MK Party has had 7 Secretaries-General in under a year - Analysts call it a 'One-Man Show'
Image: Tumi Pakkies / Independent Newspapers
Political analysts have slammed Former President Jacob Zuma's Umkhonto weSizwe (MK Party) as a 'one-man show' after its leader said that the party has had seven secretaries general in under a year.
Some were of the view that the party is Zuma's own 'personal project,' which he runs as he wishes.
Zuma spoke at the launch of the MKP Youth Branch in Claremont on Monday, reigniting concerns over the party's internal instability, leadership style, and long-term viability.
Zuma defended the party's decision to cycle through seven Secretaries-General in under a year.
'We're not here to play games,' he said.
'This is not an organisation to make money, it is an organization to liberate South Africa,' Zuma told supporters.
'If one of us goes off track, we don't beg them.'
However, independent political analyst Goodenough Mashego said the turnover in senior leadership is less about discipline and more about Zuma's whims, pointing to a worrying pattern of autocratic control.
Speaking to IOL News on Tuesday, Mashego said the repeated removal and replacement of secretary-generals reflects a deeper issue within the party's structure.
'Zuma is the one looking for a certain caliber of secretary-general,' said Mashego.
'It's not the party's membership that determines that. Skills and popularity with members don't matter; what matters is who Zuma wants.'
'If Zuma wants a secretary-general who can't even write the word 'tomorrow,' the MK Party will get one who can't write. If he wants someone who can't read, that's who will be appointed…,' Mashego said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Mashego described the secretary-general as the engine of any political organisation, responsible for managing membership, expanding structures, and coordinating development at provincial, regional, and branch levels.
'When the secretary-general is unstable, the entire party becomes unstable,' he said.
'Most of the people removed from that position weren't even given a chance to prove themselves. Some were removed within two weeks.'
'You can't build a political party on one man's whim,' he added.
'You need vision, a mission, and a democratic mandate. The MK Party, apart from the votes it got in the 2024 general election, has no such mandate. Its leadership was not elected, it was appointed.'
Meanwhile, the latest demotion of Floyd Shivambu as the secretary-general for the party has raised eyebrows.
Even though the party claimed Shivambu would be deployed to Parliament, IOL News previously reported that his name does not appear on the party's official list of Members of Parliament.
This has raised speculation that he may have been quietly removed from the party.
Mashego said this again points to the 'undemocratic structure' of the MKP.
'No one in MK's leadership was elected. All were appointed and continue to be shuffled based on Zuma's decisions. That's why it's so easy for the party to move people around,' he said.
He argued that MKP is not a political party in the conventional sense.
'I've said many times, that MK is a project. Projects have a start date and an end date,' Mashego said.
'This party exists to reclaim the ANC. If the ANC's leadership in 2027 doesn't suit MK's ambitions, the party won't survive to 2029.'
He warned that MKP is likely hoping a figure like Deputy President Paul Mashatile will emerge as ANC leader in 2027, someone they believe might recall President Cyril Ramaphosa, exit the GNU, and realign with MKP.
'That's their way of creeping back into power,' he said.
Professor Theo Neethling echoed Mashego's concerns.
He said while the MK Party claims to carry forward the liberation legacy of the ANC's former armed wing, the original Umkhonto weSizwe, Zuma's interpretation of democratic principles is troubling.
'Zuma's stance on the Constitution is often ambiguous, if not outright contradictory,' Neethling told IOL News.
'He publicly acknowledges the Constitution's role in protecting democracy and rights, but many of his actions suggest a willingness to sidestep or undermine it - particularly on land reform, corruption, and the rule of law.'
Neethling said the MK Party has openly stated it will not hold elective conferences, which is something that sets it apart from even the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), often criticised for being tightly controlled by its leader, Julius Malema.
'Malema is accused of running the EFF like a personal project, but at least the party holds elective conferences. MK Party doesn't... That's extraordinary in a democracy,' said Neethling.
Commenting on Shivambu's demotion, he said,'It's becoming clear that MK Party may be the most undemocratic party ever to win parliamentary seats in post-1994 South Africa.'
Neethling said Zuma appears to believe in a form of democracy rooted in racial majoritarianism.
'Now that white minority rule is over, he seems to think that the party representing the black majority, according to him, MK Party, should have unchecked power. This raises real concerns about democratic backsliding,' he said.
'Zuma did not hesitate to attack the Constitution in recent years, and that shows clear signs of anti-constitutionalism.'
