking for a successor. And the majority of shareholders last year backed a $US56 billion pay package for its chief executive. Who could replace Musk? There would also be the tricky task of replacing Musk, who, as the company's largest shareholder, would continue to be actively involved. Last week X's chief executive Linda Yaccarino resigned after two years in which she had regularly been undermined by Musk's behaviour. The most likely candidate would be an insider such as JB Straubel, the company's former technology chief, or Tesla's chief designer Franz von Holzhausen. Musk would bristle at any attempt to replace him. He has said he wants to run Tesla for another five years, predicting that it will be the most valuable company in the world. When Wall Street analyst Dan Ives last week called on the board to rein him in, Musk tweeted back: 'Shut up, Dan'.