Ukraine's Patriot demand is showing the US Army that it needs to be stockpiling interceptor missiles
The US Army is closely watching the engagements and using them to inform its planning.
Two Army officers told BI it underscores the need for sufficient interceptor stockpiles.
Ukraine's high demand for US-made Patriot air defense systems and interceptors to defend against Russian attacks is showing the US Army that it needs to stockpile missiles for future fights, two officers told Business Insider.
The MIM-104 Patriot is Ukraine's best surface-to-air missile system and a critical shield since it arrived in the country over two years ago. Kyiv is believed to be operating six batteries, which are a critical element in its defense against Russia's massive attacks on Ukrainian cities, especially those involving ballistic missiles.
However, this high-tempo operating environment has strained Patriot interceptor stockpiles. Ukraine has long been hamstrung by a shortage of missiles, with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy repeatedly calling on the US and NATO allies to send more. The country has been unable to get enough of these weapons.
Patriot interceptors come in multiple variants, and Ukraine is known to have received several different types of missiles since it started operating the system in 2023. This diversity of ammunition is helping inform US war planning.
Lt. Col. James Compton, the deputy operations officer for the 10th Army Air and Missile Defense Command, said that the Ukraine conflict "has highlighted that you should not stockpile one or two types of interceptors. It is obviously important to have a large number, but there are several variants of the Patriot missile," each bringing its own capability against a threat.
"There is not a 'one size fits all' solution," he added, explaining that "you do not want to use the same missile against a drone that you would against a ballistic missile, and this conflict reinforces the need to plan how units are postured accordingly."
Ensuring sufficient stockpiles of each of the interceptors requires a strong defense industry and global supply chain.
Chief Warrant Officer Sanjeev "Jay" Siva, a technician with the 10th Army Air and Missile Defense Command, said recent conflicts, especially the Ukraine war, have demonstrated an "urgent need for increased global production and distribution of Patriot interceptor missiles," specifically the Patriot Advanced Capability-2, PAC-3, and MSE variants.
Reinforcing that point are conflicts in the Middle East, where the Army has used Patriot batteries to help fend off multiple Iranian ballistic missile attacks since April 2024; the most recent engagement was last month. In Ukraine, at least two interceptors are thought to be needed to destroy an incoming ballistic missile, so a medium-sized barrage can quickly eat away at stockpiles.
As the US military looks across the Pacific at China's growing military power and substantial arsenal of ballistic missiles, land- and ship-based air defense is top of mind. Analysts and officials have voiced concern that American forces are using up interceptors without clear plans for replacing them.
Having a large number of Patriot interceptors would be critical for the US in a large-scale conflict with a peer adversary, like China or Russia. The head of Indo-Pacific Command, Adm. Samuel Paparo, has said that shipments of Patriots and interceptors to the Ukrainians have been "eating into stocks." He said that "to say otherwise would be dishonest."
Last year, the Army awarded Lockheed Martin, one of the Patriot manufacturers, a contract to boost the annual production of PAC-3 MSE missiles to 650, up from 350 just a few years ago. The company said in March that it expects to reach this milestone by 2027.
Siva stressed that the Patriot "represents a critical final tier of defense against increasingly complex threats," like one-way attack drones and cruise missiles, and the weapons remain "the sole effective" protection against tactical ballistic missiles. He said that "addressing this capability gap is paramount to maintaining regional and global security."
