Diamond Care Transportation Expands Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Services Across South Carolina and Beyond
Following increasing demand for reliable, compassionate transport options, Diamond Care Transportation now serves patients in South Carolina, Florida, Washington, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. This strategic move ensures more patients can access critical medical appointments safely and on time.
'Our expansion across these regions represents our deep commitment to accessible healthcare,' said a Diamond Care Transportation spokesperson. 'We've invested in top-tier vehicles, staff training, and new technology to make the ride experience seamless and stress-free.'
The newly added service zones come with upgrades to booking convenience, including phone scheduling, online booking, and a dedicated customer support team.
Diamond Care Transportation offers:
Wheelchair-accessible vehicles with trained drivers.
On-time pickups and courteous service.
Transportation to clinics, hospitals, rehabilitation centers, and dialysis centers.
Medicaid-approved and private pay ride options.
This service update follows the company's recent milestones, including securing new broker partnerships and hiring additional trained drivers across service areas.
For families seeking dependable, compassionate transportation for their loved ones, Diamond Care Transportation is now accepting new bookings.
About Diamond Care Transportation
Diamond Care Transportation provides non-emergency medical transportation with a focus on seniors, individuals with disabilities, and patients requiring wheelchair-accessible rides. Serving South Carolina, Florida, Washington, Maryland, and the DC area, the company is committed to patient safety, punctuality, and comfort.
Contact:
Email: [email protected]
Phone: +1 (864) 335-9824
Website: https://diamondcaretransportation.com
Contact Information:
Diamond Care
Isabella Masters
564-668-4966
Contact via Email
kknewsofficial.com
Read the full story here: Diamond Care Transportation Expands Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Services Across South Carolina and Beyond
Press Release Distributed by PR.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
Larry Kudlow On The President's Pressure Campaign Against The Fed
There is a lot of focus on the economy this week, particularly this afternoon when the Federal Reserve will conclude a two-day meeting and announce whether it will cut interest rates. President Trump has been urging Chairman Powell to make this move for weeks. Additionally, new tariffs are set to take effect on Friday, and an inflation update is scheduled for Thursday. FOX News Contributor and host of 'Kudlow' on the FOX Business Network, Larry Kudlow, joins the Rundown to discuss the state of the economy and weigh in on President Trump's pressure campaign against the Fed. A new Wall Street Journal poll finds the Democratic Party with its lowest favorability rating in the history of the survey. But do their current woes suggest a poor performance in next year's midterm elections? Kyle Kondik, managing editor of Sabato's Crystal Ball and co-author of the new book 'Campaign of Chaos: Trump, Biden, Harris, and the 2024 American Election,' joins The Rundown to break down the challenges facing Democrats, explore potential paths forward, and discuss the rise of progressive mayoral candidates like Zohran Mamdani and Omar Fateh–questioning whether this signals a broader shift in the party's direction. Plus, commentary from the host of OutKick's 'Gaines for Girls', Riley Gaines Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
Washington Post
20 minutes ago
- Washington Post
The White House can't fix its deficit problem with tariffs
Jessica Riedl is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. After passing tax cuts that will likely cost $5.5 trillion over the coming decade, the Trump administration is under increasing pressure to rein in soaring budget deficits. So what's the plan? Tariffs, tariffs and more tariffs. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick recently claimed on CBS's 'Face the Nation' that tariff revenue 'is going to pay off our deficit.' Administration estimates of 10-year tariff revenue have ranged from 'substantial' (Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent) to $6 trillion (presidential adviser Peter Navarro) and now $7 trillion (Lutnick). Just last week, President Donald Trump asserted that these exorbitant projected gains even had him considering issuing tariff rebates to taxpayers. As both a critic of Trump's tariffs and a longtime deficit hawk, I would certainly find it to be nice if the silver lining of our misguided trade policies is that they helped scale back Washington's nearly $30 trillion in projected 10-year budget deficits. Unfortunately, no such silver lining exists. Not only is the reduction in deficits not worth the harsh economic damage from the tariffs, but it's also likely to be modest at best. Thus far, Trump has pushed up typical monthly tariff revenue from nearly $8 billion to over $27 billion. That additional $20 billion extrapolates to $240 billion annually and $2.4 trillion over the next decade — estimates that generally align with the consensus of static tariff revenue forecasts. Except the economy is not static. Rather, it dynamically responds to trade wars in ways that will pare back that revenue. Part of the increase is because businesses and consumers moved up scheduled purchases before more punitive tariffs are implemented, which suggests an import decline in the months ahead. Moreover, the central purpose of tariffs is to spur the production of domestic alternatives for consumers to purchase, which over time means fewer imports, a shrinking tariff base and declining tariff revenue. Washington cannot tax foreign trade that no longer takes place. Additionally, economists generally agree that trade wars harm long-term economic growth by limiting consumer options, raising costs, reducing investment capital and killing jobs in industries that suffer from foreign retaliation. This slowdown in the growth of businesses, jobs and wages in turn means less income for Washington to tax. If annual economic growth rates decline by 0.5 percent of gross domestic product — an admittedly aggressive assumption based on past trade wars — that would cost Washington $1.8 trillion in 10-year revenue. And even if some net tariff revenue survives, Congress and the White House will likely spend some of it bailing out industries hit with retaliatory tariffs. During Trump's first term, as much as 92 percent of tariff revenue on Chinese goods was spent bailing out farmers who lost access to export markets. With a long-term contraction of the tariff tax base, revenue lost to slower economic growth and likely bailouts of industries harmed by retaliation, the new tariffs are unlikely to notably reduce Washington's exorbitant