logo
Tata Play FY25 loss widens to ₹529 cr; revenue slides to ₹4,082 cr

Tata Play FY25 loss widens to ₹529 cr; revenue slides to ₹4,082 cr

Mint25-06-2025
New Delhi, Jun 25 (PTI) Tata Play, formerly known as Tata Sky, has reported widening of consolidated loss to ₹ 529.43 crore for FY25, as it competes with other DTH operators including DishTV, Airtel Digital TV, and DD Free Dish.
The company had incurred a net loss of ₹ 353.88 crore in FY24.
Revenue from operations declined 5.15 per cent to ₹ 4,082.5 crore in FY25. Reasons for the company's widening loss could not be immediately known.
Total income, which includes other income, was also down 5.03 per cent to ₹ 4,109.3 crore in last financial year, according to financial data accessed by business intelligence platform Tofler.
Tata Play's advertising promotional expenses were down 29.2 per cent to ₹ 124.28 crore in FY25, as against ₹ 175.54 crore a year before. Total expenses were 3 per cent lower at ₹ 4,619.22 crore.
However, the company reduced its net debt to ₹ 3,445.60 crore in FY25 from ₹ 4,010.21 crore a year ago.
As of March 31, 2025, Tata Sons is the largest shareholder in the company with 60 per cent shares. A year ago, it had acquired 10 per cent stake in Tata Play from Baytree Investments (Mauritius) Pte Ltd, an affiliate of Singapore's Temasek Holdings, in a USD 100 million deal.
After Tata Sons, Network Digital Distribution Services FZ – LLC (NDDS) and TS Investments Ltd are the company's second biggest shareholders, owning 20 per cent shares each.
Currently, Tata Sons and TS Investments are the two promoters of Tata Play.
The direct-to-home service provider competes with DishTV, Airtel Digital TV, and DD Free Dish, owned by public broadcaster Prasar Bharati.
Earlier, telecom services provider Bharti Airtel and the Tata group were in discussions for the merger of their loss-making Direct DTH business.
However, on May 3, Bharti Airtel informed that discussions for a merger have been terminated because the two sides were not able to find a satisfactory resolution.
Tata Play had also tried to get listed. It had received the nod from capital market regulator Sebi to raise funds through initial public offering (IPOs).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US penalty risk on Russian oil may add ₹9-11 bn to India's import bill
US penalty risk on Russian oil may add ₹9-11 bn to India's import bill