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia calls Trump's demand for Ukraine ceasefire in 50 days unacceptable
Russia has rejected President Trump's "ultimatum" for Moscow to sign a ceasefire deal to end the war in Ukraine within 50 days on Tuesday as "unacceptable," calling for continued negotiations and insisting that the invasion ordered by President Vladimir Putin would continue until its goals are achieved. In response to President Trump's threat to impose 100% secondary tariffs on countries that do business with Russia if Putin's government does not agree to a deal to end the war in that timeframe, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said Tuesday that "any attempts to make demands, especially ultimatums, are unacceptable to us," according to Russia's state-run TASS news agency. "We need to focus on political and diplomatic work. The President of the Russian Federation has repeatedly said that we are ready to negotiate and the diplomatic path is preferable for us," Ryabkov was quoted as saying. "If we cannot achieve our goals through diplomacy, then the SVO (war in Ukraine) will continue… This is an unshakable position. We would like Washington and NATO as a whole to take it with the utmost seriousness." Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov separately called Mr. Trump's announcement "quite serious." "Some of it is addressed personally to (Russian) President Putin. We definitely need time to analyze what was said in Washington," Peskov said during his daily briefing on Tuesday. "If and when President Putin deems it necessary, he will definitely comment on it. I would not want to get ahead of ourselves, so let's wait for Putin's decision on whether he will comment on it himself." Russia's former President Dmitry Medvedev, who is close to the Kremlin, called Mr. Trump's remarks "a theatrical ultimatum" in a post on social media, adding that "Russia didn't care." Speaking Monday in the Oval Office alongside visiting NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Mr. Trump said: "We are very unhappy, I am, with Russia." He also announced a deal for the U.S. to sell additional weapons to its NATO allies, with the understanding that they will then send the weapons to Ukraine. "We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it, and they're going to be paying for it," Mr. Trump said. "This is really big," Rutte said. "And the decision is that you want Ukraine [to have] what it needs to have to maintain, to be able to defend itself against Russia, but you want Europeans to pay for it, which is totally logical." Mr. Trump again expressed his frustration with Putin, whom he recently called "absolutely crazy" for ordering strikes on civilian areas in Ukraine. On Monday, Mr. Trump suggested the Russian autocrat had a habit of saying one thing and then doing another. "I always hang up, say, 'Well, that was a nice phone call.' And then missiles are launched into Kyiv or some other city and I say, 'That's strange.'" Mr. Trump said. "After that happens three or four times, you say, the talk doesn't mean anything." When asked in an interview with CBS News partner BBC News if he was done trying to deal with the Russian leader, Mr. Trump said: "I'm disappointed in him, but I'm not done with him. But I'm disappointed in him." In a social media post on Monday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he had spoken with Mr. Trump and thanked his American counterpart, "for the willingness to support Ukraine and to continue working together to stop the killings and establish a lasting and just peace." "It's important that we have such a good relationship, and that the Alliance countries are working to increase defense spending," Zelenskyy said, adding that he and Mr. Trump had made plans to speak again. "We agreed to catch up more often by phone and coordinate our steps in the future as well," he said. "Thank you, Mr. President! Thank you, America!" Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The attack, involving tens of thousands of uniformed soldiers and barrages of missiles, came after Russia unilaterally annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula after backing separatist forces in the region. While Russia has maintained control over Crimea and installed its own administration there — along with a huge swathe of eastern Ukraine seized over the last three years — its dominion over those regions is not recognized by the U.S., the United Nations, or the majority of the international community. One of Putin's key demands for a ceasefire in the ongoing war is that Ukraine, and its international backers, should recognize Russian ownership of at least some of that occupied territory. Sen. Lindsey Graham says "a turning point regarding Russia's invasion of Ukraine is coming" Trump pushes senators to make $9.4 trillion in spending cuts Exclusive discounts from CBS Mornings Deals
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tim Davie says he can ‘lead' the BBC in ‘right way' in wake of scandals
