SLED, Inspector General investigating state Treasurer's Office
Both Lamkin and Keel told Loftis they planned to investigate the State Treasurer's Office after a $1.8 billion accounting mistake was made, the statement said.
'I welcome this review and the opportunity to evaluate our actions independently,' a statement from Loftis reads. 'Claims that the Treasurer's Office participated in a deliberate effort to mislead the legislature are entirely without merit.'
The problems started as the state changed computer systems in the 2010s. When the process was finished, workers couldn't figure out why the books were more than $1 billion out of whack. A fund was created to cover the accounting error and over the years more was added on paper to keep the state's books balanced.
'Despite claims by Senator Grooms, our office has fully cooperated with all state agency partners and independent audit firms since this matter surfaced, stemming from the former Comptroller General's $3.5 billion restatement in the 2022 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report,' Loftis said.
Loftis first took office in 2010, and is currently serving his fourth term as the 'state's banker.' Despite past plans to retire after his fourth term, Loftis announced plans to run for reelection in 2026.
'Once the investigation concludes, I am confident the findings will reflect my office's integrity and diligence throughout this matter,' Loftis said.
One of his arguments to stay in office was it wasn't fair to overturn the results of an election.
Earlier this week, the Republican-dominated House has decided not to take up a resolution passed by the Senate to kick Loftis out of office because of his role in a phantom $1.8 billion account and the failure to report it to lawmakers for years.
House Speaker Murrell Smith said there just isn't enough time to take it up before the session ends May 8.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Why the best Independence Day present would be more US citizens
You wouldn't have known it from the Democratic mayoral primary — dominated by promises of free stuff and anti-ICE grandstanding — but New York keeps driving residents away. Only Andrew Cuomo, in passing at a Queens rally, mentioned that from 2023 to 2024 Gotham lost 327,000 residents, per a May 15 Census report. That 3.7% drop was the largest hemorrhage of any big city in the country. It might make sense to stop the trend by doing something about high taxes and subway crime — but progressives are actually panicked about something else: a looming loss of still more Empire State seats in Congress, as determined by population count. Their solution isn't to hold on to high-earning taxpayers fleeing to Florida. Instead, they want to make sure residents not even eligible to vote — non-citizens, including illegal immigrants — aren't so afraid of ICE that they don't respond to Census surveys and don't get counted. Advertisement 5 Protestors in the Bronx holding signs that read 'I heart immigrant NY.' Getty Images They're particularly concerned about House legislation that would require the Census to ask about citizenship status. The New York Times, in what amounted to a recruiting campaign for their cause, reported on the efforts of 'a coalition of elected officials, community activists, and labor and civic leaders in New York City' that is 'already stirring ahead of the next census in 2030 amid a brewing battle over whether to include noncitizens in the population count.' Advertisement Their concern: 'threats from the Trump administration and the Republican-led Congress to exclude noncitizens, which could lead to a significant undercount of the city's population.' Lower East Side Council member Julie Menon, who in April keynoted a New York Law School conference kicking off the effort, has filed a bill to establish a City Office of the Census 'tasked with maximizing local participation in the federal decennial census.' 5 House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters about the U.S. bombing of three sites in Iran, at the Capitol in Washington, Monday, June 23, 2025. AP This Fourth of July weekend suggests a better approach: A campaign to encourage legal immigrants to be counted by becoming citizens. There's a reason liberals don't mention that. Advertisement Dems are not trying to help residents vote, but merely to buoy the city's population to protect their congressional seats, including those of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and progressive star Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. In both of their districts, voter totals are abysmally low — because so many non-citizen residents can't vote. They represent a new version of what England used to call 'rotten boroughs,' districts guaranteed representation despite low population. All 435 congressional districts are required to have an equal number of residents — about 740,000. But they don't have to have an equal number of eligible voters. That means that districts with high numbers of immigrants — legal and illegal — are likely to have low voter rolls. In Jeffries's Brooklyn district, there are 267,000 foreign-born residents. Advertisement 5 A recent Census Bureau report revealed that New York City lost more residents than any other big US metro between 2023 and 2024. There's no way to know how many are citizens, but we do know that Jeffries was elected in 2024 with just 168,000 votes. Ocasio-Cortez needed 132,000 in 2024 — in a district where 300,000 residents are immigrants. In contrast, House Speaker Mike Johnson received 262,000 ballots just to win his primary election, in a district with just 22,000 immigrants It's a great deal for Democrats; they can safely ignore the views (in AOC's case) of 40% of her district. Who knows whether Hispanic immigrants are on board with democratic socialism? She doesn't have to care. 5 Dems like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, are not trying to help residents vote, but merely to buoy the city's population to protect their congressional seats, Howard Husock writes. LP Media If progressives want to do something constructive to make sure residents won't be concerned about being asked about their citizenship status — and be counted in the Census — there's an obvious (and positive) approach: encourage citizenship. There are, per the Mayor's Office of Immigrant Affairs, some 3.1 million immigrants in New York City. There's no way to know how many have become naturalized citizens—but there's no mystery about how to become one: those who have been legally in the US for at least five years need only pass a citizenship test. Common sense Democrats might actually want to encourage that approach. Doing so means learning enough English to read the questions. (The test is only offered in English.) That would help immigrants advance economically, too. Advertisement 5 Pres. Trump — here at the 2025 SOTU address — has threatened to disallow illegal migrants from being counted in future census polls. Getty Images The test, it's worth noting, consists of just 10 questions — but they're chosen among 100 possibilities, and cover US government and history. For July 4, let's make it possible for immigrants to have a real voice in government — by becoming citizens and voting. Howard Husock is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
American Press
2 hours ago
- American Press
Jim Beam column:Checks, balances don't exist
