
UK to implement new visa and settlement rules for immigrants starting July 22
End of international recruitment for care workers: Employers will be barred from recruiting care workers from overseas under the Skilled Worker route. Those already sponsored by that date will not be affected.
You Might Also Like:
UK to raise English language standards for migrants seeking residency
Tighter student visa compliance: Universities will face stricter compliance rules to maintain their licence to sponsor international students.
Levy on international student fees: The government is exploring a charge on university income from foreign tuition, which would require parliamentary approval.
Graduate visa shortened: The post-study Graduate visa is set to be reduced from two years to 18 months.
Stricter English language requirement: The Home Office has announced plans to introduce higher English language standards by year-end, including for dependents of work visa holders.
You Might Also Like:
QS Rankings 2026: London is no longer the world's best city for international students. This Asian capital is
Partners of British citizens
Victims of domestic abuse
EU nationals under the Settlement Scheme, who are covered by the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement
The UK government will begin enforcing the first phase of immigration reforms from July 22, 2025, as part of its wider policy agenda outlined in the immigration white paper titled 'Restoring control over the immigration system'. The measures, aimed at reducing net migration, include a narrower list of sponsor-eligible jobs and a ban on overseas hiring in the care sector.The white paper, published on May 12, signals the government's intent to make it more difficult to move to and settle in the UK. Though a white paper does not itself change immigration law, several of its proposals are already being actioned through changes to immigration rules.Effective tomorrow, the Home Office will implement two key reforms:These changes form part of a wider policy drive to prioritise domestic labour and reshape immigration pathways.Additional proposals in the white paper include:A key feature of the white paper is the proposal to extend the qualifying period for permanent residence—known as Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR), from five years to ten. This policy is still under consultation and will not come into force immediately.The white paper also proposes an 'earned settlement' route, which would allow some migrants to qualify earlier if they demonstrate sufficient contribution to the UK economy and society under the points-based system. However, the criteria for this route have yet to be defined.'We will set out further details of the earned settlement and citizenship reforms later this year, and we will consult on them. There will be plenty of opportunity for people to comment on and consider the detail,' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told Parliament.Certain groups are expected to be exempt from the longer settlement timeline:The government has not clarified whether other routes currently offering a five-year path to ILR—such as the Hong Kong BN(O) visa, will be included. When questioned in Parliament, the Minister for Migration and Citizenship said, 'We will be consulting on the earned settlement scheme later this year and will provide details of how the scheme will work after that, including which immigration routes it will apply to.'Whether the ten-year settlement rule will apply to migrants already on existing routes remains undecided. A technical annex to the white paper suggests it might, 'A number of those currently in the UK are likely to leave due [to] it taking longer to gain settled status.'Parliamentary responses have so far deferred specifics, saying the issue will be addressed during the consultation phase. Nonetheless, media reports indicate that transitional measures may be considered for those nearing eligibility under current rules.Most of the changes, including adjustments to the visa sponsorship list and English requirements, can be made through statements of changes to immigration rules. These do not require a parliamentary vote and come into effect automatically unless disapproved by motion within 40 days, a rare occurrence.Only a few proposals, such as the levy on student fees or changes to naturalisation law, will require an Act of Parliament.With the first round of changes beginning July 22, the UK's immigration framework is entering a new phase. While many of the most impactful changes, such as the settlement timeline are still pending consultation, the direction of policy is clear: tighter eligibility, increased compliance, and a greater focus on economic contribution.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
BCCI may boycott ACC meet in Dhaka
Bengaluru, July 21 (UNI) In a dramatic escalation that could reshape the Asian cricketing calendar, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has warned of pulling out of the upcoming Asia Cup if the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) goes ahead with its Annual General Meeting (AGM) in Dhaka on July 24-25. The standoff, centred on the venue of the ACC meet, threatens to trigger a governance crisis within the ACC and casts serious doubt over the fate of the Asia Cup, scheduled for September in the UAE. Media reports indicate that the BCCI, backed by Sri Lanka and Afghanistan, is strongly opposed to holding the AGM in Dhaka under the chairmanship of Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chief Mohsin Naqvi. The Indian board has insisted that a neutral venue be considered, failing which it may not only boycott the AGM but also the Asia Cup itself. This move has turned a routine administrative meeting into a major flashpoint in cricket geopolitics. The BCCI, as the designated host of the Asia Cup, is unlikely to be severely impacted by Pakistan's