BBC director-general Tim Davie has said he can 'lead' the corporation in the 'right way' following a series of reputational scandals faced by the organisation. The BBC has been criticised for a number of failings in recent months which include breaching its own accuracy editorial guidelines, livestreaming the controversial Bob Vylan Glastonbury set, and recent misconduct allegations surrounding the former MasterChef presenter Gregg Wallace. The corporation's annual report showed that Mr Davie, who has been in the role since 2020, has had a 3.8% pay rise with his salary going up £20,000 from £527,000 last year to £547,000. Mr Davie was asked during the release of the corporation's 2024/2025 annual report on Tuesday whether he would resign. He said: 'I simply think I'm in a place where I can work to improve dramatically the BBC and lead it in the right way. 'We will make mistakes, but I think as a leadership and myself, I've been very clear, and I think we have been decisive. 'There's enormous, massive noise and different opinions about what we should do, but I think we have been clear. We are making the right decisions. We're being transparent on what we do, and I think that's what counts. I would also say that under my tenure, I've set a very clear stall out in terms of impartiality. 'I think we're setting a global standard in terms of public service broadcasting and media. 'Under my leadership, and the team I've assembled, I think we feel very passionately about that. 'One of the things that I focus on, as a leader, is there has never been a more important time for public service broadcasting. 'Gaza has been the most challenging editorial issue I've had to deal with, but the importance of fair, balanced reporting, the need for high quality, homegrown programming in the face of massive pressure, I think, has never, ever been greater. 'I believe my leadership and the team I've assembled can really help the leadership thrive in that environment.' This comes after a review conducted by Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews – which is independent of BBC News, and published on Monday, found its documentary, Gaza: Surviving a Warzone, breached BBC editorial guidelines on accuracy for failing to disclose details of the narrator's father. The report did not find any other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality and also found no evidence that 'outside interests' 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'. Since the report was published, broadcasting regulator Ofcom announced it would investigate the documentary under its own broadcasting code, which states that factual programmes 'must not materially mislead the audience'. Dr Samir Shah, BBC chair, added: 'I want to be absolutely clear that I and the board support Tim Davie's leadership fully. 'He has shown very confident and decisive leadership in a very, very challenging environment, right from the start 'The number of issues of vision from people behaving badly to News in some cases, when it's appropriate, decisively and shouldn't do it all, in other cases, 'We are the BBC, and we will do this properly. We do it fairly, we do it correctly, and we will then take action. That's where we are at the moment. 'Tim Davie and his team, and Tim in particular, has shown very strong leadership throughout all this period, and he has my full support.' Dr Shah also said in the annual report: 'The BBC is a wonderful place to work. Our staff are dedicated, hard-working and treat each other with respect. However, there are pockets in the organisation where this is not the case. 'There are still places where powerful individuals – on and off-screen – can abuse that power to make life for their colleagues unbearable.'
The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bolton on Russian sanctions threat: Trump laying the groundwork to say ‘I'm done with it'
Former national security adviser John Bolton said Monday that President Trump could soon retreat from efforts to resolve Russia's war with Ukraine. The Trump administration has been engaged with both Kyiv and Moscow in search of peace, while GOP lawmakers have pushed for secondary sanctions against Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'He didn't get what he wanted, which was a quick ceasefire from his friend Vladimir. He tried for six months, it's not going anywhere,' Bolton said of Trump during a Monday appearance on NewsNation's 'On Balance.' 'So now he's justifying taking steps against Putin, but I think it also lays the groundwork for him to say, 'I'm done with it, it's Europe's war, that's what I said in the beginning, I'm done with it,'' he added. On Monday, the president threatened to impose tariffs on the Kremlin if Russia continues to reject ceasefire proposals. 'We're very, very unhappy with [Russia], and we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in about 50 days,' Trump said during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office. Bolton said the increased pressure comes after Putin has outwitted Trump for months by prolonging the peace process. 'I think he believed Putin was his friend — I think he still believes Putin was his friend. But you know, you can have arguments with your friends, they don't last forever,' Bolton told anchor Leland Vittert. 'I think what was really going on today was that he was saying, 'this is not my war, this is Biden's war', and in 50 days, he may put secondary sanctions on Russia or he may not. I think he's trying to walk away from this,' he added. Last week, NATO leaders struck a deal with the Trump administration outlining the organization's purchase of U.S. weapons to be sent to Ukraine in an effort to support the defense of their sovereign borders. Trump said Monday the systems would include Patriot missile defense batteries to increase Ukraine's air surveillance, providing more warning of incoming strikes from Russia. 'Look, a number of American commanders in Europe, former commanders in the European combatant command, have said they think Ukraine could win the war. And I think what the U.S. could do uniquely to help the Ukrainians out is give them a strategy to do that, and then give them the weapons systems that they need,' Bolton told NewsNation. 'And I understand it's three years into this thing, but the fact is Putin thinks he's on a roll now, he thinks he's doing well in Ukraine militarily. I don't understand how he believes that, but that's what he believes. And a real defeat on the battlefield would have implications not just for what Russia's done in Ukraine, but for Russia's threat to all the former parts of the Soviet Union and to China watching America stand up to this aggression.'
