Lithuania charges three with defacing anti-Soviet monument
Prosecutor Rimas Bradunas told a press conference two of the three charged are dual Estonian-Russian citizens, while one is a Russian citizen.
When asked at the press conference about any involvement of Russia's GRU military intelligence agency in the act, Bradunas said: "That was the main organizer, without doubt, yes".
Two of the three detained were arrested in Estonia and handed over to Lithuania, he said.
(Reporting by Andrius Sytas, writing by Louise Breusch Rasmussen, editing by Anna Ringstrom)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Ukraine's Zelenskiy says latest phone call with Trump his most productive yet
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy attend a meeting on the sidelines of NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands June 25, 2025. Ukrainian Presidential Press Service/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo (Reuters) -Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Saturday that his latest conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump this week was the best and "most productive" he has had to date. "Regarding the conversation with the president of the United States, which took place a day earlier, it was probably the best conversation we have had during this whole time, the most productive," Zelenskiy said in his nightly video address. "We discussed air defence issues and I'm grateful for the willingness to help. The Patriot system is precisely the key to protection against ballistic threats." Zelenskiy said the two leaders had discussed "several other important matters" that officials from the two sides would be considering in forthcoming meetings. Trump told reporters on Friday that he had a good call with Zelenskiy and restated his disappointment at a conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin over what he said was Moscow's lack of willingness to work toward a ceasefire. Asked whether the United States would agree to supply more Patriot missiles to Ukraine, as requested by Zelenskiy, Trump said: "They're going to need them for defense... They're going to need something because they're being hit pretty hard." Russia has intensified air attacks on Kyiv and other cities in recent weeks. Moscow's forces launched the largest drone attack of the 40-month-old war on the Ukrainian capital hours after Trump's conversation with Putin on Thursday. (Reporting by Ron Popeski and Oleksander Kozhukhar; Editing by Daniel Wallis and Diane Craft)
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
US deportees arrive in South Sudan, airport sources say
FILE PHOTO: U.S. flag and Judge gavel are seen in this illustration taken, August 6, 2024. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo NAIROBI (Reuters) -An aircraft carrying U.S. deportees arrived in South Sudan on Saturday, two officials working at Juba airport said, after eightmigrants lost their last-ditch effort to halt their deportation by the Trump administration. An airport staffer speaking on condition of anonymity told Reuters he had seen a document showing that the aircraft "arrived this morning at 6:00 am."(0400 GMT) An immigration official also said the deportees had arrived in the country but shared no further details, referring all questions to the National Security Service intelligence agency. Earlier, a South Sudan government source said U.S. officials had been at the airport awaiting the migrants' arrival. (Reporting by Nairobi bureau; additional reporting by Ryan Jones in Toronto and Andrea Shalal in Bedminster, New Jersey; editing by Diane Craft)
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Where are today's global statesmen?
With wars raging in Ukraine and Gaza, the world needs a credible mediator and arbiter like never before. But just when the United Nations (UN) needs to get into the act, it is absent, bordering on irrelevance, instead. It is, of course, not the UN's fault that it is exposed as not fit for purpose. The UN Security Council (UNSC) is tasked with being the global forum to deliberate on political disputes among member states. So war becomes unnecessary. Indeed, only the UNSC is authorised to approve the use of force against recalcitrant nations. The United States did bring the case for invading Iraq to the UN but the subsequent attack was never sanctioned by the UNSC. Russia's case for the invasion of Ukraine was never presented before the UNSC. It is, of course, a fact that in both Iraq and now Ukraine, the invading countries — the US and Russia respectively — are permanent members of the UNSC, each (along with China, the United Kingdom and France) wielding a veto. Faced with the prospect of a US veto over the Iraq war and a Russian one over Ukraine, the UNSC is thus rendered toothless when one of the warring parties carries a veto. In the case of the Gaza war, Israel is generally understood to be backed by the US, which will shield it with a veto should the UNSC attempt to send a peacekeeping force into the territory. In fact, even getting an effective UN-sanctioned humanitarian mission into Gaza right now is problematic. Is it any wonder, then, that the humanitarian disaster in bombed-out Gaza has increasingly bothered the conscience not just of individuals the world over but even governments traditionally close to Israel? But if global institutions such as the UN seem increasingly toothless, we need also ask difficult questions about dispute-resolution and peace-settlement mechanisms in our own backyard. Asean seems unable to put any dent in the intractable political crisis in Myanmar. Another crisis is brewing between Thailand and Cambodia over a border dispute, which has been deliberated upon and decided in the latter's favour, twice. As this crisis seems to be going from bad to worse, Malaysia as the current Asean chair is hoping the offer of its good offices will be taken up. It is disheartening to witness the international trend where nations both big and small revert to the belief that might is right. Where are today's global statesmen who will come forward as they did after the devastation of the last world war, to reform world institutions if not create a new global architecture really fit for purpose, lest we descend collectively and perhaps inexorably into another world war?
