logo
Who has a deal, who doesn't? The state of play on eve of Trump's tariffs

Who has a deal, who doesn't? The state of play on eve of Trump's tariffs

Al Jazeera3 days ago
Global trade markets remained on edge Thursday as the United States prepared to implement reciprocal tariffs, with the deadline for negotiating a trade deal with Washington fast approaching.
US President Donald Trump has already announced steep trade tariffs for many of the country's largest trading partners, even as dozens of countries scramble to secure last-minute deals or extensions for negotiations beyond the Friday, August 1 deadline.
Friday's deadline comes more than 120 days after President Trump's administration first announced a barrage of tariffs on the world, on the so-called 'Liberation Day'.
Despite several delays in imposing tariffs since Trump took office in January this year, his administration looks set to roll out new tariff rates for those countries that fail to clinch a trade deal by the end of today.
So, what will happen tomorrow? Which countries already have deals in the bag? And who is hoping to rescue a last-minute deal?
What will happen on August 1?
As the clock ticks down to August 1, the US's imposition of a significant round of reciprocal tariffs on imports from various countries marks a pivotal moment in global trade dynamics, experts say.
Trump is adamant he will not be extending this deadline. 'THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE IS THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE – IT STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED. A BIG DAY FOR AMERICA!!!' Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, on Wednesday.
At midnight Eastern Time tonight, therefore, US Customs and Border Protection will begin enforcing these new duties, which will range from 15 percent to 50 percent – or even higher in some cases – depending on the trading partner, the nature of the goods being traded and whether the trading partner and the US have specific agreements in place.
Additional sectoral tariffs will be applied to certain industries. For example, a 50 percent tariff will be applied to copper, steel and aluminium for most countries, while a 20 percent levy will be applied to pharmaceutical products.
The White House confirmed that Trump will sign new executive orders on Thursday, formally imposing all these higher tariffs. Recipients are likely to include some of the US's biggest trading partners, like Mexico, Taiwan and Canada.
Many nations facing sweeping new tariffs on all exports to the US are likely to incur immediate economic repercussions along with potential shifts in diplomatic relations.
Tariffs may also cost the US economy. The Yale Budget Lab, a non-partisan policy research centre, noted in its most recent analysis that overseas trade tariffs could cost US households on average an extra $2,400 in 2025, because of higher prices of imported goods.
Meanwhile, industries reliant on imports, such as electronics, pharmaceuticals and clothing, may have to contend with new supply chain disruptions as companies scramble to absorb costs or pass them on to consumers.
Why is Trump launching all these new tariffs?
In April, Trump declared a 'national emergency' when he announced his 'Liberation Day' tariff strategy and imposed an across-the-board 10 percent baseline tariff on all imports, followed by higher, country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs.
The US has large trading deficits with many countries, which Trump believes are deeply unfair.
The Trump administration, therefore, has justified these new rates as being necessary to redress these trade imbalances in order to boost US manufacturing and jobs, even though economists point out that deficits are not direct evidence of unfair trade practices.
Beyond trade, experts note that the Trump administration is leveraging these tariff threats to broader agendas of curbing immigration, combating the opioid and fentanyl crisis, and pressing allies and partners on geopolitical issues, including India's energy ties with Russia or Brazil's legal action against Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro.
In the last-minute run-up to the August 1 deadline, Trump's administration has strong-armed trading partners, including Japan, the European Union, Indonesia and the Philippines, into new deals under which they accept higher US tariffs in exchange for continued market access and investment commitments – and in most cases, a promise not to levy counter-tariffs of their own.
Who already has deals in the bag with the US?
The EU has agreed to a 15 percent tariff on most of its exports to the US, including cars and pharmaceuticals, in exchange for zero tariffs on select US exports and commitments to buy US gas and increase investments. Initially, Trump had threatened a 30 percent rate.
Japan has secured a 15 percent reciprocal tariff on its goods exported to the US, reduced from a threatened 25 percent, with Japan promising to invest $550bn in the US economy.
The UK agreed to a 10 percent tariff rate on its exports to the US. It also received a 25 percent sectoral tariff on steel and aluminium – half the 50 percent being imposed on other countries.
A lower 15 percent tariff will apply to South Korean imports to the US, in return for a $350bn investment pledge and zero tariffs on US exports like cars and agricultural products.