Business Standard

time37 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

US penalty risk on Russian oil may add ₹9-11 bn to India's import bill

India's annual oil import bill could rise by $9-11 billion if the country is compelled to move away from Russian crude in response to US threats of additional tariffs or penalties on Indian exports, analysts said. India, the world's third-largest oil consumer and importer, has reaped significant benefits by swiftly substituting market-priced oil with discounted Russian crude following Western sanctions on Moscow after its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Russian oil, which accounted for less than 0.2 per cent of India's imports before the war, now makes up 35-40 per cent of the country's crude intake, helping reduce overall energy import costs, keep retail fuel prices in check, and contain inflation. The influx of discounted Russian crude also enabled India to refine the oil and export petroleum products, including to countries that have imposed sanctions on direct imports from Russia. The twin strategy of Indian oil companies is posting record profits. This is, however, now under threat after US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian oil and weapons. The 25 per cent tariff has since been notified but the penalty is yet to be specified. Coming within days of the European Union banning imports of refined products derived from Russian-origin crude, this presents a double whammy for Indian refiners. Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst (Refining & Modeling) at global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler termed this as "a squeeze from both ends". EU sanctions - effective from January 2026 - may force Indian refiners to segment crude intake on one side, and on the other, the US tariff threat raises the possibility of secondary sanctions that would directly hit the shipping, insurance, and financing lifelines underpinning India's Russian oil trade. "Together, these measures sharply curtail India's crude procurement flexibility, raise compliance risk, and introduce significant cost uncertainty," he said. Last fiscal, India spent over USD 137 billion on import of crude oil, which is refined into fuels like petrol and diesel. For refiners like Reliance Industries Ltd and Nayara Energy - who collectively account for a bulk (more than 50 per cent in 2025) of the 1.72.0 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian crude imports into India - the challenge is acute. While Nayara is backed by Russian oil giant Rosneft and has been sanctioned by the EU last month, Reliance has been a big fuel exporter to Europe. As one of the world's largest diesel exporters - and with total refined product exports to Europe averaging around 200,000 bpd in 2024 and 185,000 bpd so far in 2025 - Reliance has extensively utilised discounted Russian crude to boost refining margins over the past two years, according to Kpler. "The introduction of strict origin-tracking requirements now compels Reliance to either curtail its intake of Russian feedstock, potentially affecting cost competitiveness, or reroute Russian-linked products to non-EU markets," Ritolia said. However, Reliance's dual-refinery structure - a domestic-focused unit and an export-oriented complex - offers strategic flexibility. It can allocate non-Russian crude to its export-oriented refinery and continue meeting EU compliance standards, while processing Russian barrels at the domestic unit for other markets. Although redirecting diesel exports to Southeast Asia, Africa, or Latin America is operationally feasible, such a shift would involve narrower margins, longer voyage times, and increased demand variability, making it commercially less optimal, he said. Kpler data shows a notable decline in India's Russian crude imports in July (1.8 million bpd versus 2.1 million bpd in June), aligning with seasonal refinery maintenance and weaker monsoon-driven demand. However, the drop is more pronounced among state-run refiners, likely reflecting heightened compliance sensitivity amid mounting geopolitical risk. Private refiners, who account for over 50 per cent of Russian crude intake, have also begun reducing exposure, with fresh procurement diversification underway this week as concerns over US sanctions intensify. Ritolia said replacing Russian crude isn't plug-and-play. The Middle East is the logical fallback, but has constraints - contractual lock-in, pricing rigidity, and a mismatch in crude quality that affects product yield and refinery configuration. "The risk here is not just supply but profitability. Refiners will face higher feedstock costs, and in the case of complex units optimized for (Russian) Urals-like blends, even margins will be under pressure," he said. On the future course, Kpler believes India's complex private refiners - backed by robust trading arms and flexible configurations - are expected to pivot toward non-Russian barrels from the Middle East, West Africa, Latin America, or even the US, where economics permits. This shift, while operationally feasible, will be gradual and strategically aligned with evolving regulatory frameworks, contract structures, and margin dynamics. However, replacing Russian barrels in full is no easy feat - logistically daunting, economically painful, and geopolitically fraught. Supply substitution may be feasible on paper, but remains fraught in practice. "Financially, the implications are massive. Assuming a USD 5 per barrel discount lost across 1.8 million bpd, India could see its import bill swell by USD 911 billion annually. If global flat prices rise further due to reduced Russian availability, the cost could be higher," it said. This would increase fiscal strain, particularly if the government steps in to stabilize retail fuel prices. The cascading impact on inflation, currency, and monetary policy would be difficult to ignore. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

India faces $9–11 billion oil bill spike: Pivot from Russian crude after Trump's 'penalty' could hit margins- What analysts say
India faces $9–11 billion oil bill spike: Pivot from Russian crude after Trump's 'penalty' could hit margins- What analysts say

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

India faces $9–11 billion oil bill spike: Pivot from Russian crude after Trump's 'penalty' could hit margins- What analysts say