simon.majadibodu@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Steenhuisen rejects Mbeki's call for DA to attend National Dialogue
DA leader John Steenhuisen has responded to former President Thabo Mbeki's criticism of their withdrawal from the National Dialogue. Image: Ayanda Ndamane/Independent Newspapers, IOL Graphics A war of words has ensued between ANC leaders, former president Thabo Mbeki, and DA leader John Steenhuisen over the withdrawal of the DA from the national dialogue. Last weekend, the DA announced its withdrawal from the National Dialogue, just days after President Cyril Ramaphosa fired former Trade and Industry deputy minister Andrew Whitfield for travelling to the US without presidential permission. Whitfield's departure has rocked the Government of National Unity (GNU) with the DA threatening to leave the arrangement but later back-tracking. Ramaphosa accused the DA of turning its back on South Africans and lacking commitment to core democratic values. Ramaphosa said the national dialogue would continue without the DA's participation, emphasising that the dialogue is not a party-political event but a national platform for all South Africans. "It's the poverty of adherence to good principles for a party to walk away from the people of South Africa," Ramaphosa said. "Nothing is wrong with the dialogue. It will continue without Democratic Alliance involvement, Ramaphosa told reporters Friday. 'What a pity for a party that says it represents 20 or so percent of the people of South Africa. They are depriving those that they seek to represent an opportunity to make an input into the future of the country,' Ramaphosa said. Steenhuisen, speaking on the sidelines at the Union Buildings, criticised the government's reliance on "corrupt and incompetent individuals" to implement South Africa's development plans. "If you're going to rely on those people to be the ones implementing your plans and your decisions, it's going to end up just like every other issue, every other talk-shop that's happened for the last 20 years," Steenhuisen said. "People will still be living in abject poverty. Unemployment will still be unacceptably high, Steenhuisen said. Steenhuisen further criticised the government's reliance on what he calls 'corrupt and incompetent individuals' to implement South Africa's development plans, warning that ongoing dialogue without action will not solve the country's deepening crises. 'A dialogue isn't going to feed anybody. It's not going to build a single house or create a single job. We must burn off the oxygen implementing the plan,' Steenhuisen said. Former President Thabo Mbeki also weighed in on the issue, writing an 11-page open letter to Steenhuisen. Mbeki expressed disappointment with the DA's decision to withdraw from the National Dialogue, saying it was "misplaced and very strange". "I assume that you agree with what your Federal Chairperson has said about the National Dialogue," Mbeki wrote. He criticised the party for its decision to withdraw from South Africa's upcoming National Dialogue, calling the move 'misplaced and very strange indeed' and accusing the DA of acting 'against its own very direct interests". President Cyril Ramaphosa says the national dialogue will continue without the DA. Image: GCIS Federal Chair Helen Zille went further, suggesting the dialogue was merely 'a cover for the ANC's 2026 election campaign,' adding that without DA participation, 'the whole thing becomes a sham, a hollow exercise.' 'It is very good that, at last, Ms Helen Zille has openly expressed her eminently arrogant and contemptuous view of the masses of the people, that they cannot think and plan their future correctly, without the DA!,'' said Mbeki. In a written response to Mbeki's open letter, Steenhuisen said the DA would not participate in the National Dialogue, describing it as an 'expensive talk shop'. 'You sought my indulgence and now I must ask that you commit time for me to explain the DA's decision to stay away from yet another enormously expensive process that will predictably involve a lot of talking, but do nothing to advance open, transparent and corruption-free governance that South Africans so desperately desire,' Steenhuisen said. The ANC and DA have clashed repeatedly since the coalition government was formed last year, with the DA accusing the ANC of acting without proper consultation within the GNU. Political Analyst Dr John Molepo said the war of words between ANC leaders, Mbeki and Steenhuisen highlighted the deepening divisions between the two parties. He further said both parties could not afford to leave the GNU. 'It is not surprising that these two parties are always at loggerheads. The ANC will always wants to push the transformation agenda while the DA will always rebut ANC's decisions, but the two parties will not divorce because they can't afford the backlash if they do,' he said.
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Why DA appoints independent civil servants like Mettler, and why ANC wants him removed?
History might be repeating itself in the City of Tshwane, where Johann Mettler now works as municipal manager, says Cilliers Brink Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers One of the reasons that so many municipalities collapse is that so few of them hire competent professionals as municipal managers (MMs). A MM is the chief executive of a municipality. Unlike the mayor, an MM is not meant to be a politician. The skillset of a good MM is different to that of a good mayor. For local government to work, you need both. Each has to stay in their respective lanes, supporting the other, and not competing for political power. A good mayor, and there are far too few of them, too, will soon realise the impossibility of delivering on your election promises without the help of a good MM. That is what makes Johann Mettler such a rare creature. A giant of a man, he speaks little but works hard. You'll find him at the office at 7:00 AM, and often long after the sun has set. He grew up on the Cape Flats during apartheid, qualified as a lawyer, and took his first job in government when South Africa became a democracy. In 1998, he was part of the team that drafted the White Paper on Local Government. He is probably one of the most experienced local government practitioners still working. What makes him truly exceptional is that he wears no party political colours. In a local government sector dominated by recycled politicians, this also makes him highly vulnerable. All the same, Mettler is usually in high demand to fix broken municipalities. He has worked with DA mayors, but he has also been headhunted by ANC ministers. That's