Republican President Donald Trump is close to making American federal government a one-man operation, which the father of our constitution warned us about.(Photo courtesy of PBS). Today's Republican members of Congress and conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court have apparently forgotten about the checks and balances provided for in the Constitution. Under President Donald Trump, it is abundantly clear that the executive branch has almost complete control of the federal government. James Madison, the father of the Constitution, defended the checks and balances in that document that don't exist at the moment. Madison said, 'The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.' We are awfully close to that point today. Trump has pretty much ignored the rulings of federal courts. Republicans in Congress are so frightened Trump will fight them at the next election they are either doing his bidding or deciding not to run for re-election. The civics text that I used years ago said the three branches of government are not completely independent of one another. While each branch has its own distinct field of powers, it is subject to a series of constitutional checks which the other branches may exercise against it. The president, for example, may veto acts of Congress, but Congress has the right to override those vetoes by a two-thirds majority vote. Or Congress may refuse to appropriate funds requested by the president, which the current GOP Congress doesn't have the courage to do. Congress can also impeach the president, judges and other civil officers. Its members had the courage to impeach Trump twice during his first term — on Dec. 18, 2019, and Jan. 13, 2021. The first impeachment stemmed from a call Trump had with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Trump wanted him to investigate the Bidens and some in Ukraine who interfered in the 2016 election. The second impeachment followed the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021, when Trump was impeached for 'incitement to insurrection.' In each case, he was acquitted on all counts by the Senate. Conviction requires a two-thirds vote of senators present. When all 100 are there, it requires 67 votes. The votes on the two articles at the first trial were 48-52 and 47-53. The vote at the second trial was 57-43. Federal courts have the power to pass on the constitutionality of acts of Congress or actions of the president (judicial review). President Harry Truman in 1952 seized the steel industry to prevent a strike. However, the Supreme Court said that was a job for Congress, and that Truman had exceeded his powers. My civics text said the check and balance system makes compromise necessary, and compromise is of the essence in a democratic system. Unfortunately, compromise has pretty much become a lost art in today's hostile political climate. Many political scientists are convinced Trump was elected based on his promise to get control of immigration. The unrestricted flow along the nation's borders during the President Joe Biden administration bothered many Americans (Democrats and Republicans). Trump continues to insist getting illegal immigrants out of this country is his No. 1 priority. In order to do that, some members of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have taken questionable actions when rounding up immigrants. Going back to that civics text, it says democracy cannot succeed except where all people are entitled to fair treatment under the law. It adds that both the national Constitution and constitutions of the various states contain numerous guarantees of fair treatment for those accused of crime. The 14th Amendment reinforces the guarantees against unfair treatment by the states. And the Writ of Habeas Corpus is a court order directing that a person being held be brought before the court so a judge can determine whether the prisoner is being illegally detained. That hasn't happened for many immigrants who have been rounded up and shipped to some country they have probably never heard of. The courts have tried to stop it, but the Trump administration throws up as many roadblocks as possible. Kristi Noem, secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under which ICE operates, during a Senate hearing in May said habeas corpus was 'a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country and suspend their rights.' Anyone who thinks this country's democracy isn't in trouble hasn't been keeping up with the news. Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than six decades. Contact him at 337-515-8871 or Reply Forward Add reaction
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Tax-dodging Congressman Charles Rangel left puny estate: records
Harlem Rep. Charles Rangel — infamously known for pocketing rental income from his Caribbean cottage without disclosing it — has apparently left behind a modest estate, court records show. Rangel, who died May 26 at age 94, had assets worth only $300,000, according to Manhattan Surrogate Court filings. That is far less than his net worth of more than $1.7 million upon his retirement from Congress in 2017, as reported by the watchdog group Open Secrets. Advertisement 3 Congressman Charles Rangel died in May at age 94. Getty Images The current assets of the once-powerful chair of the House's Ways and Means Committee were not detailed in court filings. His daughter, Alicia Rangel-Haughton, was named executor of the Democrat's estate. Advertisement The late representative's property is to be placed in the Charles Bernard Rangel Revocable Trust, the assets of which were not disclosed in a will signed March 31, just nine weeks before his death at Harlem Hospital. 3 Alicia Rangel-Haughton will serve as executor of her father's estate, court records show. REUTERS Rangels' financial misbehavior and other ethical questions dogged him throughout his decades-long career, long before The Post outed his business dealings in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. He was criticized right from the start of his career when, in the 1960s, he took a low-interest loan from a New York City program meant to help the poor and used it to renovate his family's Central Harlem home, turning the property into rental apartments — one of which he used for himself. Advertisement Decades later, Rangel was caught using four rent-stabilized apartments in Lenox Terrace for himself, including one he used as a campaign office. 3 Rangel, seen here in 2010 leaving his Harlem home, was thought to be worth more than $1 million when he retired from Congress in 2017. Ben Parker for NY Post He parked his vintage Mercedes for free in a House of Representatives garage; was questioned for his participation in junkets to the Caribbean sponsored by corporations and lobbyists in violation of House rules, and eventually copped to omitting as much as $780,000 in assets from financial disclosures he filed in the 2000s. He was also slammed for using Congressional stationery to solicit donations for the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at the City College of New York, a move which broke House ethics rules. Advertisement A week after The Post's 2008 exposé revealed Rangel's ownership of the three-bedroom, three-bath casita No. 412 at a beachfront resort in Punta Cana — which he rented out for between $500 and $1,100 a night — he confessed he'd failed to disclose rental income from the property. Rangel failed to declare $75,000 in income from the sun-drenched property, he eventually admitted. He unloaded the villa in 2010 and made a handsome profit. In December 2010, Rangel's financial misdeeds earned him a censure from his Congressional colleagues. He retired from Congress in 2017.
