Whose responsibility is eastern Oregon flooding?
Possibly no place in Oregon has a more rugged, individualistic, even anti-governmental attitude than Burns, a small city in the middle of the state's southeast desert country.
This is an area of old-style ranchers and resource industries, or at least has been. It votes as conservative and Republican as it can, and political people who argue for smaller government and less by way of cooperative efforts are those who get the votes. It's a cowboy ethic kind of place.
The recent big event in Burns might not demolish that world view. But there's a fair chance it could generate some second thoughts.
An absence of government action, regulation and ownership and of a strong mutual cooperative effort among people locally -— in contrast to what one person called 'kind of a group-hug scenario' — is why, in late March and early April, a lot of Burns was overrun by a flood.
Such a disaster might have been notable in other places, but it overwhelmed Burns. According to the American Red Cross, the flooding abated only after several weeks, affected 952 homes (some of those may have been on Burns Paiute Tribe lands), and the flood area ran through most of the downtown area. Burns is home to just 2,736 people as of 2023, and there are just 1,438 total homes.
The city reported 'a complete sewer failure' from the Paiute Reservation to the Triangle Park, and other infrastructure was hit too. Evacuation orders affected almost half of the people in town.
This was not damage to only a small part of the community but, directly or indirectly, to all of it. And it happened in a place more than an hour's drive from any other city as large, and two hours away from any that are larger. Help is not close by.
Beginning the task of making sure this doesn't happen again starts with understanding why this flood hit so hard.
Its natural causes are clear and not unusual. Although the Burns area is arid, heavy rains occur periodically, and the right timing for snowpack melt in the region can cause the Silvies River, which flows from the mountains to the north, to run high.
The river borders a residential area on the northeast side of town, and high flows there are intended to be contained by an old and informally developed system of levies.
Actually, there is no system in a comprehensive sense. The 2.4 miles of levees — barriers against the water, to keep it channeled — stretching across the north and east side of town apparently were built not by a government or formal organization but by local residents, and the approach was not thoroughly organized. Even the history is foggy: There are no clear records of when the levees were built, or exactly by whom.
A 2019 report submitted to Harney County officials warned that the levees needed upgrading and repair, but that didn't happen. One reason is that no one specific person or group had the specific obligation to respond: No federal, state or local agency or private entity, and none had the specific authority to enter the private property along the river to make improvements. Everyone could pass it off to someone else.
The do-it-yourself approach remains in place today. During the flooding, a public notice from the city asked residents to stop diverting water onto other properties.
'Do not erect barriers in the streets to divert the water,' the city's notice said. 'This can be a hazard as these are evacuation routes and you could be charged with disorderly conduct in the 2nd degree in addition to being liable for any damages to the neighboring property or properties by that diversion. We understand that these are very scary and unsure times and people are wanting to save their homes and property, but please do not put yourself or other people in danger or damage someone else's property by trying to do so.'
This isn't unique to Burns.
Colin Rowan, planning director for the Urban Flood Safety and Water Quality District in Portland, told Oregon Public Broadcasting that the kind of levee system Burns has had can be found in many places all across Oregon including the Willamette Valley, many built a century or more ago.
'There's not clear responsibility,' Rowan told OPB. 'There's also sometimes unclear funding. How would you actually pay for it? Even if it was privately-owned land or publicly-owned land, they might not even know that repairs are needed.'
Sometimes organized and expert help is what's needed. Even in communities like Harney County.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
Baltimore residents urged to hydrate, stay cool amid weekend heat wave in Maryland
The heat index in the Baltimore area is expected to reach up to 109 degrees on Friday during a dangerous weekend heat wave. Baltimore is under a Code Red Heat Alert Friday, July 25, through Tuesday, July 29. The city has opened its cooling centers to the public. You can call 311 or visit the city website to find a cooling center near you. The extreme temperatures prompted the city Department of Public Works (DPW) to activate its Heat Illness Prevention Plan to keep crews safe. DPW said trash and recycling collections ended early on Friday due to the dangerous heat. All DPW Recycling Centers closed at 5 p.m. to protect crews. The American Red Cross is urging Marylanders to protect themselves from extreme temperatures. "Extreme heat kills more people in the United States than any other natural disaster," said Scott Marder, a spokesperson with the American Red Cross Central Maryland Chapter. The Red Cross encourages people to: Most importantly, pay close attention to signs of heat exhaustion, like vomiting, nausea and weakness, Marder advised. Also, know the signs of heat stroke, like dizziness, confusion and high body temperature, Marder said. The extreme heat did not stop people from visiting Baltimore's Inner Harbor on Friday. "It feels awesome," said Chris Layton, who traveled from Arkansas to Baltimore with his family. "It feels like home." "Really hot, like sweating," said Astrid Villegas, another visitor. Whether it's a walk, bike ride or boat ride, several people took advantage of the sunny day. "Do a little fishing," said Baltimore resident Cedric Booze. "I want to come out here, maybe grab some catfish…salmon." "The Fantastic Four just came out and I don't want any spoilers," Villegas said. "I'm on my way to that." Visitors are mindful of the dangerous impact and are all taking the same action. "We just drink lots of water," Layton said.