Indonesia has negotiated a 19 percent tariff on its exports to the US, down from a threatened 32 percent, by making a commitment to buy US Boeing aircraft and to remove or reduce trade barriers.
Vietnam has agreed to a 20 percent tariff on most exports to the US, with an additional 40 percent levy to be applied to 'transshipped' goods – those entering the US via another location – while also agreeing to zero tariffs on US imports like large-engine automobiles.
This Philippines has agreed to a 19 percent tariff on its exports to the US, with zero tariffs on US exports to the Philippines, alongside commitments for enhanced military cooperation.
Struck a deal to jointly develop oil reserves with the US, but specific tariff rates on goods remain unclear.
Which big US partners have no deal yet?
None of the US's top three trading partners – Mexico, Canada, and China – have trade deals in place as of Thursday.
Tops the list of trade partners of the US, with nearly $840bn in total trade, driven by sectors including vehicles, electronics and agriculture. With no new deal for August 1, existing tariffs of 25 percent on most imports will persist under earlier 2025 trade war measures, with some exemptions under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
Ranks second in terms of size with about $700bn, primarily in energy, vehicles, and aerospace products, passing between the two countries. With no deal finalised by the August 1 deadline, Trump has threatened to impose a 35 percent tariff on goods that don't comply with the USMCA.
Third among the top US trade partners, Beijing trades about $532bn with the US, focused on electronics, machinery and consumer goods. With no permanent deal in place, a 30 percent combined tariff will be applied, following an agreed pause until August 12. That followed an earlier escalation to a 145 percent tariff on imports.
Who is hoping for a last-minute deal?
Even a 'very good friendship' with Washington could not save India, the world's most populous nation and fourth-largest global economy, from Trump's reciprocal tariffs.
On Wednesday, Trump announced a sweeping 25 percent tariff on all Indian goods exported to the US, plus an unspecified penalty for buying energy from Russia, as trade deal negotiations remain unresolved.
Total trade between the US and India was valued at about $130bn in 2024, with US exports to India worth $41.8bn and imports from India at $87.4bn – a trade deficit which Trump will not ignore.
'While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.
Later, in another post, Trump said he did not 'care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.
'We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World. Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together,' he wrote. 'Let's keep it that way.'
In a statement, the Indian government said it was studying the implications of these new tariffs and added: 'India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months.'
The statement further noted that 'we remain committed to that objective.' New Delhi signalled what it believes to be potential barriers to the deal by noting that the government 'attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs'.
India's neighbouring rival, Pakistan, has seen its stock rise with the Trump administration before and after the military conflict with New Delhi earlier this year.
Trump revealed that the US had concluded a deal with Pakistan, where they will work together on developing oil reserves, but did not announce tariffs. 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!'
Taiwan is also facing a high-stakes deadline, with proposed tariffs set at 32 percent, excluding semiconductors, if no deal is struck by August 1.
Taiwanese officials have engaged in intense negotiations in Washington, spanning four high-level rounds led by Vice Premier Cheng Li‑chun and US counterparts, addressing not only tariff technicalities but also non‑tariff trade barriers, investments and market access. These talks are reportedly pending US approval.
Who has little hope of reaching a deal with the US?
The country faces the most punishing tariffs among major US trading partners, with President Trump formally issuing a 50 percent reciprocal tariff on Brazilian imports.
The US actually runs a trade surplus with Brazil of nearly $7.4bn; however, Trump has been unhappy about the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing trial for allegedly attempting a coup to overturn his 2022 election loss.
Trump has publicly called the trial a 'witch-hunt' and an 'international disgrace', tying his imposition of a 50 percent tariff on Brazilian imports, announced on July 10, directly to this issue.
Brazil's government responded with alarm. President Lula decried Trump's measures as 'economic blackmail' and negotiations have stalled.
Speaking at a news conference in Washington this week, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, the IMF's chief economist, called for an end to the trade war.
'Restoring stability in trade policy is essential to reduce policy uncertainty. We urge all parties to settle trade disputes and agree on clear and predictable frameworks. Collective efforts should be made to restore and improve the global trading system,' Gourinchas said, indirectly referring to the Trump administration.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan's Sharif hosts Iran's Pezeshkian, agrees to security, trade boost
Pakistan's Sharif hosts Iran's Pezeshkian, agrees to security, trade boost