absence. However, a potential Indian pullout could cripple the tournament's commercial and broadcast viability, posing a severe challenge for the ACC. The legitimacy of the ACC AGM is also in question. As per ACC's constitution, a quorum requires the participation of at least three out of five permanent (Test-playing) members - India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Afghanistan. With India, Sri Lanka, and Afghanistan reportedly skipping the Dhaka meeting, the quorum will be incomplete. Further complications arise from the requirement that at least ten full or Associate members attend. But uncertainty looms over the participation of countries like Oman, Nepal, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, Bhutan, Maldives, Myanmar, and Indonesia, making it unlikely the quorum threshold will be met. At the heart of the crisis is PCB Chairman and ACC President Naqvi's firm stance on Dhaka as the host city. Naqvi, who also serves as Pakistan's Interior Minister, was in Kabul over the weekend in an effort to gain Afghanistan's support. However, the Afghanistan Cricket Board (ACB) reportedly assured India that they would not attend the Dhaka meeting. India's firm stance is also driven by recent diplomatic tensions with Pakistan. The BCCI had earlier cancelled a six-match white-ball series scheduled for next month, citing political sensitivities. This growing strain is now spilling over into multilateral platforms like the ACC. Caught in the middle is the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB), which agreed to host the AGM at Pakistan's request. Publicly, the BCB has maintained that it is an internal matter for the ACC. However, insiders say the interim BCB chief Aminul Islam may have underestimated the implications. The developments in Dhaka have also revived memories of a recent incident in Birmingham, where Indian cricket legends refused to play a veterans' match against Pakistan due to the presence of Shahid Afridi, underscoring how cricket continues to reflect diplomatic undercurrents. As the clock ticks down to the Dhaka meeting, uncertainty clouds both the AGM and the Asia Cup. Whether diplomacy or defiance wins out in the coming days could shape the future of Asian cricket in more ways than one. UNI BDN SSP


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
White House drops WSJ from Scotland press pool over Epstein report
The White House on Monday droppedThe Wall Street Journal from the press pool for President Donald Trump's upcoming trip to Scotland. This comes just days after Trump filed a $10billion defamation lawsuit against the paper for reporting that he sent Jeffrey Epstein a 'bawdy' birthday note in2003."Due to The Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board,' said press secretary Karoline Leavitt in a news organisation in the entire world wishes to cover President Trump, and the White House has taken significant steps to include as many voices as possible.' Tarini Parti, a White House reporter for The Wall Street Journal, was initially scheduled to serve as the print pool reporter during the final two days of Trump's four-day visit to his golf courses in Turnberry and Aberdeen, Scotland. However, according to Politico, Parti was removed from the official trip manifest by the White will head to Scotland next week, visiting areas where his family owns two golf courses and is opening a third. The President will meet British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to discuss trade ahead of an official state visit to Britain in trip, scheduled from July 25–29, will include stops at Turnberry -- home to a historic golf course and hotel he purchased in 2014 -- and Aberdeen, where one Trump golf course has operated since 2012 and a new one is set to open in August, the White House said last the trip, Trump plans to meet with Starmer to 'refine' a previously announced trade deal, press secretary Karoline Leavitt on the Ayrshire coast, about 200 miles (320 kilometers) southwest of Aberdeen, Trump Turnberry is one of 10 courses on the rotation to host the British Open -- the oldest of the four major championships in men's golf -- but it hasn't staged the event since 2009, before Trump bought the resort.- EndsWith inputs from Associated Press


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Gandhi's only known oil portrait, painted during 1931 London visit, sells for over ₹1.75 crore at Bonhams auction
A rare oil portrait of Mahatma Gandhi, painted in 1931 during his historic visit to London, has been sold for £152,800 (approximately ₹ 1.75 crore) at a Bonhams auction — more than double its estimated price of £50,000 to £70,000. The painting, created by British artist Clare Leighton, is believed to be the only oil portrait for which Gandhi personally sat. According to Bonhams, it had never before been offered at auction and was the top lot in the "Travel and Exploration" sale held online between July 7 and 15. The portrait was completed during Gandhi's attendance at the Second Round Table Conference in London, where he represented the Indian National Congress to discuss constitutional reforms for India. The artist, Clare Leighton, was introduced to Gandhi by political journalist Henry Noel Brailsford, a known supporter of the Indian independence movement. The artwork remained in Leighton's personal collection until her death in 1989, after which it was passed on to her family. The portrait carries a complex history; Leighton's family recalled that it may have been attacked with a knife by an RSS activist during a public exhibition in 1974. Documentation attached to the frame confirms the painting was restored that same year by the Lyman Allyn Museum Conservation Laboratory. This is not the first time a portrait of Gandhi has fetched a significant price at auction. In 2017, a rare pencil portrait of Gandhi sold for £32,500 — roughly four times its estimated value.