Miami Herald
16-07-2025
- Miami Herald
Florida AG ties ‘weather modification' to Texas floods. There is no link, experts say
Climate scientists and weather experts are clear: the deadly floods in Texas earlier this month were an entirely natural tragedy, with off-the-charts rainfall levels coming from lingering moisture from a nearby tropical storm feeding off a steamy Gulf of America. That has not stopped unfounded conspiracy theories from spreading, mainly in extremist social media circles. Days after flash floods swept away roads, homes and a Christian girls' summer camp, claiming more than 100 lives, posts flourished attempting to link a common practice called 'cloud seeding' in a nearby county with the devastating floods. Florida's Attorney General James Uthmeier jumped in to amplify the misinformation — citing a newly passed Florida law banning loosely defined 'weather modification' practices that climatologists say have nothing to do with increasingly severe weather events. When Uthmeier posted his letter to all public airports in Florida on X this week, many who responded also aired widely debunked concerns that aircraft contrails — those streaks of condensation left behind jets —are actually 'chemtrails' that are part of some sort of nebulous but nefarious government plot. While no Florida official explicitly linked this law to these theories, it hasn't stopped proponents from championing the new law as a solution to the perceived problem. In his letter, Uthmeier warned airports that they must comply with a new state law designed to halt weather modification activity in the state. The bill, introduced by Miami Republican state senator Ileana Garcia, makes releasing substances designed to change temperature, cloud cover or sunlight levels into the atmosphere punishable with a third-degree felony and fines as high as $100,000. Uthmeier, whose spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment, called the new law 'another landmark victory for Florida's health, freedom, and environmental protection.' In the letter, Uthmeier doesn't use the phrase 'chemtrails' but seemed to give a nod to the common concerns held by conspiracy theorists, mentioning spraying chemicals into the air that end up 'polluting our water, contaminating agriculture, and destroying human health.' The majority of Garcia's public comments on the bill have focused on cloud seeding and weather modification, but she said she wanted her legislation to help separate 'fact from fiction' when it comes to this enduring but fringe conspiracy theory. 'Many of us senators receive concerns and complaints on a regular basis regarding these condensation trails, a.k.a. chemtrails to many. There's a lot of skepticism in regards to this, and basically, what I wanted to do with this is try to look for a way to separate fact from fiction,' she said in a hearing for the bill. She also thanked supporters for the 'remarkable response' to her bill in a post on X featuring several pictures of contrails, an email from a constituent complaining that the 'sky was peppered with trails this morning,' alongside a screenshot of a social media post claiming that Garcia's bill would 'ban chemtrails.' She's not the first elected Republican to raise similar concerns, even though the Trump administration has flatly dismissed them. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last week released a 'fact check' shooting down the 'chemtrails' claims and explaining that those white plumes behind planes are simply condensation that occurs when hot, humid air from a plane's engine mixes with colder air in the atmosphere. 'Contrails are a normal effect of jet aircraft operations and have been since its earliest days of air travel. If you are seeing a lot of contrails in your area it is because there are a lot of jet aircraft flying overhead,' the EPA wrote. 'The federal government is not aware of there ever being a contrail intentionally formed over the United States for the purpose of geoengineering or weather modification.' A state ban on 'weather modification' Florida's new 'weather modification' law is vague. It does not clearly differentiate between decades-old, somewhat successful practices like 'cloud seeding' — spraying common chemicals like silver iodide to coax more rain or snow from clouds — from theoretical 'geoengineering' concepts scientists have brainstormed to potentially slow some impacts of climate change. Those ideas, many untested and far from reality, have also often been lumped into broader weather-control conspiracies. In a statement celebrating his signature on the bill, Gov. Ron DeSantis specifically mentioned weather modification and geoengineering but does not mention chemtrails. His statement also explained that a public portal for reporting suspected geoengineering or weather modification activity would be opened over the summer. For now, geoengineering is an open scientific question. Experts aren't sure whether or not it will be necessary in the future, or if it could harm the world more than it helps, said James Hurrell, a professor of environmental science and engineering at Colorado State University and an expert on geoengineering. Most importantly, Hurrell said, geoengineering is purely a scientific debate right now. 'There are no geoengineering activities happening in the US. The government is not doing this,' he said. 