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

Pakistan's Sharif hosts Iran's Pezeshkian, agrees to security, trade boost

Pakistan and Iran have signed agreements pledging to raise bilateral trade to $10bn and committing to work more closely to eliminate the menace of 'terrorism' in favour of peace and prosperity in the region, as both nations have recently been embroiled in conflicts with their respective regional foes. Sunday's agreements across various sectors, including energy and trade, were signed during the two-day visit of Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. 'We have set a target of $10bn in trade and hope to achieve it as soon as possible,' Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said, addressing a joint press briefing. Sharif reiterated Pakistan's stance of supporting Iran's right to a nuclear programme for peaceful purposes under the United Nations charter and condemned Israel's aggression against Iran, saying there was 'no justification' for the 12-day June conflict in which the United States militarily intervened on Israel's behalf. He said the two countries would take effective steps to eliminate 'terrorism' and open the avenues of prosperity in the region. Pakistan and regional rival India were on the cusp of their fifth all-out war earlier this year before a ceasefire ended several days of heavy and deadly aerial exchanges. The Iranian president said, 'My deep belief is that we can easily, in a short time, increase the volume of our trade relations from the current $3bn to the projected goal of $10bn.' He thanked the government and people supporting Iran 'during the 12-day terrorist aggression by the Zionist regime and the United States'. Analyst Ammar Habib Khan of the Institute of Business Administration told Al Jazeera that the informal trade between Iran and Pakistan is likely to increase more than the formal trade target shared by the countries. 'Discussions have been held on how to formalise the informal trade that is already happening, whether it is oil, gas or something else,' he told Al Jazeera from Karachi. The analyst said Pakistan's normalising relations with Iran might lead to the creation of a trade route between Pakistan and Europe. 'It would be an efficient and logistically sound route,' he said. Along with a high-level delegation, including foreign and defence ministers, Pezeshkian arrived on a two-day visit to Pakistan on Saturday. Tense ties Pezeshkian called for better border management and cooperation around the mutual border to counter security threats. In return, Sharif said that Islamabad and Tehran have a common stand against 'terrorism', and no such activity would be allowed in Pakistan or Iran. 'We have to protect our borders and take strict steps against terrorism to open the roads to peace and development in the region,' said Sharif. Relations between Pakistan and Iran have often been shaky, especially over cross-border tensions that escalated in January 2024 when both sides launched tit-for-tat missile strikes. Al Jazeera's Kamal Hyder, reporting from Islamabad, said Pakistan and Iran have agreed to cooperate in order to ensure violence is prevented on either side. 'They agreed to have more border management between the two countries,' he said. Hyder added that the sides also discussed Pakistan acting as an intermediary between Washington and Tehran, among other countries trying to ease tensions between archenemies. Despite the strains, the two countries have kept the diplomatic door open. In May, the Iranian foreign minister visited Pakistan amid rising tensions with India. During the Iran-Israel conflict, Pakistan supported Iran's right to self-defence and condemned the US attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities. The leaders of Pakistan and Iran also called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and an end to Israel's attacks in the enclave. The two sides also inked a string of memorandums of understanding in the fields of information technology, law and justice, climate change, and tourism.