AI-image As US President Donald Trump announced penalties on India in addition to a 25 per cent tariff- citing, in part, India's trade ties with Russia- analysts warn the moving away could come at a significant cost. According to estimates, India's import bill could rise by $9–11 billion if it is forced to pivot away from Russian oil. "Financially, the implications are substantial. If a USD 5 per barrel discount is lost across 1.8 million barrels per day, India's import bill could increase by USD 9–11 billion annually. If global prices rise further due to reduced Russian supply, the cost could be even higher," as stated in the report by global real-time data and analytics firm Kpler, cited by PTI. Coming within days of the European Union banning imports of refined products derived from Russian-origin crude, this presents a double blow for Indian refiners. Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst (Refining & Modelling) at Kpler, termed this as "a squeeze from both ends". EU sanctions, effective from January 2026, may force Indian refiners to segment crude intake on one side. On the other, the US tariff threat raises the possibility of secondary sanctions that would directly hit the shipping, insurance, and financing lifelines underpinning India's Russian oil trade. "Together, these measures sharply curtail India's crude procurement flexibility, raise compliance risk, and introduce significant cost uncertainty," further said Ritolia, as quoted by PTI. Last fiscal, India spent over Rs 1.14 lakh crore on the import of crude oil, which is refined into fuels like petrol and diesel. India, as the world's third-largest oil consumer and importer, has significantly benefited from quickly replacing market-priced oil with discounted Russian crude. This shift came after Western sanctions on Moscow following its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Before the conflict, Russian oil constituted less than 0.2% of India's imports. However, it now represents 35-40% of the country's crude intake. This change has helped India reduce overall energy import costs, stabilize retail fuel prices, and manage inflation. Also read: India's US crude oil imports surge over 50% in first half of 2025; LNG, LPG trade also expands- Report The availability of discounted Russian crude has also allowed India to refine the oil and export petroleum products, even to countries that have imposed sanctions on direct imports from Russia. This dual strategy has led Indian oil companies to achieve record profits. For refiners such as Reliance Industries Ltd and Nayara Energy, which together are responsible for more than 50 per cent of the 1.7–2.0 million barrels per day of Russian crude imports into India by 2025, the situation presents significant challenges. Nayara, supported by the Russian oil giant Rosneft, recently faced sanctions from the EU, while Reliance has been a major exporter of fuel to Europe. As one of the leading diesel exporters globally, Reliance has capitalized on discounted Russian crude to enhance its refining margins over the past two years. In 2024, their total refined product exports to Europe averaged around 200,000 barrels per day, and in 2025, they have averaged 185,000 barrels per day, according to data from Kpler, cited by PTI. Reliance's dual-refinery setup, consisting of a domestic-focused unit and an export-oriented complex, provides strategic adaptability. This allows the company to direct non-Russian crude to its export-oriented refinery, ensuring compliance with EU standards, while processing Russian oil at the domestic unit for other markets. While it is operationally possible to redirect diesel exports to regions like Southeast Asia, Africa, or Latin America, such a move would result in narrower profit margins, longer shipping times, and increased demand variability, making it less commercially attractive. Private refiners, who process over half of the Russian crude imports, have started to reduce their reliance on Russian oil. This week, they are diversifying their procurement sources due to growing concerns about potential US sanctions. Ritolia noted that replacing Russian crude is not straightforward. The Middle East is a logical alternative, but it presents challenges such as contractual commitments, rigid pricing, and differences in crude quality that can affect product yield and refinery operations. "The risk extends beyond supply to profitability. Refiners will face higher feedstock costs, and for complex units optimized for blends similar to Russian Urals, profit margins could be under pressure," he explained. Looking ahead, Kpler anticipates that India's complex private refiners, supported by strong trading capabilities and adaptable configurations, will gradually shift towards non-Russian crude from regions like the Middle East, West Africa, Latin America, or even the US, where it is economically viable. This transition, while operationally possible, will be gradual and strategically aligned with changing regulatory frameworks, contract structures, and margin dynamics. However, completely replacing Russian oil is a significant challenge- logistically complex, economically burdensome, and geopolitically sensitive. While supply substitution may seem feasible on paper, it is fraught with practical difficulties. This would place additional fiscal pressure, especially if the government intervenes to stabilize retail fuel prices. The resulting impact on inflation, currency, and monetary policy would be significant and challenging to overlook. India continuing to buy oil from Russia: Report Just days after the tariff announcement, Trump claimed he had 'heard' that India was no longer going to buy oil from Russia, calling it 'a good step' while speaking to reporters on Friday. However, government sources have reprotedly firmly refuted this, saying Indian oil refiners continue to purchase crude from Russian suppliers. 'Indian oil refiners continue to source oil from Russian suppliers. Their supply decisions are guided by price, grade of crude, inventories, logistics, and other economic factors,' sources were quoted as saying by ANI. They also noted that Russia, as the world's second-largest crude producer and exporter, remains a key player in global energy markets. In this context, India- being the third-largest energy consumer with 85 per cent import dependency- has adjusted its sourcing strategy to ensure affordable and secure energy access while complying with international norms. Read more: India continuing to buy oil from Russia- Report rebuts Donald Trump's 'good steps' claim Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store