Registrar row throws Kerala University into administrative chaos
A day after the Syndicate reinstated Registrar K.S. Anil Kumar, interim Vice-Chancellor Ciza Thomas on Monday appointed Director (Planning and Development) Mini Dejo Kappen as Registrar through a separate order, as she remained firm on her stance that the Syndicate's decision was legally invalid. Dr. Kappen, who accepted the appointment, has been operating from a different room on campus.
Joint Registrar replaced
The crisis escalated further after the Vice-Chancellor replaced P. Harikumar as the Joint Registrar (Administration). Hema Anandan, Joint Registrar (Academic), has been appointed to the position following Mr. Harikumar's participation in the Syndicate meeting after being adjourned by Prof. Thomas. He also apparently failed to respond to an explanation sought by the Vice-Chancellor and went on leave.
Governor seeks report
The deadlock could further intensify with the intervention of Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar, who also serves as the Chancellor in the university, in the issue. Raj Bhavan sought a detailed report from the Vice-Chancellor regarding the chaotic developments and the Syndicate's decisions on Sunday. In her response, Prof. Thomas reportedly stated that the Syndicate's decision to revoke the suspension was illegal and lacked procedural validity.
Higher Education Minister R. Bindu alleged that Vice-Chancellors, who have been appointed on temporary basis, have been overstepping their administrative boundaries without fully understanding the regulations governing their roles. Rather than fuelling controversies, the interim Vice-Chancellors must help the academic community move forward by acting with restraint and responsibility.
General Education Minister V. Sivankutty blamed the Governor for the university's troubles, accusing him of interfering in administrative matters and misinterpreting the university Act.
Activists of the Students Federation of India and Left-aligned service organisations held protests on the university campus against the 'autocratic behaviour' of Vice-Chancellor in-charge Mohanan Kunnummal, who is expected to return within a few days after a brief visit to Russia.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
RTS panel can now take suo motu cognizance of delay in service
With the Haryana government amending Haryana Right to Service Act, 2014, the Right to Service Commission will now be able to take suo motu cognizance in case the designated officer or grievance redressal authority does not decide on the application or appeal within the stipulated time period. According to a notification chief secretary Anurag Rastogi has issued, a new provision has been added replacing Rule 9 of the Haryana Right to Service Rules, 2014. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) A government spokesperson said that if undue delay is found in the disposal of the application or appeal, the Commission will be able to pass appropriate orders. According to a notification chief secretary Anurag Rastogi has issued, a new provision has been added replacing Rule 9 of the Haryana Right to Service Rules, 2014. These rules will be called 'Haryana Right to Service (Amendment) Rules, 2025'. 'If before the application for availing any notified service, the matter concerned is pending before any court or the revisional authority of the concerned department, then the Commission shall not exercise its powers under section 17 of the Act against the designated officer or the first or second grievance redressal authority until a final decision is given by the court or the revisional authority,' the spokesperson said.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Two amendment bills passed to tighten slum revamp Act, bring drug peddling under MCOCA
The Maharashtra state Legislative Assembly on Wednesday passed two key amendment bills — one aimed at tightening enforcement in slum redevelopment and rehabilitation projects the other expanded the scope of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) by bringing the drug peddling under the purview of organised crime. Both bills will now be sent to the Legislative Council (Upper House) for approval. The bill amends the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, granting the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) stronger powers to recover pending transit rent from defaulting developers or builders by attaching their personal properties. Under the revised provisions, if a builder fails to pay dues, the SRA can now treat the unpaid rent as arrears of land revenue and recover it by attaching personal properties of directors or partners, not just company assets. The amendment also reduces the consent window for dissenting slum dwellers from 120 to 60 days once a majority supports a redevelopment plan. Those who fail to join within this period risk losing their eligibility for on-site rehabilitation. Additionally, land under slum redevelopment can now be handed over to government agencies within 30 days of issuing a letter of intent, expediting project execution. The second bill involves a proposed amendment to the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). It aims to bring drug peddling under the purview of 'organised crime' by expanding the definition to include activities involving narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. The bill was introduced by Minister of State for Home (MoS) Yogesh Kadam who said that narcotics substances like hydroponic weed and synthetic drugs were being peddled through networks and stringent laws were needed to crack the peddlers network. Kadam informed the House that in the five years, over 10,000 people were booked for possessing commercial quantities and drugs worth Rs 11,000 crore were seized. Kadam said out of this, drugs worth Rs 10,000 crore were synthetic drugs. Both bills are expected to be tabled in the Upper House later this week for further discussion and clearance.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