US museum denies political pressure in removal of Trump impeachment display
US museum denies political pressure in removal of Trump impeachment display

Al Jazeera

time13 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US museum denies political pressure in removal of Trump impeachment display

The parent organisation of a top-visited history museum in the United States has denied that political pressure played a role in the removal of a display about the impeachments of US President Donald Trump. The Smithsonian Institution, which runs the National Museum of American History in Washington, DC, said on Saturday that it removed the 'temporary' placard for failing to meet the museum's standards in 'appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation'. 'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard,' the institution said in a statement. 'We were not asked by any Administration or other government officials to remove content from the exhibit.' The Smithsonian Institution, which runs 21 museums and the National Zoo, said the impeachment section of the museum would be updated in the coming weeks to 'reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history'. The statement comes after The Washington Post on Thursday reported that the museum removed an explicit reference to Trump's impeachments last month, resulting in its exhibit about impeachment incorrectly stating that 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal'. The Post, citing an unnamed person familiar with the exhibit plans, said the display was taken down following a 'content review that the Smithsonian agreed to undertake following pressure from the White House to remove an art museum director'. The museum's removal of the display drew swift backlash, with critics of Trump casting the development as the latest capitulation to the whims of an authoritarian president. 'You can run, but you cannot hide from the judgment of history,' Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Friday. 'So, here's my message to the president: no matter what exhibits you try to distort, the American people will never forget that you were impeached – not once, but twice.' Trump has, with lightning speed, moved to exert greater control over political, cultural and media institutions as part of his transformative 'Make America Great Again' agenda. In March, the US president signed an executive order to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian Institution's properties and deny funding for exhibits that 'degrade shared American values' or 'divide Americans based on race'. During his first term, Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives twice, in 2019 and 2021, but the Senate failed to convict him on both occasions. He was the third US president to be impeached, after Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, and the only US president to be impeached twice. Former President Richard Nixon faced near-certain impeachment before his resignation in 1974 in the wake of the Watergate scandal.

US Senate confirms former Fox News host Pirro as DC top prosecutor
US Senate confirms former Fox News host Pirro as DC top prosecutor

Al Jazeera

time15 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US Senate confirms former Fox News host Pirro as DC top prosecutor

The United States Senate has confirmed former Fox News television personality Jeanine Pirro as the top federal prosecutor in the nation's capital, Washington, DC, filling the post after President Donald Trump withdrew his controversial first pick, conservative activist Edward Martin Jr. Pirro, a former county prosecutor and elected judge, was confirmed on Saturday, with a vote of 50-45. Before becoming the acting US attorney for the District of Columbia in May, she co-hosted the Fox News show The Five on weekday evenings, where she frequently interviewed Trump. Trump yanked Martin's nomination after a key Republican senator said he could not support him due to Martin's outspoken support for rioters who stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. Martin now serves as the Justice Department's pardon attorney. Other hires from cable news include Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who co-hosted Fox & Friends Weekend, and Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy, a former reality TV show competitor and Fox Business co-host. Pirro briefly entered politics in ill-fated attempts to run for the US Senate and for the New York attorney general, losing the latter race to Democrat Andrew Cuomo. She began earning wider public exposure by hosting a weekday television show, Judge Jeanine Pirro, from 2008 to 2011. In 2011, she joined Fox News Channel to host Justice with Judge Jeanine, which ran for 11 years, and today, she is a co-host of the network's show, The Five. Pirro has also authored several books, including Liars, Leakers, and Liberals: The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy, which was published in 2018. The Washington Post described the book as 'sycophantic' in its support for Trump. After promoting unfounded conspiracy theories alleging election fraud in 2020, Pirro was named a defendant in a defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems, which said that Fox had broadcast false statements about the company. Fox News settled the case for nearly $800m. Last month, Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to send Pirro's nomination to the Senate floor after Democrats walked out to protest Emil Bove's nomination to become a federal appeals court judge. Pirro, a 1975 graduate of Albany Law School, has significantly more courtroom experience than Martin, who had never served as a prosecutor or tried a case before taking office in January. She was elected as a judge in New York's Westchester County Court in 1990, before serving three terms as the county's elected district attorney. In the final minutes of his first term as president, Trump issued a pardon to Pirro's ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who was convicted in 2000 on conspiracy and tax evasion charges.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store