
Asylum sites to be expanded as ministers bid to end hotel use
A Home Office spokesperson said the government was "making strong strides to deliver a more sustainable and cost-effective asylum accommodation system"."This includes ending the use of hotels, testing new locally-led models, and working closely with local authorities and other departments to ensure a fairer, more efficient approach," they added."Our use of any property or Home Office-owned site will be used in line with the permissions set by planning permissions."The taxpayer cost of asylum hotels has rocketed in recent years, with total accommodation contracts now set to be worth £15.3bn over a 10-year period.But while extending large sites might be cheaper, the move is likely to anger local residents and refugee rights groups.In April last year, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the Wethersfield site couldn't be "seen as either a sustainable solution for housing asylum seekers nor value for money for the taxpayer".Conservative MP Sir James Cleverly, whose Braintree constituency includes Wethersfield, said the existing cap on the number of people living at the facility "was there to protect the safety and security" of constituents, and "those working at and living on the site".Sir James, who became home secretary shortly after the first asylum seekers moved into Wethersfield, said the government plan to potentially expand the site was "disgraceful and shows just how out of touch they are with the concerns of local communities".In March, the High Court found the previous Conservative government's use of Wethersfield to house asylum seekers was unlawful, after three men argued they were living in "prison-like" conditions.The former RAF base has been housing asylum seekers since 2023. It has a current capacity of 800, but is thought to house closer to 500 people at present.The Home Office contract for the base is held by Clearsprings, whose founder Graham King recently became a billionaire, according to the Sunday Times rich list.The Helen Bamber Foundation, a human rights groups, has previously said that accommodating people at the base causes harm to their physical and mental health.Kamena Dorling, the group's director of policy, told the BBC that Wethersfield "should be closed immediately, not extended".She said: "Housing people, including survivors of torture and trafficking, in an isolated, overcrowded camp reminiscent of an open-air prison, with inadequate healthcare and legal services, is an inhumane way to treat those seeking protection."
Savings target
A pair of former student accommodation blocks in Huddersfield, acquired by the Home Office last year, could also be extended.The buildings, constructed in 2019, have a current capacity of 650 but have never been occupied because of safety concerns.Any extensions to asylum seeker accommodation would be paid for using money earmarked for investment from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, meaning it could be borrowed without falling foul of the chancellor's strict spending rules.Home Office figures released last month show that as of March, there were about 100,000 asylum seekers in government-funded accommodation, with about 32,000 of those in hotels.Cooper hopes to end the use of hotels by reducing small boat crossings, speeding up the asylum application process and moving people into alternative accommodation.Following the chancellor's Spending Review, there had been some confusion over what that alternative accommodation might be.Chief secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones told BBC Newsnight the government would be "upgrading current facilities, which will include some extensions".But on Thursday, the prime minister's official spokesman refused to comment on whether new accommodation would be built.A senior Home Office source has now confirmed to the BBC that while there were no plans for entirely new accommodation blocks, extensions of current facilities will be built and other existing accommodation such as unused student blocks will be rented.The £1bn saving which the chancellor said would come from reducing hotel use has already been taken out of the Home Office budget.The Home Office has a new target for how much additional asylum accommodation needs to be created to help achieve the saving, but that exact figure is unknown.The BBC understands that moving around 14,000 asylum seekers from hotels into other forms of accommodation would likely achieve a saving of £1bn.A senior Home Office source said they were "confident" they could save the required money, but acknowledged that failing to hit the target would force the department to ask Reeves for more funding to avoid having to make cuts elsewhere.The number of asylum seekers in hotels is far lower than the record figure in 2023, but has increased since Labour came to power last year.The latest statistics go up to March and therefore don't take into account the knock-on effect of increased small boat crossings in the months since.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Children accessing 'vile porn' on social media, warns safeguarding chief
Children are gaining access to "vile" pornography through social media platforms, the head of Northern Ireland's child safeguarding organisation has told McNally said the problem was "just beyond belief" and called for greater intervention in schools and local chair of the Safeguarding Board for Northern Ireland was speaking at the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee as MPs held an evidence session on tackling violence against women and said their research suggested "kids as young as nine" were accessing pornography, and its availability had been "normalised" by some social media platforms. The committee was also told that many women surveyed in Northern Ireland have withdrawn from public participation in online spaces as a result of "online violence".Olga Jurasz, a professor of law at the Open University and director of the Centre for Protecting Women Online, told MPs that those silencing effects are particularly deeply felt for women in Northern said the issue of violence against women and girls has been "amplified through technology"."Misogyny in particular has been popularised - we witness it every day - and it has also been monetised. Quite simply, it is for profit," she added. 'Some is down to influencers' BBC News NI has contacted X, Snapchat, TikTok and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, for comment on Bernie McNally's remarks. Snapchat guidelines prohibit users from sharing, promoting or distributing sexually explicit content, including Ms McNally told the committee that "some kids in school are asking their teacher how do you choke a woman".She said that girls between the ages of 16 and 18 who are sexually active were "all reporting being choked during sex"."So something has changed to normalise this and for young people, and some of it can be down to influencers," she added. Alliance Party MP Sorcha Eastwood raised the case of Alexander McCartney, a man from Northern Ireland who was jailed for extreme online sexual abuse of children and the manslaughter of a 12-year-old girl. She told the committee that during a meeting with representatives of social media companies before Christmas, "not a single one" had heard of the McCartney case."And we are expected to believe that these platforms can keep our children safe online," she Smith, from the broadcast and internet regulator Ofcom, responded: "Well, that's absolutely shocking that they hadn't heard of the case. I'm astounded by that."


BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
'New option' being explored for larger Nottingham boundary
A "new option" for an expanded boundary for Nottingham is being explored, a council leader has government announced last year it wanted to merge some local authorities in an attempt to streamline services, and three potential options for Nottinghamshire were published in Borough Council leader Milan Radulovic, however, told a public meeting on Tuesday that a fresh proposal was being looked into which would see the city of Nottingham combine with some of the surrounding suburbs rather than entire boroughs."I'm sure you're all aware of the city's new option which is an enlarged city taking in West Bridgford, Beeston, Hucknall, Arnold and Carlton," he said. The city council says these areas have not been officially proposed and no decisions have been made.A council spokesperson said: "Nottingham is a significantly under-bounded local authority, covering a population of 328,000 at the centre of a built-up area of well over 750,000 (and a wider county population of 1.17m)."We are responsible for delivering the services expected in a core city, but many of the people who work in the city, and use council services, currently live in the suburbs, meaning they can't vote in city elections, and pay council tax elsewhere. We need to address that imbalance through LGR."Government guidance states existing district boundaries should be considered the "building blocks" for proposals, but more complex boundary changes have not been ruled have also said any new authorities should have a population of 500,000 or more. City councillors have previously complained that the authority raises relatively little through council tax because about 80% of the city's properties are in bands A and Neghat Khan has previously endorsed the so-called "Nottingham +2" model, where the city would combine with any two of Broxtowe Borough Council, Gedling Borough Council, and Rushcliffe Borough BBC understands the latest suggestion to cut across existing boundaries was dubbed the "wiggly line option" at a recent source said it was "all about getting Band D properties into Nottingham".The government has set a deadline of 28 November for councils to submit final have been calls for the plans to be paused, however, and some councillors have suggested the proposals should be put to a local at the cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Radulovic said: "We seem to be in a difficult situation at the moment on forming any sort of consensus across Nottinghamshire".


BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
Norwich City Council owned housing firm recorded losses of £5m
A council-owned housing developer which lost millions of pounds will be closed down and liquidated.A report to Norwich City Council's Labour cabinet blamed changes to the housing market and economy for making its social and affordable housing arm, Lion Homes, show the company made £5m in losses in five years, while homes in one development it built were sold for less than what they cost to councillor Alex Catt said the company had been a poorly-run "disaster" which had made "an enormous loss". The company, which is wholly owned by the council, was founded as Norwich Regeneration Limited in 2015 in the hope of delivering more affordable the venture has faced strong criticism, particularly after the Eastern Daily Press reported in 2020 that the company had lost £6m when homes in Bowthorpe were sold at a loss and the council was council also invested £3.5m in the company and loaned it a further £6.1m to keep it no accounts have been filed for Lion since 2023, Companies House records show it made losses of £5m in the previous five years. Catt, who leads the council's Green group, said "the lack of openness displayed by the Labour councillors who have overseen this disaster that has led to this enormous loss for the public has been striking"."There needs to be a full and public investigation into how this was allowed to happen, and a plan from the council for how it will deliver housing for Norwich at value for money after this failure," he said. 'No impact' Carli Harper, Labour's cabinet member for finance and major projects, told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that liquidating the company was "a strategic decision that makes sense for the long-term".Rather than using a private company to borrow money to fund developments, she argued the council could get better deals on loans from the government."It means we deliver more homes at better value for money for the taxpayer if we do it ourselves," she said the closure of the company would have "no impact" on a planned development of 200 houses at the former Mile Cross depot – while the council was "exploring options" for continuing another development in Bowthorpe, where a total of 1,000 homes are expected to be added the council hoped to get back some of the £6.1m loaned to Lion by recovering assets owned by the company including "a significant plot of land". The council's cabinet will be asked to consider voluntary liquidation of the company at a meeting next week in light of a recommendation received from its shareholder states the council will explore "alternative routes" to invest in housing development that are "less risky" and provide "better prospects". Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.