M A Baby writes: CAA, NRC and now SIR: Government is following a path that leads to disenfranchisement, exclusion
The Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), the National Register of Citizens (NRC), and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar seek to disenfranchise citizens, and change the nature of citizenship in India. Collectively, they carry echoes of the most disturbing episodes of 20th-century history and augur a dangerous, exclusionary path that independent India has consciously avoided thus far. Two main perspectives exist regarding citizenship: Citizenship by birth (jus soli) and citizenship based on race and culture (jus sanguinis). Of these, the Indian Constitution upheld the modern perspective of citizenship by birth, after the discussions on citizenship that took place in the Constituent Assembly in August 1949. Even in those discussions, arguments were raised in favour of making religion the basis for citizenship. However, the Constituent Assembly rejected this argument and adopted the position that the granting citizenship based on religious identities does not befit a modern democratic society. Thus, Articles 5 to 11, which deal with the question of citizenship, were formulated, and Article 5(a) unequivocally stated that anyone born in the territory of India would be an Indian citizen. With the CAA, religion is a factor in deciding Indian citizenship. The Sangh Parivar claims that the CAA will not affect existing citizens. However, the Union Home Minister stated both inside and outside Parliament, 'chronology samjhiye' — that is, to understand the chronology. What is that chronology? First the CAA, then the NRC; that's the order. Those who are unable to produce proper documents will have to undergo verification based on the CAA criteria in order to be included in the NRC. How can one then say that the CAA will not affect existing citizens? During the preparation of the NRC, the citizenship of those who are unable to provide precise details, including the birthplace of their parents, will fall under the shadow of doubt. We saw a clear picture of this when the NRC was implemented in Assam. Around 19 lakh people were excluded. Two-thirds of those excluded were women. Although the Sangh Parivar's primary targets are religious minorities, even others — especially Adivasis, the poor and uneducated, transgender people — may not possess the requisite documents. Their citizenship, too, will come under question. It is estimated that about 42 per cent of people in India do not have birth certificates. Crores of our brothers and sisters could cease to be Indian citizens for want of necessary documents. They will either be locked up in detention centres or become a populace devoid of civil rights. This is the dark reality that is staring us in the face. The recent moves by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the guise of the SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar suggest that a backdoor effort is underway to prepare the NRC. The SIR process has raised concerns about the disenfranchisement of marginalised groups, especially minorities. This has to be seen as part of a broader pattern of using bureaucratic processes to exclude certain sections from political participation. Against the backdrop of these developments, we need to recall that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) drew inspiration from Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy during its formative years in the 1920s and 1930s. Balkrishna Shivram Moonje's — president of the Hindu Mahasabha and mentor of RSS founder K B Hedgewar — visit to Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini in 1931 was a pivotal moment in the cross-pollination of ideas between Italy and Hindu nationalist circles in India. In his diary, Moonje praised Mussolini's vision for the 'military regeneration of Italy' and explicitly stated that 'India and particularly Hindu India need some such institution for the military regeneration of the Hindus'. Inspired by what he saw, Moonje established the Central Hindu Military Education Society in 1935 and the Bhonsala Military School in Nashik in 1937, aiming to militarise 'Hindu India'. The RSS later adopted aspects of this model, with notable similarities in recruitment and organisational structure to the Opera Nazionale Balilla — the Italian fascist youth organisation. Moonje's efforts and admiration for Mussolini's methods have left a lasting impact on the organisational development of the RSS. Early RSS leaders, including their second chief, M S Golwalkar, and ideologue Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, openly admired aspects of Adolf Hitler and Mussolini's regimes. They were especially influenced by the concept of 'cultural nationalism' and the fascist model of organising society around a dominant ethnic or religious identity. Golwalkar's book We or Our Nationhood Defined (1939) explicitly referenced admiration for Hitler's policies, arguing that India should be defined as a Hindu nation and that minorities should be treated similarly to how Nazis treated Jews. This book played a key role in shaping the RSS's ideology and tied the organisation to fascist thought. In his Bunch of Thoughts, Golwalkar described Muslims, Christians and communists as India's 'internal threats'. Those who lament that progressive values of secularism and socialism are foreign concepts are in fact using regressive foreign ideas and methods to carry forward their divisive communal agenda. Soon after enacting the discriminatory Nuremberg Laws in 1935, Nazi Germany completely abolished all democratic rights and stopped conducting elections. Taken together, the CAA, NRC and SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar that are being implemented and deemed appropriate for present-day India are a disturbing portent. The writer is general secretary of the CPI(M)