budget deficits. Current estimates by the Tax Foundation, which account for slower economic growth and foreign retaliation, suggest $1.6 trillion in net 10-year revenue. If half of that revenue is then spent on industry bailout as well as higher unemployment and safety net costs, the remaining $800 billion in net savings would close less than 3 percent of the projected 10 -year budget deficits. And yet, future presidents and congresses may face resistance to repeal the tariffs because the Congressional Budget Office will likely exaggerate tariff revenue. This is because congressional rules typically forbid the CBO from accounting for the revenue lost to a bill's reduction in economic growth when scoring bills. And those who point to rising tariff revenue in the federal budget tables may not notice the corresponding weakness of income, payroll and corporate tax revenue. That's a shame, since escalating federal debt requires serious attention from lawmakers. Annual budget deficits are set to double over the next decade to $3.6 trillion — or $4 trillion if interest rates remain elevated. Since 2021, annual interest costs on the federal debt have nearly tripled — surpassing Medicaid, defense and Medicare to become the second largest budget item after Social Security. Within a decade, interest costs could consume as much as one-third of all annual tax revenue. Imagine all of your yearly taxes until May paying interest to bondholders rather than financing Medicare, national security, veterans benefits, education or infrastructure. But swelling budget deficits require a comprehensive solution that both raises revenue and limits spending (including popular programs). Even at the higher end of projections, tariff revenue cannot offset more than a fraction of the latest tax reductions, and these steep and unpredictable rates impose more damage and dislocation than most other tax increase proposals. There are lots of alternatives, such as canceling the 20 percent small-business deduction and the expanded state and local tax deductions in the latest tax package, that could likely raise comparable revenue without ravaging key industries, driving up consumer prices and starving the economy of investment capital. Of all the taxes for Republicans to finally embrace, tariffs are among the most self-defeating.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A divided Fed is expected to hold rates steady, defying Trump's calls for a cut
The Federal Reserve is widely expected to hold interest rates steady Wednesday amid internal divisions over the path of monetary policy as President Trump and other White House officials intensify their pressure on the central bank. Investors will be watching to see whether two Fed governors choose to dissent, which would mark the first time that has happened in more than three decades. Fed governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman have both made a case publicly for a cut at today's meeting. Michael Feroli, chief economist for JPMorgan, said he expects that Waller will dissent, while Bowman is a closer call, but "we suspect she joins him and dissents dovishly." Wilmer Stith, senior bond portfolio manager for Wilmington Trust, said one dissent is more likely than two, but he notes that "at the end of the day it doesn't change the fact that the Fed funds rate will remain unchanged and that they will be patient. That's the narrative.' That raises another pressing question for investors: whether Fed Chairman Jerome Powell will give any signal at his Wednesday afternoon press conference that he is open to a rate cut in September. Traders are currently betting the Fed will use that gathering on Sept. 16-17 to make the first cut of 2025. Read more: How the Fed rate decision affects your bank accounts, loans, credit cards, and investments Stith said he thinks Powell may offer some dovish comments that set the table potentially for a move in September, following months of unrelenting criticism from Trump and other White House officials who are now citing a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's headquarters as another reason to question Powell's management. "Given the cost overruns at the [Fed's headquarters], and the constant harping by the administration, I think that does play on the psyche," Stith said. "So a politician would probably open the door just a little bit. Before the door was always closed." Read more: How much control does the president have over the Fed and interest rates? Powell has defended the $2.5 billion renovation project while also insisting for months that more time is needed to assess how the president's tariffs will affect the path of inflation. Many of his fellow policymakers agree with that stance, noting that inflation remains above target, inflation risks still pervade, and the labor market is near full employment. Waller, on the other hand, has been outspoken since the Fed's last meeting in June about his belief that tariffs offer one-off price increases, allowing the Fed to "look through" them and refocus on the employment side of its dual mandate. Waller said he worries that private sector job growth is near "stall speed." Other data suggests that downside risks to the job market have increased. Bowman's case for a cut is that inflation has declined or come in below expectations over the past several months and that trade policy will only amount to "minimal impacts" on inflation. She has also cited concerns about downside risks to employment due to signs of fragility in the job market. Bowman's support for a cut represents a shift in her views since last fall, when she dissented against a jumbo 50-basis-point reduction in September 2024 due to her concerns that inflation was not yet under control. Read more: How jobs, inflation, and the Fed are all related Two Fed governors haven't dissented at the same meeting since December 1993 under then-Fed Chair Alan Greenspan, when governors Wayne Angell and Lawrence Lindsey both opposed the Fed's looser monetary policy and preferred to instead hike rates. Of the 61 meetings Powell has chaired, there have been 16 dissents. Of the dissents, 14 were from regional bank presidents, and two were from Fed governors. One double-dissent from regional fed presidents came in July 2019, when a Powell-led Fed cut rates for the first time in a decade to deal with uncertainties caused by Trump's first-term tariffs. Kansas City Fed president Esther George and Boston Fed president Eric Rosengren both dissented because they thought rates should have remained unchanged. Despite any dissents Wednesday, most Fed watchers expect Powell to defend the central bank's patient stance thus far in 2025. "The Fed's not going to do anything, and I think Powell is going to continue to dig in his heels, and he has, frankly, firm ground to stand on," Thornburg Investment Management's Christian Hoffman told Yahoo here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