what happened in 2015 when he was appointed to lead the national government intervention in Nelson Mandela Bay. The details of that story are told by Chippy Olver in his book 'How to steal a city'. In Olver's otherwise vexing cast of characters, Mettler is one of the good guys. When the ANC lost control in the Bay in 2016, he was rehired as MM by a DA coalition. At the time, the mayor was Athol Trollip, now ActionSA's parliamentary leader. The irony of this will become obvious later. In 2018, Trollip was toppled as mayor when one of his coalition partners switched sides to the ANC. Even though Mettler had been brought to the Bay under an erstwhile ANC mayor, he soon became an immovable object to the irresistible force represented by the new ANC coalition. The Coalition of Corruption, as the DA branded them, spent a fortune of taxpayers' money to get rid of Mettler. And he spent a great deal of his own money to defend himself. But he did get away with his reputation intact, while one of his former persecutors, Mayor Mongameli Bobani, was later implicated in fraud and corruption (Bobani died of Covid-19 before the matter could proceed). History might be repeating itself in the City of Tshwane, where Mettler now works as MM. He got the Tshwane job in September 2022, a few months after the city emerged from a prolonged period of administration under the Gauteng provincial government. Aside from an unstable coalition and what would turn out to be an adverse audit opinion for the year preceding his appointment, Mettler also inherited an enormous ANC-induced operating deficit. This led to the city falling behind on its payments to Eskom. In my own 18-month stint as mayor, Mettler and I worked hard to turn the city around, a job that I have to stress is not yet done. Similar to Athol Trollip in Nelson Mandela Bay, I was turned out of office as mayor in September last year after my coalition partners decided to join an ANC coalition. The irony was that the coalition partner who rebalanced the forces in the ANC's favour is Trollip's new party, ActionSA. In exchange for getting rid of a DA mayor, an ActionSA councillor now gets to wear the mayoral chain. But there is little doubt where the real power lies. As before, the non-political Mettler is seen by the ANC as a threat to whatever they plan to do in Tshwane. In meetings I had with the ANC in my last weeks as mayor, they had made clear to me that they did not want Mettler as MM. They said that they would prefer a Tshwane local as MM. But what I suspect they want is someone who will withdraw the case against five city officials implicated in awarding an irregular tender to a consortium with links to ANC benefactor Edwin Sodi. That project, the upgrade of Rooiwal Wastewater Treatment Plant, was set back years because Sodi's people did not have the qualifications and experience to finish the job. The business interests of ANC deputy mayor Eugene Bonzo Modise and ANC regional secretary George Matjila can fill an article of their own. Let's just say the ANC would prefer an MM in Tshwane who is less concerned about doing things by the book. And so, Matjila is now on record as suggesting that when Mettler was appointed as MM in September 2022, the right processes weren't followed. This is, as far as the DA is concerned, a legal absurdity. If this is the pretext for moving against Mettler, our lawyers will be on call. In the meantime, what has happened to the likes of Mettler is a major chapter in the story of the decline of South African towns and cities. Let's make sure that this time the good guys win. Cilliers Brink is the DA Tshwane Caucus Leader
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
DA leader John Steenhuisen hits back at Thabo Mbeki over national dialogue withdrawal criticism
DA leader John Steenhuisen has responded sharply to former President Thabo Mbeki's criticism for withdrawing from the National Dialogue. Image: Ayanda Ndamane/Independent Newspapers, IOL Graphics Democratic Alliance (DA) leader John Steenhuisen has hit back at former president Thabo Mbeki's criticism of the party's decision to withdraw from the upcoming National Dialogue. The DA announced last weekend that it would be withdrawing from the National Dialogue, just days after they threatened repercussions for the firing of former deputy minister Andrew Whitfield, who was fired by President Cyril Ramaphosa for travelling to the US without the president's permission. IOL reported this week that Mbeki, in a 10 page open letter, criticised the DA for its decision to withdraw from the upcoming National Dialogue, calling the move 'misplaced and very strange', accusing the DA of acting 'against its own very direct interests.' Good morning, South Africa. President Mbeki's open letter to me confirms that the National Dialogue is a creature of the ANC that has been sprung upon the public with the disingenuous claim that it is an 'inclusive' process. Read my full response below. — John Steenhuisen MP (@jsteenhuisen) July 5, 2025 Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ In a written response to Mbeki's open letter on Saturday, Steenhuisen said the DA would not participate in what he described as "another expensive talk shop" that would do nothing to improve people's lives. 'You sought my indulgence and now I must ask that you commit time for me to explain the DA's decision to stay away from yet another enormously expensive process that will predictably involve a lot of talking, but do nothing to advance open, transparent and corruption-free governance that South Africans so desperately desire,' Steenhuisen said. Steenhuisen also pointed out what he called a 'double standard' in how ANC ministers have been treated compared to the DA's deputy minister, Whitfield. He also criticised the dialogue's timing and origins, pointing out that Mbeki only called for it after the ANC's poor showing in recent elections. Suggesting it was a political move to regain lost support. "We also think the timing of this proposed dialogue is significant. We note that you did not call for a National Dialogue during the disastrous term of your successor, Jacob Zuma, even when the public outcry grew for his removal. "It was only last year, when it became clear that the ANC, for whom you campaigned in the 2024 election, was about to lose its majority, that you proposed this National Dialogue. It is clear to us that, as the ANC lost the confidence of the voters, ANC leaders (including yourself) began seeking ways of addressing this 'problem' as if it were a national crisis.' Steenhuisen said the dialogue was mainly planned between Mbeki and the ANC, without involving other political parties properly.
