Liberal government's throne speech passes in House of Commons without a vote
Article content
It was adopted 'on division,' meaning no recorded vote was held. It does not need a vote in the Senate.
Article content
Article content
Leader of the Government in the House of Commons Steven MacKinnon said on social media that the adoption of the speech sets the stage for a 'strong and focused agenda.'
Article content
Article content
'We have a clear mandate to deliver on priorities for Canadians and build a strong Canada — and we're going to do just that,' MacKinnon said.
Article content
Article content
Earlier Wednesday, interim NDP Leader Don Davies said New Democrat MPs would vote against the government's throne speech.
Article content
After a caucus meeting, Davies said that 1.2 million Canadians sent New Democrats to Parliament to advocate for working families and those priorities aren't reflected in the speech.
Article content
Davies said the speech offers few details about the government's plans for health care and housing.
Article content
MacKinnon said the vote on the throne speech was a confidence matter, which means it was the first real test of Prime Minister Mark Carney's government.
Article content
If the government loses a confidence vote, it's defeated — which can lead to a snap election.
Article content
Davies said that while Canadians don't want an election right now, his party was taking a 'principled approach.'
Article content
'It's a clear message that this throne speech is not a worker-centric throne speech,' he said. 'We can't support a throne speech that so badly misses the mark in terms of the economic and social policies that people need in this country.'
Article content
Article content
MacKinnon said before the Liberal caucus meeting on Wednesday that the caucus was confident the throne speech would pass.
Article content
He would not say if his party had secured the support of other parties, referring questions directly to those parties.
Article content
He said that while the Liberals have a minority government, they also have a mandate to deliver for Canadians.
Article content
The Conservatives did not say how the party would vote.
Article content
In the House of Commons Wednesday, during a debate on the reply to the throne speech, Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said she would vote in favour of the speech.
Article content
May said she agreed with the major theme of the speech — building a stronger Canada — but said it lacked details and only mentioned climate change in 'passing references.'
Article content
The Liberals lost a vote Monday evening when opposition members successfully amended the reply to the throne speech to call on the government to table an economic update before Parliament breaks for the summer. That vote was not a matter of confidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
27 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Prime Minister Mark Carney scheduled to visit Kelowna, B.C., Tuesday
KELOWNA - Prime Minister Mark Carney is scheduled to be in Kelowna, B.C., for an announcement at a lumber facility on Tuesday after attending the Vancouver Pride parade on the weekend before he toured a Canadian Forces facility on Vancouver Island on Monday. Carney toured the Canadian Forces Maritime Experimental and Test Ranges facility near Nanoose Bay outside Nanaimo with officials from the Canadian Navy.
CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
Young people more prone to believe in conspiracies, research shows
Hillary Clinton had Jeffrey Epstein killed. Barack Obama was not born in the United States. The pharmaceutical industry was responsible for the spread of COVID-19. These are all conspiracies with no basis in fact, says University of Ottawa professor Daniel Stockemer — but his research shows that theories like them are gaining traction among young people. In fact, people younger than 35 are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories than other age groups, according to a recent study by Stockemer and co-author Jean-Nicolas Bordeleau that surveyed more than 380,000 people internationally. The research was recently published in the journal Political Psychology. "Conspiracy theories are now for everyone," Stockemer told CBC Radio's All In A Day, noting that between 20 and 25 per cent of the population believes in one. "But the young are slightly more likely to believe in them." If the problem isn't addressed, Stockemer said he expects the "democratic backsliding" he's seen all over the world to continue. "If we don't have a young population that stands up for the values of democracy ... who else will?" Why do young adults believe conspiracies? There are many reasons why young people are particularly susceptible, Stockemer said — including the fact the political world has become more divided and chaotic. "Right now, we're in a world of polarization," he said. "There is no compromise, no middle ground." Compounding that effect, Stockemer said, is that young people are being "alienated" from politics as mainstream politicians largely ignore their concerns — including during the last federal election. "The leaders didn't even come to the [University of Ottawa] to have a talk or anything," he said. "And then we wonder why young people have a higher tendency to go the populist