'No one in the science community is advocating for it at this time. We're simply using models to ask the 'what if questions.' We're trying to understand if this is a scientifically plausible idea or not.' Meanwhile, Florida's bill does nothing to address what climatologists consider the most pressing cause of climate change, which experts say will fuel more weather disasters — the burning of fossil fuels like oil and coal. While large-scale geoengineering remains far off, some emerging start-up efforts have been singled out by Republican political leaders. On X, Garcia specifically mentioned a two-man for-profit company called 'Make Sunsets' that has been launching balloons filled with sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere in California and Nevada and selling 'cooling credits' for the sunlight they reflect. The EPA has also targeted this company with regulatory action and social media posts and name-checked them in their recently released fact check on geoengineering. Under Florida's new bill, that activity would not be allowed here. There is no evidence that the company has plans to expand to Florida. Like other recent Florida bills banning offshore wind farms and the sale of lab-grown meat, the bill appears to have been a preemptive strike ahead of any actual activity. Florida's bill would ban another activity that does not appear to take place currently in the state — cloud seeding. For decades, governments have allowed companies to spritz clouds with chemicals like silver iodide to encourage extra snow or rain onto arid fields below, usually at the request of farmers and ranchers. It's common practice in the arid West, including in Texas. That's what triggered the latest social media speculation. Two days before the Texas flash floods, a company called Rainmaker conducted cloud-seeding activities about 100 miles away from Kerr County, where the flooding occurred. The spraying encouraged about half a centimeter of rainfall directly below it, CEO Augustus Doricko told the Washington Post. A few days later, theories began to spread that Rainmaker's activity sparked the floods. Even before Uthmeier waded in, they were echoed by other current and former Republican politicians on X, which Doricko refuted. 'Rainmaker did not operate in the affected area on the 3rd or 4th or contribute to the floods that occurred over the region,' Doricko posted on X. 'Rainmaker will always be fully transparent.' Several news outlets, including the Associated Press, CBS News and Snopes, directly debunked the claim via several expert meteorologists. All said that the extra moisture in the air that led to so much rain came from a nearby tropical storm, Barry, and was not the result of any 'cloud seeding' technology. 'That was something that is orders of magnitude more than anything cloud seeding can do,' Hurrell said. A week later, Uthemeier released his letter to Florida airports. 'I can't help but notice the possibility that weather modification could have played a role in this tragedy,' he wrote, citing a Yahoo News article that actually debunked that theory and featured an expert calling it 'scientifically unfounded.'


The Hill
15-07-2025
- The Hill
Florida AG orders airports to report ‘weather modification' activities
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier (R) has ordered all airports in the state to report any geoengineering and ' weather modification ' activities or face penalties. Uthmeier urged all public-use airports in Florida in a Monday letter to adhere to Senate Bill 56, which was signed into law by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) last month. Violators of the law face third-degree felony charges and a fine as high $100,000. 'Injecting our atmosphere with novel chemical compounds to block the sun is a dangerous path, especially in Florida, where sunshine is our most valuable resource,' Uthmeier said in the letter, the copy of which he shared on the social media platform X. 'Furthermore, as our hearts break for the victims of the flash floods in Texas, I can't help but notice the possibility that weather modification could have played a role in this tragedy.' The law went into effect at the beginning of this month. The legislation bars the intentional release of substances, compounds and chemicals into the atmosphere in hopes of changing the weather, climate and temperature. From Oct. 1 onwards, all operators are required to submit monthly reports to the Florida Department of Transportation disclosing the physical presence of any aircraft on public property, including public-use airports, that have equipment that could be used for either 'weather modification' or geoengineering. Airports could lose state funding if they do not comply, Uthmeier warned in the letter. 'Because airports are most likely to catch those who seek to weaponize science in order to push their agenda, your compliance with these reporting obligations is essential to keeping our state safe from these harmful chemicals and experiments,' the Florida attorney general said. Some states have performed cloud seeding. It is the process of adding small particles, normally silver iodide crystals, to clouds in order to prompt snow or rain, according to the Government Accountability Office. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said earlier this month that she plans to put forward a bill to tackle 'weather modification.' 'I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity. It will be a felony offense,' the Georgia Republican said.