or conspiracies route." Then there's technological leaps like the internet, smart phones and social media, Stockemer said, which allow conspiracy and misinformation to spread, especially among young people. The internet also potentially exposes them to every unfortunate incident that happens in the world, said Carmen Celestini, who teaches at the University of Waterloo and studies disinformation, extremists and conspiracy theorists. "That fear and that perpetual sense of disaster can lead people to believe in conspiracy theories," said Celestini, noting she wasn't surprised "even a little bit" by Stockemer and Bordeleau's findings. Influencers who tote extremist views and conspiracies also give their viewers someone or something to blame, she added. No 'quick fix' Widespread conspiracies and the problems inherent to the internet will require a "global response," said Celestini, one that will involve talking about the fears and emotions that led people to these conclusions. "It really is [about] having that transparent talk with your child about what it is that they're feeling, why they might believe some of these ideas and where the emotions behind it come from," she said. Stockemer said there's no "quick fix," but improving civic education and better regulating misinformation online would help. "To bring [young people] back, we need to also include them within the democratic politics much more than now," he said. And there could be immense consequences, he added, if we continue to neglect the susceptibility of young people to conspiracy theories. "Over the past 10 years, the number of democracies has declined [and] long-standing democracies like the United States [and] India are in serious danger of falling," he said. "If we continue the path we are continuing, I don't know how long some established democracies will survive. … And I think that's one of the far-reaching lessons from my research."
CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
McGill faculty challenge Quebec's Bill 89, arguing it violates constitutional right to strike
Four McGill University faculty associations representing more than 500 academics have filed a court challenge against Quebec's Bill 89, arguing the provincial legislation violates the constitutional right to strike. The Confederation of Faculty Associations of McGill (COFAM) announced Tuesday that the groups filed an application for judicial review in Quebec Superior Court, seeking to overturn the law — declaring Bill 89 unconstitutional and invalid as of the date it was passed. The bill was adopted May 29. It gives the provincial labour minister broad powers to restrict strikes deemed harmful to the population. "This legislation represents a frontal attack on workers' fundamental rights," said Evan Fox-Decent, a law professor and president of the Association of McGill Professors of Law, in a COFAM news release. Fox-Decent notes the Supreme Court of Canada's 2015 ruling in Saskatchewan Federation of Labour, which found the right to strike has been recognized as the "irreducible minimum" of freedom of association. "Bill 89 attempts to overturn this constitutional protection," he said in the news release. Barry Eidlin, vice-president of the Association of McGill Professors of the Faculty of Arts, said in the news release that the law risks allowing the government to impose service requirements on universities during labour disputes, threatening academic independence. "As university faculty, we have a particular responsibility to defend constitutional rights and the rule of law," says Eidlin, who specializes in labour movements. In an interview with CBC News, Eidlin says this law is dangerous from a labour relations perspective because it "erodes the very foundation on which collective bargaining occurs in Quebec." For meaningful bargaining to exist, the parties need to be on a level playing field, he said. Employers have many tools at their disposal to leverage their power over workers, while workers have only tool at their disposal — the power to collectively withhold their labour, he explained. Taking away that leverage skews the playing field in favour of the employers. "It removes the incentive of the employer to actually reach an agreement, because they know they have a trick up their sleeve," said Eidlin, adding that employers can drag out their process until the employees are ordered back to work. The four associations involved in the legal challenge include the Association of McGill Academic Staff of the School of Continuing Studies, the Association of McGill Professors of the Faculty of Arts, the Association of McGill Professors of Education and the Association of McGill Professors of Law. "This is about protecting fundamental labour rights for all Quebec workers," says Margaret Levey, president of the continuing studies association, in the news release. Back in February, when Quebec Labour Minister Jean Boulet tabled Bill 89, he said such as the labour conflict that lasted years and It caused major delays on mourners being able to bury their loved ones. He also cited the hypothetical situation of an education strike preventing services to children with special needs. Boulet said strikes involving ferries, food transportation and school transit in Quebec were other examples that led his office to draft the bill.
